Here you're using an extra-biblical standard to judge the Bible. It's a bad idea, because the Bible does not claim that for itself. The Bible contains records of lies, which put it outside of "nothing but the truth".
This discussion is going in circles. Despite many rejoinders, you continue to repeat the canard of, "Can you put forth a book without error?" (in several variations). It has become meaningless, because it overlooks a whole raft of relevant issues which you have refused to concede. Unless you can come up with something logically sound and irrefutable with which to support your claims, I suggest you stop making them. Nobody will hold you in contempt for preferring the KJV or even thinking (privately) that it is perfect. However, you earn nothing but pity when you disregard sound reason and logic and keep arguing the truth and validity of your belief. Remember, logic and reason are expressions of God's character, not human inventions to be set aside when inconvenient.
This discussion is going in circles. Despite many rejoinders, you continue to repeat the canard of, "Can you put forth a book without error?" (in several variations). It has become meaningless, because it overlooks a whole raft of relevant issues which you have refused to concede. Unless you can come up with something logically sound and irrefutable with which to support your claims, I suggest you stop making them. Nobody will hold you in contempt for preferring the KJV or even thinking (privately) that it is perfect. However, you earn nothing but pity when you disregard sound reason and logic and keep arguing the truth and validity of your belief. Remember, logic and reason are expressions of God's character, not human inventions to be set aside when inconvenient.