Catholic Heresy (for the record)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Mary was only an human being. She was born and died a sinner. Mary sinned her whole life just like everyone else. Mary died just like everyone else and she was buried just like everyone else. There is nothing special about Mary. She was only a servant of God like Adam was, like Moses was and just like Paul was.
And just like the apostles were.

She is due the same respect as all of them are.
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
Many will object at this point and deny “the woman” of Revelation 12 is Mary. They will claim it is either the Church, or, as do dispensationalists, they will claim it is the Israel of old.
The woman was Israel resulting in the Jewish church. Her offspring were the true believers in the church. This is clearly demonstrated by the sun, moon and stars associated with her in line with Gen 37.9. John's illustrations are all taken from the Old Testament

The Church acknowledges Scripture to have a polyvalent nature. In other words, there can be many levels of meaning to the various texts of Scripture.
You mean yours does LOL :D

So, are there many levels of meaning to Rev. 12?
Not at all, unless someone tries to squeeze Mary in where she doesn't belong. The Messiah came through the birth pangs of Israel

Absolutely! Israel is often depicted as the Lord’s bride in the Old Testament (Song of Solomon, Jer. 3:1, etc.). So there is precedent to refer to Israel as “the woman.” And Jesus was born out of Israel.
Yes and the Messiah would spring from the birth pangs of Israel (e.g. Micah 5.3).

Moreover, the Book of Revelation depicts the New Covenant Church as “the bride of Christ” and “the New Jerusalem” ( Rev. 21:2).
True, so the church sprung out of Israel and in fact in the NT IS Israel.

“The woman” of Revelation 12 is also depicted as continuing to beget children to this day and these children are revealed to be all “who keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ” (vs. 17). The Church certainly fits this description.
So true and the church which is composed of all true believers was begotten out of Israel, and is Israel.

In fact, we argue as Catholics “the woman” to represent the people of God down through the centuries, whether Old Covenant Israel or the New Covenant Church, “the Israel of God” (Gal. 6:16).
No the woman was Israel, it is her offspring who are the church of true believers.

All we have said about “the woman” of Revelation 12 representing the people of God down through the millennia of time does not diminish in any way the first and literal sense of the text as representing Mary.

well the woman does not represent the people of God down through the millennia. It is her offspring who do so. It counts MARY out of the reckoning. In no way did the offspring spring out of Mary. They sprang out of Israel.

In fact, there are at least four reasons why one cannot escape including Mary when exegeting Revelation 12 and specifically the identity of “the woman.”
Let's look at them.

1. “The woman” in Rev. 12 “brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with an iron rod: and her son was taken up to God, and to his throne.” This child is obviously Jesus. If we begin on the literal level, there is no doubt that Mary is the one who “brought forth” Jesus.
The man child is clearly the equivalent of the son of man and includes both Jesus and His living church, as he does also in Daniel 7.. Both were to shepherd the nations with a rod of iron (Rev 2.27; 19.15). Both were or will be caught up to God.

2. Though we could discover many spiritual levels of meaning for the flight of “the woman” in 12:6, 14, Mary and the Holy Family literally fled into Egypt in Matt. 2:13-15 with divine assistance.
Mary did not flee into the desert. She fled into Egypt (hardly a desert). However, the Jewish church (the true Israel) certainly fled into the wilderness in the days prior to the destruction of Jerusalem and were preserved. Nor did a flood follow Mary to swallow up her enemies so that she was miraculously preserved.. But pursuers would have followed the church into the wilderness and by the power of God they were preserved.

3. Mary is referred to prophetically as “woman” in Gen. 3:15, Jer. 31:22, and by Jesus as the same in John 2:4 and 19:26. Especially considering the same apostle, John, wrote the Gospel of John and the book of Revelation, it is no stretch to say St. John would have had Mary in mind when he used the familiar term “the woman” as the descriptor of the Lady of the Apocalypse.
LOL now I've heard it all. The woman in Gen 3.15 was Eve. The woman in Jer 31.22 was a faithless daughter and is called the virgin Israel. The virgin Israel is the woman who will protect her offspring.

You cannot seriously think that the double mention of 'a woman' as a term of endearment in John by Jesus would associate the woman in Rev 12 with Mary in totally different circumstances? Why should it?

4. There are four main characters in the chapter: “the woman,” the devil, Jesus, and the Archangel Michael. No one denies that the other three mentioned are real persons. It fits the context exegetically to interpret “the woman” as a person (Mary) as well.
Well I have already demonstrated that the man-child (the son of man) represents both Jesus and the church of true believers. The Devil and the Archangel are mighty heavenly beings, hardly comparable with a young Israelite woman. We would expect the woman to be someone outstanding in Scripture i.e. Israel. Michael was the protector of Israel. No wonder he fought.

Sorry, you fail.


"From henceforth, all generations shall call me Blessed." ---Luke 1:48[/QUOTE]
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
And just like the apostles were.

She is due the same respect as all of them are.
Yes they do require respect, but are they to be treated any different than anybody else that does God's will in their lives.
No because we are all called to do that, and the bible says nobody who does not do the will of God will inherit the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 7:21).
Do we pray to them or ask them to intercede for us?
No because we have the Lord Jesus who we pray directly to to intercede for us, so there is no need to pray to somebody else because we only have one mediator between us and God. Mary is no more of a saint then anybody else who does God's will in their lives. Some just are called to do different parts within the body.....
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Yes they do require respect, but are they to be treated any different than anybody else that does God's will in their lives.
No because we are all called to do that, and the bible says nobody who does not do the will of God will inherit the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 7:21).
Do we pray to them or ask them to intercede for us?
No because we have the Lord Jesus who we pray directly to to intercede for us, so there is no need to pray to somebody else because we only have one mediator between us and God. Mary is no more of a saint then anybody else who does God's will in their lives. Some just are called to do different parts within the body.....
Agreed. . .but why do we ask fellow Christians to pray for us when we only have one mediator between God and us?
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
Agreed. . .but why do we ask fellow Christians to pray for us when we only have one mediator between God and us?
Because we are all together supporting one another in the battle on earth. And we do not expect those prayers to have special effect because of who makes them. We bear one another's burdens and so fulfil the law of Christ. Thus we reveal our love for one another. We know of each other because we live among each other.

We have no grounds whatsoever for thinking that those who have gone into Heaven are aware of our activities or what we do.
To think that Mary and the saints have cognisance of all that goes on on earth and can actually hear prayers sent to them from round the world is absurd. It is to turn them into gods. Only Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit in their omnipresence and omniscience can do that.
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
Agreed. . .but why do we ask fellow Christians to pray for us when we only have one mediator between God and us?

We ask them to pray for us, not to mediate for us between us and God.
Because those who we ask to pray for us here on earth has to have their prayers go through the Mediator Lord Jesus Christ as well. They do not mediate directly to God for us, they just show a collective union in the body of Christ all praying for the same outcome.
If we are going to pray to somebody rather you believe they are already in heaven or still asleep in the grave what purpose does it serve when the only person you need to pray to in heaven is God with the Lord as the Mediator. We do not nor does the bible say anybody else serves as a mediator for us.
 

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,370
113
Can you show me the verse to back up your interpretation of the existence of Jesus of Nazareth before his conception within Mary?
What do you mean by my interpretation?

How about your interpretation? where is the verse?
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
Agreed. . .but why do we ask fellow Christians to pray for us when we only have one mediator between God and us?
We ask them to pray for us, not to mediate for us between us and God.
Because those who we ask to pray for us here on earth has to have their prayers go through the Mediator Lord Jesus Christ as well.
I think that is what Catholics do, ask Mary to intercede with Jesus, her Son, for them, as Christians intercede with Jesus for others.

They do not mediate directly to God for us, they just show a collective union in the body of Christ all praying for the same outcome.
If we are going to pray to somebody rather you believe they are already in heaven or still asleep in the grave what purpose does it serve when the only person you need to pray to in heaven is God with the Lord as the Mediator. We do not nor does the bible say anybody else serves as a mediator for us.
 
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Elin said:
Jackson123 said:
Elin said:
There was no Jesus of Nazareth before the incarnation, there was only God the Son.

After the incarnation and ascension, God the Son is now also human, which he was not before the incarnation.
can you show me the verse to back up your interpretation?
Can you show me the verse to back up your interpretation of
the existence of Jesus of Nazareth before his conception within Mary?
What do you mean by my interpretation?

How about your interpretation? where is the verse?
I am asking for the same thing you are asking for.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Agreed. . .but why do we ask fellow Christians to pray for us when we only have one mediator between God and us?
Clear this up for me please. We do pray to our heavenly Father correct? We do pray directly to God correct? The vale of the temple rent in twain allows us direct access to God the Father correct?

Yes Jesus is the Mediator of the NT and yes the Holy Spirit makes intercession for us but we do have direct access to God our heavenly Father correct? Just want to make sure I'm not off somewhere in la-la land.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
I think that is what Catholics do, ask Mary to intercede with Jesus, her Son, for them, as Christians intercede with Jesus for others.
And you really think that a young woman who failed to appreciate Jesus while He was ministering is capable of hearing millions of prayers from all round the world and presenting them to Jesus in a moment of time? You turn her into a god. The idea is monstrous.
 
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
And you really think that a young woman who failed to appreciate Jesus while He was ministering is capable of hearing millions of prayers from all round the world and presenting them to Jesus in a moment of time? You turn her into a god. The idea is monstrous.
You misunderstood about me. . .read it again.
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Clear this up for me please. We do pray to our heavenly Father correct? We do pray directly to God correct? The vale of the temple rent in twain allows us direct access to God the Father correct?

Yes Jesus is the Mediator of the NT and yes the Holy Spirit makes intercession for us but we do have direct access to God our heavenly Father correct? Just want to make sure I'm not off somewhere in la-la land.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
God's truth remains unchanged.

You are not off somewhere in la-la land.

Just trying to sort out Catholic belief.
 
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
Many will object at this point and deny “the woman” of Revelation 12 is Mary. They will claim it is either the Church, or, as do dispensationalists, they will claim it is the Israel of old.The Church acknowledges Scripture to have a polyvalent nature. In other words, there can be many levels of meaning to the various texts of Scripture. So, are there many levels of meaning to Rev. 12? Absolutely! Israel is often depicted as the Lord’s bride in the Old Testament (Song of Solomon, Jer. 3:1, etc.). So there is precedent to refer to Israel as “the woman.” And Jesus was born out of Israel.

Moreover, the Book of Revelation depicts the New Covenant Church as “the bride of Christ” and “the New Jerusalem” ( Rev. 21:2). “The woman” of Revelation 12 is also depicted as continuing to beget children to this day and these children are revealed to be all “who keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ” (vs. 17). The Church certainly fits this description.In fact, we argue as Catholics “the woman” to represent the people of God down through the centuries, whether Old Covenant Israel or the New Covenant Church, “the Israel of God” (Gal. 6:16).

All we have said about “the woman” of Revelation 12 representing the people of God down through the millennia of time does not diminish in any way the first and literal sense of the text as representing Mary. In fact, there are at least four reasons why one cannot escape including Mary when exegeting Revelation 12 and specifically the identity of “the woman.”
1. “The woman” in Rev. 12 “brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with an iron rod: and her son was taken up to God, and to his throne.” This child is obviously Jesus. If we begin on the literal level, there is no doubt that Mary is the one who “brought forth” Jesus.
2. Though we could discover many spiritual levels of meaning for the flight of “the woman” in 12:6, 14, Mary and the Holy Family literally fled into Egypt in Matt. 2:13-15 with divine assistance.
3. Mary is referred to prophetically as “woman” in Gen. 3:15, Jer. 31:22, and by Jesus as the same in John 2:4 and 19:26. Especially considering the same apostle, John, wrote the Gospel of John and the book of Revelation, it is no stretch to say St. John would have had Mary in mind when he used the familiar term “the woman” as the descriptor of the Lady of the Apocalypse.
4. There are four main characters in the chapter: “the woman,” the devil, Jesus, and the Archangel Michael. No one denies that the other three mentioned are real persons. It fits the context exegetically to interpret “the woman” as a person (Mary) as well.


Pax Christi


"From henceforth, all generations shall call me Blessed." ---Luke 1:48


Im having a hard time writing in the reply box to whatever code you have going on in here

Here are men referred to as a woman in travail also

John 16:21-22 A woman when she is in travail hath sorrow, because her hour is come: but as soon as she is delivered of the child, she remembereth no more the anguish, for joy that a man is born into the world.

John 16:22 And ye now therefore have sorrow: but I will see you again, and your heart shall rejoice, and your joy no man taketh from you.

You had referenced Gen 3:15

Paul speak of a mystery in Genesis of the man and the woman there as being Christ and the church (which are many members) not just one

He said of the two becoming one flesh (In Genesis 2:21)

Ephes 5:32 This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.

Whereas you referred to Gen 3:15 (which is after the one Paul referred to) which says


Gen 3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

The same wording is found here in respects to the church (the woman) here


Romans 16:20 And the God of peace shall bruise Satan under your feet shortly.

See how that everytime I look at those references it just dont seem to fit?

I was told Mary was assumed into heaven in respects to that woman clothed in the sun part, but I just never got the part where she took off into the wilderness shprtly after she was supposedly assumed there. But even with the additional scriptures posted which Paul quotes from Genesis it isnt about Mary (a singular the woman) but rather Christ and the church (the woman, as in the many membered body) as shown in Ephes 5:32

Is Paul incorrect there? Or am I still missing it somehow?

Also, doesnt "assumed" mean "supposed"?

Because everytime I see the word "supposed" used in scripture it seems they were dead wrong in supposing anything when supposing it.

Also, did you see my post on that Luke 1:48 verse you have snipped into your post? Do you see any connections bettern the verses at all?

Thanks







 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
I think that is what Catholics do, ask Mary to intercede with Jesus, her Son, for them, as Christians intercede with Jesus for others.

That is what they may say, but that is not the truth for they have different saints they pray to for certain things; healing, financial, and so on. I was in the Catholic church for 5 years and left because of those falsehoods. We do not need to pray to certain people for those things, we only need to pray to God through Jesus Christ for those things.
 
Nov 30, 2012
2,396
26
0
LOL now I've heard it all. The woman in Gen 3.15 was Eve. The woman in Jer 31.22 was a faithless daughter and is called the virgin Israel. The virgin Israel is the woman who will protect her offspring.

You cannot seriously think that the double mention of 'a woman' as a term of endearment in John by Jesus would associate the woman in Rev 12 with Mary in totally different circumstances? Why should it?
So the virgin with child wasn't Mary?

Who is denying Scripture now?
 
Nov 30, 2012
2,396
26
0
And you really think that a young woman who failed to appreciate Jesus while He was ministering is capable of hearing millions of prayers from all round the world and presenting them to Jesus in a moment of time? You turn her into a god. The idea is monstrous.
SHE FAILED TO APPRECIATE JESUS?!

The Mother of Jesus Christ failed to appreciate her child?!

Who is spouting nonsense us or you? Because at this point, you have thoroughly just spit in the face of Jesus's mother.
 

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,370
113
I am asking for the same thing you are asking for.

Rev 22:13

13"I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end."

You said Jesus of Nasaret different from Jesus the beginning and the end?

Jesus always exist never ceases to exist.

Jesus in the beginning is the same Jesus in the end.
 
Dec 26, 2014
3,757
19
0
SHE FAILED TO APPRECIATE JESUS?!
.......
she once thought him crazy, which of course you never knew.

your post is a false and ludicrous accusation against another poster,

you who who idolizes mary with and in the rcc heresy, and admits it,
and keeps trying every day to promote it
and to deny it all at once.
 
Dec 26, 2014
3,757
19
0
God calls catholic (rcc) belief, doctrines and practices worse than HERESY (see the op) from hasatan's deception, always was, always will be.

It is directly against HIS WORD to try to sort it out or study it or promote it.


God's truth remains unchanged.
Just trying to sort out Catholic belief.