Oh come on when was that 30 years ago? And whats wrong with southerners? That's what we send our reps to do to represent us. And if they rejected this data...Im sure its because its full of left wing type tree-hugger stuff 
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
It's full of years of research by world renowned geologists, engineers, marine biologists, meteorologists and journalists that cover affected regions. It doesn't matter that it was thirty years ago, the reason it happened 30 years ago with tobacco and its health effects is the same reason it happens today with fossil fuels and their climate effects -- money!
Edison was for DC and Tesla was for AC. Large scale distribution of DC in the quantities needed today would be virtually impossible. Also generation of DC is much more expensive.
Solar power is a viable substitute for power generation, but we will always need a primary source.
If we combine natural gas and coal, we have about 150 years of fossil fuels left. That's assuming the current rate of world industrialization. As that rate increases, the fossil fuels quantity will decrease. Alternative fuels resources must be explored, along with conservation of fossil fuels.
I have a suggestion. If the world would learn to live together, rather than fight continuous wars, the energy crisis would be easy to resolve. Unless the Lord comes and establishes His new kingdom on Earth, that isn't going to happen!
Solar power is a viable substitute for power generation, but we will always need a primary source.
If we combine natural gas and coal, we have about 150 years of fossil fuels left. That's assuming the current rate of world industrialization. As that rate increases, the fossil fuels quantity will decrease. Alternative fuels resources must be explored, along with conservation of fossil fuels.
I have a suggestion. If the world would learn to live together, rather than fight continuous wars, the energy crisis would be easy to resolve. Unless the Lord comes and establishes His new kingdom on Earth, that isn't going to happen!
Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Evidence
NASA, a group of arguably the most well trained and intelligent scientists in the world, on how human instigated climate change is a real thing. Care to share with us your abundant scientific knowledge on how they're wrong?
NASA, a group of arguably the most well trained and intelligent scientists in the world, on how human instigated climate change is a real thing. Care to share with us your abundant scientific knowledge on how they're wrong?
Last edited:
V
Tell me, how does the ability to launch payloads and astronauts into space with minimal risk and rare failure -- a questionable ability at that, now that they don't have a rocket or a space vehicle to work with -- qualify NASA scientists to have an academic viewpoint on human-instigated "climate change"? They are entirely working the fields of astrophysics, aerospace engineering, propulsion theory, etc. They rely on NOAA to provide their meteorological data for launches, so don't try to putt a weatherman out of the hat to explain yourself.
I say that last part to warn you, consider how often your own side has insisted the "lack of a field-specific degree" in climate theory or meteorology negates the opinions of countless experts in the various sciences who produce peer-reviewed research that tends to disprove human involvement in climate change. I'll await your response, and enjoy the pretzel you're going to have to twist yourself into to explain your answer.
I say that last part to warn you, consider how often your own side has insisted the "lack of a field-specific degree" in climate theory or meteorology negates the opinions of countless experts in the various sciences who produce peer-reviewed research that tends to disprove human involvement in climate change. I'll await your response, and enjoy the pretzel you're going to have to twist yourself into to explain your answer.
.
http://www.nasa.gov/about/career
As you can read from that link, '' I think the advice that I would give to any kids who want to be astronauts is to make sure that they realize that NASA is looking for people with a whole variety of backgrounds: they are looking for medical doctors, microbiologists, geologists, physicists, electrical engineers. So find something that you really like and then pursue it as far as you can and NASA is apt to be interested in that profession."
http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/amu
As you can see, NASA have a meteorological department; launches aren't NASA's only function.
Give me a link to one such peer reviewed article that ''tends to disprove climate change'', written in the last 50 years.
Sorry to disappoint.
http://www.nasa.gov/about/career
As you can read from that link, '' I think the advice that I would give to any kids who want to be astronauts is to make sure that they realize that NASA is looking for people with a whole variety of backgrounds: they are looking for medical doctors, microbiologists, geologists, physicists, electrical engineers. So find something that you really like and then pursue it as far as you can and NASA is apt to be interested in that profession."
http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/amu
As you can see, NASA have a meteorological department; launches aren't NASA's only function.
Give me a link to one such peer reviewed article that ''tends to disprove climate change'', written in the last 50 years.
Sorry to disappoint.
V
Not a meterologist nor climatologist in the bunch, just like I said.
From your own link: "The Applied Meteorology Unit (AMU) is a tri-agency cooperative effort for transitioning new techniques from the research arena to improve operational weather forecasting and analysis in support of the National space program."
No climate change research mentioned.
I can do better than that. I can give you a peer-reviewed paper indicating that anthropomorphic climate change advocates are in the minority, and that they delude themselves in addition to attempting to delude the public.
Science or Science Fiction? Professionals’ Discursive Construction of Climate Change
I'm not disappointed at all. You've twisted the truth and attempted to misdirect the issue just as I expected you would.
From your own link: "The Applied Meteorology Unit (AMU) is a tri-agency cooperative effort for transitioning new techniques from the research arena to improve operational weather forecasting and analysis in support of the National space program."
No climate change research mentioned.
I can do better than that. I can give you a peer-reviewed paper indicating that anthropomorphic climate change advocates are in the minority, and that they delude themselves in addition to attempting to delude the public.
Science or Science Fiction? Professionals’ Discursive Construction of Climate Change
I'm not disappointed at all. You've twisted the truth and attempted to misdirect the issue just as I expected you would.
What is the difference between weather and climate? And why is forecasting weather, and the data thereof, important to understand changing climate patterns? The database of knowledge thereof is of fundamental importance in understanding climate shifts. Also, the point of the recruiter listing job types isn't to give an exhaustive list, it is to emphasize that any scientific discipline, taken further enough, is important for NASA in their employment practice, because it is functionally important in their scientific studies and applications.
This paper is debating the validity of a scientist's claim to authority in denying or advocating climate change from a sociological and psychological perspective. It contains virtually no actual climate scientific claims. As it states though, the majority of dissenters and deniers work for oil companies.
Regardless, an international consensus most certainly exists (as is in the paper). Here is its source: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/press-ar4/ipcc-flyer-low.pdf
I noticed a couple years ago, the sun didn't seem to set nor rise where I remember as a kid in the late 80s early 90s. MATTER of face. I can remember looking right down the alley to the west on Jun 21+/- and the sun setting very close in line. NOW the sun seems to set more to my NW.
But as for this man made climate change garbage, WHY has every single planet in the system seen warmer temps? it would appear man made global warming is happening on all the planets... oh wait. man is only on one planet.... welp so much for man made.
ALSO lets think.. a little over 1,000 years ago the earth was warmer... I don't think the Vikings had Hummers and 747's and factories....
But as for this man made climate change garbage, WHY has every single planet in the system seen warmer temps? it would appear man made global warming is happening on all the planets... oh wait. man is only on one planet.... welp so much for man made.
ALSO lets think.. a little over 1,000 years ago the earth was warmer... I don't think the Vikings had Hummers and 747's and factories....
The planets closer to the sun are warmer. The planets further from the sun are cooler. This planet retains heat by atmospheric gases, namely CO2. More CO2 in the atmopshere means more heat retention. So, as the co2 content in the atmosphere gets higher, the planet's ability to get rid of heat gets lower. Therefore; higher average global temperatues.
Planet temperatures naturally fluctuate responsively to their proximity to the sun in their orbits. However, Earth is warming disproportionately to the levels it should from orbital proximity and natural seasonal changes alone, since the advent of industry. This would make sense, because CO2 retains heat and the Co2 levels of the atmosphere are continually increased by the by-products of industry.
It really isn't complex.
It really isn't complex.
Exactly and same here.....the house I grew up in in the 70's and 80's.......the sun set during the summer dead over the house across the street and I noticed about 10 years ago when driving by there during the summer that the sun was setting in a different location...people thought I was mistaken until the info came out about polar north shifting......
K
Yes down here in the Ozarks of Missouri the sun is setting in a different location then it use to do.
That and plus not to mention from what I have seen the seasons are one month off. Growing up the worst of our winter weather was in February and by March it was over. Now for the past 5 years at least the worst has come in March and been over by either mid March or April.......
