Is Atheism a Religion?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Is Atheism a Religion?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 25 59.5%
  • No.

    Votes: 17 40.5%

  • Total voters
    42
J

JessP

Guest
Aha, an undercover evangelist, eh?

Better to keep it out in the open. I mean, there is nothing you are afraid to say you believe out in public, is there?


God bless.
Hahaha not at all! :D I honestly just don't want to be one of those Atheists that goes to a Christian forum and hijacks the website to talk about myself. I really am here to learn from people with different views to my own.

I did some more research today about the idea of Atheism as a religion and I do think it comes down to language and definition.

I did not before but I think that yes depending on how you are defining Atheism and Religion it could be considered a Religion. I suppose it also surprises me as I would never have considered myself religious.

As you and a couple of others have asked me and do not mind me talk about it on here I will explain why I believe.

I would say I have a lack of belief in God/Gods, however I am willing to be proven wrong. I don't claim to know this as a fact.

I do believe that evolution is true based on what I know and understand now. However I don't desire it to be true or hope it is If something more compelling is presented or if it is proven wrong I will change my mind. I don't have an emotional investment in that belief. The same goes for the Big Bang and other science based questions.

If all the above points turn out not to be true I wont necessarily believe in God then as there are many possibilities. God could be one but I personally have not been convinced that is the case.

I also think culturally I have grown up with very little exposure to religion. Religion is something personal and does not have the same level of controversy as perhaps it does in other countries, I can only speak from what I know from the media and family that live abroad. That may also lead to my Atheistic approach to life.

So consider my example of the Vegan. Religious? Or no?
I think that being Vegan no in and of itself, being Vegan as a result of religion then it would be the religion that is religious and being a Vegan is as a result of that.

(which often is associated with why an atheist is an atheist in the first place, i.e., a bad experience with religion or religious people)
Could you clarify this for me? I only have a desire not be recognised as not religious in so much as I don't view myself as religious. If however through language a consequences were agreed by all/ the majority including Atheists that we were a religion i don't think I would have a problem with that. Although the idea of being religious Atheist is a funny concept to me.

I also what to say the above points about bad experiences is not the case for me I can't say I have had any bad experiences like that....yet ;)

Originally Posted by JessP

Many Atheist disagree about the extent to which someone can be an Atheist.
How do you know this?
Because when I talk to my friends some of them make Claims that God Cannot exists and although I Identify as an atheist they call me agnostic. Some of them say you can't be an Atheist if you believe in ghosts. The list goes on....

We will have to wait until you explain exactly what you believe before we can compare common beliefs you hold with other atheists. but, I am going to guess you embrace evolution, for one. If you do not, I would be glad to hear what other option there is for the atheist.

Another would be in regards to the universe. There is Intelligent Design and Chance. Where do you stand on that?
I have to say that I view us as animals and I also don't believe in Intelligent design.

Okay P1lgr1m I am going to get on to your next post and start answering those questions now! - I'm getting there
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
How about if someone refuses to eat chocolate because they don't eat anything that has animal products in it?
say, P1LGR1M, what's your comment on this?

The majority of Christians worldwide use icons in their worship... you are a Christian, so you must use icons...

Or, a similar issue... are you in the same religion as Catholics?
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
This might make you laugh but I know of an Atheist that believe life was put here by an Alien race! - I definitely only share the lack of belief in God with that guy!
Actually, I've heard of that... and some prominent scientists like that idea... (unfortunetly, I don't have any references for that.)
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
You could say the universe was eternal, but again...where did it come from?
I think Hinduism has an interesting approach to this... there is only one substance (monism, imo...compare to dualism, say, spirit and physical)

With monism, God is the universe, and the universe is God... so, if one can posit the existence of an eternal God, one can also posit an eternal universe...
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,691
13,135
113
Actually, I've heard of that... and some prominent scientists like that idea... (unfortunetly, I don't have any references for that.)
i had a biophysics class about 15 years ago, and back then panspermia (the idea that life didn't originate on earth, but somewhere else in the universe, and hitched a ride here somehow - the 'usual suspect' is an icy comet) was really starting to become popular among scientists.
what i've been taught about why this is attractive is that the more we learn about the intricacies of biology, and about early conditions on earth, the less plausible it appears that life could have ever arisen by chance under any reasonable circumstance here. the most successful attempts at re-creating this sort of thing in a lab have been unabashedly and totally rigged for success, and very basic - just trying to get amino acids to form randomly in a primordial soup with some heat or lightning or other energy source - and have all failed miserably. we get only 1 or two out of the twenty odd amino acids necessary for all life as we know it. and those are in totally the wrong concentrations, and are spiraled in the wrong direction (right helix instead of left) so they couldn't be used by living creatures, and they are the simplest ones to boot. and this is with rigged experiments that don't even resemble our best guesses at actual conditions or concentrations of chemicals!

basically, people who just refuse to accept any sort of divine intervention throw their hands up and say "well the universe is infinite, so there must be some planet somewhere where circumstances are perfect for life to arise out of nothing" when it becomes apparent that it just couldn't have happened on earth. so they push the impossibility away long, long ago to a galaxy far, far away and pretend magical unknown circumstances existed (though there is 0 evidence for it) in some unknown magical planet somewhere. because the existing evidence refutes their pre-suppositions.
there's that atheist "faith" in action again :rolleyes:

that's how i understand it. my biophysics professor used to be an atheist until he got more education and realized this kind of implausibility. when i took his class, he was agnostic -- he wasn't convinced of any particular "god" but he was convinced the universe needed to have one. he gave us (in a totally secular setting) other arguments supporting creation - mostly about the enormous improbabilities involved.

if you're interested, "panspermia" is the search term you want to use. you'll probably have to dig pretty well to find meaningful websites, but fanciful imagination i bet is easy to find on the subject :)
 
Last edited:
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
Originally Posted by P1LGR1M

Aha, an undercover evangelist, eh?

Better to keep it out in the open. I mean, there is nothing you are afraid to say you believe out in public, is there?


God bless.
Hahaha not at all! :D
Whew! You have a sense of humor!

Outstanding!

It was a joke, glad you recognized it, lol.


I honestly just don't want to be one of those Atheists that goes to a Christian forum and hijacks the website to talk about myself. I really am here to learn from people with different views to my own.
So you recognize there are Atheists that go to Christian Forums for the express purpose of presenting their beliefs.

Could I suggest to you that this is something that atheists do, and this presents a parallel to the evangelists of other beliefs that do the same. I don't see that everyone goes to speak about themselves, but to speak about the differences in beliefs we have. Christian Forums get visits from Atheists, Muslims, and even groups who consider themselves Christian, and they come for the specific purpose of making proselytes to their own faith.

If you go through the threads here, you will find a multitude of types of Christians, Conservative, Fundamentalists, Charismatics, Reformed, Catholic, and a few that we simply cannot associate with any group because their doctrine is so far displaced from an Orthodox view (which is itself subject to debate) that there is no group which would really support the individual doctrines they teach (or I should say try to).

But I commend you on wanting to learn from others. You might be surprised but I owe a debt of gratitude to atheists for a number of reasons. One would be that I have learned that the caricature of atheists that I had, which was instilled by preaching from pulpits I say under, was an erroneous and unjust attitude to have. Another would be that their faith in their beliefs has challenged me to actually challenge my own understanding about certain issues. Another would be that I have learned the importance of understanding what and why my antagonist believes before assuming I understand them.

We can all benefit from discussion with antagonists, and it does not mean we have to violate as simple command of God, that being...love they neighbor as thyself.

I am not given a mandate to give my "neighbors" a test to see if they qualify for the love of God as expressed through my person, just a simple command that all I come into contact with I am commanded to have love for. That doesn't mean that love is always expressed in gushy platitudes, lol, because we do not show love when we refrain from being honest with people.

I see no purer form of hatred than disinterest in the fate of others.


I did some more research today about the idea of Atheism as a religion and I do think it comes down to language and definition.
In one sense, yes, because many times people try to classify others based on limited knowledge. We can see that in the threads designed to bash a certain group.

So by definition we can categorize, but, with that definition we also have practical matters to consider. The easiest way to explain it is in saying that someone professing to be a Christian doesn't mean that they are. Association is not the only matter to consider, we also look at their lives and determine what that life represents. A man might join the Marines and wash out of boot camp. Is he a Marine? The American Soldier that threw a grenade into his barracks...was he an American Soldier?


I did not before but I think that yes depending on how you are defining Atheism and Religion it could be considered a Religion. I suppose it also surprises me as I would never have considered myself religious.
And this is likely due to the fact that most atheists define atheism simply as a "lack of belief in God or gods," but that isn't all that has to be taken into consideration. The Atheist you referred to earlier who goes to forums with the intent of "hi-jacking" the forum is a good example of a "religious atheist."

How "religious" you are doesn't change the fact that Atheism is for some atheists...their religion. And how religious of an atheist they are is determined, surprise surprise...in their works.

And we can say that we see faith in the things which serve as a basis for their beliefs. For example, one might believe that Evolution is a fact based on the "science" presented to support it, but what is always lacking is an examination of not only the science's validity, but science which points us to believe that evolution is not only in error, but cannot be supported by the fact that man is steadily devolving, rather than evolving.

And that is the picture of man as presented in God's Word.


As you and a couple of others have asked me and do not mind me talk about it on here I will explain why I believe.

I would say I have a lack of belief in God/Gods, however I am willing to be proven wrong. I don't claim to know this as a fact.
O ye of little faith...

;)

Again I commend you for that. All I can suggest is that you consider whether you have, like many who are religious, indoctrinated yourself by looking only at those things which agree with what you want to believe. This is a typical problem for most who are religious, and we can see this on every forum.

Usually those who are reformed, for example, appeal to reformed resources. Catholics appeal to Catholic resources. Atheists appeal to atheist resources.

But when we approach it with an honest desire to know truth, I think we can find that truth.


I do believe that evolution is true based on what I know and understand now.
And the question is...what resources have you gone to that have led you to believe it to be true? Was your education biased towards Evolution? The television shows you watched?

What was the motivation to go to resources that promote Evolution and have you ever consulted resources that deny Evolution and promote Creationism?


However I don't desire it to be true or hope it is If something more compelling is presented or if it is proven wrong I will change my mind.
Then at this time I would consider you to be very nominal in your convictions. You're not alone in that, many, if not most...are.

The question is, are you willing to challenge the beliefs you currently hold to the point where you look at both sides, that you can better determine and draw conclusions that are more balanced?


I don't have an emotional investment in that belief.
Are you sure about that? lol

Seriously, consider the fact that previously you had not considered a "religious" connotation to Atheism. Some people vote Republican, for example, because Republicans tend to be pro-life. Doesn't mean they are on-board with the Republican Party. Doesn't mean they agree with every Republican.

But the emotion arises when the counter Party or parties come up. Because of a rejection of abortion, they despise all Democrats.

Is such a person a Republican, and does that mean there are no Democrats that are Pro-Life?


The same goes for the Big Bang and other science based questions.
Where is the Science?

There is no real science that can validate the Big Bang.

We just don't have the necessary data to draw that conclusion, but, you say it is "Science."

And I agree theory is in fact scientific, but, that is a far cry from a dogmatic conclusion on the matter.



If all the above points turn out not to be true I wont necessarily believe in God then as there are many possibilities. God could be one but I personally have not been convinced that is the case.
So what are the "many possibilities?"


I also think culturally I have grown up with very little exposure to religion.
Your testimony seems to contradict that a little.


Religion is something personal and does not have the same level of controversy as perhaps it does in other countries,
I think I can dismantle that theory simply by suggesting you check into the threads, lol.

As far as it being personal, that is not really the case with a religious mindset. Usually religion is something that consists of like-minded "believers," if you will, who share in doctrine. Went round and round with one atheist on his assertion "There is no such thing as Atheist Doctrine," and he took great offense at me capitalizing those two words together. The truth is...doctrine simply means teaching, and there are many atheist teachings we could examine.

We have touched on a few of those, but the primary Atheist Doctrine is the assertion "There is no God or gods." The many Atheist Doctrines associated with Atheism can be traced back to proving that primary doctrinal position. And many atheists will appeal to the available resources geared for the express intent of strengthening faith in that primary doctrine.

Atheism is not a neutral position. It is a pro-active assertion which logically demands a basis for that belief, or the atheist becomes that which he charges the "religious" with, someone who blindly accepts something that has no proof.

Can you see the problem there?


I can only speak from what I know from the media and family that live abroad. That may also lead to my Atheistic approach to life.
Two things, first, we see an influence in your life which is external, which you credit as contributing to your current beliefs.

Secondly, you admit an "atheistic approach to life," which affirms the definition given in the first few posts, taken from Wikipedia...


From Wikipedia:
A religion is an organized collection of beliefs, cultural systems, and world views that relate humanity to an order of existence.[SUP][note 1][/SUP] Many religions have narratives, symbols, and sacred histories that aim to explain the meaning of life, the origin of life, or the Universe. From their beliefs about the cosmos and human nature, people may derive morality, ethics, religious laws, or a preferred lifestyle.


And I just mention this to see if you can see a relation between your statement and the definition of religion given here.


So consider my example of the Vegan. Religious? Or no?
I think that being Vegan no in and of itself, being Vegan as a result of religion then it would be the religion that is religious and being a Vegan is as a result of that.
Is there a spiritual connotation given to the life of animals, one which presents a view of sanctity of life?


(which often is associated with why an atheist is an atheist in the first place, i.e., a bad experience with religion or religious people)


Could you clarify this for me?
Basically many atheists (and I know this from speaking with a great many of them) absolutely hate religion because they view it as harmful, and this is usually a matter of experiential knowledge.

They have either been harmed by someone professing a religion or they have been indoctrinated by someone who has declared religion harmful and presented "historical accounts" to support their teaching.

The Catholic Church seems to take the largest brunt, primarily because they are viewed in large part as a representative group of Christianity which has along history of errors to draw from.

When's the last time you saw history or the media highlight something good that has been accomplished by Catholics or other Christians?



I only have a desire not be recognised as not religious in so much as I don't view myself as religious.
And if someone else views you as religious?

Can you tell me that this thread did not attract your attention and that your initial reaction wasn't "That's ridiculous!"

And I am trying to be as sensitive as I can be, Jess, this is just a topic which is in itself sensitive.

IS there really a problem with being viewed as religious? James states pure and undefiled religion is to visit the fatherless and widows. Would you take offense if someone viewed your "religion" (your works) in a positive light and meant it as a compliment?

So where does that negative connotation come from. If you can answer that, I think you will begin to see a little bit of "religion" in your beliefs, lol.



If however through language a consequences were agreed by all/ the majority including Atheists that we were a religion i don't think I would have a problem with that.
Maybe not.

But some atheists will fight that tooth and nail. And again, I know this from past experience with atheists.


Although the idea of being religious Atheist is a funny concept to me.
It is, lol. The irony is overwhelming.


I also what to say the above points about bad experiences is not the case for me I can't say I have had any bad experiences like that....yet ;)
But you have testified of influence which held a negative connotation, yes?


Originally Posted by JessP

Many Atheist disagree about the extent to which someone can be an Atheist.
How do you know this?

Because when I talk to my friends some of them make Claims that God Cannot exists and although I Identify as an atheist they call me agnostic.

So you challenge their assertion that "God does not exist" is an assumption? Something you are not willing to do?


Some of them say you can't be an Atheist if you believe in ghosts.
Well, that suggest something more than the electro-chemical process most atheists view human conscience to be.

Do you believe in ghosts, Jess?


The list goes on....
If you could add to it I would be appreciative.


We will have to wait until you explain exactly what you believe before we can compare common beliefs you hold with other atheists. but, I am going to guess you embrace evolution, for one. If you do not, I would be glad to hear what other option there is for the atheist.

Another would be in regards to the universe. There is Intelligent Design and Chance. Where do you stand on that?


I have to say that I view us as animals
So what do you base that on? Where did you learn this?


and I also don't believe in Intelligent design.
But are you able to state dogmatically that it is an impossibility?


Okay P1lgr1m I am going to get on to your next post and start answering those questions now! - I'm getting there
You did excellent, Jess, I appreciate your efforts.

And have to get going, but again I appreciate your participation in the thread. You are a valuable part of this process of discussion that allows us to put away caricatures and misconceptions we have about each other, to where we can look at the issues that divide us, and perhaps along the way grow a little on a number of levels.


God bless.
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
Originally Posted by P1LGR1M
How about if someone refuses to eat chocolate because they don't eat anything that has animal products in it?

say, P1LGR1M, what's your comment on this?
If you mean on refusing to eat chocolate...I think that is insane. lol

Except for dark chocolate, which is pretty nasty in my own humble opinion. That I can understand.


The majority of Christians worldwide use icons in their worship... you are a Christian, so you must use icons...
This was actually something an atheist denied, that Atheists have symbols.

I told them remember that the next time you're driving down the road and see a fish with legs.

Now what would motivate a person to put that on their car, except to broadcast to the world that they view Christianity as false, and Evolution as true?

A simple google search of atheist symbols is all that is required to see the many symbols of Atheism.


Or, a similar issue... are you in the same religion as Catholics?
Yes, I am, because I do not view Catholicism as anything than what it has been historically, a Christian Group.

But me personally, I am an Independent Fundamental Baptist. And I usually attend these types of fellowships because I think they are closest to a sound theology as we can get to, and if I am going to refer someone to the fellowship I attend, I want it to be one where they will hear a clear presentation of the Gospel of Christ first and foremost.


God bless.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,691
13,135
113
my biophysics professor used to be an atheist until he got more education and realized this kind of implausibility. when i took his class, he was agnostic -- he wasn't convinced of any particular "god" but he was convinced the universe needed to have one.

a lot of Christians i think have this idea that most or all scientists are militant atheists -- i'm not sure where that comes from exactly, or how it keeps spreading -- but it's not true. Newton, Heisenberg, Maxwell, and a lot of other big names were specifically Christian, and a lot of others were at least agnostic. Edison was a pantheist. i think the issue is that there are a handful of very vocal and very, let's say, "enthusiastic" atheists with a lot of "cred" in the scientific community, and there's this culture of not coming out with ideas or views until you can support them fully, because scientists as a whole are pretty much trained to tear apart ideas and hypothesis. it's how they look for truth.

and here's me - with degrees in math & physics, and working on a phd now - and i'm no atheist!

the idea that science itself is nearly or entirely dominated by atheism just doesn't jive with any of my academic or professional experience. what's true though about it is that science - especially published science - is concerned with verifiable, repeatable facts and experimentation. theology doesn't really fit in that. but just because you don't see bible discussion in Nature magazine doesn't mean that a good percentage of contributors aren't Christian, or at the least, agnostic. people who study things like cosmology and microbiology have a real front-row seat to the inexplicable wonder of creation - and they don't come away from it unaffected. anyone who tells you that "science explains everything" doesn't know enough science.
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
I think Hinduism has an interesting approach to this... there is only one substance (monism, imo...compare to dualism, say, spirit and physical)

With monism, God is the universe, and the universe is God... so, if one can posit the existence of an eternal God, one can also posit an eternal universe...
The only time I really come in contact with people of this faith is when I watch Star Wars, lol.

Or am forced to listen to a John Lennon song.

But most of us can distinguish between sound theology and entertainment, even if the entertainment has influence of false religion in it.

Right?

And I think one of the things that points to a dualistic nature are the many recorded instances of Near Death Experiences. People have died and relayed a conscious existence in the time when Science declared there to be no biological activity. That doesn't mean I give all testimonies of it credence, but I do have a grandmother who tells of her grandmother having one. She sums it up in saying, "People said she was a special woman before it happened, and more special afterwards."

I tend to believe that. I think someone dying and seeing that there is an afterlife would dramatically change that person's view.

Some stories reach into the absurd, though. Like "I died and went to Hell!" Maybe it did happen, but we can see in some of these accounts things which contradict Scripture, and I have to question experiences that imply God is doing something different than what He has already revealed. I can't recall the recent movie about this, but it was declared fraudulent and the mother of the son tried to keep them from making the movie. That kind of nonsense only serves to support an atheist's views rather than help it.


God bless.
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest

a lot of Christians i think have this idea that most or all scientists are militant atheists -- i'm not sure where that comes from exactly, or how it keeps spreading -- but it's not true. Newton, Heisenberg, Maxwell, and a lot of other big names were specifically Christian, and a lot of others were at least agnostic. Edison was a pantheist. i think the issue is that there are a handful of very vocal and very, let's say, "enthusiastic" atheists with a lot of "cred" in the scientific community, and there's this culture of not coming out with ideas or views until you can support them fully, because scientists as a whole are pretty much trained to tear apart ideas and hypothesis. it's how they look for truth.

and here's me - with degrees in math & physics, and working on a phd now - and i'm no atheist!

the idea that science itself is nearly or entirely dominated by atheism just doesn't jive with any of my academic or professional experience. what's true though about it is that science - especially published science - is concerned with verifiable, repeatable facts and experimentation. theology doesn't really fit in that. but just because you don't see bible discussion in Nature magazine doesn't mean that a good percentage of contributors aren't Christian, or at the least, agnostic. people who study things like cosmology and microbiology have a real front-row seat to the inexplicable wonder of creation - and they don't come away from it unaffected. anyone who tells you that "science explains everything" doesn't know enough science.
Hey thanks for the testimony.

It is another instance of caricaturizing a group, though, isn't it. Some would have us believe there are "no credible scientists that believe in God," and that is not the case.

Are you familiar with the research at Princeton known as P.E.A.R.?

And have to get going, but wanted to say thanks for your contributions to the thread. This post hasn't been on long enough for me to "like" it yet, but I will once I get the chance.


God bless.
 
Dec 1, 2014
1,430
27
0
Speaking purely as a born again Christian: It takes more faith to stay an atheist than it does to become a Christian.
 
O

oldthennew

Guest
good point Post,

when I was much younger and going to school and taking botany, the professor asked a blanket question,
'what do you think would be the first step in solving the world's problems???

one would say something like, 'clean-up the environment', another would say,
'clean-up political corruption', another would say, 'make everyone equal', and
finally, one lone voice stood up and said, 'we all have to get down on our hands and knees
as a nation and repent and ask God to clean us up individually and then we can do it collectively'...
and everybody in the class responded with 'boos and hisses and you have got to be kidding', -
but the professor stood up and said, 'no, listen to this man, he has as much right as you do to
voice what he believes',
I was taken aback, as I thought that all science professors were automatically evolutionists....

so, I learned a great lesson that day, that we just can't generalize or put people in a box, no
more than we can our Maker....
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
If you mean on refusing to eat chocolate...I think that is insane. lol
when I wrote, "say, P1LGR1M, what's your comment on this?", I meant on what I wrote following...

What I was getting at was there's variation within Christianity... some Christians cast a much larger net than others... there are qualities that are found in the majority of Christians (example, use of icons) than probably you or I don't have...
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
The only time I really come in contact with people of this faith is when I watch Star Wars, lol.

Or am forced to listen to a John Lennon song.

But most of us can distinguish between sound theology and entertainment, even if the entertainment has influence of false religion in it.

Right?
Yes... though I'm not sure if you mean that Hinduism is basically an entertainment...?

I was presenting a philosophical alternative to "the universe must have a beginning."




And I think one of the things that points to a dualistic nature are the many recorded instances of Near Death Experiences. People have died and relayed a conscious existence in the time when Science declared there to be no biological activity.
When the person remembers the nde, though, are they remembering something that actually happened, or something that the brain produces after getting oxygen again?

Either way, though, imo, monism doesn't mean there's no spiritual, just that spiritual and physical are of the same 'substance'...
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
So, P1LGR1M, is it fair to say that nearly all humans have a worldview... that nearly every worldview is a religion... then, that nearly all humans have a religion?

And further, that nearly all atheists have enough beliefs in common to be classified in the same religion?
 
J

JessP

Guest
Whew! You have a sense of humor!

Outstanding!

It was a joke, glad you recognized it, lol.
:D


So you recognize there are Atheists that go to Christian Forums for the express purpose of presenting their beliefs.

Could I suggest to you that this is something that atheists do, and this presents a parallel to the evangelists of other beliefs that do the same. I don't see that everyone goes to speak about themselves, but to speak about the differences in beliefs we have. Christian Forums get visits from Atheists, Muslims, and even groups who consider themselves Christian, and they come for the specific purpose of making proselytes to their own faith.
I recognise that some Atheists may do that, but I hope you can tell that I am not interested in changing peoples mind but I am interested in knowing peoples minds.

If you go through the threads here, you will find a multitude of types of Christians, Conservative, Fundamentalists, Charismatics, Reformed, Catholic, and a few that we simply cannot associate with any group because their doctrine is so far displaced from an Orthodox view (which is itself subject to debate) that there is no group which would really support the individual doctrines they teach (or I should say try to).
But I commend you on wanting to learn from others. You might be surprised but I owe a debt of gratitude to atheists for a number of reasons. One would be that I have learned that the caricature of atheists that I had, which was instilled by preaching from pulpits I say under, was an erroneous and unjust attitude to have. Another would be that their faith in their beliefs has challenged me to actually challenge my own understanding about certain issues. Another would be that I have learned the importance of understanding what and why my antagonist believes before assuming I understand them.
I completely agree with you and am not surprised as I believe that if you don't reflect and test what you believe then you don't grow change or learn. I can say although I do understand some of the beliefs of Christianity I don't understand how people come to their beliefs as their view is so different on my own. I like to challenge my assumptions.

We can all benefit from discussion with antagonists, and it does not mean we have to violate as simple command of God, that being...love they neighbor as thyself.
I would go further to say we benefit from those who challenge us the most not just with different views but loving those who perhaps are intentionally trying to hurt us. I see an opportunity to be a better person with everyone I meet especially the challenging ones.

I am not given a mandate to give my "neighbors" a test to see if they qualify for the love of God as expressed through my person, just a simple command that all I come into contact with I am commanded to have love for. That doesn't mean that love is always expressed in gushy platitudes, lol, because we do not show love when we refrain from being honest with people.

I see no purer form of hatred than disinterest in the fate of others.
Agreed , I try and love everyone.


In one sense, yes, because many times people try to classify others based on limited knowledge. We can see that in the threads designed to bash a certain group.

So by definition we can categorize, but, with that definition we also have practical matters to consider. The easiest way to explain it is in saying that someone professing to be a Christian doesn't mean that they are. Association is not the only matter to consider, we also look at their lives and determine what that life represents. A man might join the Marines and wash out of boot camp. Is he a Marine? The American Soldier that threw a grenade into his barracks...was he an American Soldier?
True but who can make that judgement? You would perhaps say God? I might say general consensus of people....although I need to reflect on this more.

And this is likely due to the fact that most atheists define atheism simply as a "lack of belief in God or gods," but that isn't all that has to be taken into consideration. The Atheist you referred to earlier who goes to forums with the intent of "hi-jacking" the forum is a good example of a "religious atheist."
I can also think of some other words to describe them LOL. - I would usually use the definition that you have above. But yes there are different 'types' of Atheist.


How "religious" you are doesn't change the fact that Atheism is for some atheists...their religion. And how religious of an atheist they are is determined, surprise surprise...in their works.
Yes maybe for SOME atheists, but would you be prepared to say not all Atheists are religious?

And we can say that we see faith in the things which serve as a basis for their beliefs. For example, one might believe that Evolution is a fact based on the "science" presented to support it, but what is always lacking is an examination of not only the science's validity, but science which points us to believe that evolution is not only in error, but cannot be supported by the fact that man is steadily devolving, rather than evolving.
I would LOVE love LOVE to talk to you about faith I have not seen a thread on it that I would feel okay typing on... yet but I don't think this is the right one. so random tangent time..... But I really don't think I have faith , I don't really know how faith could work and I don't think I use what I understand it to be in my everyday life. - Perhaps we could look at this in another thread on faith?

And that is the picture of man as presented in God's Word.


O ye of little faith...

;)
ROFL

Again I commend you for that. All I can suggest is that you consider whether you have, like many who are religious, indoctrinated yourself by looking only at those things which agree with what you want to believe. This is a typical problem for most who are religious, and we can see this on every forum.

Usually those who are reformed, for example, appeal to reformed resources. Catholics appeal to Catholic resources. Atheists appeal to atheist resources.

But when we approach it with an honest desire to know truth, I think we can find that truth.
Possibly I have a bias approach it think it is hard not to but I really try not to. I think it is valuable to weigh up both sides as you have said.

And the question is...what resources have you gone to that have led you to believe it to be true? Was your education biased towards Evolution? The television shows you watched?

What was the motivation to go to resources that promote Evolution and have you ever consulted resources that deny Evolution and promote Creationism?
School has had a big part in this , creationism is not taught beyond Religious Education classess ( RE is compulsary in the UK) I have never met a creationist , or knowingly met one. I have read papers that have denied evolution and promote creationism but far less than the other way around.






The question is, are you willing to challenge the beliefs you currently hold to the point where you look at both sides, that you can better determine and draw conclusions that are more balanced?
Yep, im here am I not. Although I don't know myself what I am hear to learn , currently I think I want to understand Christians rational for their belifes.


Are you sure about that? lol
I would say so, I don't mind being wrong , im not prepared to stick to it against more plausable claims, I don't have hope of it's truth.

I do have belifes that I would consider myself emotionaly invested in. For example I belive that people are fundermentaly good. ( although I can have a guess at what you think of that). That does effect how I live my life. How the world was created or if evolution is true personaly does not mean I choose to act a ceritan way in my opinion.



So what are the "many possibilities?"
I don't know, but just because I don't know does not mean that their arnt any... ( thats a cop out I know)



Your testimony seems to contradict that a little.
I should have clarified in terms of knowing religious people or having religious people to speak to. Religion is not as openly discussed as it is in America. I would say the UK is fairly secular.

Right that's all I have time for! I gtg have some dinner, TBC , night night everyone.
 
S

sydlit

Guest
In order to make the definite statement, 'There is no God', (i.e. atheist) wouldn't one have to have exhausted every possibility to the contrary? You would have to explore the farthest reaches of the universe, as well as all the smallest molecular regions, all the visible and invisible places of matter and thought, and have all knowledge of everything possible, in order to say and know emphatically and absolutely, 'There is no God'.

But then, you would be ALL-knowing, and as the all-knowing one, you yourself would BE God, making yourself a self-contradiction, and the statement, 'There is no God', would be untrue.

So at best, one could say I doubt, I don't think, or I don't know if there is a God.
But God Himself rejects even this position. (please read Romans1:18-25 kjv).

I won't get into the often circular arguement that some unbelievers engage in now, (using the bible to prove it's God's Word, [tho it is], or using God's Word to prove His existence, [tho it does]), but simply to say that a person who honestly admits, 'I don't know', (i.e. agnostic), but is willing to come to know, is in a great place, and ultimately will not be disappointed.

Jesus said we would find Him if we seek Him with our whole heart,
but it also says that those who would come to God must first believe
that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him.

My prayers are for the unbelievers here, and they also should keep in mind, all of us are in different stages of growth, and have our own struggles with fears and doubts and personal sins, and many trials and tribulations, as we learn to grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our God and Saviour Jesus Christ.
If you learn nothing else, I pray you know this...

●Jesus loves you,
He died for your sins,
He rose from the grave,
And He's coming again.●

Whoever comes to Him by faith, He will not cast out.
"For God so loved the world, He gave His only begotten Son,
that whosoever believes in Him should not perish,
but have everlasting life.
For God sent not His Son into the world
to condemn the world,
But that the world, through Him, should be saved."
~John3:16-17~
Father in heaven, please bless the readers of these posts, in Jesus' name. Amen.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
JessP sorry I missed you in the chat room.I seem to get booted out,dont know why I have a really good laptop. Anyway then I got in to Christmas decorating and making supper{cranberry crockpot chicken} and time flew by. So I wasnt bored with your answers and hopefully we can connect in here. Dont worry people know you're new so take your time and answer as you can. :)
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
Originally Posted by P1LGR1M
Whew! You have a sense of humor!

Outstanding!

It was a joke, glad you recognized it, lol.
:D
:rolleyes:


Originally Posted by P1LGR1M

So you recognize there are Atheists that go to Christian Forums for the express purpose of presenting their beliefs.

Could I suggest to you that this is something that atheists do, and this presents a parallel to the evangelists of other beliefs that do the same. I don't see that everyone goes to speak about themselves, but to speak about the differences in beliefs we have. Christian Forums get visits from Atheists, Muslims, and even groups who consider themselves Christian, and they come for the specific purpose of making proselytes to their own faith.

I recognise that some Atheists may do that, but I hope you can tell that I am not interested in changing peoples mind but I am interested in knowing peoples minds.
And we see that on both sides. Even in Theological Discussion people can be seen to be looking for views that make sense. And I think all of us want our views to be seen as reasonable and logical, rather than something that might be viewed negatively.

Originally Posted by P1LGR1M

If you go through the threads here, you will find a multitude of types of Christians, Conservative, Fundamentalists, Charismatics, Reformed, Catholic, and a few that we simply cannot associate with any group because their doctrine is so far displaced from an Orthodox view (which is itself subject to debate) that there is no group which would really support the individual doctrines they teach (or I should say try to).




Originally Posted by P1LGR1M

But I commend you on wanting to learn from others. You might be surprised but I owe a debt of gratitude to atheists for a number of reasons. One would be that I have learned that the caricature of atheists that I had, which was instilled by preaching from pulpits I say under, was an erroneous and unjust attitude to have. Another would be that their faith in their beliefs has challenged me to actually challenge my own understanding about certain issues. Another would be that I have learned the importance of understanding what and why my antagonist believes before assuming I understand them.
I completely agree with you and am not surprised as I believe that if you don't reflect and test what you believe then you don't grow change or learn. I can say although I do understand some of the beliefs of Christianity I don't understand how people come to their beliefs as their view is so different on my own. I like to challenge my assumptions.
For myself I view my conversion as supernatural. I was a Heavy Metal musician bent on being famous and heavily addicted to drugs and alcohol, and can look back now and see about a years time when the Lord was bringing me under conviction.

Since then it has been a rather slow process, but what can you expect from someone of Irish descent, lol. "Scotch-Irish!" an elderly uncle once corrected me on.

Well, can't say I can blame my hard-headedness on ancestors, but, might be something to that...


Originally Posted by P1LGR1M

We can all benefit from discussion with antagonists, and it does not mean we have to violate as simple command of God, that being...love they neighbor as thyself.


I would go further to say we benefit from those who challenge us the most not just with different views but loving those who perhaps are intentionally trying to hurt us. I see an opportunity to be a better person with everyone I meet especially the challenging ones.
I think we need to be careful, though. I don't see the Lord as intending for us to place ourselves in dangerous situations if there are better routes of dealing with certain issues. And sometimes we can do more damage trying to help someone.

Originally Posted by P1LGR1M

I am not given a mandate to give my "neighbors" a test to see if they qualify for the love of God as expressed through my person, just a simple command that all I come into contact with I am commanded to have love for. That doesn't mean that love is always expressed in gushy platitudes, lol, because we do not show love when we refrain from being honest with people.

I see no purer form of hatred than disinterest in the fate of others.

Agreed , I try and love everyone.
Some people are harder to love than others, lol.

But the truth is, the people we think we could never establish profitable relationships with sometimes surprise us the most. As I said, some of the atheists I have talked to have been great conversationalists, and while some challenge more than others, it has helped my perspective and how I approach other people, particularly atheists. I think most of us have been the victim of bias, even from those of our own "faiths." And they're the ones that usually rag on you the worst, it seems.


Originally Posted by P1LGR1M

In one sense, yes, because many times people try to classify others based on limited knowledge. We can see that in the threads designed to bash a certain group.

So by definition we can categorize, but, with that definition we also have practical matters to consider. The easiest way to explain it is in saying that someone professing to be a Christian doesn't mean that they are. Association is not the only matter to consider, we also look at their lives and determine what that life represents. A man might join the Marines and wash out of boot camp. Is he a Marine? The American Soldier that threw a grenade into his barracks...was he an American Soldier?

True but who can make that judgement? You would perhaps say God? I might say general consensus of people....although I need to reflect on this more.
I think we can look at the events and elements of most situations and conclude rightly on matters like this.

Christianity gets a bad rap from people claiming to be Christians. There is a saying, "The number one cause of Atheism in the world is...Christians." I can believe that, especially after talking to atheists who have rejected God primarily due to their interaction with Christians, usually their parents or some authority figure in their lives.


Originally Posted by P1LGR1M

And this is likely due to the fact that most atheists define atheism simply as a "lack of belief in God or gods," but that isn't all that has to be taken into consideration. The Atheist you referred to earlier who goes to forums with the intent of "hi-jacking" the forum is a good example of a "religious atheist."

I can also think of some other words to describe them LOL. - I would usually use the definition that you have above. But yes there are different 'types' of Atheist.
It's true, but many do not stop to think about that.

I've had atheist curse me, use very foul language and concepts, and I've also talked to atheists that were very polite and genuinely decent folk. Now if I was given a choice between having to interact with certain people I have had discussions with, can't say I wouldn't opt for some of the atheists, lol.


Originally Posted by P1LGR1M

How "religious" you are doesn't change the fact that Atheism is for some atheists...their religion. And how religious of an atheist they are is determined, surprise surprise...in their works.

Yes maybe for SOME atheists, but would you be prepared to say not all Atheists are religious?
Of course, just like I would not all believers are religious, in two senses: first, we look at the positive side of what religion can be. Then we consider the negative side. It irritates me when people call me religious, even though they think it is a compliment. But the truth is, being "religious" can be both negative and positive.

For me, being "religious" in the sense of faith is not a good thing. It suggests rote ritual rather than what Christianity is, a relationship with God. Christianity is the only "Religion" where it is God that initiates the relationship and sustains it. Everything else is simply Religion.

We have to admit that there are some atheists who do good. They have a concern for their fellow man, and I believe God has put that in their heart. Of course it is my belief that Scripture makes it clear He has revealed Himself and His will to all men. Unfortunately, we have a nature that has a proclivity for rebellion, so it is "natural" in the truest sense of the Word for us to reject an authority that has eternal ramifications.

Let me ask you this: have you ever had a fear of Hell? Ever given any real consideration? It is a concept most cultures have to some extent, and few of us grow up never being introduced to it. For me, in my youth, I believed there was a Hell, but never considered myself a candidate, because I thought of myself as a pretty good person.


Originally Posted by P1LGR1M

And we can say that we see faith in the things which serve as a basis for their beliefs. For example, one might believe that Evolution is a fact based on the "science" presented to support it, but what is always lacking is an examination of not only the science's validity, but science which points us to believe that evolution is not only in error, but cannot be supported by the fact that man is steadily devolving, rather than evolving.


I would LOVE love LOVE to talk to you about faith I have not seen a thread on it that I would feel okay typing on... yet but I don't think this is the right one. so random tangent time..... But I really don't think I have faith , I don't really know how faith could work and I don't think I use what I understand it to be in my everyday life. - Perhaps we could look at this in another thread on faith?

And that is the picture of man as presented in God's Word.
I think this thread is a great candidate for a discussion of faith. It's pretty simple in concept, and there are, in my view, varying degrees of faith. In my own experience as a born again believer, I had faith to believe in Christ when I was saved. But my faith has grown stronger over the years and expanded to more than just understanding that God has my best interests at heart on an eternal level. Through study of His Word I have developed an understanding of Man which I did not have before, and the more I know the more I lean on the Lord.

As far as you having faith, we have been broaching that subject through the questions posed to you. For example, I have asked you in regards to the basis for the beliefs you have, which are not limited to simply a lack of belief in God (and I am willing to acknowledge that people can be of that mind), but actually delve into a number of realms in the lives of atheists. We've only scratched the surface, but you have shared, for example, that you feel Man is part of the animal kingdom, basically.

Now it's time to test your faith in that belief. And we can do that, and see how strong your faith really is.


Continued...
 
P

P1LGR1M

Guest
Originally Posted by P1LGR1M

O ye of little faith...

;)

ROFL
It's really nice to have someone who appreciates humor for a change, lol.

(I usually get myself in trouble with my humor...I blame that on my ancestry too...)

Originally Posted by P1LGR1M

Again I commend you for that. All I can suggest is that you consider whether you have, like many who are religious, indoctrinated yourself by looking only at those things which agree with what you want to believe. This is a typical problem for most who are religious, and we can see this on every forum.

Usually those who are reformed, for example, appeal to reformed resources. Catholics appeal to Catholic resources. Atheists appeal to atheist resources.

But when we approach it with an honest desire to know truth, I think we can find that truth.

Possibly I have a bias approach it think it is hard not to but I really try not to. I think it is valuable to weigh up both sides as you have said.
Most do, whether they acknowledge it or not. The only real association I had with Christianity was through my Grandparents out west. They were Christians, so of course I was a Christian too, lol.

In our culture you can't turn on the TV without having Evolutionary Doctrines mentioned. In movies too. Not sure if you've seen that movie Prometheus, but your friend that thinks earth was seeded would like it. The X-Files (and I am a big fan of X-Files) had that in their theme as well. And on one of the spaceships were "holy writings" from the Bible, the Koran, and I think a few others.

And what happens is we receive information like that, then we toss it around in our minds, and most of us create our own particular belief system. It might have tones of other religions or beliefs mixed in, but, in large part I think that most are very individualistic in their personal belief systems.


Originally Posted by P1LGR1M

And the question is...what resources have you gone to that have led you to believe it to be true? Was your education biased towards Evolution? The television shows you watched?

What was the motivation to go to resources that promote Evolution and have you ever consulted resources that deny Evolution and promote Creationism?

School has had a big part in this , creationism is not taught beyond Religious Education classess ( RE is compulsary in the UK) I have never met a creationist , or knowingly met one. I have read papers that have denied evolution and promote creationism but far less than the other way around.
Believe it or not Young Earth Creationists seem to have gotten fairly scarce. I believe God created the earth and the universe in the Six Days Scripture states He did. I am viewed as a moron because of that (and a number of other beliefs, lol, by the way) even in certain Christian Circles. There are those who are Theistic Evolutionists, who view the Creation Account as though it were an allegory, rather than literal. I recognize figurative language in Scripture, but, it is usually pretty easy to identify when that is taking place.



Originally Posted by P1LGR1M

The question is, are you willing to challenge the beliefs you currently hold to the point where you look at both sides, that you can better determine and draw conclusions that are more balanced?

Yep, im here am I not. Although I don't know myself what I am hear to learn , currently I think I want to understand Christians rational for their belifes.
Fair enough, lol. Glad you are (it's get kind of boring just talking to believers all the time...and don't tell them I said that, I will deny it).


Originally Posted by P1LGR1M

Are you sure about that? lol
I would say so, I don't mind being wrong , im not prepared to stick to it against more plausable claims, I don't have hope of it's truth.

I do have belifes that I would consider myself emotionaly invested in. For example I belive that people are fundermentaly good. ( although I can have a guess at what you think of that). That does effect how I live my life. How the world was created or if evolution is true personaly does not mean I choose to act a ceritan way in my opinion.
While I wouldn't say I am "emotionally invested in it," I recognize a fundamental teaching in Scripture that is best summed up as "Total Depravity." Basically, men are evil, and given certain conditions that evil will be the dominating characteristic. That doesn't mean I think everyone goes around committing evil acts every day, and that many are able to live decent lives because conditions have led to that result. I think man still retains a modicum of what he was created as, but, Scripture teaches a fallen nature that I think even Christians can downplay.

But in understanding it that way, I think it helps me to have compassion on those who fall into bad circumstances and conditions. This is not to downplay personal culpability, because I think there is only so far someone can blame their own works on the conditions they were raised in, for example. There are many who have grown up under adverse conditions and overcome those conditions and led productive lives. The reverse is true as well.

So I keep my eye on everyone, and the only person I truly trust is my wife, lol.


Originally Posted by P1LGR1M

So what are the "many possibilities?"
I don't know, but just because I don't know does not mean that their arnt any... ( thats a cop out I know)
Okay, you're killing me with the honesty, lol.

Yep, that's a cop-out.

Anyway, give it some thought and let me know. In the meantime we are stuck with some pretty basic doctrines generally accepted by most atheists.


Originally Posted by P1LGR1M

Your testimony seems to contradict that a little.

I should have clarified in terms of knowing religious people or having religious people to speak to. Religion is not as openly discussed as it is in America.
I am a little surprised. In talking with a fellow on the Isle of Wight in the last year he did give an impression that his upbringing was actually "religious" in the school he attended.


I would say the UK is fairly secular.
That's why we left.

;)


Right that's all I have time for! I gtg have some dinner, TBC , night night everyone.
Thanks for the response. Time for me to grab some grub myself.


God bless.