Romans 8:1-2, is conditional

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

JGIG

Senior Member
Aug 2, 2013
2,295
167
63
#21
It would be nice if no condemnation was the truth.
Try telling that to the Corinthians.

1Co 11:26 For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he come.
1Co 11:27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.
1Co 11:28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.
1Co 11:29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.
1Co 11:30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.
1Co 11:31 For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged.
1Co 11:32 But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world.
We are to examine ourselves to see if we're in Christ. If you're in Christ, you're worthy.

No condemnation is the truth.

There is NO condemnation for those in Christ.

-JGIG
 
Mar 23, 2016
6,857
1,646
113
#22
know1 said:
rewneddaybyday said:
for what it’s worth, I believe the condition is in Christ Jesus.
Would you say, just because they sinned that they are no longer in Christ?
I believe a son or daughter of God can sin, but still remain in Christ.
I believe all who are born again are members in particular of the body of the Lord Jesus Christ and the son/daughter of God walks either in the flesh or in the Spirit.

The believer who walks according to the flesh, while still a member of the body, becomes as Paul describes in Rom 7. It is not until we turn our hearts to the Lord Jesus Christ, put off the old, put on the new, that we enjoy the fruit of no condemnation as shown in Rom 8:1.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,658
3,540
113
#23
Condemnation does not have to be eternal condemnation. There is temporal condemnation in the Bible as well for the believer.

Romans 14
20 For meat destroy not the work of God. All things indeed are pure; but it is evil for that man who eateth with offence.
21 It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor any thing whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak.
22 Hast thou faith? have it to thyself before God. Happy is he that condemneth not himself in that thing which he alloweth.
23 And he that doubteth is damned if he eat, because he eateth not of faith: for whatsoever is not of faith is sin.

This type of condemnation comes from offending thyself in participating in things against your conscience. It is called sin.

1 Corinthians 11
28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.
29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.
30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.
31 For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged.

Again, taking the Lord's supper in an unworthy manner brings judgment, condemnation upon a person. We should judge ourselves first that we not be judged by God.

If a believer is not walking after the Spirit but after the flesh, that person is subject to condemnation, temporal judgment in the thing that he allows.
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
#24
Jesus said that there would be tares in with the wheat. In every church gathering there will be tares in there. Many times scripture writers address these "tares" as well as the true "wheat" that are in their midst.

The Lord desires that all men come to repentance and believe in His Son for life and salvation. Rightly discerning that there are "tares" with the "wheat" can bring a lot of things into better focus. We really need to rely on the Holy Spirit to reveal scriptures to us.

There is no condemnation for those that are in Christ Jesus - but we can be fooled by our unrenewed minds. There is a difference between the two Greek nouns "damnation" in 1 Cor. 11:29 which means judgment and in "condemnation" in Rom. 8:1

Just for clarity we can see both of these words used in one verse.

Romans 5:16 (NASB)
[SUP]16 [/SUP] The gift is not like that which came through the one who sinned; for on the one hand the judgment ( word used in 1 Cor. 11:29 ) arose from one transgression resulting in condemnation, ( word used in Rom. 8:1 ) but on the other hand the free gift arose from many transgressions resulting in justification.

The reason we have no more condemnation for those that are in Christ is seen in this verse - we should be believing it.

Romans 5:18 (NASB)
[SUP]18 [/SUP] So then as through one transgression there resulted condemnation ( Rom. 8:1 Greek word ) to all men, even so through one act of righteousness there resulted justification of life to all men.

We have been declared righteous by the work of Christ which is why we cannot be condemned by God because we are in Christ Himself in our inner man - the new creation - created in righteousness and holiness.

Just some of my thoughts on this...
 
G

Gr8grace

Guest
#25
Condemnation does not have to be eternal condemnation. There is temporal condemnation in the Bible as well for the believer.

Romans 14
20 For meat destroy not the work of God. All things indeed are pure; but it is evil for that man who eateth with offence.
21 It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor any thing whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak.
22 Hast thou faith? have it to thyself before God. Happy is he that condemneth not himself in that thing which he alloweth.
23 And he that doubteth is damned if he eat, because he eateth not of faith: for whatsoever is not of faith is sin.

This type of condemnation comes from offending thyself in participating in things against your conscience. It is called sin.

1 Corinthians 11
28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.
29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.
30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.
31 For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged.

Again, taking the Lord's supper in an unworthy manner brings judgment, condemnation upon a person. We should judge ourselves first that we not be judged by God.

If a believer is not walking after the Spirit but after the flesh, that person is subject to condemnation, temporal judgment in the thing that he allows.
Excellent, excellent post. There is eternal life only IN Christ. And every believer is IN Christ. There is no eternal condemnation IN Christ.......but there sure is temporal condemnation in this life.

Not one verse in the bible warns believers that their eternal life is in question, they do warn them about temporal condemnation. And it is self imposed, God has given us all the tools and gifts needed to follow His plan. Some believers just don't follow that plan.
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
6,646
1,397
113
#26
Sir, you are spouting off about something you know very little about.
3Jn 1:2 Beloved, I wish above all things that thou mayest prosper and be in health, even as thy soul prospereth.

If John said it, then God said it. Which makes it the will of God.

Mat 6:10 Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.

Is it God's will for you to suffer lack, be in want, or be sick in heaven? Then neither is it His will for His children to suffer such things here in this world.


I just gave two witnesses, therefore the testimony is true.
As for Paul, God gave him the answer to his dilemma. He didn't tell him, no, but how to get delivered.
Was God's grace sufficient for Paul's salvation?
Wasn't God's power perfected when Paul accepted Christ's work on the cross in faith, because of His inability to save himself?
If God's grace was sufficient for Paul's salvation, then the same said grace is sufficient to take care of a messenger of the devil, if he uses the same faith that he got saved with.
John was giving a typical greeting of the day to a friend and brother in Christ, Gaius. He was NOT being prophetic about the condition of ALL believers. You read with very little comprehension..... or, perhaps, you see only what you WANT to see, and form it to fit YOUR belief system.

[SUP]12 [/SUP]Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, [SUP]1[/SUP]
[SUP]11 [/SUP]Not that I am speaking of being in need, for I have learned in whatever situation I am to be content. [SUP]12 [/SUP]I know how to be brought low, and I know how to abound. In any and every circumstance, I have learned the secret of facing plenty and hunger, abundance and need. [SUP]13 [/SUP]I can do all things through him who strengthens me.
a thorn was given me in the flesh, a messenger of Satan to harass me, to keep me from becoming conceited. [SUP]8 [/SUP]Three times I pleaded with the Lord about this, that it should leave me. [SUP]9 [/SUP]But he said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” Therefore I will boast all the more gladly of my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ may rest upon me. [SUP]10 [/SUP]For the sake of Christ, then, I am content with weaknesses, insults, hardships, persecutions, and calamities. For when I am weak, then I am strong.
There..... I give you three "witnesses"... therefore, my testimony is "truer"..... by your reckoning.
 
E

eph610

Guest
#27
Please read posts 13 and 14. It should explain why it was REMOVED from the corrupt versions, and not added as you assume.
You do understand that Romans 8.1-2 is finishing the thought of Romans 7.25 right?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#28
The condition to the law of life in Christ Jesus is not walking in the Spirit.
When a child of God sins, they are not walking in the Spirit, but in the flesh.
Would you say, just because they sinned that they are no longer in Christ?
I believe a son or daughter of God can sin, but still remain in Christ.
Why, How can this be, How can a child of God sin (be carnal) and still be saved.

Oh wait, thats right, There is no condemnation to those who are in Christ.
Who do not spend there time walking after the flesh, But learns to walk after the spirit. Bt as Paul said in romans 7. Not all the time (not perfect)

Thats why Rom 8 is NOT CONDITIONAL except for one thing, CHRIST..
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,658
3,540
113
#29
Excellent, excellent post. There is eternal life only IN Christ. And every believer is IN Christ. There is no eternal condemnation IN Christ.......but there sure is temporal condemnation in this life.

Not one verse in the bible warns believers that their eternal life is in question, they do warn them about temporal condemnation. And it is self imposed, God has given us all the tools and gifts needed to follow His plan. Some believers just don't follow that plan.
Condemnation, judgment will happen is this life for the believer or at the Judgment Seat of Christ. Either way a believer can be under condemnation. The context of Romans 8 comes right off chapter 7 and is talking about a believer's walk and is not talking about one's eternal salvation in Christ.
 
E

eph610

Guest
#30
Condemnation, judgment will happen is this life for the believer or at the Judgment Seat of Christ. Either way a believer can be under condemnation. The context of Romans 8 comes right off chapter 7 and is talking about a believer's walk and is not talking about one's eternal salvation in Christ.
Not quite right...

Jesus will not judge the believer at he judgement seat for their SIN, because he took care of the SIN problem over 2000 years.
The Judgement seat of Christ is where we give account of how we let the kingdom of God manifest in us to expand the kingdom.

There is NO condemnation since we are in Christ....PERIOD! Condemnation is from the enemy not Jesus Christ.

We do agree that the context of Romans 8 comes off Roman 7, 6, 5, 4, 3,2 and 1
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,658
3,540
113
#31
Not quite right...

Jesus will not judge the believer at he judgement seat for their SIN, because he took care of the SIN problem over 2000 years.
The Judgement seat of Christ is where we give account of how we let the kingdom of God manifest in us to expand the kingdom.

There is NO condemnation since we are in Christ....PERIOD! Condemnation is from the enemy not Jesus Christ.

We do agree that the context of Romans 8 comes off Roman 7, 6, 5, 4, 3,2 and 1
Absolutely correct, I apologize if that came through. The JSOC is the believer's judgment on one's obedience upon the foundation. Sin will not be the issue here. Agreed brother.
 
E

eph610

Guest
#32
Absolutely correct, I apologize if that came through. The JSOC is the believer's judgment on one's obedience upon the foundation. Sin will not be the issue here. Agreed brother.
no worries brother
 
L

ladylynn

Guest
#33
Deliverance from Bondage

8 Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. [SUP]2 [/SUP]For the law of the Spirit of life [SUP][a][/SUP]in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death.


It's a very presumptuous thing for many Christians to actually believe there is NO condemnation on us anymore. It's such a daring thing to believe that God holds us guiltless now. As humans we are too used living as humans under natural laws. We see 1+1=2 at all times.

Being reasonable people we can't help but bring that reasoning into our Christian lives too. But we must actually do exactly that., we must not bring natural laws into our spiritual lives. It's daring to believe the impossible that will actually show us how to live by faith. Hebrews 11:1
11 Now faith is the assurance (the confirmation, [SUP][a][/SUP]the title deed) of the things [we] hope for, being the proof of things [we] do not see and the conviction of their reality [faith perceiving as real fact what is not revealed to the senses].

I don't think it will be possible to accept the truth of no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus until a person begins to start seeing by faith and learning more about grace. Like in the other thread about being seen perfect in God's eyes. Because it's really a matter of Jesus Christ and not us.

And daring to believe the extent of what our salvation really means for us to be IN Christ. This verse in Romans 8 tells about the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus having set us free from the law of sin and death. Grace is giving us what we do not deserve by any means and taking away the law of sin and death. We are now operating under a totally different set of truths for our life now that we are sons of God.

We are new creations in Christ. Old things have past away behold all things have become new. That means more than where we are going to spend eternity. It holds a ton of impact on our lives right this very second.






 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
#34

While it is true the fleshly Christian of 1 Cor 3 is born again of the Spirit, it is not true that the fleshly Christian of 1 Cor 3 is walking after the Spirit.


Of course they are. They are babes with a fleshly pull on them but they do walk after the Spirit. They are born from above. They do NOT walk after the flesh, even though they pander to the flesh.



Go back to Rom 7 and we find the born again one who continues to walk after the flesh.
Who says they are born again ones? They are still under the Law not under grace.

Romans 7:

18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.

19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.



The believer who walks after the flesh knows he/she wants to do what is rght in the sight of God. But he/she finds him/herself falling short.
you forgot a bit. 'I AM carnal, sold under sin.' (7.14) What real Christian could say that of himself?
It is pre-conversion experience when he is under the influence of the Spirit.

Romans 7:

24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?

25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.
This is where he is converted.
 
Last edited:

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
#35


Now go to Rom 8:1

There is therefrore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus,


Romans 8.1continues on from 5.21. Romans 6-7 is a parenthesis dealing with problems, as it says. There is no conjunction to 8.1.



As the believer continues in Christ Jesus there is no condemnation.
For the true believer there can never be any condemnation. He has been justified by His blood (Rom 5.9)

If the believer turns from the Lord Jesus Christ and lives according to the flesh, he/she is again subjected to what we see in Rom 7 ... For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I (Rom 7:15).
no doubt you will show me where it SAYS that?

And it is as the believer walks in the flesh that see him/her living as shown in 1 Cor 3:3 For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?
A believer CANNOT walk after the flesh. He is born of the Spirit from above. He may simply pander to his flesh for a time. But he does not walk after the flesh. If he did he would prove he had never been a Christian. I can see you are struggling with Romans. :)
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
#36
Funny, after reading your post, I was thinking the same about you.
And it would be a waste of my time to try to disprove the mess you are propagating.

you wouldn't do it because it is CORRECT :)
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
#37
Condemnation, judgment will happen is this life for the believer or at the Judgment Seat of Christ. Either way a believer can be under condemnation. The context of Romans 8 comes right off chapter 7 and is talking about a believer's walk and is not talking about one's eternal salvation in Christ.
In Romans condemnation is the opposite of justification, and justification is a Forensic term. It is speaking about our legal position in Christ.

All men are either condemned, once for all (1.18-3.20), or are justified in Christ (Rom 3.21-5.21), they are either under the Law or under grace. So it IS speaking of eternal condemnation.

Roman 3.21-5.21 have proved that we are justified. We are accounted as righteous with Christ's righteousness. We cannot therefore be condemned. That is why there is no condemnation in 8.1. As he says later in chapter 8. Because God has justified, who will condemn,

If chapter 8 is not about our eternal condemnation. what is it about? He gives the whole panorama from foreknowledge to glorification,
 
Last edited:

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
#38
It would be nice if no condemnation was the truth.
Try telling that to the Corinthians.

1Co 11:26 For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he come.
1Co 11:27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.
1Co 11:28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.
1Co 11:29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.
1Co 11:30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.
1Co 11:31 For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged.
1Co 11:32 But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world.


It would also hold some weight if the so called "oldest and most reliable" transcripts weren't so corrupt.
The codex Vaticanus and Sinaiticus are both corrupt copies of the bible.

[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD]
Where Did the King James Bible Come From?
[SIZE=-1]Adapted from LET'S WEIGH THE EVIDENCE by Barry Burton. Concerned that the whole issue of "Which Bible?" was confusing members of his church, Burton wrote this easy-to-read summary of the research of many gifted men in the field of Bible translation. Here is just a small portion of this very readable book.[/SIZE]
There Are Two Kinds of Manuscripts:
Accurate Copies
These manuscripts represent the manuscripts from which the "Textus Receptus" or Received Text was taken.
They are the majority of Greek manuscripts which agree with each other and have been accepted by Bible believing Christians down through the centuries. It is from these manuscripts that the King James Bible was translated in 1611.
Corrupted Copies
These manuscripts represent the corrupted copies of the Bible, also known as the Alexandrian manuscripts. These manuscripts, many times, do not even agree with each other. The Vaticanus and Sinaiticus manuscripts are part of this group. These are the manuscripts on which Westcott and Hort and the modern versions rely so heavily.
There are 5,309 surviving Greek manuscripts that contain all or part of the New Testament. These manuscripts agree together 95% of the time. The other 5% account for the differences between the King James and the modern versions.
The modern versions had to use the Textus Receptus, since it contains the majority of the surviving Greek manuscripts. The problem is that, when the Textus Receptus disagreed with the Vaticanus or the Sinaiticus, they preferred these corrupted manuscripts over the Textus Receptus.
That accounts for the 5% corruption in the modern versions. Even these two manuscripts agree with the Textus Receptus much of the time. When they do not agree, it is because Marcion (120-160 AD) or Origin (184-254 AD) or whoever, corrupted them.
Now, the fact has been established that the modern versions are different than the King James Bible (see LET'S WEIGH THE EVIDENCE for numerous, verse by verse examples). But, we still need to answer the question: Why are they different?
There are at least 5,309 surviving Greek manuscripts which contain all or part of the New Testament. Plus, there are translations into different languages which date back to within 100 years of the disciples. For example, the Peshitta is a Syrian translation from the 2nd century.
These manuscripts agree with each other about 95% of the time. The problem is, how does one determine what is right in the 5% of the places where the manuscripts do not agree?[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD]
Where Did the King James Bible Come From?
[SIZE=-1]Adapted from LET'S WEIGH THE EVIDENCE by Barry Burton. Concerned that the whole issue of "Which Bible?" was confusing members of his church, Burton wrote this easy-to-read summary of the research of many gifted men in the field of Bible translation. Here is just a small portion of this very readable book.[/SIZE]
There Are Two Kinds of Manuscripts:
Accurate Copies
These manuscripts represent the manuscripts from which the "Textus Receptus" or Received Text was taken.
They are the majority of Greek manuscripts which agree with each other and have been accepted by Bible believing Christians down through the centuries. It is from these manuscripts that the King James Bible was translated in 1611.
Corrupted Copies
These manuscripts represent the corrupted copies of the Bible, also known as the Alexandrian manuscripts. These manuscripts, many times, do not even agree with each other. The Vaticanus and Sinaiticus manuscripts are part of this group. These are the manuscripts on which Westcott and Hort and the modern versions rely so heavily.
There are 5,309 surviving Greek manuscripts that contain all or part of the New Testament. These manuscripts agree together 95% of the time. The other 5% account for the differences between the King James and the modern versions.
The modern versions had to use the Textus Receptus, since it contains the majority of the surviving Greek manuscripts. The problem is that, when the Textus Receptus disagreed with the Vaticanus or the Sinaiticus, they preferred these corrupted manuscripts over the Textus Receptus.
That accounts for the 5% corruption in the modern versions. Even these two manuscripts agree with the Textus Receptus much of the time. When they do not agree, it is because Marcion (120-160 AD) or Origin (184-254 AD) or whoever, corrupted them.
Now, the fact has been established that the modern versions are different than the King James Bible (see LET'S WEIGH THE EVIDENCE for numerous, verse by verse examples). But, we still need to answer the question: Why are they different?
There are at least 5,309 surviving Greek manuscripts which contain all or part of the New Testament. Plus, there are translations into different languages which date back to within 100 years of the disciples. For example, the Peshitta is a Syrian translation from the 2nd century.
These manuscripts agree with each other about 95% of the time. The problem is, how does one determine what is right in the 5% of the places where the manuscripts do not agree?

More in the next post.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
The Peshitta is 4th century at the earliest. It is the old Syriac which dates earlier. The Greek dates back to 1st century. But we DO NOT HAVE actual manuscripts or versions at those dates. Your statements are therefore incorrect. You are giving to much credence to a few unsophisticated scholars.

The kjv was translated from MS all of which came 1000 years after the original.
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,047
13,056
113
58
#39
Those "who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit" is descriptive language of those who are in Christ. ​Believers walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit not in order to get in Christ, but because they are in Christ.
 
Mar 23, 2016
6,857
1,646
113
#40
valiant said:
reneweddaybyday said:
While it is true the fleshly Christian of 1 Cor 3 is born again of the Spirit, it is not true that the fleshly Christian of 1 Cor 3 is walking after the Spirit.
Of course they are. They are babes with a fleshly pull on them but they do walk after the Spirit. They are born from above. They do NOT walk after the flesh, even though they pander to the flesh.
1 Corinthians 3:3 For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?

carnal = Greek sarkikoi from sarx which means fleshly, having the nature of flesh, i.e. under the control of the animal appetites; pertains to behavior which is typical of human nature, but with special focus upon more base physical desires.

Thayer's Greek Lexicon says specifically of 1 Cor 3:1,3 "governed by mere human nature, not by the Spirit of God".



valiant said:
reneweddaybyday said:
Go back to Rom 7 and we find the born again one who continues to walk after the flesh.
Who says they are born again ones? They are still under the Law not under grace.
Romans 7:6 But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter.

Only those who are born again can serve in newness of spirit.



valiant said:
reneweddaybyday said:
Romans 7:

18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.

19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.


The believer who walks after the flesh knows he/she wants to do what is rght in the sight of God. But he/she finds him/herself falling short.
you forgot a bit. 'I AM carnal, sold under sin.' (7.14) What real Christian could say that of himself?
It is pre-conversion experience when he is under the influence of the Spirit.
Every "real Christian" as long as he/she is alive on this earth has to deal with his/her carnal flesh. That is the whole point of Rom 7.

Romans 7:22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man

The inward man is what is created within at the time the believer is born again. And the born again believer can follow his/her fleshly instincts or he/she can follow the Lord Jesus Christ. It is not until the born again one follows the Lord Jesus Christ that he/she is delivered from the body of this death:


Romans 7:24-25 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

The flesh will always serve the law of sin. If/when we put on the Lord Jesus Christ, we are able to overcome the lusts of our flesh:

Romans 13:14 But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts hereof.


I know of no other way to not make provision for the flesh to fulfill the lusts thereof. And until the born again one turns from self to the Lord Jesus Christ and puts on the Lord Jesus Christ, the lusts of the flesh will prevail. We may fight against the flesh and try as hard as we can to not sin or become as the Rom 7 guy/gal. But why go through that struggle when the putting on of the Lord Jesus Christ causes those lusts to melt away? No struggle. Just peaceful rest.



valiant said:
reneweddaybyday said:
Romans 7:

24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?

25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.
This is where he is converted.
You and I are not in agreement concerning the Romans 7 verses. At the very least, please just consider what I am saying to you. Thanks.