Ireland Votes For Same-Sex Marriage

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 21, 2015
643
4
0
#42
That's when the SCOTUS ruling on gay marriage should come out.
Please pardon this humble Aussie's ignorance re Yank-isms.
What's a SCOTUS ?
Have you perchance omitted an 'R' from the plural of 'SCROTUM' ?
 
G

Galahad

Guest
#43
"So then, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord." - 1 Corinthians 11:27
What does that have to do with not allowing some partake in communion? I don't understand.
 

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2014
70,869
9,602
113
#44
Please pardon this humble Aussie's ignorance re Yank-isms.
What's a SCOTUS ?
Have you perchance omitted an 'R' from the plural of 'SCROTUM' ?



uhhhhhhhhhhh... what is this? I don't even.. :confused:
 

Oncefallen

Idiot in Chief
Staff member
Jan 15, 2011
6,032
3,292
113
#49
Please pardon this humble Aussie's ignorance re Yank-isms.
What's a SCOTUS ?
Have you perchance omitted an 'R' from the plural of 'SCROTUM' ?
Supreme Court Of The United States

Some Americans don't stop to think about the fact that many common abbreviations here would not necessarily be readily recognized by others.
 
S

sealabeag

Guest
#51
Honestly I fully understand the CC perspective on Gays and Im defo not trying to disrespect that. I'm just saying that its just about Gays having the right to marry. That means their partner is legally recognised. Í guess I don't see it as so catastrophic as you guys. I don't see people rushing of to be gay or wotevea and I don't see how it will affect Christian beliefs coz u either believe or not..... so wot am I trying to say - I guess yea disapprove but try not to be like this is the end of the world. Things change - nothing stays the same.... sigh...I know wot Ive said is out there so maybe I'll just say sorry now if I have offended anyone
Hi zoii, as an Irishman, maybe I can shed some light on some of the problems with this legislation which was passed here in Ireland.

This is not simply an "equality" or "gay rights" issue. This is an issue that will directly affect the lives of thousands of people, in particular children, here in Ireland over the coming decades.
For starters, this legislation has changed the very constitution of Ireland. One of the most pro-life and pro-family constitutions ever written by any country is now under attack on these very issues.
You said that you believe that gay people should have the right to marry. That sparks a hugely important question; What is Marriage? What meaning does that word actually hold? Very simply, for the past several thousand years, every culture in the world held the same meaning for the word marriage: the lifelong union between a man and woman in which their commitment would be expressed sexually and in the rearing of children. That IS what marriage is. That is it's meaning. The first country to decide that gay people could be included in that definition was the Netherlands about 15 years ago.
Should two gay people have the right to commit to each other for life? That's a matter of opinion. But that union can and never will be Marriage, because it is simply different. It is a fruitless union incapable of bringing new life into the world.

Moving on to what it all means for Ireland. The legislation now means that, because two men in a "marriage" is totally equal to a man and a woman (which is nonsense, as these two unions are clearly different), those two mean have an equal right to have children. Now that, at first, of course seems totally irrational. Two men cannot have children. Fact. However because of the age we now live in, a process called surrogacy exists. I won't go into details as you're quite young but basically a child is created at the request of this gay couple, which a surrogate mother gives birth to, and must then hand over two these two men. That child has no right to make contact with her biological mother until she turns 18. This is going to create innumerable children who are born with no biological family ties. No father, no mother, no aunts, no uncles, no grandparents. No medical history from her parents, as both her fathers will be listed on the birth certificate as her actual parents (again, irrational).
Again, with adoption, two men will have the exact same right as a man and a woman two adopt a child. This means that it will be against the law for an adoption agency to favour a man and woman as parents over two men, even though common sense and the medical world both clearly state that the best environment for the raising of a healthy happy child is in a male-female marriage that is low in conflict.

All the moral and legal issues, and the likely future consequences for children and Irish society make this far from being a simple matter which only affects two people in a "gay marriage".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Apr 8, 2015
895
18
0
#52
Hi zoii, as an Irishman, maybe I can shed some light on some of the problems with this legislation which was passed here in Ireland.

This is not simply an "equality" or "gay rights" issue. This is an issue that will directly affect the lives of thousands of people, in particular children, here in Ireland over the coming decades.
For starters, this legislation has changed the very constitution of Ireland. One of the most pro-life and pro-family constitutions ever written by any country is now under attack on these very issues.
You said that you believe that gay people should have the right to marry. That sparks a hugely important question; What is Marriage? What meaning does that word actually hold? Very simply, for the past several thousand years, every culture in the world held the same meaning for the word marriage: the lifelong union between a man and woman in which their commitment would be expressed sexually and in the rearing of children. That IS what marriage is. That is it's meaning. The first country to decide that gay people could be included in that definition was the Netherlands about 15 years ago.
Should two gay people have the right to commit to each other for life? That's a matter of opinion. But that union can and never will be Marriage, because it is simply different. It is a fruitless union incapable of bringing new life into the world.

Moving on to what it all means for Ireland. The legislation now means that, because two men in a "marriage" is totally equal to a man and a woman (which is nonsense, as these two unions are clearly different), those two mean have an equal right to have children. Now that, at first, of course seems totally irrational. Two men cannot have children. Fact. However because of the age we now live in, a process called surrogacy exists. I won't go into details as you're quite young but basically a child is created at the request of this gay couple, which a surrogate mother gives birth to, and must then hand over two these two men. That child has no right to make contact with her biological mother until she turns 18. This is going to create innumerable children who are born with no biological family ties. No father, no mother, no aunts, no uncles, no grandparents. No medical history from her parents, as both her fathers will be listed on the birth certificate as her actual parents (again, irrational).
Again, with adoption, two men will have the exact same right as a man and a woman two adopt a child. This means that it will be against the law for an adoption agency to favour a man and woman as parents over two men, even though common sense and the medical world both clearly state that the best environment for the raising of a healthy happy child is in a male-female marriage that is low in conflict.

All the moral and legal issues, and the likely future consequences for children and Irish society make this far from being a simple matter which only affects two people in a "gay marriage".
Ty for taking the time to reply and say what this means for Ireland
 
C

CeileDe

Guest
#53
I'm sure they will and even if I give them the source they will argue it so what is the point?
 
M

MadParrotWoman

Guest
#54
The Pope did not actually say anything. You're pastor was misquoting the Archbishop of Dublin who said, "The Church has to find a new language which will be understood and heard by people," Archbishop of Dublin Diarmuid Martin, a senior Irish cleric, told reporters after mass at the city's St Mary's Pro-Cathedral."We have to see how is it that the Church's teaching on marriage and family is not being received even within its own flock."
He added: "There's a growing gap between Irish young people and the Church and there's a growing gap between the culture of Ireland that's developing and the Church."

So, what the Archbishop is saying is not that they have to listen to the younger generation and accept their folly, but instead, seek how to correctly teach and communicate the truth about marriage and family. I find it rather uplifting that the Church's response in this situation is in essence, "This is our fault. We failed to educate, and the people have gone astray." That is honesty.
Oh really! I do apologise yes my pastor said the pope had responded in the way I previously posted. Hmmmm...
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
#55
Honestly I fully understand the CC perspective on Gays and Im defo not trying to disrespect that. I'm just saying that its just about Gays having the right to marry. That means their partner is legally recognised. Í guess I don't see it as so catastrophic as you guys. I don't see people rushing of to be gay or wotevea and I don't see how it will affect Christian beliefs coz u either believe or not..... so wot am I trying to say - I guess yea disapprove but try not to be like this is the end of the world. Things change - nothing stays the same.... sigh...I know wot Ive said is out there so maybe I'll just say sorry now if I have offended anyone
Hey Zoii.....this is where your lack of knowledge hinders your stance and belief...Romans teaches that when a society reaches the point where it accepts and embraces homosexuality that it is the end result of God giving them over to a re[probate mind void of judgment and the only thing left is the wrath of God...it is sign of impending judgment and God will eventually run out of patience and it will be time for him to judge.....so in reality it is a tragic sing that the end of the age is not that far away....when God gets done there will be few men left and a man (singular) will be worth more that fine gold.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,712
3,651
113
#56
Supreme Court Of The United States

Some Americans don't stop to think about the fact that many common abbreviations here would not necessarily be readily recognized by others.
true, but a simple Google inquiry would have pre-empted a giggle fest. :)
 
S

Shadow-THI

Guest
#58
Crossnote, according to my pastor yesterday the pope spoke of listening to the younger generation and moving with the times in response to the vote on gay marriage.
Does that mean he no longer listens to the LORD, only public opinion????
 

Angela53510

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2011
11,782
2,951
113
#60
I've been reading about this on FB and in the secular media. It is so nice that these gays now feel like real people. Apparently, some did not. So they can really adopt children and raise them to be homosexuals, too, I guess.

I am sorry to hear Ireland has followed Canada down this path. Including change the constitution and the whole meaning of marriage.

It's times like this, I do believe Jesus needs to return sooner, rather than later.

I'm not against gay people, just the fact that they are such a small minority and changing the values of everything that has been know to be right through history in thousands of places and cultures.