"replacement theology" - what is it?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
oh yes....the Plan B theory.

Plan B?


Never been a plan B.

Salvation has been by grace since adam, will be until the last man alive on earth.

this argument gets old Zone.


and people wonder why it gets so heated.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Ya, I never said Israel does everything right. But if you're talking about Palestinians and who has a right to the land,its Israel.
it seems to be their pet argument, We love on Israel and let them do whatever they want,

Even though NOBODY does this..

I guess it is OK for Palestinians to slaughter jewish babies and women, But how dare Israel retaliate. They should not defend themselves.

If palestine was the US, we would be screaming to wipe palestinians off the map..
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary

25. For I would not … that ye should be ignorant of this mystery—The word "mystery," so often used by our apostle, does not mean (as with us) something incomprehensible, but "something before kept secret, either wholly or for the most part, and now only fully disclosed" (compare Ro 16:25; 1Co 2:7-10; Eph 1:9, 10; 3:3-6, 9, 10).

lest ye should be wise in your own conceits—as if ye alone were in all time coming to be the family of God.

that blindness—"hardness"

in part is happened to—"hath come upon"

Israel—that is, hath come partially, or upon a portion of Israel.

until the fulness of the Gentiles be—"have"

come in—that is, not the general conversion of the world to Christ, as many take it; for this would seem to contradict the latter part of this chapter, and throw the national recovery of Israel too far into the future: besides, in Ro 11:15, the apostle seems to speak of the receiving of Israel, not as following, but as contributing largely to bring about the general conversion of the world—but, "until the Gentiles have had their full time of the visible Church all to themselves while the Jews are out, which the Jews had till the Gentiles were brought in." (See Lu 21:24).
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63

I love you too, But your wrong

King davids grandma was a gentile. Ninevah repented at jonahs teaching, There are all kinds of Gentiles who will be in heaven, It was never just jewish. In fact, Abraham never got his land, because Gentiles had not yet completed there sin, they had to wait 400 years.


If the church was strickly jewish in the OT, then people before abraham must have missed out..
I never said any of that.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Ya, I never said Israel does everything right. But if you're talking about Palestinians and who has a right to the land,its Israel.
actually, it would technically be jewish Christians who own the land.
if they cared about it, which they do not, since they have new Jerusalem as their mother.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I never said any of that.
yet, when I said The church was never just Israel. You told me I was wrong??

forgive me if I am confused.


was I wrong, or right?
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
And we are there.. "hate Israel", "Hitler argument", "holocaust argument" etc etc.

Can you "hear" yourself? Be rational and slow down in your hysterical reactions, so typical for pro-Israel centered Christians.

Quote"And we are there.. "hate Israel", "Hitler argument", "holocaust argument" etc etc."

I posted what the church fathers said. Do you agree or disagree with them? How about Zeek who was posting here and got banned. Agree with his sentiments? There is a history between replacement and anti-semitism, read history and its easily proven. As I said before Hitler wasn't the first to put the Jews in ghettos,or make them wear the star,it was the Catholics who taught the replacement theology. And they admitted this and recanted from this belief after the Holocaust as did the Protestant church. Then someone drags it out of the dirt pile and dresses it up again. Its unbelievable that with the history attached to it people still believe this nonsense.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
actually, it would technically be jewish Christians who own the land.
if they cared about it, which they do not, since they have new Jerusalem as their mother.

So if you moved away from the land your family owned, You would never care about that land? It would hold no sentimental value to you?

You are not like most people.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
yet, when I said The church was never just Israel. You told me I was wrong??

forgive me if I am confused.


was I wrong, or right?
you're right about that, but wrong about dispensationalism.
the disciples were the Israel of God (Christ) and gentiles are grafted in.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
Quote"And we are there.. "hate Israel", "Hitler argument", "holocaust argument" etc etc."

I posted what the church fathers said. Do you agree or disagree with them? How about Zeek who was posting here and got banned. Agree with his sentiments? There is a history between replacement and anti-semitism, read history and its easily proven. As I said before Hitler wasn't the first to put the Jews in ghettos,or make them wear the star,it was the Catholics who taught the replacement theology. And they admitted this and recanted from this belief after the Holocaust as did the Protestant church. Then someone drags it out of the dirt pile and dresses it up again. Its unbelievable that with the history attached to it people still believe this nonsense.
There is history of everything. That does not mean we should be hysterical and argument by Hitler every time somebody says Isreal is doing wrong and is not the people of God.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63

So if you moved away from the land your family owned, You would never care about that land? It would hold no sentimental value to you?

You are not like most people.
who cares about that?
what God said matters.

Jerusalem in paul's day was already called Hagar.
he said Jerusalem above is the mother of the saved.
he said cast out the bond woman (hagar) as she will NOT inherit.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113

So if you moved away from the land your family owned, You would never care about that land? It would hold no sentimental value to you?

You are not like most people.
Actually, do you care about the land your ancestors lived 2000 years ago? Do you even know which one it was? This is so absurd.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary

25. For I would not … that ye should be ignorant of this mystery—The word "mystery," so often used by our apostle, does not mean (as with us) something incomprehensible, but "something before kept secret, either wholly or for the most part, and now only fully disclosed" (compare Ro 16:25; 1Co 2:7-10; Eph 1:9, 10; 3:3-6, 9, 10).

lest ye should be wise in your own conceits—as if ye alone were in all time coming to be the family of God.

that blindness—"hardness"

in part is happened to—"hath come upon"

Israel—that is, hath come partially, or upon a portion of Israel.

until the fulness of the Gentiles be—"have"

come in—that is, not the general conversion of the world to Christ, as many take it; for this would seem to contradict the latter part of this chapter, and throw the national recovery of Israel too far into the future: besides, in Ro 11:15, the apostle seems to speak of the receiving of Israel, not as following, but as contributing largely to bring about the general conversion of the world—but, "until the Gentiles have had their full time of the visible Church all to themselves while the Jews are out, which the Jews had till the Gentiles were brought in." (See Lu 21:24).

so, since "it would be to far into the future" Lets twist what the apostle paul said, because it could not say what some think he said.

It says when the hardening will be removed, When the time of the gentile is fulfilled.

actually it does not contradict the later part. It brings the latter part into focus.

and makes it real. Which was pauls argument, As a gentile believe, do not be to proud.. For they ar eonly blinded in part. until the time of gentile is complete. THEN all isreal will be saved.

Until then, They are hated according to the gospel. Beloved according to th epromise (election) why, Because Gods gifts and calling are irrevocable.

when will that occur?

it has not occurred yet.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
it seems to be their pet argument, We love on Israel and let them do whatever they want,

Even though NOBODY does this..

I guess it is OK for Palestinians to slaughter jewish babies and women, But how dare Israel retaliate. They should not defend themselves.

If palestine was the US, we would be screaming to wipe palestinians off the map..


Its
ridiculous, you dont need the Bible to prove the land belongs to Israel. Palestinians drag bodies into playgrounds, force people to stay in their homes during attacks,and tunnel in to Israel underground. But its Israels fault. smh Its crazy.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
So to you the remnant in Romans 11 is the church?
I don't know what you mean the church? The remnant are flesh Jews that come to Christ, God hasn't thrown away his chosen people just because he cast away Israel. There are still chosen people in the Jewish bloodline that will be saved.

That's exactly what Paul was saying in Romans 11:1

Romans 11:1 KJV
I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Actually, do you care about the land your ancestors lived 2000 years ago? Do you even know which one it was? This is so absurd.

lol.. well I did not have land given to me like God. They did. I may not Know. BUT THEY DO!

So it is just a little different?

Also. My land does not have a history (I do not even know what land it was)


If God gave my ancestors land, and promised, if my people obeyed him, and heeded his word, he would be my God and keep my family in peace.

You bet I would want to be there..
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Its
ridiculous, you dont need the Bible to prove the land belongs to Israel. Palestinians drag bodies into playgrounds, force people to stay in their homes during attacks,and tunnel in to Israel underground. But its Israels fault. smh Its crazy.
all you have to do is talk to them for a but, and it comes out. Always does.. That hate is there, it just needs to be proded (see Zeek and a few others who have suffered his fate)
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
There is history of everything. That does not mean we should be hysterical and argument by Hitler every time somebody says Isreal is doing wrong and is not the people of God.

No, the replacement theology is anti-semetic. Always has been. What is Israel doing "wrong" btw?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I don't know what you mean the church? The remnant are flesh Jews that come to Christ, God hasn't thrown away his chosen people just because he cast away Israel. There are still chosen people in the Jewish bloodline that will be saved.

That's exactly what Paul was saying in Romans 11:1

Romans 11:1 KJV
I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.
No this is not what it says, God separated believing gentiles from believing jews in Romans 11. If what you said was true, he would never have done this.

again, Why do you judge we do not want to take the word of God for what it says, when your the one doing it?