Science Disproves Evolution
- Thread starter Pahu
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
G
And I didn't say anything contrary to that. My post was starting with the single living cell being there. *sigh* once again I find myself explaining the basics of the conversation to those who can't follow along.
I wasn't talking about wolves into dogs. I was talking about the first single living cell into dogs, the single cell into cats. That's the common ancestry the evolutionists purport, but yet when they'll called out on it, they always try to change the subject, all the while trying to avoid the holes that just got blown into their religion.
I wasn't talking about wolves into dogs. I was talking about the first single living cell into dogs, the single cell into cats. That's the common ancestry the evolutionists purport, but yet when they'll called out on it, they always try to change the subject, all the while trying to avoid the holes that just got blown into their religion.
No one is saying that single celled organisms evolved next into dogs or cats.
M
After billions of years yes.
Back in reality, there is no evidecne that billions of years can do such a thing. It's just a speculation, a belief, a religion.
Seriously though Grey, you should stop trying to convince us of this nonsense. We're not going to believe it.
G
Ah, the magical properties of billions of years. Any problems or flaws in evolution? Don't worry, with billions of years, even the scientifically impossible becomes possible. Just believe that billions of years can turn a single cell into dogs and cats. If you just believe it hard enough, maybe it'll be true.
Back in reality, there is no evidecne that billions of years can do such a thing. It's just a speculation, a belief, a religion.
Seriously though Grey, you should stop trying to convince us of this nonsense. We're not going to believe it.
Back in reality, there is no evidecne that billions of years can do such a thing. It's just a speculation, a belief, a religion.
Seriously though Grey, you should stop trying to convince us of this nonsense. We're not going to believe it.
M
"Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun the moon, and the truth".
And thus, if anyone listens I'll continue to write on here about it.
Interested to know who said that?
And thus, if anyone listens I'll continue to write on here about it.
Interested to know who said that?
Oh, and btw, quote mining.
G
Oh look, the predictable point where evolutionists assume that their view is absolute truth. And then you wonder why I group you with the 98%, it's becuase you fit the bill.
Oh, and btw, quote mining.
Oh, and btw, quote mining.
I quoted Siddhartha Gautama (Buddha), to point out that I'm not hostile to religion, I'm hostile to indoctrination.
M
You've missed my point. The "truth", is that evolution is a theory, the truth is that neither your or I have absolute certainty, and the truth is many people don't understand what the theory of evolution entails.
I quoted Siddhartha Gautama (Buddha), to point out that I'm not hostile to religion, I'm hostile to indoctrination.
G
But you claimed it's truth that billions of years can go from single cell which isn't a dog into dogs. Or are you going to backtrack and tell me that suddenly you're not certain that billions of years could do that, and that maybe what's purported by evolutionists isn't truth?
So are you hostile to indoctinating kids into beliefs of billions of years that you're not certain is absolute truth? (Let's see if you're capable of giving a simple yes or no to that, with no strings attached.)
So are you hostile to indoctinating kids into beliefs of billions of years that you're not certain is absolute truth? (Let's see if you're capable of giving a simple yes or no to that, with no strings attached.)
Everything I have said about evolution, including the time frame, is based on current evidence, as I said earlier there's no absolute certainty, but this is where the evidence points.
You're comparing the teachings of theories in classrooms to religious indoctrination? How often do you go to church to listen to a sermon and have an audience member interject with a comment or question? They clearly aren't the same thing.
M
You're comparing the teachings of theories in classrooms to religious indoctrination? How often do you go to church to listen to a sermon and have an audience member interject with a comment or question? They clearly aren't the same thing.
Btw, good job completely evading what was a simple yes or no question. Like I said, 98%.
G
Really, so why is there such heavy censorship by evolutionists against anything that goes against their "theory" (aka. relgious beliefs)
Btw, good job completely evading what was a simple yes or no question. Like I said, 98%.
Btw, good job completely evading what was a simple yes or no question. Like I said, 98%.
As if evolution was a religion. You can cry out and bemoan that fact that in no way shape or form it is. You can stamp your feet and insist that it is on an internet forum, but it simply isn't.
M
As if evolution was a religion. You can cry out and bemoan that fact that in no way shape or form it is. You can stamp your feet and insist that it is on an internet forum, but it simply isn't.
Anyways, I'm done playing with the typical atheist for now, just a waste of time and effort.
G
As if evolution was an absolute fact. You can stamp your feet and insist that it is on an internet forum, but it simply isn't.
Anyways, I'm done playing with the typical atheist for now, just a waste of time and effort.
Anyways, I'm done playing with the typical atheist for now, just a waste of time and effort.
A
That's what I'm saying dude, dolphins are nothing close to fish but the theory of evolution seems the exact same thing with common ancestors. I believe that human and animal learn to adapt to environment but I don't know about having a common ancestor cuz primates of all kind are still classified separate from us, just as dolphins are separate from invertebrates....see
A
Because it isn't a yes or no question. Its a loaded question. You do realize that some classrooms, some PUBLIC school classrooms still teach creationism. If by censorship do you mean it isn't taught in accredited universities due to a lack of evidence, then yes. Why don't we still teach that there are humors in the body and that an imbalance leads to disease in classrooms?