-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
B
We should have never invaded Iraq in the first place and Congress is to blame for this mess. It is ironic that Republicans are blaming Obama for the fall although he opposed the war as a senator. He also given the Iraq government 15B to build up its military. Who do I blame? the Iraq government. There is a possibility that Baghdad could be topple and it huge embassy taken over. We do remember the Iran hostage crisis with the takeover of the American Embassy. This reminds me of the Tet offensive military push by the North Viet against the South Vietnam that forced out the American forces in 1975. And the main reason this happened was because the South Vietnamese military forces were worthless and often collaborate with the enemy.
Last edited by a moderator:
The only ones connecting terrorism witgh Iraq was the media who could not understand when you have a cease fore agreement and the other side breaks it, shooting starts. What Hussein did in thumbing his nose at us all of those years, under this cease fire was to give moral support for the terrorists.
That was probably the only connection. The intel was not the most accurate either before the war.
That was probably the only connection. The intel was not the most accurate either before the war.
1
Actually it's getting near 6% again.
62% of Reagan's presidency was spent with 7% or higher unemployment.
Reference http://christianchat.com/christian-...ant-obamaphone-like-policy-2.html#post1568135
Reagan didn't hit 6% until August of 1987. Almost a year and a half before he left office.
Obama is right on track to reach 6% at the same time in his presidency as Reagan.
Go figure!
62% of Reagan's presidency was spent with 7% or higher unemployment.
Reference http://christianchat.com/christian-...ant-obamaphone-like-policy-2.html#post1568135
Reagan didn't hit 6% until August of 1987. Almost a year and a half before he left office.
Obama is right on track to reach 6% at the same time in his presidency as Reagan.
Go figure!
I have no problem with either war. I don't see hypocrisy.
The economy got better under Reagan. It has not under Obama and is much worse than the manufactured unemployment rates.
I know its popular to bash both parties. Some of that is merited. However to compare Reagan with Obama is ridiculous.
Carter was a joke. His answer to the energy crisis was to wear sweaters and turn down the thermostats at the White House.
Every time the economy under Bush fluctuated the media was saying its the worse economic times since the Depression.
I'll take conservative point of view over a liberal one every time. Reagan was not perfect but he was a much better president than this one.
The economy got better under Reagan. It has not under Obama and is much worse than the manufactured unemployment rates.
I know its popular to bash both parties. Some of that is merited. However to compare Reagan with Obama is ridiculous.
Carter was a joke. His answer to the energy crisis was to wear sweaters and turn down the thermostats at the White House.
Every time the economy under Bush fluctuated the media was saying its the worse economic times since the Depression.
I'll take conservative point of view over a liberal one every time. Reagan was not perfect but he was a much better president than this one.
Ahh! The Orwelian smell of revisionist history! I lived about 50 miles from ground zero. Virtually every person I spoke to left, right and center wanted us to bomb immediately every muslim country. MANY wanted us to bomb mecca itself. THAT was the mood of the country. BEFORE 9/11, if you can get your mindset to that time, NO ONE wanted to aggressively go after these guys. Clinton had osama on a silver platter and said "nah, no thanks". The political correctness of that time would have in no way allowed Bush to pursue a pre-emptive war on terror. I'v'e already told you how silly it is to criticise Bush for saying he didn't think much about osama. You brushed aside the fact that admitting he was preoccupied with osama would have been far worse than the answer he gave. The idea that it was because of obama's leadership that the seals and other support system, that Bush put in place, was the reason we got osama is absurd.
THIS is the fruit of obama pulling our military from Iraq in 2011, and you can't really believe it won't have serious ramifications for us:
Militant gains in Iraq catch Obama administration by surprise | Fox News
1
Not at all.
Reagan's administration traded arms for hostages to a terrorist nation.
Obama traded terrorists for a hostage.
Reagan cut and ran after a terrorist attack in Beirut.
Obama was president when our military put to death the guy who murdered 3000 Americans. (Ok not a valid comparison on that one.)
Reagan went after a terrorist Libyan dictator by bombing a few tents and missing his target.
Obama joined a coalition to get the same Libyan terrorist dictator, and now the dictator is dead. (Ooops..not a valid comparison again.)
Reagan took office when unemployment was 7.5% and almost two years later it was at 10.8%
Obama took office and unemployment was around 10% for him almost a year later too.
Reagan's administration traded arms for hostages to a terrorist nation.
Obama traded terrorists for a hostage.
Reagan cut and ran after a terrorist attack in Beirut.
Obama was president when our military put to death the guy who murdered 3000 Americans. (Ok not a valid comparison on that one.)
Reagan went after a terrorist Libyan dictator by bombing a few tents and missing his target.
Obama joined a coalition to get the same Libyan terrorist dictator, and now the dictator is dead. (Ooops..not a valid comparison again.)
Reagan took office when unemployment was 7.5% and almost two years later it was at 10.8%
Obama took office and unemployment was around 10% for him almost a year later too.
