Someone please answer my question .
- Thread starter Makahiya2028
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
There are two types of bibles, Holy Bibles and Corrupt Bible.
Holy Bibles are translated from holy manuscripts
and Corrupt Bibles from corrupt manuscripts.
99% of the 5,500+ existing N.T. manuscripts support
the readings of the KJV Holy Bible.
The N.T. manuscripts of the KJV Holy Bible
predate the existing 45 Alexandrian corrupt manuscripts
and the reconstructed Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus.
Over seven years 47 of history’s greatest scholars prayerfully
translated the Authorized King James Holy Bible
from the majority manuscripts and Wycliffe Bible,
Erasmus N.T., Luther Bible, Colinaeus N.T.,
Stephanus N.T., Tyndale Bible, Coverdale Bible,
Great Bible, Geneva Bible, Bishop Bible and Beza N.T.
Last edited:
J
^ That.
Seems to me you nailed it, so what's the question?
(And, holy cow! I finally understood something you wrote. I'm feeling smarter today. lol)
Seems to me you nailed it, so what's the question?
(And, holy cow! I finally understood something you wrote. I'm feeling smarter today. lol)
A
I don't know. I've been thinking this same thing ever since I've seen people on here claiming the OT is an allegory, the hell thing is just not true, all 200+ versions of the Bible (and there are so many more versions, once we get it out of our head that all Bibles are for 21st century English-speakers) are inaccurate, therefore let's not use them, and that the truth of the Bible is only what we make of it.
This seems to hit the nail on the head of things I've been thinking for a couple of weeks now. Is it contentious? Sure, but only to those who are sure they, and they alone, have the "real answers."
You've been on here longer than I have. You haven't noticed the amount of truly funky versions of "Christian?"
There's a sticky thread above about why the RCC is funky. Why aren't we to bring up it's not the only funky posing as Christian? Whereas, I agree there are many views of many positions I disagree with, but that doesn't stop that person or me from being a Christian, that list of funky beliefs I've just covered seriously makes me know they are NOT Christians.
It's not pointless.
This seems to hit the nail on the head of things I've been thinking for a couple of weeks now. Is it contentious? Sure, but only to those who are sure they, and they alone, have the "real answers."
You've been on here longer than I have. You haven't noticed the amount of truly funky versions of "Christian?"
There's a sticky thread above about why the RCC is funky. Why aren't we to bring up it's not the only funky posing as Christian? Whereas, I agree there are many views of many positions I disagree with, but that doesn't stop that person or me from being a Christian, that list of funky beliefs I've just covered seriously makes me know they are NOT Christians.
It's not pointless.
V
I do. The OP is a KJV Onlyist, though a most bizarre one whose let his radical nonsense carry him into territory most KJV Onlyists won't go. He point-blank denies that is his agenda even when confronted with the facts that his posts contain all the rhetoric, key words, and heresy of the movement.
Reading him is a waste of time and effort.
Reading him is a waste of time and effort.
A
Not there, but then again you promote a version that was very much about trying to corrupt God's word. (It didn't work.) King James hired a bunch of scholars to translate the Bible into what he wanted it to say. He wanted it to say the King is Law, instead of the law is king. God had other plans, and got the scholars to do a good translation for its time.
Words have changed in meaning since then, and new evidence proves some of the words were mistranslated, but this is what we get -- the best translations by the scholars of the time.
Let's face it, if KJV1611 was the only version that works, that's roughly 1578 years of people stuck with bad translations and countless people who never got any translation, because they can't read English.
That rather proves the point.
Words have changed in meaning since then, and new evidence proves some of the words were mistranslated, but this is what we get -- the best translations by the scholars of the time.
Let's face it, if KJV1611 was the only version that works, that's roughly 1578 years of people stuck with bad translations and countless people who never got any translation, because they can't read English.
That rather proves the point.
ah, ok, I think the Lord did preserve his words unto all generations
Psalms 12:6-7
6 The words of the LORD are pure words:
as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
7 Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them
from this generation for ever.
When the Lord gave scripture to O.T. Jews, he gave it to them in their language.
When the Lord gave scripture to N.T. Christians, he gave it to them in the language of the day.
Then the Lord gave nations Holy Bibles in their language.
Finally, the Lord gave the entire world Holy Bibles in the universal language,
which was translated into languages throughout the world.
The KJV Holy Bible is the most translated bible of all time.
The KJV Holy Bible is the most translated book of all time.
No, there are actually only a few theories of final authority .
The theological theories of sola scriptura (the scriptures are the final authority)
or sola eccelsia (the church(s) are the final authority)
and the philosophical theories of ethics inclusive
of everlasting consciousness or everlasting non-existence.
A
Get real! Love would have corrected politely. That was out of the blue and had no sincerity or love in it. I may not get what you're saying half the time, but I know love when I see it. That's not it. I know sincerity when I see it. And even that wasn't there. Just absolutely no reproof, correction nor instruction. It was a knee-jerk reaction, and I have no idea where it came from.
Once you get off your ego, I think he deserves a true act of love, to go back and ask for his forgiveness.
Once you get off your ego, I think he deserves a true act of love, to go back and ask for his forgiveness.