16 YO Girl on 'Refugees'

[didymos]

"I refuse to believe that male migrants who misbehave are refugees. If you're really fleeing and given shelter somewhere, you should never behave like that. How the bleep can anyone as a guest behave that way? Meanwhile, you [subversive migrants] are destroying everything. Not only Germany, but also France, Sweden and Austria. You're as welcome as Ebola. And how blind do have to be not to see that it soon will be war if this continues? Men, I'm begging you. Protect your women and children.,we need this protection, we are terrified. Meanwhile, politicians don't act.
And then those demonstrations of refugees: "Allah is the only god, Allah is your future." How wonderful of you to have a god to believe in, but that doesn't mean you have to push it down other people's throats. And why do immigrants tell me I can't wear a T-shirt in summer and try to touch me with their dirty hands if I do? Meanwhile, refugees laugh at us. The government laughs at us. At some time German citizens have to take matters into their own hands, and believe me, that won't be plesant for you [Muslim occupation forces, ed]. Every German must demonstrate, in a peaceful but firm manner. Does Germany have another option? I beg you. Don't stop believing in Germany as it was."

(might contain stong language I missed)

[video=youtube;ZjBKYDEJDJk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjBKYDEJDJk[/video]

 

[coby]

My ex remarried someone from Brazil. She has to rot op/ go away to her own country after 3 months. They thought for one week, so she came back after a 12 hour flight and immediately had to go back for 3 months. She doesn't even cost the State anything. I said you had better put up a beard and shout Allah and dress like an extremist, then you were welcome here.

 

[Roh_Chris]

I saw a disturbing video of what happened in Cologne. I can only hope that these countries have learnt a lesson, albeit the hard and painful way. There is nothing wrong with taking in refugees per se, but the problem with Muslim refugees is that they are very close-minded and not all of them assimilate into the local culture. If I am staying for free in someone's home, I will do my best to participate in their activities, and will not try to mess up the peace and harmony in the home.

 

[tanakh]

A lot of these immigrants are economic migrants. If they were all being persecuted they would stay in the first safe country
that would have them. The UK has been critisised for not taking enough but we have a history of taking in persecuted minorities that go as far back as the Huguenots. A few decades ago we took in Asians being persecuted by Idi Amin in Uganda. Unlike some we have now they were grateful to be allowed to settle here. Many of them started businesses and
integrated with the local population. The main difference between then and now is that they were a comparatively small
number and we had the recourses to cope with them.

 

[psalm6819]

The refugees never seem to be women and children but always young men.

 

[Magenta]

Their express purpose is to destroy our culture. It should not
surprise us, therefore, that that is exactly what they are doing.

 

[crossnote]

...There is nothing wrong with taking in refugees per se, but the problem with Muslim refugees is that they are very close-minded and not all of them assimilate into the local culture.

That's because Muslim Immigrants are their own country!! Islam is both a religion and government (Sharia).
They will move into a new land and of course keep their old government (Sharia).
They need to be made to renounce Sharia, in order to be admitted into any non Muslim nation.

 

[p_rehbein]

[h=2]Assimilation of immigrants in the United States[edit][/h]Further information: Americanization (immigration)
Immigrant assimilation is a complex process in which immigrants not only fully integrate themselves into a new country, but also lose aspects, perhaps all of their heritage too. Social scientists rely on four primary benchmarks to assess immigrant assimilation: socioeconomic status, geographic distribution, second language attainment, andintermarriage.[SUP][1][/SUP] William A.V. Clark defines immigrant assimilation as "a way of understanding the social dynamics of American society and that it is the process that occurs spontaneously and often unintended in the course of interaction between majority and minority groups".[SUP][2][/SUP]
It has been found that between 1880 and 1920, the United States took in roughly 24 million immigrants.[SUP][1][/SUP] This increase in immigration can be attributed to many historical changes. Later, during the Cold War from the 1960s through the 1980s and the disintegration of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s, over 1.8 million Jews (including some non-Jewish family members) emigrated from the former Soviet Union. The major destination countries were Israel (about 1.1 million), the United States (over 400,000),Germany (about 130,000), and Canada (about 30,000).[SUP][3][/SUP] The beginning of the twenty-first century has also marked a massive era of immigration, and sociologists are once again trying to make sense of the impact that immigration has on society and the impact it has on immigrants themselves.[SUP][1]



[/SUP]