So I am one who is fascinated with science and also with outer space though I lack the intelligence to fully understand it all my friend who is a very scientific kind of guy told me a couple years ago about a discovery called the god particle. If I remember and understand correctly the god particle was always there and was in fact the direct link to mass and gravity the big bang and all creation and scientists say the fact the god particle existed and made something out of nothing proves god is not needed.
But there are so many flaws with this theory, first off say the god particle really was just always there, that in itself disproves it's existence or at least it way of existence because in this universe that we live in never once has anything simply come from nothing it always had to be made born created or evolved in some way or manner to say this particle simply always existed defies the laws of this universe. I am a very firm believer in cause and effect, if say the god particle is the cause and everything we see is the eventual effect it still doesn't explain how that cause was in existence when everything else was an effect.
In other words while every other thing in this universe had to be made created or born in some way it's extremely unbelievable that a single particle didn't have to and is the one exclusion to laws of this universe. Now scientists can argue about God in the same way however our faith and belief in God is not limited to this universes laws while their god particle is. The big bang theory is no longer considered a theory to many scientists as they believe it is now fully proven but say I am right about my view of the god particle what made the god particle and what made that thing that made the god particle and so on and so forth eventually it's like how there is never truly the number 0 you will always have an infinite amount of 0.1 at the end there has to be a source but the issue is if there is a source then it only proves the existence of an all knowing eternal being not disproves it
But there are so many flaws with this theory, first off say the god particle really was just always there, that in itself disproves it's existence or at least it way of existence because in this universe that we live in never once has anything simply come from nothing it always had to be made born created or evolved in some way or manner to say this particle simply always existed defies the laws of this universe. I am a very firm believer in cause and effect, if say the god particle is the cause and everything we see is the eventual effect it still doesn't explain how that cause was in existence when everything else was an effect.
In other words while every other thing in this universe had to be made created or born in some way it's extremely unbelievable that a single particle didn't have to and is the one exclusion to laws of this universe. Now scientists can argue about God in the same way however our faith and belief in God is not limited to this universes laws while their god particle is. The big bang theory is no longer considered a theory to many scientists as they believe it is now fully proven but say I am right about my view of the god particle what made the god particle and what made that thing that made the god particle and so on and so forth eventually it's like how there is never truly the number 0 you will always have an infinite amount of 0.1 at the end there has to be a source but the issue is if there is a source then it only proves the existence of an all knowing eternal being not disproves it