FBI Expert Claims Obama Picks Muslim For CIA Chief

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
C

Crossfire

Guest
#1
One of the FBI’s former top experts on Islam has announced that President Obama’s pick to head the Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, converted to Islam years ago in Saudi Arabia.

As WND has reported, former FBI Islam expert John Guandolo has long warned that the federal government is being infiltrated by members of the radical Muslim Brotherhood.

But Guandolo now warns that by appointing Brennan to CIA director, Obama has not only chosen a man “naïve” to these infiltrations, but also picked a candidate who is himself a Muslim.

“Mr. Brennan did convert to Islam when he served in an official capacity on the behalf of the United States in Saudi Arabia,” Guandolo told interviewer and radio host Tom Trento.

“That fact alone is not what is most disturbing,” Guandolo continued. “His conversion to Islam was the culmination of a counterintelligence operation against him to recruit him.

The fact that foreign intelligence service operatives recruited Mr. Brennan when he was in a very sensitive and senior U.S. government position in a foreign country means that he either a traitor … [or] he has the inability to discern and understand how to walk in those kinds of environments, which makes him completely unfit to the be the director of Central Intelligence.”

Brennan did indeed serve as CIA station chief in Riyadh in the 1990s and today holds the official title of Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism. On Jan. 7, Obama nominated Brennan as the next director of the CIA, though he has yet to be confirmed.

“Are you kidding me?” Trento balked at Guandolo’s allegations. “The head of the CIA is a Muslim? For real? … Are you sure?”

“Yes I am,” Guandolo asserted. “The facts of the matter are confirmed by U.S. government officials who were also in Saudi Arabia at the time that John Brennan was serving there and have direct knowledge.

These are men who work in very trusted positions, they were direct witnesses to his growing relationship with the individuals who worked for the Saudi government and others and they witnessed his conversion to Islam.”

A former Marine and combat veteran, Guandolo worked for eight years in the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division as a “subject matter expert” in the Muslim Brotherhood and the global spread of Islamism.

Guandolo boasts he created the Bureau’s first counterterrorism training/education program and twice received United States Attorney’s Awards for investigative intelligence.

Guandolo is also one of the authors of the Center for Security Policy’s Team B II report, “Shariah: The Threat to America.”

Read the report yourself in paperback, available in the WND Superstore!

“My contention is that [Brennan] is wholly unfit for government service in any national security capacity, and that would specifically make him unfit to be the director of Central Intelligence,” Guandolo told Trento.

Guandolo then broke down a three-part argument against Brennan’s confirmation.

“The first is he has interwoven his life professionally and personally with individuals that we know are terrorists,” Guandolo asserted. “He has overseen and approved and encouraged others to bring known leaders of Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood into the government in positions to advise the U.S. government on counterterrorism strategy as well as the overall ‘war on terror.’”

Second, Guandolo asserted, Brennan has “proven through his own comments publicly that he is clueless and grossly ignorant of Al-Qaida’s strategy.

“Third and finally, which some would say is most disturbing, is Mr. Brennan did convert to Islam,” Guandolo said, but stressed, “I think the [larger] news is that that conversion is the culmination of the work of people in Saudi Arabia who worked for the Saudi Government – and that makes John Brennan just naïve, foolish, dangerously ignorant and totally unfit for this position.

“That in and of itself, again, shouldn’t be shocking to people,” Guandolo continued. “Mr. Brennan, they have the clip where he specifically says during a public address … he said during that speech that he has learned and gets his understanding and his ‘worldview’ in large part from Islam. It shouldn’t be a large leap to imagine he’s converted to Islam.”


http://www.wnd.com
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#2
what the....?
hmmm....interesting.
these guys are all stabbing each other in the back and playing secret-double-quadruple-agent man.

Muslim Advocacy Group: There's No Evidence That John Brennan Converted to Islam
By STEVEN NELSON
Muslim Advocacy Group: There's No Evidence That John Brennan Converted to Islam - Washington Whispers (usnews.com) < click.

then of course, who would expect them to tell the truth if it was an islamic infiltration?
but, then again...who can we trust?

Israel and the U.S. CREATED Hamas, Hezbollah and Al Qaeda
Israel and the U.S. CREATED Hamas, Hezbollah and Al Qaeda - Washington's Blog < click

Muslim Brotherhood created by British Intelligence
Muslim Brotherhood Created By British Intelligence | BobTuskin.com < click
 

HEIsRiSen

Senior Member
Feb 4, 2013
487
11
0
#3
Next thing we know, Christians will be considered terrorists and a threat to national security.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#6
ok AoK.
but don't stop there.
you have to go back and find out who and what the Muslim Brotherhood really is.
you can save some time by finding out what these guys do (hint: it's not about hospitals)



also, if Henry Kissinger isn't showing up in the research you're doing on the Islam/Arab thing, you've been pointed in the wrong direction by gatekeepers.

and just who is the Saudi Royal Family? why do they wear those checkered tablecloths and pretend to represent 'Islam'?
 
F

FORHISGLORY

Guest
#7
This makes alot of sense if you believe what I believe about Obama.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#9
There is a lot to read in there, is there a section that specifically speaks of Christians being a potential threat that you could point me to?
sure...i'll go through it later.

they had that on the shelf ready for the false....i mean terror attack on 9-11.
out it came.

everyone became a potential terrorist that day.

at the time it was written to be all about us giving permission to get the bad guys who did it, whatever the cost, and forget about Law and stuff. these were special circumstances, after all.

so, little by little they have changed the language, and focus from being 'radical islamic terrorists" etc....to domestic extremists.
mix in a boatload of mass shootings by crazed young domestic lone gunmen; have extremism re-defined over and over again to mean intolerance...

stuff like that.

the real target is, and always was christians. but we had to say it was OK to do things to other people, first.
that way we gave our permission for things like Homeland Security; checkpoints and whatnot.

some ppl are uber-paranoid of us...regular citizens. they are super-worried about us not liking being enslaved and looted and so on. so they have set up this internal gulag. we just don't know it yet.

every dictatorship is more afraid of someone with AN IDEA, or someone with A SOLID BELIEF in something, someone who can THINK and reason through what is happening....more afraid of that than they are of citizen with guns etc.

it's the ones who can figure out what's happening they are concerned about.
they don't want anybody spooking the herd or talking about anything which might identify them

in the long run it doesn't matter what you do or don't do, or say or don't say, or think or don't think - they're just crazy and want ya silent and obedient, or just gone.

there's one thing that MUST stop - it's THAT NAME!

stop using that NAME "Jesus"!


and they want to make sure you keep an eye on your neighbor for them too.

East Germany only needed a few cops at the end...they had it so that everybody spied on and willingly reported their neighbors for stuff. anything at all.

ttyl.

9/11 Researcher Found Dead: Wrote Book Implicating Bush Administration In The 9/11 Attacks | 9/11 and Ground Zero < click
 
Last edited:
K

Kefa52

Guest
#11
Well...We are a free country. I read something somewhere about religious freedom in the United States. Come on now. Does anyone believe he appoints someone all on his own. Like pulls names out of a hat. The president has advisers all over the place. He just gets the blame.
 

HEIsRiSen

Senior Member
Feb 4, 2013
487
11
0
#12
I kinda think Obama is the just face for those who are really calling the shots in this country. Call me a conspiracy theorist or whatever.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#13
I kinda think Obama is the just face for those who are really calling the shots in this country. Call me a conspiracy theorist or whatever.
careful...you be on the LIST:rolleyes:
for even entertaining such a thought [crime].
eh...whatevah.
bring it.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#14
Well...We are a free country. I read something somewhere about religious freedom in the United States. Come on now. Does anyone believe he appoints someone all on his own. Like pulls names out of a hat. The president has advisers all over the place. He just gets the blame.
^ I have found that every Obama voter lives on a pink cloud of delusion to one extent or another. That's why they have to make excuses. Obama handpicked the 23 members of his cabinet just as every president does. He never delegated this responsibility to advisers to do for him. And as for "freedom," I have a lot less of it today than I did when I was young and given the new legislation Democrats are pushing: about to have a lot less.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#15



The first complete account of America's most
dangerous foreign policy miscalculation: sixty years of support for Islamic fundamentalism


Devil's Game is the gripping story of America's misguided efforts, stretching across decades, to dominate the strategically vital Middle East by courting and cultivating Islamic fundamentalism. Among all the books about Islam, this is the first comprehensive inquiry into the touchiest issue: How and why did the United States encourage and finance the spread of radical political Islam?

Backed by extensive archival research and interviews with dozens of policy makers and CIA, Pentagon, and foreign service officials, Robert Dreyfuss argues that this largely hidden relationship is greatly to blame for the global explosion of terrorism. He follows the trail of American collusion from support for the Muslim Brotherhood in 1950s Egypt to links with Khomeini and Afghani jihadists to cooperation with Hamas and Saudi Wahhabism. Dreyfuss also uncovers long-standing ties between radical Islamists and the leading banks of the West. The result is as tragic as it is paradoxical: originally deployed as pawns to foil nationalism and communism, extremist mullahs and ayatollahs now dominate the region, thundering against freedom of thought, science, women's rights, secularism--and their former patron.

Wide-ranging and deeply informed, Devil's Game reveals a history of double-dealing, cynical exploitation, and humiliating embarrassment. What emerges is a pattern that, far from furthering democracy or security, ensures a future of blunders and blowback.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#16
L. Carl Brown in Foreign Affairs, criticized the book's emphasis, arguing that the US has also opposed Islamic fundamentalism on many occasions, and that the author would have done better to focus on America's "excessively intrusive, regime-changing approach to the Middle East" instead.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#17
L. Carl Brown in Foreign Affairs, criticized the book's emphasis, arguing that the US has also opposed Islamic fundamentalism on many occasions, and that the author would have done better to focus on America's "excessively intrusive, regime-changing approach to the Middle East" instead.
hi AoK....
it's one and the same:) each got half right.
that was kinda my point.
put both sides together and we have the whole picture.
the latter was about what DC does, the former is how.

gotta put them both together.
DC isn't 'american' anyways.
 
Last edited:
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#18
Recent studies in Britain suggest the country’s most rapidly growing demographic is Muslim. And the trend’s stirring trouble with native Brits, who say their government’s too scared to face the problems caused by the Muslim immigration boom which some analysts say could lead to a Civil War in Britain in 60 years.

[video=youtube_share;wjvFhGH2eyo]http://youtu.be/wjvFhGH2eyo[/video]

London’s East End: A Melting Pot Simmers Closer to the Boil:

"In the past few weeks, footage has emerged of gangs of vigilantes calling themselves the Muslim Patrol, prowling the streets and intimidating those who “disobey God”. In a series of shocking incidents filmed on mobile phones and posted on YouTube, the hooded extremists confiscated alcohol from residents in Whitechapel, calling it a “forbidden evil” and harassed a white woman late at night for wearing a short skirt. They also launched a tirade of homophobic abuse against a man who appeared to be wearing make-up, ordering him out of the area and calling him a 'bloody fag'."

London's East End: a melting pot simmers closer to the boil - Telegraph
 
Last edited:

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#19
Tony Blair made it clear - the plan was to 'change' British culture once and for all.


"For the 21st century will not be about the battle between capitalism and socialism but between the forces of progress and the forces of conservatism.
They are what hold our nation back. Not just in the Conservative Party but within us, within our nation.
The forces that do not understand that creating a new Britain of true equality is no more a betrayal of Britain's history than New Labour is of Labour's values.
The old prejudices, where foreign means bad.
Where multi-culturalism is not something to celebrate, but a left-wing conspiracy to destroy their way of life.
Where women shouldn't work and those who do are responsible for the breakdown of the family...."

BBC News | UK Politics | Tony Blair's speech in full < click


LOL....look at the newspeak:rolleyes:


'Dishonest' Blair and Straw accused over secret plan for multicultural UK
By SIMON WALTERS, MAIL ON SUNDAY POLITICAL EDITOR
UPDATED: 02:26 GMT, 25 October 2009

Jack Straw and Tony Blair 'dishonestly' concealed a plan to allow in more immigrants and make Britain more multi-cultural because they feared a public backlash if it was made public, it has been claimed.
The allegation was made after a former Labour adviser said the Government opened up UK borders partly to humiliate Right-wing opponents of immigration.

Andrew Neather, who worked for Mr Straw when he was Home Secretary, and as a speech writer for Mr Blair, claimed a secret Government report in 2000 called for mass immigration to change Britain's cultural make-up forever.

'Dishonest' Blair and Straw accused over secret plan for multicultural UK | Mail Online < click

oops...busted.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#20
All true Zone but Labour led the way. Everyone knows that.

Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser - Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed.

Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser - Telegraph

Migrant cover-up: Reports kept secret by Labour show mass immigration cut wages, raised tensions and that too many stayed too long.

UK immigration: Labour's secret reports show too many stayed too long | Mail Online