Iraq Cities Fall To Al Qaeda-inspired militants: NeoCons want Obamaphone like policy?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
1

1still_waters

Guest
#21
He is gutting out military and the world is going to pay a heavy price because the vacuum will get filled... and it won't be filled with heart and soul of the what makes America great, which is its generous spirit. Now I'm not saying we should police the world but I do agree with the philosophy of peace thru strength....albeit a benevolent strength not fostered by greed and lies.
Can't be any worse than the Reagan administration's foreign policy on terror.

1. Cut and run after a terrorist attack in Beirut.
2. Trade arms for hostages to a state sponsor of terror.
3. Knock over a few tents in Libya, and miss the dictator you're claiming to go after.
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#22
Can't be any worse than the Reagan administration's foreign policy on terror.

1. Cut and run after a terrorist attack in Beirut.
2. Trade arms for hostages to a state sponsor of terror.
3. Knock over a few tents in Libya, and miss the dictator you're claiming to go after.
Or the Bush administration's foreign policy on terror.

1. Ignore terror for eight months until 3000 Americans get murdered by a terrorist.
2. Six months later announce to the world you don't spend that much time thinking about the guy who murdered 3000 of your people.
3. Send more troops and money to chase a guy who didn't murder 3000 of your people.
4. Leave office eight years after the guy who murdered 3000 Americans is still alive.
5. Redistribute our military wealth to a nation that's not willing to stand on their own against rag-tag al-quaeda sympathizers.
 
S

Sirk

Guest
#23
Reagan started with an apparatus given him by Carter as well as an economy in shambles and ended his 2 terms with a period of unprecedented prosperity and hope for America.
Can't be any worse than the Reagan administration's foreign policy on terror.

1. Cut and run after a terrorist attack in Beirut.
2. Trade arms for hostages to a state sponsor of terror.
3. Knock over a few tents in Libya, and miss the dictator you're claiming to go after.
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#24
Reagan started with an apparatus given him by Carter as well as an economy in shambles and ended his 2 terms with a period of unprecedented prosperity and hope for America.
"Blaming Carter".

Next?
 
D

didymos

Guest
#25
Can't be any worse than the Reagan administration's foreign policy on terror.

1. Cut and run after a terrorist attack in Beirut.
2. Trade arms for hostages to a state sponsor of terror.
3. Knock over a few tents in Libya, and miss the dictator you're claiming to go after.
Yeah, the good old days, I kinda miss Ronnie. ;)
 
S

Sirk

Guest
#26
"Blaming Carter".

Next?
Not blaming just stating facts. The good Carters foreign policy brought us OPEC and a whole host of nice things...not to mention gas lines and unemployment lines. Who does the unemployment lines remind you of?
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#27
Not blaming just stating facts. The good Carters foreign policy brought us OPEC and a whole host of nice things...not to mention gas lines and unemployment lines. Who does the unemployment lines remind you of?
Reminds me of Reagan.
In 1982, Reagan's second year in office, unemployment was already 8.6%, and it skyrocketed to 10.8% by the end of the year.
Now this was two years into his presidency.
Now if you're going to blame that on Carter, then you have to allow Obama to "blame Bush" for at least the first two years of his economy.

Which is it gonna be?
Accuse Reagan of having a bad economy, or allow Obama to "blame Bush"?

OOOoo tough choices!

Reagan1.jpg
Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
 
S

Sirk

Guest
#28
Obama is 6 years into his and it's getting worse by the day. His ship for blaming bush has sailed.
 
P

psalm6819

Guest
#30
Even if Solomon were president of America, we would be in the same boat. Throughout history when a nation begins to persecute Israel,(Egypt, Assyria, Rome, Germany, Great Britain) that nation falls under the judgement of the Lord. There is little to no support for Israel politically in the US anymore. Our current state of affairs is no surprise to me.
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#31
Not blaming just stating facts. The good Carters foreign policy brought us OPEC and a whole host of nice things...not to mention gas lines and unemployment lines. Who does the unemployment lines remind you of?
The more I think about it, the MORE it does remind me of Reagan.
Reagan spent 8 years in office.
Unemployment for five of those eight years was 7% or more.
That means 62% of his presidency had 7% or higher unemployment.

Yes you could blame those five years on Carter.
But if you do that, you have to allow Obama to blame Bush for five years too.

Tough choices indeed.
Can't speak against Reagan, but can't let Obama "blame Bush".
AHHHHH!

Reagan2.jpg
Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#34
Sorry if my memory is fuzzy on that and thanks for the correction...but Reagan was an anomaly in line of presidents after Kennedy who were beholden to the organized crime syndicate known as the federal reserve.
"Blaming Carter" and "Blaming the FED"? :p
 
S

Sirk

Guest
#35
You can argue statistics and who's to blame but lemme just give you some facts on the ground. I am a small business owner who is heavily burdened by more taxes, more regulation, a 70% increase in my insurance premiums, soaring energy prices and the difficult balancing act of passing some of this on to my customers so I can put food on my table and still have customers in the first place
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
7,773
1,548
113
#36
Sorry if my memory is fuzzy on that and thanks for the correction...but Reagan was an anomaly in line of presidents after Kennedy who were beholden to the organized crime syndicate known as the federal reserve.
in the link there is another link for the "1979 crises",,,that was in the carter admin. (thats the one you prob. remember),it was very similar,,,,
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
7,773
1,548
113
#37
Are you for military-welfare, and redistribution of our military wealth to fight for people who won't fight for themselves against rag-tag militants?
It might be biblical prophecy that they don't fight Forborne (1 Occurrence) I notice that when we(u.s.) attacked them they laid down their arms and did not fight(forborn),in both wars,,,again now that they are attacked they do the same,,,but then thats what (jer.51;30) said
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#38
This talk of Carter and Reagan, Bush and Obama, has me thinking something.
What if Facebook existed after Carter was out of office?

Carter left office with unemployment around 7.5% in January of 1981.
In November of 1982 it hits 10.8% under Reagan.
That's almost two years into the presidency of Reagan
Reagan2.jpg

Now picture Carter's Facebook messages...

"How's that city upon a hill stuff workin for ya America?"
"How's the mornin in American workin out?"

[video=youtube;EU-IBF8nwSY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EU-IBF8nwSY[/video]

And of course with unemployment up to 10.8% almost two years in, we'd need the obligatory from Carter...

missmeyet.jpg
 
S

Sirk

Guest
#39
Lemme axe you this. Does obama set foreign policy? Did Bush? Do yourself a favor and google operation northwoods.
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#40
Lemme axe you this. Does obama set foreign policy? Did Bush. Do yourself a favor and google operation northwoods.
I'm not much into 911 Truther theories.
Plus there is a lot better creative writing on my Kindle right now that needs reading.