-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
well, is the police department suing arby's?
are well-funded, private policeman's agenda groups pouncing on the news and multicasting so much noise about it that regular media outlets think it's a grassroots viral trend and jump on the bandwagon?
because that's how this sort of thing gets plastered on thousands of websites & newsfeeds.
it really has little to do with the potus.
are well-funded, private policeman's agenda groups pouncing on the news and multicasting so much noise about it that regular media outlets think it's a grassroots viral trend and jump on the bandwagon?
because that's how this sort of thing gets plastered on thousands of websites & newsfeeds.
it really has little to do with the potus.
K
But thats the whole point. Hers is a religious matter which is rather different. The point is if she has to give a licence then the officer should have been served.She is being disciplined with fines and losing her job so should the employees that refused service to the cop.Fair is fair.Thats the point.
This whole story is so sad. Why would anyone refuse a police officer service unless the officer had done something illegal and the kid saw it or something like that? The notion of "the officer was unsure of the safety of the food" sounds just like a reason to sue someone to me, but when I think about it maybe it meant he was worried they spat in his food...
K
Actually thank you for pointing that out.I think I actually mixed that comment with another thread I was posting on about cops being shot and how the president says nothing.It shouldnt have been there.Apologise,Ive been sick for over two weeks now with this weird flu.Ive taken so many meds Im still loopy.I was out with my husband trying to get groceries.He asked if we needed something and I said no then when he put it back I "yes,yes we do"! I told him to never mind what I say and that he could have the brain for the day cause mine is fried. So,sorry,that remark shouldnt have been there about the president.
I'll type this slowly so you can read it. He does not have the right to deny service without provocation. So you yourself go into a business and you're denied service for no reason and you're going to just chalk it up as that person has the right to refuse you service and you're going to go on your merry way. You're such a lying hypocrite.
Pointless because you know it won't make the man more sensitive twisty one.
Your hypocrisy is showing. Either the man can refuse service to the cop and the woman can refuse to condone sodomites or elsewise the man has to serve everyone and the woman has to condone sodomites. Pick which side you're on, can't have your cake and eat it too.
Your hypocrisy is showing. Either the man can refuse service to the cop and the woman can refuse to condone sodomites or elsewise the man has to serve everyone and the woman has to condone sodomites. Pick which side you're on, can't have your cake and eat it too.
K
Yes exactly the whole mentality to punish all for what one did is just a lame thing to do !!!
Where do you get this ideal for I see police officers given and accepting free food form gas stations and restaurants all the time around the Kansas city metro area.
Go to the Quick Trip on Lees Summit road and 23rd in Independence, MO around 3 AM and you will see them given free donuts from there.
Same as the punishments go that all should not pay for what one did, also not all officers should reap the benefits of a wrongful act of not being served that was only done to the one.
Only the one wronged should be compensated, and the one who did the wrong needs to pay for it !!!
Where do you get this ideal for I see police officers given and accepting free food form gas stations and restaurants all the time around the Kansas city metro area.
Go to the Quick Trip on Lees Summit road and 23rd in Independence, MO around 3 AM and you will see them given free donuts from there.
Same as the punishments go that all should not pay for what one did, also not all officers should reap the benefits of a wrongful act of not being served that was only done to the one.
Only the one wronged should be compensated, and the one who did the wrong needs to pay for it !!!
If I go into a business and they refuse me service I'll move on and shake the dust off my feet.
So can the man refuse service to the cop and the woman refuse to condone sodomites or does the man have to serve everyone and the woman has to condone sodomites. Pick which side you're on, can't have you're cake and eat it too.
So can the man refuse service to the cop and the woman refuse to condone sodomites or does the man have to serve everyone and the woman has to condone sodomites. Pick which side you're on, can't have you're cake and eat it too.
G
What do you mean he has every right to deny to service to anyone he wants? Can you explain? He has the "right" meaning, he has the freedom to deny it? Well, that's true. I mean, the government is standing behind him with a gun, "Serve or We'll shoot!"
Neither is Arby's.
Maybe the better statement is: "He has the POWER to deny service to anyone he wants."
But does he have the "right"?
No. Arby's is his employer. The man took the job, agreed to serve the general public who visit Arby's.
No. The apostle Paul teaches a principle in Colossians 3. When you serve your earthly master, do so as unto the Lord.
Yes. The man has the "right" to deny service. According to himself and his own standard, yes. He has the right. But Arby's has the POWER/AUTHORITY and the right to run him through the beef shredder, that is, put their boot up his you know what and out the door, that is "You're Fired. And you're lucky we're doing the firing, and not a police officer who's gone postal."
Now go to Arby's. Order a Roast Beef. And don't complain about being short changed, being served a cold RB sandwich, a dirty table, and all that and more. They have a right!
Neither is Arby's.
Maybe the better statement is: "He has the POWER to deny service to anyone he wants."
But does he have the "right"?
No. Arby's is his employer. The man took the job, agreed to serve the general public who visit Arby's.
No. The apostle Paul teaches a principle in Colossians 3. When you serve your earthly master, do so as unto the Lord.
Yes. The man has the "right" to deny service. According to himself and his own standard, yes. He has the right. But Arby's has the POWER/AUTHORITY and the right to run him through the beef shredder, that is, put their boot up his you know what and out the door, that is "You're Fired. And you're lucky we're doing the firing, and not a police officer who's gone postal."
Now go to Arby's. Order a Roast Beef. And don't complain about being short changed, being served a cold RB sandwich, a dirty table, and all that and more. They have a right!