GO Bernie GO!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
5,055
1,495
113
see, this is the key to the sanders and Obama's of the world : everything they say SOUNDS good, but if people only would engage their brains, and see what all the " free stuff" they promise really means.
What does single payer health care have to do with "free stuff"?
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,213
6,548
113
What does single payer health care have to do with "free stuff"?

EXCERPT:

s ObamaCare continues to disappoint, some states are pushing for a single-payer replacement within their borders. Vermont is working to create such a system; Hawaii’s governor has singled out single-payer as the only potential replacement for his state’s failing exchange. And legislators have offered up proposals to institute single-payer in California, New York, Pennsylvania, Minnesota and Colorado.
Single-payer’s cheerleaders cite Canada as proof of the system’s superiority. It’s a foolish fetish: Our northern neighbor’s health-care system is plagued by rationing, long waits, poor-quality care, scarcities of vital medical technologies and unsustainable costs. That’s exactly what’s in store for America if we follow Canada’s lead.
As a native of Canada, I’ve seen this reality firsthand. To keep a lid on costs, Canadian officials ration care. As a result, the average Canadian has to wait 4½ months between getting a referral from his primary-care physician to a specialist for elective medical treatment — and actually receiving it.
Mind you, “elective treatment” in Canada doesn’t mean Botox or a tummy tuck. We’re talking about life-or-death procedures like neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery or cardiovascular surgery.

The false promise of single-payer healthcare | New York Post

by: Sally C. Pipes

Vermont is learning this high-tax reality firsthand. One Democratic state representative has admitted that its single-payer system will “cost more” than the initial estimate of $1.6 billion to $2.2 billion a year. Avalere Health, a consultancy, estimates that the state will have to essentially double its tax revenue to pay for the system.
 

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
5,055
1,495
113
EXCERPT:

s ObamaCare continues to disappoint, some states are pushing for a single-payer replacement within their borders. Vermont is working to create such a system; Hawaii’s governor has singled out single-payer as the only potential replacement for his state’s failing exchange. And legislators have offered up proposals to institute single-payer in California, New York, Pennsylvania, Minnesota and Colorado.
Single-payer’s cheerleaders cite Canada as proof of the system’s superiority. It’s a foolish fetish: Our northern neighbor’s health-care system is plagued by rationing, long waits, poor-quality care, scarcities of vital medical technologies and unsustainable costs. That’s exactly what’s in store for America if we follow Canada’s lead.
As a native of Canada, I’ve seen this reality firsthand. To keep a lid on costs, Canadian officials ration care. As a result, the average Canadian has to wait 4½ months between getting a referral from his primary-care physician to a specialist for elective medical treatment — and actually receiving it.
Mind you, “elective treatment” in Canada doesn’t mean Botox or a tummy tuck. We’re talking about life-or-death procedures like neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery or cardiovascular surgery.

The false promise of single-payer healthcare | New York Post

by: Sally C. Pipes

Vermont is learning this high-tax reality firsthand. One Democratic state representative has admitted that its single-payer system will “cost more” than the initial estimate of $1.6 billion to $2.2 billion a year. Avalere Health, a consultancy, estimates that the state will have to essentially double its tax revenue to pay for the system.
You still haven't answered the question. Obamacare is not a single payer system.

My question was "What does a single payer healthcare have to do with "free stuff".

I'll even loosen the requirement a little. What is wrong with free health care? Don't give me the ridiculous line "it doesn't work". There is not a single country with it that would give it up. Do you honestly believe that God is against universal health care?
 

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
5,055
1,495
113
EXCERPT:

s ObamaCare continues to disappoint, some states are pushing for a single-payer replacement within their borders. Vermont is working to create such a system; Hawaii’s governor has singled out single-payer as the only potential replacement for his state’s failing exchange. And legislators have offered up proposals to institute single-payer in California, New York, Pennsylvania, Minnesota and Colorado.
Single-payer’s cheerleaders cite Canada as proof of the system’s superiority. It’s a foolish fetish: Our northern neighbor’s health-care system is plagued by rationing, long waits, poor-quality care, scarcities of vital medical technologies and unsustainable costs. That’s exactly what’s in store for America if we follow Canada’s lead.
As a native of Canada, I’ve seen this reality firsthand. To keep a lid on costs, Canadian officials ration care. As a result, the average Canadian has to wait 4½ months between getting a referral from his primary-care physician to a specialist for elective medical treatment — and actually receiving it.
Mind you, “elective treatment” in Canada doesn’t mean Botox or a tummy tuck. We’re talking about life-or-death procedures like neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery or cardiovascular surgery.

The false promise of single-payer healthcare | New York Post

by: Sally C. Pipes

Vermont is learning this high-tax reality firsthand. One Democratic state representative has admitted that its single-payer system will “cost more” than the initial estimate of $1.6 billion to $2.2 billion a year. Avalere Health, a consultancy, estimates that the state will have to essentially double its tax revenue to pay for the system.
I forgot.

Maybe you should read 5 Myths About Canadian Health Care - AARP
 
J

jennymae

Guest
Free health care isn't a bad thing. Maybe the state has to let go of a few prestigious projects, but if a kids life can be saved by that I'm in. Funny thing, though, that medical doctor Bentley isn't...
 

Oncefallen

Idiot in Chief
Staff member
Jan 15, 2011
6,031
3,268
113
You (and Bernie) don't know what you are talking about here. DoD is the most audited agency in the US Government. I spent 10 years in Defense procurement, five of which were as an auditor. It might interest you to know that it is DoD audits that identify the ridiculously priced items such as $1000 hammers, $10,000 toilet seats, and one of my favorites, $50 rivets. If all other agencies (treasury, state, DHS, IRS, Justice, etc) were audited at one quarter the rate of DoD, the cost of government could be reduced by at least 20% (My guess).
If I'm not mistaken, at least a percentage of this problem was solved under either Reagan or Bush Sr. There was a time where everything that the DoD procurred had to have a MilSpec rating and those items being purchased had to be tested (at the cost of the manufacturer) to test that they met MilSpec. For those unaware, MilSpec is one of the most stringent specification standards and the testing process is extremely expensive. Unless I'm sadly mistaken it was under one of the aforementioned administrations that the DoD was ordered to procure things like office supplies, non-specialized tools, etc via regular means versus MilSpec.

Even at that, I work in construction and over the years have worked on a number of DoD construction projects. DoD construction projects typically have a cost of one and a half to two times a similar civilian project due to their extremely strict standards.


The biggest problem driving the cost of defense is the political leadership and lobbyist and their pet projects. Most auditors can tell you stories of being called on the carpet of Congressional, or executive branch staffers for recommendations that were not in line with the staffer's boss's desires. Bernie, as well as most senators and representatives have been a part of the problem.
I would agree with you on this in that the DoD budget typically grows by leaps and bounds from what the DoD requests to what Congress gives them. Every Senator and Congressman with a military base or DoD contractor in their district is adding money and projects to the budget to bring that money home to their district. Here in Colorado Springs our economy rises and falls on DoD money having five military bases of varying sizes here. I've read numerous articles over the years about programs that the DoD has wanted to eliminate but Congress keeps forcing them down the DoD's neck.
 

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
5,055
1,495
113
If I'm not mistaken, at least a percentage of this problem was solved under either Reagan or Bush Sr. There was a time where everything that the DoD procurred had to have a MilSpec rating and those items being purchased had to be tested (at the cost of the manufacturer) to test that they met MilSpec. For those unaware, MilSpec is one of the most stringent specification standards and the testing process is extremely expensive. Unless I'm sadly mistaken it was under one of the aforementioned administrations that the DoD was ordered to procure things like office supplies, non-specialized tools, etc via regular means versus MilSpec.

Even at that, I work in construction and over the years have worked on a number of DoD construction projects. DoD construction projects typically have a cost of one and a half to two times a similar civilian project due to their extremely strict standards.




I would agree with you on this in that the DoD budget typically grows by leaps and bounds from what the DoD requests to what Congress gives them. Every Senator and Congressman with a military base or DoD contractor in their district is adding money and projects to the budget to bring that money home to their district. Here in Colorado Springs our economy rises and falls on DoD money having five military bases of varying sizes here. I've read numerous articles over the years about programs that the DoD has wanted to eliminate but Congress keeps forcing them down the DoD's neck.
DoD projects are inherently more expensive because of the environment that they operate in. Simple examples. If a rifle misfires occasionally, a hunter might lose a meal or two, but a soldier may lose his life. Passenger aircraft may pull two or three gs, but in combat an aircraft will pull over 9gs. When you add the burden of politicians' pet projects, DoD project managers start wit a disadvantage.
 
3

3Scoreand10

Guest
Free health care isn't a bad thing. Maybe the state has to let go of a few prestigious projects, but if a kids life can be saved by that I'm in. Funny thing, though, that medical doctor Bentley isn't...
There is no such thing as free health care.
Somebody has to pay for it.
No one is ever turned away when they need help.
The reason health care is so expense is that those who pay also pay for those who do not.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,312
1,039
113
Bernie Sanders actually makes a lot of sense but the fact that he is a socialist makes me distrustful because if he wins then our taxes will go through the roof.... I do like how he plans to go after these major pharmaceutical companies and medical suppliers because it's really just a legal form of extortion and they have been getting away with it for far too long. I also like how he address the issue of college. Many people go to college for 4 years and then are in debt for the rest of their life. Then with the economy the way it is you have a slim chance of finding a job that you just spent all that money studying so essentially you have a $40,000 piece of paper
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
11,748
6,332
113
There is no such thing as free health care.
Somebody has to pay for it.
No one is ever turned away when they need help.
The reason health care is so expense is that those who pay also pay for those who do not.
if only, if only people would understand this simple concept.
 
Feb 24, 2015
13,204
168
0
You guys seem to be forgetting something. We are living longer and the medical intervention that is occuring is increasing and costing more. As people get more frail and dependent, the question is where is the tipping point between withdrawal of ability and provision of support.

Over the past 40 years wealth has gone from the majority to the minority. These two forces will lead to either dictatorship of the minority over the majority or redistribution of wealth and the rebalancing of power.

Now which method you support determines the level of violence and problems our society is going to go through.
Or have you never read history?
 
J

jennymae

Guest
There is no such thing as free health care.
Somebody has to pay for it.
No one is ever turned away when they need help.
The reason health care is so expense is that those who pay also pay for those who do not.
Yes, of course, you're right, I was in utopia for a moment there.
 
3

3Scoreand10

Guest
Yes, of course, you're right, I was in utopia for a moment there.
My dad had a unique thought about insurance companys.
If they were all out lawed, everything would be cheaper.
Without auto ins everyone would drive more carefully.
Without health insurance, every one would take better care of themselves and not run to the doctor or hospital unless they were really sick.
Didn't say it would work, said it was unique.
 

Oncefallen

Idiot in Chief
Staff member
Jan 15, 2011
6,031
3,268
113
My dad had a unique thought about insurance companys.
If they were all out lawed, everything would be cheaper.
Without auto ins everyone would drive more carefully.
Without health insurance, every one would take better care of themselves and not run to the doctor or hospital unless they were really sick.
Didn't say it would work, said it was unique.
Definitely wouldn't work.

I spent 7 years of my life driving tow trucks for a living and on those occasions where a driver was involved in a collision and didn't have insurance invariably they were the one at fault.

As for health insurance, persons without health insurance are by far less likely to have routine physicals in which case quite often by the time they are sick enough to pay a doctor bill their condition is considerably worse and more expensive to treat. Likewise, persons with health insurance are more likely to take their children with the sniffles or the flue to a family physician whereas persons without said health insurance are more likely to take those same kids to the ER (considerably more expensive) because the ER cannot turn them away due to inability to pay.
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
Oh this is SO GREAT! Bernie now leads Clinton in national polls .....rolf I guess Hillary barking like a dog, did not work? :(
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
Im predicting the Bern puts a beat down on that dog barking Hillary today ..anyone else have any guesses?
 
P

popeye

Guest
Bernbomb is worse than Obama.

If an f 8 tornado is worse than a f 7
 
P

popeye

Guest
You guys seem to be forgetting something. We are living longer and the medical intervention that is occuring is increasing and costing more. As people get more frail and dependent, the question is where is the tipping point between withdrawal of ability and provision of support.

Over the past 40 years wealth has gone from the majority to the minority. These two forces will lead to either dictatorship of the minority over the majority or redistribution of wealth and the rebalancing of power.

Now which method you support determines the level of violence and problems our society is going to go through.
Or have you never read history?
The bible addresses this dynamic in the rise of one world one ruler that has the "correct" solution.