Honestly I fully understand the CC perspective on Gays and Im defo not trying to disrespect that. I'm just saying that its just about Gays having the right to marry. That means their partner is legally recognised. Í guess I don't see it as so catastrophic as you guys. I don't see people rushing of to be gay or wotevea and I don't see how it will affect Christian beliefs coz u either believe or not..... so wot am I trying to say - I guess yea disapprove but try not to be like this is the end of the world. Things change - nothing stays the same.... sigh...I know wot Ive said is out there so maybe I'll just say sorry now if I have offended anyone
Hi zoii, as an Irishman, maybe I can shed some light on some of the problems with this legislation which was passed here in Ireland.
This is not simply an "equality" or "gay rights" issue. This is an issue that will directly affect the lives of thousands of people, in particular children, here in Ireland over the coming decades.
For starters, this legislation has changed the very constitution of Ireland. One of the most pro-life and pro-family constitutions ever written by any country is now under attack on these very issues.
You said that you believe that gay people should have the right to marry. That sparks a hugely important question; What is Marriage? What meaning does that word actually hold? Very simply, for the past several thousand years, every culture in the world held the same meaning for the word marriage: the lifelong union between a man and woman in which their commitment would be expressed sexually and in the rearing of children. That IS what marriage is. That is it's meaning. The first country to decide that gay people could be included in that definition was the Netherlands about 15 years ago.
Should two gay people have the right to commit to each other for life? That's a matter of opinion. But that union can and never will be Marriage, because it is simply different. It is a fruitless union incapable of bringing new life into the world.
Moving on to what it all means for Ireland. The legislation now means that, because two men in a "marriage" is totally equal to a man and a woman (which is nonsense, as these two unions are clearly different), those two mean have an equal right to have children. Now that, at first, of course seems totally irrational. Two men cannot have children. Fact. However because of the age we now live in, a process called surrogacy exists. I won't go into details as you're quite young but basically a child is created at the request of this gay couple, which a surrogate mother gives birth to, and must then hand over two these two men. That child has no right to make contact with her biological mother until she turns 18. This is going to create innumerable children who are born with no biological family ties. No father, no mother, no aunts, no uncles, no grandparents. No medical history from her parents, as both her fathers will be listed on the birth certificate as her actual parents (again, irrational).
Again, with adoption, two men will have the exact same right as a man and a woman two adopt a child. This means that it will be against the law for an adoption agency to favour a man and woman as parents over two men, even though common sense and the medical world both clearly state that the best environment for the raising of a healthy happy child is in a male-female marriage that is low in conflict.
All the moral and legal issues, and the likely future consequences for children and Irish society make this far from being a simple matter which only affects two people in a "gay marriage".