The Banned Story Of Adam And Eve From The Bible [Video]
Any thoughts on why it was changed or taken out?
Any thoughts on why it was changed or taken out?
THE BANNED STORY OF ADAM AND EVE FROM THE BIBLE
- Thread starter MusicTester
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
N
They raise some questions that everyone always ask, but no one care to answer . Thing about the history channel is they consult atheist half the time for these "Biblical" specials .
But, no reason not to talk about the bible and the questions they asked. One I can remember is where did Cain get his wife. Well that's a easy one for me. He went to a land already named after some one. That would mean there were already other people there besides Adam and Eve. Who God created on the sixth day pretty much covers that for me . well I got to go for now, be back later.
But, no reason not to talk about the bible and the questions they asked. One I can remember is where did Cain get his wife. Well that's a easy one for me. He went to a land already named after some one. That would mean there were already other people there besides Adam and Eve. Who God created on the sixth day pretty much covers that for me . well I got to go for now, be back later.
J
lolwut
The name is applied after. It's like if I said my dad went to Lebanon High School, even though there isn't a High School there anymore. Another example, my grandfather has a farm. The plots are normally given names. Brown Place, Durr Place, Cunningham place, but no one by those names has lived their for almost a hundred years. It's used as a reference for those who would know the meaning.
It's a terrible argument. The bible says God created two people, adam and eve. He didn't create other civilizations.
The name is applied after. It's like if I said my dad went to Lebanon High School, even though there isn't a High School there anymore. Another example, my grandfather has a farm. The plots are normally given names. Brown Place, Durr Place, Cunningham place, but no one by those names has lived their for almost a hundred years. It's used as a reference for those who would know the meaning.
It's a terrible argument. The bible says God created two people, adam and eve. He didn't create other civilizations.
The bible names the boy babies of Eve, what about the girl babies she must have had? The bible is not a history book, it gives history only as it teaches us the spiritual.
Serious bible scholars will also follow what we now know about Hebrew thinking vs Greek thinking, and trace the history of the change over to Greek thinking and how it affected how we see the words of the bible. You can explore this on the net, being careful to check out the source your teacher uses.
When we read Genesis with Greek thinking, we ask many questions that scripture simply doesn't give us answers to. Ancient Hebrews would never consider asking God just how He managed His creation, how long did He spend on it, or any of the questions we ask. That mind would say "Oh, God created us, how does that affect me?" Genesis was written for the Hebrew mind.
Serious bible scholars will also follow what we now know about Hebrew thinking vs Greek thinking, and trace the history of the change over to Greek thinking and how it affected how we see the words of the bible. You can explore this on the net, being careful to check out the source your teacher uses.
When we read Genesis with Greek thinking, we ask many questions that scripture simply doesn't give us answers to. Ancient Hebrews would never consider asking God just how He managed His creation, how long did He spend on it, or any of the questions we ask. That mind would say "Oh, God created us, how does that affect me?" Genesis was written for the Hebrew mind.
N
God created people already, on the sixth day. If you have a copy of the Hebrew manuscripts, it shows this is just men and women in general of all the different people God created. Then He rested the seventh. Then after that , he created Adam and then Eve. There are separate days recorded . They can't be lumped together .
If you look at Adams name in the Hebrew manuscripts , it says a specific man, the Adam. Hard to show without the Hebrew to show here . But Adam and Eve is through who Christ would arrive. But I see on the sixth day, there are already people created and they are multiplying and God said it is good.
If people don't follow that, you'll find they grasp at the idea of family incest ,which I read is wrong according to God's words.
If you look at Adams name in the Hebrew manuscripts , it says a specific man, the Adam. Hard to show without the Hebrew to show here . But Adam and Eve is through who Christ would arrive. But I see on the sixth day, there are already people created and they are multiplying and God said it is good.
If people don't follow that, you'll find they grasp at the idea of family incest ,which I read is wrong according to God's words.
Last edited:
N
It's in the Hebrew manuscripts. Any one willing to make a real, effort will find what I said is accurate to the letter . Just like the definitions in a past thread you looked up from a ,"digital" source which omitted definition's that were not omitted in the printed versions since they were first published.
Again, anyone willing to do their homework will find what im reporting is facts. going to biblehub is not doing your work.
Again, anyone willing to do their homework will find what im reporting is facts. going to biblehub is not doing your work.
THE SIXTH DAY OF CREATION
[ EIGHTH DAY MAN ?]
(Acts 17:26) "From ONE MAN He made EVERY nation of men, that they should inhabit the whole earth....
The Shepherds Chapel teaches that the Bible says the "sixth day creation of man" in Genesis 1:26,27 was the creation of the non-Adamic races (i.e., not Adam & Eve), and that the Adamic race (i.e., Adam & Eve, and their descendants ) whom they claim were of a "ruddy complexion" (i.e., white skinned), were created on some unwritten "8th day", but is this really what the Bible says?
Shepherds Chapel teaches Adam & Eve were of "ruddy" complexion (i.e., white skinned). Yet they use a incorrect word meaning for Adam to confirm this theory. By improperly inferring Strong's word #119 for Adam {#119 is a Hebrew word, meaning dyed red , red, or ruddy}, in place of the actual assigned word meaning, which is Strong's #120, which is properly rendered "man" or "mankind", they teach that the "blushing" race descended from Adam. However, a search of Strong's #119 below will reveals it's used only ten times in the Old Testament, and never in reference to the man Adam or even in Genesis at all!
Consequently, in order to support their doctrine, Shepherds Chapel must rely on substituting "root words" and/or assigning "possible" alternative meanings to what is actually written! Thereby altering the meaning of the beginning of Genesis!
- tripod. com/theo_theophilus
i'm not wading through more of Murray's videos and tapes for this.
nathan can just admit this is what they believe.
[ EIGHTH DAY MAN ?]
(Acts 17:26) "From ONE MAN He made EVERY nation of men, that they should inhabit the whole earth....
The Shepherds Chapel teaches that the Bible says the "sixth day creation of man" in Genesis 1:26,27 was the creation of the non-Adamic races (i.e., not Adam & Eve), and that the Adamic race (i.e., Adam & Eve, and their descendants ) whom they claim were of a "ruddy complexion" (i.e., white skinned), were created on some unwritten "8th day", but is this really what the Bible says?
Shepherds Chapel teaches Adam & Eve were of "ruddy" complexion (i.e., white skinned). Yet they use a incorrect word meaning for Adam to confirm this theory. By improperly inferring Strong's word #119 for Adam {#119 is a Hebrew word, meaning dyed red , red, or ruddy}, in place of the actual assigned word meaning, which is Strong's #120, which is properly rendered "man" or "mankind", they teach that the "blushing" race descended from Adam. However, a search of Strong's #119 below will reveals it's used only ten times in the Old Testament, and never in reference to the man Adam or even in Genesis at all!
Consequently, in order to support their doctrine, Shepherds Chapel must rely on substituting "root words" and/or assigning "possible" alternative meanings to what is actually written! Thereby altering the meaning of the beginning of Genesis!
- tripod. com/theo_theophilus
i'm not wading through more of Murray's videos and tapes for this.
nathan can just admit this is what they believe.
N
Well little problem here Zone. Im not the shepherds chapel. Im a individual Christian that reads their bible and dose not make stuff up unlike yourself.
An the shepheds chapel did not author the scholarly work of the Strongs concordance, if the strongs reports that is what the word means in Hebrew, that's what the word means in the Hebrew. You can pout and cry about it all you want, but facts remain facts.
An the shepheds chapel did not author the scholarly work of the Strongs concordance, if the strongs reports that is what the word means in Hebrew, that's what the word means in the Hebrew. You can pout and cry about it all you want, but facts remain facts.
Last edited: