Is Atheism a Religion?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Is Atheism a Religion?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 25 59.5%
  • No.

    Votes: 17 40.5%

  • Total voters
    42

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
56,019
26,143
113

a lot of Christians i think have this idea that most or all scientists are militant atheists -- i'm not sure where that comes from exactly, or how it keeps spreading -- but it's not true. Newton, Heisenberg, Maxwell, and a lot of other big names were specifically Christian, and a lot of others were at least agnostic. Edison was a pantheist. i think the issue is that there are a handful of very vocal and very, let's say, "enthusiastic" atheists with a lot of "cred" in the scientific community, and there's this culture of not coming out with ideas or views until you can support them fully, because scientists as a whole are pretty much trained to tear apart ideas and hypothesis. it's how they look for truth.

and here's me - with degrees in math & physics, and working on a phd now - and i'm no atheist!

the idea that science itself is nearly or entirely dominated by atheism just doesn't jive with any of my academic or professional experience. what's true though about it is that science - especially published science - is concerned with verifiable, repeatable facts and experimentation. theology doesn't really fit in that. but just because you don't see bible discussion in Nature magazine doesn't mean that a good percentage of contributors aren't Christian, or at the least, agnostic. people who study things like cosmology and microbiology have a real front-row seat to the inexplicable wonder of creation - and they don't come away from it unaffected. anyone who tells you that "science explains everything" doesn't know enough science.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_Nobel_laureates

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christians_in_science_and_technology

I spoke with one atheist for a time whose stance was that Christians were all uninformed and unreasonable. My conclusion after conversing extensively with him concerning his opinion in this regard? He was uninformed and unreasonable.
LOL :)
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
It suggests rote ritual rather than what Christianity is, a relationship with God.
imo, it's this association that leads most atheists to not want to have 'religious' or 'religion' used for them... remove rituals (especially ancient ones) and the supernatural from 'religion' and imo most people will agree that many atheists are religious...
 
J

JessP

Guest
Originally Posted by JessP

I also what to say the above points about bad experiences is not the case for me I can't say I have had any bad experiences like that....yet ;)



But you have testified of influence which held a negative connotation, yes?
I have influences of both positive and negative, and the same for Atheists.
But there are a few stereotypes about the USA and part of that are a particular type of Christian view. Although I am indeed aware that these are stereotypes I am sure that they have influenced my opinion ( about the USA or Christians NOT on the validity of Gods existence or non existence)


Do you believe in ghosts, Jess?
No I don't , I do know some people who are not religious who do, I can't explain that though as I myself cannot understand how you could not believe in God but then believe in ghosts makes no sense to me. But they believe it, usually due to an experience.

If you could add to it I would be appreciative.
Right going to open up a can of worms now! But in the name of honesty and the fact that I am loving this conversation here we go.

I do believe in some Buddhist principals, I am going to STRESS none of the supernatural ones, so no reincarnation etc. Is that what you meant by different beliefs? - again I don't know if this is the right thread to bring this up. :rolleyes: Sorry

I have to say that I view us as animals

So what do you base that on? Where did you learn this?
So hard to pin down one origin for a belief , I appreciate you demanding this of me as I might not have wondered this myself.
I think the observed world. Biologically speaking we have the same needs as animals. I fear however we might start getting into another terminology discussion about the definition of animal if I am not careful!

Originally Posted by JessP

and I also don't believe in Intelligent design.
But are you able to state dogmatically that it is an impossibility?
No I can't assert that it is an impossibility. I don't believe it to be true but I don't deny it is a possibility ( I just don't think a very large possibility)
Do you have a similar view to mine on opposing theories? Do you categorically view them as impossible ?

You did excellent, Jess, I appreciate your efforts.
You are very kind and appreciate your time and consideration, and your acceptance of my obvious inexperience with using a forum!
 
J

JessP

Guest
Whew! Christianity gets a bad rap from people claiming to be Christians. There is a saying, "The number one cause of Atheism in the world is...Christians." I can believe that, especially after talking to atheists who have rejected God primarily due to their interaction with Christians, usually their parents or some authority figure in their lives.
I think Atheists get a bad rep too. For me its not about the people who follow a belief. put simply I just want to believe true things. For example say I did come to find out that I was mistake and God did exists , my belief would change, I could not un-know something, yet there is no guarantee I would become Christian or any other religion for that matter.

( that scenario is unlikely however as if Christian God was real I think it would be foolish not to become Christian, personally speaking)

Let me ask you this: have you ever had a fear of Hell? Ever given any real consideration? It is a concept most cultures have to some extent, and few of us grow up never being introduced to it. For me, in my youth, I believed there was a Hell, but never considered myself a candidate, because I thought of myself as a pretty good person.
I have never had fear of Hell. I have given the concept of Hell consideration, how would it work etc, what is torment could it really last for ever, all of those types of questions.
I have never considered myself a candidate because I don't believe it is real. If it is real then by God's standards I am a candidate because I don't believe in him. I cannot however force myself to believe in god as I fear the punishment of not believing. I feel that if God were real that such disingenuous motives for my believe in God would be enough to have me sent there anyway!

I do believe that people are fundamentally good, and I think we do bad things, but we are all just looking to be happy and sometimes we get broken and find that hard and heart ourselves and others in the process. But that's okay, its okay to mess up and we have to be willing to forgive ourselves and others. .... I think the question of morality is going to come up soon?

Right I'm going to reply to your Continued section in my own continued section.....:cool:
 
J

JessP

Guest
Right had a read and think that my last post was enough to get on with but I thought I would link this to you as you might get a laugh from it.

I would also like your opinion.:D

Atheist Church - This is about an hour and a bit from where I live, No i have not been and No I don't think I ever would.
Atheists set up Brighton and Hove's first godless church in Waterloo Street (From The Argus)

Christian Atheists

BBC - Religion - Atheism: Types - Christian Atheism

Now everything really is on it's head.
 
J

JessP

Guest
I think I agree with this, it is the supernatural and the ritual element that I always comes to my mind when I think of religion.
 
Feb 24, 2015
13,204
168
0
Christian Atheists
Funnily there are people I know who are very close to this position, they are moralists and like the social aspect of christianity, the church and symbols but do not believe it is more than emotional symbolism and God is not actually there.

If you want honesty about emotional emptiness and being alone with a cynical hope when you die, this is their faith.

But Jesus is so much more, but if love has never broken free in your heart and all the things you show are fake, and inside you are just a mess, nothing really makes any sense, and the words are empty.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
56,019
26,143
113
I think I agree with this, it is the supernatural and the ritual element that I always comes to my mind when I think of religion.
Interestingly enough, some Christians have trouble accepting the existence of the supernatural. Beyond acknowledging God as being a supernatural Being, of course ;)
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
56,019
26,143
113
The supernatural is something that cannot quite be pinned down, so some atheists will not accept it because it cannot be experimented with to give the same results every time, yet they will deny they are making demands of God to perform a certain way, to fit their criterion. Some will not even accept the word spiritual. I talked to one atheist for a while who would refer to "spiritual" as a soggy cabbage of a word. :)
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
56,019
26,143
113
One of the gnostics I was in contact with talked about how the pineal gland was being calcified by too much fluoride in the drinking water, which he associated with a loss of people's sensitivity to the spiritual realm in this "modern" age. Even if there is some truth in that, God is still capable of revealing Himself to whomever He chooses. Jess, you speak of being able to change your beliefs easily as if being given evidence of God is all it would take. It is no small thing to have the Creator of the universe reveal Himself to you when you are in denial, defiance, rebellion, and disobedience to Him. You might think you were having a hallucination to see or hear from God, maybe even desperately try to rationalize the experience away. And yet it is a personal relationship He desires with you. :)
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
I have influences of both positive and negative, and the same for Atheists.
But there are a few stereotypes about the USA and part of that are a particular type of Christian view. Although I am indeed aware that these are stereotypes I am sure that they have influenced my opinion ( about the USA or Christians NOT on the validity of Gods existence or non existence)
I am out of town for a few days so using my tablet. I apologize for any errors that may occur.

I would definitely like to know what it is you've heard about American Christians. We have so many kinds its fascinating to think there is a singular stereotype.


No I don't , I do know some people who are not religious who do, I can't explain that though as I myself cannot understand how you could not believe in God but then believe in ghosts makes no sense to me. But they believe it, usually due to an experience.

Well, do you feel that you are simply an organic robot, so to speak? Your conscious being, that is just a product of natural processes? When you interact with loved ones, do you feel the same about them as you/we would feel about a beloved pet? Knowing that individual consciousness is basically an illusion?

And I hope that doesn't come across as rude. It's not meant to be. It's just intended to pick your brain, lol.

Basically, if we are just animals, howbeit advanced animals, and when we die we wink out of existence, is this something that would impact how some people live? Would this significantly change how we interact?

As for me, I believe in ghosts in the sense that I believe men have spirits, but I don't believe those Spirit's have liberty to interact with this world after they die. We have some accounts of a few Just being seen, but many accounts of ghosts are negative and it is highly unlikely the unjust get to come back to accpo plosh mischief and instill fear. More likely what many who report such things are dealing with are demons.

Right going to open up a can of worms now! But in the name of honesty and the fact that I am loving this conversation here we go.

I do believe in some Buddhist principals, I am going to STRESS none of the supernatural ones, so no reincarnation etc. Is that what you meant by different beliefs? - again I don't know if this is the right thread to bring this up. :rolleyes: Sorry

You can discuss whatever you like, no real restrictions, just conversation with a central theme of religion and atheism.

And basically we're just considering the opposing viewpoints. ID versus chance. Spiritual versus non spiritual/natural, et cetera.

Perhaps you could expand on the Buddhist principles you embrace?


So hard to pin down one origin for a belief , I appreciate you demanding this of me as I might not have wondered this myself.
I think the observed world. Biologically speaking we have the same needs as animals. I fear however we might start getting into another terminology discussion about the definition of animal if I am not careful!

And that's okay. One might not view man being an animal the same way another would.

Consider children: its normal for a cat to sometimes eat the dead of a litter, is there any reason why women shouldn't? If we are all just animals, would we be wrong to impose a view that it would be natural for women to do the same?

I guess the question is, do you see a distinction between men and other animals, and if so, what? Why would we take issue with people for doing what is natural, which opens the door too a great many scenarios.

And I apologize again, I have been sick and not feeling well. Worked til 8:30 last night then made a 4 1\2 hour drive so my brain is t fully functional today, lol.



No I can't assert that it is an impossibility. I don't believe it to be true but I don't deny it is a possibility ( I just don't think a very large possibility)
Do you have a similar view to mine on opposing theories? Do you categorically view them as impossible ?

Some things, yes. It is scientifically impossible for something to come from nothing. So we eoitjher view am eternal universe with no beginning or end or we have to go outside the universe for that beginning. Which is speculated in areas such as quantum physics, which Bible believers have acknowledged for moillennoa...that's there is that which we cannot at this point identify.

The spiritual realm is another dimension, so to speak, outside of our own realm. We could never reach it in moillioms of years but be there in the twinkling of an eye when our spirits are released though death.



You are very kind and appreciate your time and consideration, and your acceptance of my obvious inexperience with using a forum!
If you are inexperienced then your doing great, lol.

Excellent job quoting.


God bless.
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
I think Atheists get a bad rep too. For me its not about the people who follow a belief. put simply I just want to believe true things. For example say I did come to find out that I was mistake and God did exists , my belief would change, I could not un-know something, yet there is no guarantee I would become Christian or any other religion for that matter.

It is possible to unknow something, lol. For example I had to "unknow" that all athreists are immoral morons. That was something I learned from other people rather than actually speaking with atheists. I had to unknow the belief that I was a "good" person. I shudder at who I used to be and still see miuch work to be done in my life.

What we need to examine, all of us, is the basis of that which we think we know.



( that scenario is unlikely however as if Christian God was real I think it would be foolish not to become Christian, personally speaking)
Well, just so you know my own perspective, I see that Scripture teaches that no one will be converted apart from the Word of God. I usually challenge atheists to spend time in Scripture and test that beleif. Many will say they grew up in çhurch so they already know that isn't true, but, there is a difference between an adult seeking truth and a child that is forced to go to church.

And just as important is the fact that many "churches" can be questioned in regards to their church's teaching and what the Bible itself actually teaches.

And at this point, if you are interested, I would ask what exactly do you know about the God of the Bible? Isn't it reasonable, Jess, that if you "do not believe in God," there be a reasonable basis for that rejection?

So I would ask what is the basis for rejecting God. What knowledge of the God of the Bible do you have. Basing it on Christians would not be reasonable, for two reasons. First, I cant see how anyone could find fault with a bibilcal Christian, which demands we first know what a Biblical Christian is, and secondly we would have to look at what kind of Christian it is that is rejected.

Again, what do you know of the Good of the Bible?


I have never had fear of Hell. I have given the concept of Hell consideration, how would it work etc, what is torment could it really last for ever, all of those types of questions.
I have never considered myself a candidate because I don't believe it is real.
So lets get hypothetical, lol. If it were real, would you discount yourself as a candidate because you felt you were a good person? This is within a framework of you believing it was real.

Secondly, could you expand on what you think Scripture teaches concerning Hell? There are some misconceptions even among believer.


If it is real then by God's standards I am a candidate because I don't believe in him.
That is true, though there is a little more to it than just that. I see Scripture as teaching that God reveals Himself to all men/women, and will judge them based on their response to that revelation. But, its not a matter that we are judged one way or the other based on our good/bad works, its a matter that we are born separated from God to begin with. In other words, we are born already bound for eternal judgment, and because God is not willing that any should perish, He has made provision for men, and that provision is the revelation He provides.

So I would suggest that likely you have a sense of right and wrong based in that which God has revealed to your heart.


I cannot however force myself to believe in god as I fear the punishment of not believing. I feel that if God were real that such disingenuous motives for my believe in God would be enough to have me sent there anyway!

Fear of eternal punishment is not the only motive, and I take the position that one must be brought to an understanding of eternal punish!ment, in reality,by God Himself. It's not something achieved by intellectual examination of data. It's like crying at a sad movie, you don't plan it...it just happens as a result of understanding the elements involved.


I do believe that people are fundamentally good, and I think we do bad things, but we are all just looking to be happy and sometimes we get broken and find that hard and heart ourselves and others in the process. But that's okay, its okay to mess up and we have to be willing to forgive ourselves and others. ....

I would agree for the most part, but forgiveness in relationship with God is another matter. As I have said, !ost people feel they are we good, and the wrongdoing they commit is never seen as extreme as the wrongdoings of others, lol.

We all-star in our own little productions and we always cast ourselves in the role of hero.

I think the question of morality is going to come up soon?

That comes up oin most discussions, lol.

Right I'm going to reply to your Continued section in my own continued section.....

Look forward to it.

God bless
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
Well, do you feel that you are simply an organic robot, so to speak?
A while back I asked Percepi (an atheist who was / is on CC ) essentially this same question... if our decisions are the result of determinism or randomness, why call them morally good or evil? I don't think he ever responded...
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
A while back I asked Percepi (an atheist who was / is on CC ) essentially this same question... if our decisions are the result of determinism or randomness, why call them morally good or evil? I don't think he ever responded...
I don't think randomness could be charged necessarily for those who view the functions of the Body which are well beyond the understanding of man as complex and that which çreates what we view as man's conscience or conscious being.

The question remains, which is really demanded if a spiritual aspect of man's existence is denied.

God bless.
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
I don't think randomness could be charged necessarily for those who view the functions of the Body which are well beyond the understanding of man as complex and that which çreates what we view as man's conscience or conscious being.

The question remains, which is really demanded if a spiritual aspect of man's existence is denied.

God bless.
the reason I included randomness was that the current thinking (imo) in physics is that really tiny particles behave randomly... and clearly, larger objects are deterministic...

but if we allow only determinism for physical stuff (excluding the soul/spirit as I assume an atheist would)
that makes a stronger case, imo, that we aren't responsible for our thoughts, decisions, actions...
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
but if we allow only determinism for physical stuff (excluding the soul/spirit as I assume an atheist would)
that makes a stronger case, imo, that we aren't responsible for our thoughts, decisions, actions...

And that is the obvious conclusion that must be drawn if the conscience of man is simply the result of bodily function. But should we be surprised that those who view man as simply a higher form of animal should conclude thus?

This is why morality is often a hot topic of debate between Atheists and those of faith. This is how something can be right for one and not necessarily right for someone else.

But we can say without controversy that there are moral absolutes, and the primary problem Atheists are going to have with that is that this suggests a source for those absolutes. If the universe and everything in it is simply the result of chance, then it is reasonable that the actions of men are morally defined individually, and that what one might see as wrong-doing might be perfectly acceptable to another, and both be right, or, at least, the one decrying the actions of another would be viewed as over-reaching their right to impose their morality on another.


God bless.
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
12,956
8,671
113
I think this woman definively made the case, at least legally, that Atheism is indeed a Religion:

Woman fights for the right to wear a colander on her head in her drivers license photo, and wins































Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles has granted one woman the right to wear a colander on her head for her drivers license photo.

SEE ALSO: Daycare workers reportedly fired after refusing to accept transgender child

Lindsay Miller practices at the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, which, according to their website, is a secular religion that believes the existence of a "spaghetti monster" to be just as possible as the existence of God. Those who practice the religion are known as Pastafarians, but they want to assure you, the religion is 100% real.

[TABLE="class: img-caption"]
[TR]
[TD]
Lindsay Miler - Boston (Darrick Fauvel via AP)
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Lindsay Miler - Boston (Darrick Fauvel via AP)
Lindsay Miler - Boston (Darrick Fauvel via AP)
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

"Some claim that the church is purely a thought experiment or satire... These people are mistaken -- The Church of FSM is legit, and backed by hard science. Anything that comes across as humor or satire is purely coincidental." Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster





When the RMV initially denied Miller's request to take her drivers license photo with a colander on her head, she enlisted the help of the American Humanist Association's Appignani Humanist Legal Center's attorneys to file an appeal and was scheduled to attend an appeal in October about the matter.




However, luckily for Miller, the appeal was postponed and the RMV has decided to let her wear the spaghetti strainer in her photo.

Miller told MyFOXBoston that she is very happy with the RMV's decision and hopes that her fight for justice encourages other Pastafarians to do the same.

"While I don't think the government can involve itself in matters of religion, I do hope this decision encourages my fellow Pastafarian Atheists to come out and express themselves as I have."



I pray, in Jesus name, that these people would see and accept the truth of the Gospel.
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
And that is the obvious conclusion that must be drawn if the conscience of man is simply the result of bodily function.
Yep!

Sadly, though, I'm not seeing our friend JessP around... I really hope she comes back.
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
I think this woman definively made the case, at least legally, that Atheism is indeed a Religion:

Woman fights for the right to wear a colander on her head in her drivers license photo, and wins































Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles has granted one woman the right to wear a colander on her head for her drivers license photo.

SEE ALSO: Daycare workers reportedly fired after refusing to accept transgender child

Lindsay Miller practices at the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, which, according to their website, is a secular religion that believes the existence of a "spaghetti monster" to be just as possible as the existence of God. Those who practice the religion are known as Pastafarians, but they want to assure you, the religion is 100% real.

[TABLE="class: img-caption"]
[TR]
[TD]
Lindsay Miler - Boston (Darrick Fauvel via AP)[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Lindsay Miler - Boston (Darrick Fauvel via AP)
Lindsay Miler - Boston (Darrick Fauvel via AP)[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

"Some claim that the church is purely a thought experiment or satire... These people are mistaken -- The Church of FSM is legit, and backed by hard science. Anything that comes across as humor or satire is purely coincidental." Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster





When the RMV initially denied Miller's request to take her drivers license photo with a colander on her head, she enlisted the help of the American Humanist Association's Appignani Humanist Legal Center's attorneys to file an appeal and was scheduled to attend an appeal in October about the matter.




However, luckily for Miller, the appeal was postponed and the RMV has decided to let her wear the spaghetti strainer in her photo.

Miller told MyFOXBoston that she is very happy with the RMV's decision and hopes that her fight for justice encourages other Pastafarians to do the same.

"While I don't think the government can involve itself in matters of religion, I do hope this decision encourages my fellow Pastafarian Atheists to come out and express themselves as I have."



I pray, in Jesus name, that these people would see and accept the truth of the Gospel.
Excellent post.

There is no question the woman is religious, lol, but, the real test of how religious she is will be seen in how often she wears her hat when she is actually driving.

If I am not mistaken, people who have eye issues must wear their glasses when driving, so, I wonder how many would pose with a colander on their head if they were forced to wear it while driving...

I pray, in Jesus name, that these people would see and accept the truth of the Gospel.

And our part is simply conveying the Word of God and examining the world views that oppose it. We can't save anyone, but, we can do our part to bring some simple truths to the attention of people who blindly engage in religious works. Colander girl thinks she is fighting for justice, but I would bet money that she will not wear her religious hat unless there is some notoriety to be gained, which is the epitome of...

...religious effort.


God bless.
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
Yep!

Sadly, though, I'm not seeing our friend JessP around... I really hope she comes back.
As do I, and if she does, she receives the Love of Christ from the members here.

Okay Dan, taking my leave of the forum today, so wanted to say good-bye and wish you the best in your efforts. May God richly bless you in your ministry and equip you for the work ahead of you.


God bless.