"A white man's perspective"

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
G

GaryA

Guest
I've always found it interesting that we fight racism by promoting racism. And that those who most decry the separation of races are those who most fiercely refuse assimilation.
Please explain...
"Never mind..." :eek:

I misread your post originally.

I understand what you are saying.

:)
 
G

GaryA

Guest
Honest question.

Does it serve reconciliation of the races when they are identified as?

African Americans

Hispanic Americans

Asian Americans

IF this is the proper/acceptable way to reconciliation between the races, then I insist I be referred to as:

German, Irish, Jewish, African, Native American American......... and not as "white."

Our Government goes to great lengths to divide all peoples according to their race.........and then wonders why race relations are such a problem........hmm.......
Indeed!

As a matter of 'American' culture --- it should be that we are all simply 'Americans'.

As a matter of 'American' culture --- there should be no 'division' in the country.

:)
 
G

GaryA

Guest
German, Irish, Jewish, African, Native American American......... and not as "white."
When I was growing up as a child, I was told that I am part Irish, part German, and part two different tribes of American-Indian / Native-American - one from each Grandmother. ( Cherokee and whatever tribe it is that is or was historically their greatest enemy. HAHA - go figure... I am not certain I remember what the other tribe was. ) Enough so - that I am eligible ( so I am told ) for some government 'programs' -- none of which I have ever applied for - or even so much as looked into. This is because I believe that "local community" should take care of people - not the goverment.

:)
 
G

GaryA

Guest
When I was growing up as a child, I was told that I am part Irish, part German, and part two different tribes of American-Indian / Native-American - one from each Grandmother.
And, possibly-or-probably, English / British.

:)
 

Fenner

Senior Member
Jan 26, 2013
7,507
111
0
I'm not sure when the whole, I am whatever nationality American. If you're born here, yes I'm sure you have ancestors from another country but if you're born here you're American. I don't use the term Swedish American because my Mom immigrated from Sweden. I was born here in America. How did the whole thing start?
 
G

GaryA

Guest
...referred to the majority of Blacks as "Lazy N____s'. To me, that says a lot. They would know more accurately than I would.
I have been told this by black folks, also.

:)
 
G

GaryA

Guest
I'm not sure when the whole, I am whatever nationality American. If you're born here, yes I'm sure you have ancestors from another country but if you're born here you're American. I don't use the term Swedish American because my Mom immigrated from Sweden. I was born here in America. How did the whole thing start?
It started with "African-American" in the 70s, if I remember correctly...

:)
 
G

GaryA

Guest
BTW, you Black people reading this thread. You actually ARE hearing a White perspective, derived from what we see all around us every day,

Not many of us ever see too many of the good, outstanding Blacks that we COULD be proud to call neighbors, though we know they must exist out there, somewhere.
As a rule, you see more in the smaller towns, and less in the big cities...


I've seen some rude & immature white neighbors before so it goes both ways.
Most white folks would call this "a drop in the bucket" compared to what Willie is suggesting...

I think we have already established a consensus that there are "rude and immature" people everywhere - in every 'group'.

Willie is suggesting that "the sheer numbers" are "very telling"...


Not to mention countless whites who look down on other races.
What about the 'countless' whites that do not?

:)
 
G

GaryA

Guest
I think the problem, or a big part of it, lies with the internal servers of individuals

people are simply not honest with themselves so how on earth are they going to stretch themselves to actually reach into another person?

I'm probably overly introspective and I didn't read the whole thread, but I did read the op and this post of yours

what do think about that?

now I'll go back and skim over the posts :)
If people cannot be truly honest with themselves, then it becomes [ virtually ] hopeless...

( They are too "self-absorbed" to be able to care enough about others. )

:)
 
Last edited:
G

GaryA

Guest
Don't worry, it's always five miles to go before you get to stupidville.
I take it that you mean "we are never that far from it" as opposed to "we never quite reach it"... ;)

:)
 
G

GaryA

Guest
Move


If we're both driving down the highway, parallel, in adjacent lanes,
you could roll down your window and shout, "I want your lane!"

I could then shout back "I will not move for you!"

And you could shout back, "you WILL move for me, or I'll run you over!"

And I could shout back again, "YOU WILL NOT MOVE ME!"




In the above scenario, we are both talking about whether or not I will "move",
all the while I'm already moving at 65 mph!



How can this be?


It can be... because words have various definitions, and various senses.
We all know this.
Every day we use words with multiple definitions, and multiple senses.
Yet when it comes to a debate, or a bible verse...
we suddenly refuse to admit multiple definitions, or multiple senses, exist.


When defending our position, we suddenly REFUSE to admit words can have
multiple definitions, or multiple senses...
although we use these multiples senses of words every day.





Your point is a good one with regard to the use of language today. However, there is one thing you are missing when you start talking about "what the Bible says"...

In the Hebrew and Greek languages, the "sense and tense" of words include a more extensive and detailed definition - as compared to words generally used in the English language today.

With regard to your above illustration -- in the Hebrew or Greek -- the word usage will actually indicate "which" idea is being presented...

What does the Bible say?
That being said -- please - let's keep this thread 'on-track' -- and, discuss 'move' - and, other similar things - in a more appropriate thread.

( i.e. - by-all-means - "move" the 'move' discussion to a Flat Earth thread...? )

:)
 

Fenner

Senior Member
Jan 26, 2013
7,507
111
0
It started with "African-American" in the 70s, if I remember correctly...

:)
I didn't realize that started in the 70's, I thought the 90's. It's funny black people that I know don't call themselves African American. Not that we talk about it, but to me it's like someone calling me white, it's not offensive I am white. I'm actually pale and sunburn easily.
 
Dec 9, 2011
13,761
1,730
113
I've always found it interesting that we fight racism by promoting racism. And that those who most decry the separation of races are those who most fiercely refuse assimilation.
Deserving of rep,coming your way.
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,415
2,489
113
Your point is a good one with regard to the use of language today. However, there is one thing you are missing when you start talking about "what the Bible says"...

In the Hebrew and Greek languages, the "sense and tense" of words include a more extensive and detailed definition - as compared to words generally used in the English language today.

With regard to your above illustration -- in the Hebrew or Greek -- the word usage will actually indicate "which" idea is being presented...


:)

You and I have no argument, but you may have misunderstood my point.


Regardless of the particular language, this issue of equivocation still occurs.


Equivocation always occurs because man is fallen.


Whenever people want to prove their preconceived beliefs, and ignore context, they will always "equivocate" by picking only the sense of a word which suits their purpose. They will even pretend that no other senses of the word exist. This occurs irrespective of the context. That is the whole point. People ignore context to prove their own fallacies.

Greek is more precise, and Hebrew is much more vague... yet words still have various senses and definitions which are INHERENT IN CONTEXT, but which will be IGNORED BY THOSE WITH AGENDAS.

My point was not that words have no precise sense within their context;
my point is that people IGNORE the precise sense by IGNORING the context.

You and I have no argument here.
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,415
2,489
113
One last bit of derailment before I exit, and leave everyone in peace.
:)

Although Greek is extremely precise, equivocation even happens in Greek.
It has ALWAYS happened in Greek.

It was primarily Aristotle who codified the logic principles which address, and thwart, rhetorical issues like equivocation.

They had these SAME SEMANTIC PROBLEMS back in ancient Greece.


Mankind hasn't really changed very much.



RACISM & SOCIAL ISSUES:

BTW... if you guys take a look at the WORDS and LANGUAGE used in current social issues like RACISM... you'll see people being manipulated by these same linguistic tricks.

The same language tricks from thousands of years ago are still being used today... to confuse and manipulate people.

There is nothing new under the sun.
:)
 
G

GaryA

Guest
You and I have no argument, but you may have misunderstood my point.


Regardless of the particular language, this issue of equivocation still occurs.


Equivocation always occurs because man is fallen.


Whenever people want to prove their preconceived beliefs, and ignore context, they will always "equivocate" by picking only the sense of a word which suits their purpose. They will even pretend that no other senses of the word exist. This occurs irrespective of the context. That is the whole point. People ignore context to prove their own fallacies.

Greek is more precise, and Hebrew is much more vague... yet words still have various senses and definitions which are INHERENT IN CONTEXT, but which will be IGNORED BY THOSE WITH AGENDAS.

My point was not that words have no precise sense within their context;
my point is that people IGNORE the precise sense by IGNORING the context.

You and I have no argument here.
Yeah - that certainly happens a lot...

:)
 
G

GaryA

Guest
RACISM & SOCIAL ISSUES:

BTW... if you guys take a look at the WORDS and LANGUAGE used in current social issues like RACISM... you'll see people being manipulated by these same linguistic tricks.

The same language tricks from thousands of years ago are still being used today... to confuse and manipulate people.
Yep...

:)
 

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
"Never mind..." :eek:

I misread your post originally.

I understand what you are saying.

:)
Sorry I didn't get back to you. I wasn't sure that I really wanted to join this debate.

The LA Times has been running a series of articles about how black and latino communities in Los Angeles are complaining about whites moving in. Ruining the neighborhoods, they claim.