I don't believe I implied that any and all men and women of science are "gross unbelievers." I hope you don't think I did.
Am I on trial?
My point was that others would argue these things as allegorical instead of being up to scientific debate. I, wasn't asserting that ANY of them are allegorical. All I said is that others might argue the point between what's scientifically disputable and what's a tall tale with a moral behind it. The latter could be rejected as irrelevant in a scientific discussion.
Am I on trial?
My point was that others would argue these things as allegorical instead of being up to scientific debate. I, wasn't asserting that ANY of them are allegorical. All I said is that others might argue the point between what's scientifically disputable and what's a tall tale with a moral behind it. The latter could be rejected as irrelevant in a scientific discussion.