God's Chosen People per Romans 11

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 13, 2016
744
6
0
Romans 11:11-12 KJV
I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy.
[12] Now if the fall of them be the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them the riches of the Gentiles; how much more their fulness?

I don't understand these two verses, it almost seems like they contradict each other.

In verse 11 - "Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid:...". This sounds like they did not fall.

Verse 12 - "Now if the fall of them....". This sounds like they fell. Any thoughts on this?

Have they offended (in killing Christ) so as to be cut off from Christ? God Forbid.
Rather, their offence has brought salvation to the nations.
Now if their offence is the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them the riches of the Nations; how much more their fulness?
 

Awakened

Senior Member
Dec 4, 2016
127
7
18
Romans 11:11-12 KJV
I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy.
[12] Now if the fall of them be the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them the riches of the Gentiles; how much more their fulness?

I don't understand these two verses, it almost seems like they contradict each other.

In verse 11 - "Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid:...". This sounds like they did not fall.

Verse 12 - "Now if the fall of them....". This sounds like they fell. Any thoughts on this?
I know you prefer KJV, as do I but this translation does make more sense.
New International Version
Again I ask: Did they stumble so as to fall beyond recovery? Not at all! Rather, because of their transgression, salvation has come to the Gentiles to make Israel envious.
 
Dec 13, 2016
744
6
0
Israel does not appear in the Greek though....it has ceased to be a translation and now become an interpretation...
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
I know you prefer KJV, as do I but this translation does make more sense.
New International Version
Again I ask: Did they stumble so as to fall beyond recovery? Not at all! Rather, because of their transgression, salvation has come to the Gentiles to make Israel envious.
I admit I have a HUGE prejudice for the KJV.:) That being said, I would like your unbiased opinion of whether I'm adding to the words or twisting scripture to make the KJV right.

Verse 7 has 2 factions of Israel: 1 has obtained and 1 is blinded.

Romans 11:7-11 KJV
[7] What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded

- Expounding on "the rest were blinded".
[8] (According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear unto this day.
[9] And David saith, Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompence unto them: [10] Let their eyes be darkened, that they may not see, and bow down their back alway.
- Expounding has ended.

In verse 11 is the first "they" referring to those blinded or is it referring to the entire group - obtained and blinded?
[11] I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy.
 
Last edited:

Awakened

Senior Member
Dec 4, 2016
127
7
18
I admit I have a HUGE prejudice for the KJV.:) That being said, I would like your unbiased opinion of whether I'm adding to the words or twisting scripture to make the KJV right.

Verse 7 has 2 factions of Israel: 1 has obtained and 1 is blinded.

Romans 11:7-11 KJV
[7] What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded

- Expounding on "the rest were blinded".
[8] (According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear unto this day.
[9] And David saith, Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompence unto them: [10] Let their eyes be darkened, that they may not see, and bow down their back alway.
- Expounding has ended.

In verse 11 is the first "they" referring to those blinded or is it referring to the entire group - obtained and blinded?
[11] I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy.
I understand it to mean, the blinded.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
I understand it to mean, the blinded.
As far as the NIV goes, I looked up the Greek (I'm no expert at all!) but I don't see "beyond recovery" in the Greek. I believe that is the translators interprestaion of what the verse means.

As far as KJV goes, I'm looking at it from this point of view:

Romans 11:11 KJV
I say then, Have they (blinded) stumbled that they (blinded and obtained) should fall? God forbid: but rather through their (blinded) fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them (blinded) to jealousy.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
As far as the NIV goes, I looked up the Greek (I'm no expert at all!) but I don't see "beyond recovery" in the Greek. I believe that is the translators interprestaion of what the verse means.

As far as KJV goes, I'm looking at it from this point of view:

Romans 11:11 KJV
I say then, Have they (blinded) stumbled that they (blinded and obtained) should fall? God forbid: but rather through their (blinded) fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them (blinded) to jealousy.
Sorry for mispellings lol.
 

Awakened

Senior Member
Dec 4, 2016
127
7
18
As far as the NIV goes, I looked up the Greek (I'm no expert at all!) but I don't see "beyond recovery" in the Greek. I believe that is the translators interprestaion of what the verse means.

As far as KJV goes, I'm looking at it from this point of view:

Romans 11:11 KJV
I say then, Have they (blinded) stumbled that they (blinded and obtained) should fall? God forbid: but rather through their (blinded) fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them (blinded) to jealousy.
What was the fall/transgression? Did both fall or just the blinded?
 
Jan 7, 2015
6,057
78
0
but the election hath obtained it, .....

Romans 11:28
As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the father's sakes. :)
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
What was the fall/transgression? Did both fall or just the blinded?
The fall was the rejection of God, specifically killing the prophets and Jesus. Just the blinded fell. The others obtained what they were seeking - Christ, salvation.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
This is the fall:

Matthew 23:37-38 KJV
O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! [38] Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
 

Awakened

Senior Member
Dec 4, 2016
127
7
18
This is the fall:

Matthew 23:37-38 KJV
O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! [38] Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
This is where I get confused, so they didn't do this because they were blinded, he blinded them because they did this?

He did not cause them to not believe, The "blindness" was punishment for their disobedience and unbelief.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
This is where I get confused, so they didn't do this because they were blinded, he blinded them because they did this?

He did not cause them to not believe, The "blindness" was punishment for their disobedience and unbelief.
I'm tied up for a while but I think these verses may help.

John 9:39-41 KJV
And Jesus said, For judgment I am come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see might be made blind. [40] And some of the Pharisees which were with him heard these words, and said unto him, Are we blind also? [41] Jesus said unto them, If ye were blind, ye should have no sin: but now ye say, We see; therefore your sin remaineth.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
This reeks of hyper-dispensationalism.
This reeks of no willingness to discuss or have an open mind, and ZERO means to prove your point..

ie.. Another attack from the left.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
This is off the subject but I'm trying to figure out if all of Israel were Jews.

Jews are descendants of two of the Israelite tribes: Judah and Benjamin but what about the other 10?
After the restoration of the temple post babylon, Representatives off all trives were present. Since they all lived in the southern kingdom (called Judah) they all were called Jews.

so yes

 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
This is where I get confused, so they didn't do this because they were blinded, he blinded them because they did this?

He did not cause them to not believe, The "blindness" was punishment for their disobedience and unbelief.
They did not believe to begin with,, They did not all of a sudden become blind, They were unbvelievers the moment Jesus was born, and still unbelievers when he was in his ministry and suffered his death.

remember, Isreal was a slave to rome, The city belonged to rime, Why? Because they were in sin, They still had not repented.
 
Dec 13, 2016
744
6
0
After the restoration of the temple post babylon, Representatives off all trives were present. Since they all lived in the southern kingdom (called Judah) they all were called Jews.

so yes

Except Anna the Prophetess?

And the Levites?
 
Dec 13, 2016
744
6
0
They did not believe to begin with,, They did not all of a sudden become blind, They were unbvelievers the moment Jesus was born, and still unbelievers when he was in his ministry and suffered his death.

remember, Isreal was a slave to rome, The city belonged to rime, Why? Because they were in sin, They still had not repented.
Awakened is talking about

Judah under judgement, which began when Jeremiah spoke the Lord's Words