i recently reed this of a website that does bring up some points about the adam and eve story for example why did god made eve from adams rib but not from sand/dirt. i would like you to have a look at it and give me your opion and answer to some of these questions heres the link
http://www.abarnett.demon.co.uk/atheism/eden.html
Ok, to entertain you, I will attempt to answer it as biblically as possible but you should be forewarned, it will give you more questions than answers.
Adam:
Probably the whole package. You have to remember than it is impossible for anyone, even Christians, to define what "God" is and isn't. What we can describe but that's all based on human-perception (which as you know, is quite limited). Each analogy is limited in its own that you can only take the technicalities so far before the analogy begins to fail. I have no idea how theologians come up with this but somehow they are able to and back it up with some kind of evidence but apparently, throughout the Bible, God Himself prophesies the coming of Christ in various analogies and themes. For example, Moses striking the rock to bring forth water is analogous to Christ being crucified for the living water to pour out. Then afterward, all Moses had to do was call out to the rock and water would come forth for one to drink.
In this case, Adam and Eve - the husband-wife analogy. In its simplest form, we (the wife) were created for Christ (the husband). One could even stretch it as far as saying that we are Jesus' "helpers." (see New Jerusalem and what people guess will happen there)
Why did God wait to give Adam his wife? One could say that God wanted to illustrate that man was insufficient and must rely on God to provide the rest. So God created man, waited to show that it was insufficient, then created Eve to show that God is needed to complete things. Reliance on God completes things - rely on God and all else falls into place.
Eve:
1. Lilith = myth. It is difficult to determine exact wordings for the oldest of the books of the Bible. So, some people second-guess what they read particularly the genealogies. Lilith was one of them.
2. Husband-wife analogy again. To say that the wife comes from the husband. Essentially, is a part of the husband for completion. That is why one feels lonely until they find their other-half, so to speak. But extended to Christ, we are from Him (Trinity), and to be complete, we need to be with Him. Again, you need to be careful with the analogy because the opposite (that Christ needs us for completion) can become un-biblical.
Death:
1. One could say that the world could have supposedly populated until there was no more room. However, since God is omnipotent and omniscient, He already knows this wouldn't be a problem. So, it wasn't a concern for Him to create things that could reproduce because eventually, He knows it is needed.
2. I have heard the dinosaur theory before. Personally, I think it's dangerous to speculate on things we really don't know or probably wouldn't understand even if God explained it to us. Someone said that dinosaurs were the result of Satan's genetic experimentation. God creates but Satan perverses and manipulates. Though the creation/perversion explanation fits with biblical ideologies, it's a bit of a stretch also because, honestly, we don't know. So, following this explanation, I guess you could say that flies and creepy crawlies were not created by God. So the world wouldn't have oozed in flies and stuff.
3. Death was natural for animals but not so for humans is the other explanation. By "death" one has to define it in the biblical sense. I didn't look it up but you can but I would guess that "death" doesn't apply to non-humans. "Death" for non-humans is natural, perhaps? Death for humans were not? So death for humans came about because of sin. Again, ask God when you die.
4. Who is to say that before death, bacterial did not exist? The writer's argument fails here. He is using a current world-view example to explain a failure for the present. Just because today we cannot live without bacteria, it doesn't mean that before sin, the world couldn't live without bacteria.
Apple:
Not really a catch-22. You see, from a biblical reading, Adam and Eve seem to know what death and living is. Read the part where the serpent tempts Eve to eat the fruit. If you read it through, the question of death and living was never... well, a question. From a straight reading, it seemed as though both Eve and the serpent were very aware of what death is like.
So here's the question... why did Eve choose to eat the fruit? Free-choice. Just because you are without sin, that doesn't mean you cannot choose. God illustrates that He allows free-choice. In fact, we all have free-choice. You can choose to steal or not steal. No one will "stop" you. However, with each choice, there is a consequence. To choose to steal, you could get caught and be sent to prison. The question is about living with the consequence.
The scene also illustrates God's love for His creation. The consequence is death. But Adam and Eve were not struck dead. God let them live. Of course, one could also say that they did receive death as their punishment because in the end, they grew old and died. But in many instances throughout the Bible, the consequence for sinning was death. God didn't even hesitate to carry out the punishment in those instances. But for Adam and Eve, He spared them. He forgave them and let them loose on a lesser punishment.
One big view of why God did many of the things He did is to take the opportunity to show that He is a just and loving God and that He really is all-powerful. Without sin, Satan, and us humans, He would never have the opportunity to show all these characteristics of Himself. Of course, you can go into circular arguments.
Nudity:
Understanding this would require one to be without sin. Remember, this is already post-sin. So everything else is just speculation. But along the same reasoning, if one is without sin, one would probably not have eaten Eve or tested the aerodynamic abilities of small rodents.
Babies are born nude into this world. Is there anything "sinful" about that? No. But it becomes sinful when you perverse nudity into something else. So for a pedophile, naked children excites him/her so that is a perversion of something natural = sinful.
Sin had already entered the world. Which means there was death. Why not kill the animal to make clothing? Given the issues illustrated in the death heading, why not just pick one and go with it?
Aliens:
lol
I have heard that aliens are actually fallen angels or Nephiliam.
Even if aliens exist, who is to say that God did not provide the same deal that He did for us? It doesn't prove anything either for or against.
Cain & Abel:
Actually, there were many more children. Back then, they were allowed to inter-breed amongst themselves. Even in the days of Abraham, it was acceptable because there just weren't that many people around. Cain and Abel was to illustrate the first murder and what God wanted as sacrifice - not fruits, but animals/blood-sacrifice. The thing with Cain and Abel is that somehow, there was already a concept of calling out to God for His favour.
Also, I have not looked into it but you might want to look at the Eve gene or whatever it's called.