An Introduction to the Doctrines of Grace: Limited Atonement

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
But they all go together. God irresistably draws those He chose from before the creation of the world.
That is why it robs God and His Christ of their glory. You reduce the great spectacle of Christ dying for sinners to little more than theatre and not a great unfathomable act of love.

Love, adoration and exultation stems from a heart that yields willingly not from a heart that is compelled by overwhelming force.

Gods wrath is so fierce because Gods love is so great. God loves every soul to the fullest extent.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,691
3,547
113
Huh? Ephesians 2:3 and Romans 9:21 states otherwise.
But isn't that what you believe? God elected you unto salvation before the foundation of the world? I apologize if that's not what you believe. If not, then when did God elect you to be saved?
 
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
yet those people in unbelief had their sins atoned for.. They had the same opportunity you and I have to be saved, because the penatly was paid for them also.

yet in unbelief, they rejected the atonement

Nice try though.
Brother, you're all over the place. You said Christ did not die for the sin of unbelief. If that sin was not atoned for, then that limits the atonement. You're making no sense here.
 
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
But isn't that what you believe? God elected you unto salvation before the foundation of the world? I apologize if that's not what you believe. If not, then when did God elect you to be saved?
When were chosen before time, saved during it. Election is not salvation. We are elected TO salvation.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth,no sacrifice for sins is left,27 but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God.28 Anyone who rejected the law of Moses died without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses.29 How much more severely do you think someone deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God underfoot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified them, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace?[Hebrews 10:26-29]

The Hebrews writer is starting this passage out with a warning. If ppl, after being saved, keep on sinning, there is no more sacrifice for sin. However, 1 John 3 states we can't keep on sinning, seeing His seed is in us.

Now, he is stating that if a believer does that, then he would deserve a greater punishment. It is a warning to the sheep to keep themselves unspotted from the world.[James 1:27] However, those who are saved, will remain saved.
Exactly but under Calvinism it is not necessary to choose to submit to Christ as it is all predestined.

In either case the blood is trod underfoot and dismissed as unimportant.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63
Well, I am in a conundrum . . .

John 6:44 says that I can't come to Jesus except the Father draws me . . . John 14:6 says that I can't come to the Father but through Jesus . . . .

:cool::D;)
 

NayborBear

Banned Serpent Seed Heresy
(Roger's opening statement from post #66)

"
Of course they had a choice. Are you stating that the "effectual drawing" could not be resisted?"

Of course, it can be resisted, Roger! But, ask yourself, Are "you", or anyone, for that matter, STRONGER then God? (meaning) ALTHOUGH, God's effectual drawing, can BE resisted? It CANNOT be EFFECTUALLY resisted! For He WILL "thread you through, EVERY tare, that gives one call TO resist! Answer every question, of doubt, in HIS effectual drawing TO HIM! AND? FILL one with such a presence of HOLINESS, LOVE, and, LIGHT, that, in the Bible, it's referred to "losing one's bowels"! When encountering His Holiness! Something a flesh man CANNOT deny, LET ALONE, "EFFECTUALLY RESIST!"....From THAT point...FORWARD!

I apologize for interjecting this into such a "spirited" debate. But, felt moved to answer your question! The actual answer being? "Yeah, YEAH!...SURE, SURE!...You can TRY to resist!" GOD, Actually finds it quite humorous, when one of His elect, in a flesh body, TRIES to resist! Because, this is, (in one particular case I am quite familiar with), WHERE, HE will start "bringing to remembrance" things past! Giving one not merely a due diligence, and "a direction" to head in, but more importantly, the sense, of purpose, leaving the recipient usually saying to himself. "YEAH!..Now THAT'S what "I'm" talkin' about!"....Along with the question "WHERE, Have YOU been, ALL my life?" :cool:

OK!...I'm finished...carry on your debate......
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Brother, you're all over the place. You said Christ did not die for the sin of unbelief. If that sin was not atoned for, then that limits the atonement. You're making no sense here.
There is a hge difference in saying God died for ONLY sins of the limited atoned people. and saying he just died for all sins of unbelief. You could rightly say it proves limited atonement, But not the way your intending it when you are discussing it

Limited atonement means a certain group of people have no chance to be saved, period. God di dnot die for them, That is just not true.

God died for all sin, but unbelief, the people earned their condemnation. the people saved, God earned their right to be called children of God by his work. The formoer group WILLINGLY rejected that offer of forgiveness.

 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Well, I am in a conundrum . . .

John 6:44 says that I can't come to Jesus except the Father draws me . . . John 14:6 says that I can't come to the Father but through Jesus . . . .

:cool::D;)
Yikes! Perhaps it's a mystery?

Just look to Jesus the Alpha and Omega the Author and Finisher of our faith.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
(Roger's opening statement from post #66)

"
Of course they had a choice. Are you stating that the "effectual drawing" could not be resisted?"

Of course, it can be resisted, Roger! But, ask yourself, Are "you", or anyone, for that matter, STRONGER then God? (meaning) ALTHOUGH, God's effectual drawing, can BE resisted? It CANNOT be EFFECTUALLY resisted! For He WILL "thread you through, EVERY tare, that gives one call TO resist! Answer every question, of doubt, in HIS effectual drawing TO HIM! AND? FILL one with such a presence of HOLINESS, LOVE, and, LIGHT, that, in the Bible, it's referred to "losing one's bowels"! When encountering His Holiness! Something a flesh man CANNOT deny, LET ALONE, "EFFECTUALLY RESIST!"....From THAT point...FORWARD!

I apologize for interjecting this into such a "spirited" debate. But, felt moved to answer your question! The actual answer being? "Yeah, YEAH!...SURE, SURE!...You can TRY to resist!" GOD, Actually finds it quite humorous, when one of His elect, in a flesh body, TRIES to resist! Because, this is, (in one particular case I am quite familiar with), WHERE, HE will start "bringing to remembrance" things past! Giving one not merely a due diligence, and "a direction" to head in, but more importantly, the sense, of purpose, leaving the recipient usually saying to himself. "YEAH!..Now THAT'S what "I'm" talkin' about!"....Along with the question "WHERE, Have YOU been, ALL my life?" :cool:

OK!...I'm finished...carry on your debate......
Matthew 23:37
[ Jesus Laments over Jerusalem ] “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the one who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing!

Luke 13:34
[ Jesus Laments over Jerusalem ] “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the one who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, but you were not willing!

Was jerusalem more powerful than God that they were able to resist him?

Or did God allow in his infinate love them to reject him, because he di dnot want to force himself on them, he wanted a relationship with them?


 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
(Roger's opening statement from post #66)

"
Of course they had a choice. Are you stating that the "effectual drawing" could not be resisted?"

Of course, it can be resisted, Roger! But, ask yourself, Are "you", or anyone, for that matter, STRONGER then God? (meaning) ALTHOUGH, God's effectual drawing, can BE resisted? It CANNOT be EFFECTUALLY resisted! For He WILL "thread you through, EVERY tare, that gives one call TO resist! Answer every question, of doubt, in HIS effectual drawing TO HIM! AND? FILL one with such a presence of HOLINESS, LOVE, and, LIGHT, that, in the Bible, it's referred to "losing one's bowels"! When encountering His Holiness! Something a flesh man CANNOT deny, LET ALONE, "EFFECTUALLY RESIST!"....From THAT point...FORWARD!

I apologize for interjecting this into such a "spirited" debate. But, felt moved to answer your question! The actual answer being? "Yeah, YEAH!...SURE, SURE!...You can TRY to resist!" GOD, Actually finds it quite humorous, when one of His elect, in a flesh body, TRIES to resist! Because, this is, (in one particular case I am quite familiar with), WHERE, HE will start "bringing to remembrance" things past! Giving one not merely a due diligence, and "a direction" to head in, but more importantly, the sense, of purpose, leaving the recipient usually saying to himself. "YEAH!..Now THAT'S what "I'm" talkin' about!"....Along with the question "WHERE, Have YOU been, ALL my life?" :cool:

OK!...I'm finished...carry on your debate......
It is the goodness of God that leads men to repentance not the severity of God.

The Holy Spirit pleads with men to be saved. The Holy Spirit does not brow beat men to be saved.

We are not saved by the sovereignty of God but by the grace of God.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
I don't understand why people argue over this one.

If atonement isn't limited then everyone is saved and no one needs to come to repentance.


I suppose the argument is really over election. People don't like that.
Kind of shows the irony of the moniker "notuptome" doesn't it?
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Kind of shows the irony of the moniker "notuptome" doesn't it?
No more so than the irony of John Calvin and the misuse of his observations.

Tell me do Calvinists have a John 16:8 experience?

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,189
113
Exactly but under Calvinism it is not necessary to choose to submit to Christ as it is all predestined.

In either case the blood is trod underfoot and dismissed as unimportant.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
No, that's not true.

We chose to submit because we are led to it.

We didn't know about the predestination until afterwards...

We didn't know salvation occurred because of the leading of the Lord Jesus Christ and not our awesome choices and strength until after we were saved.
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,189
113
I disagree, I love election, god chose me from the foundation of the earth,

i reject limited atonement, because it showed favoritism, no matter how people try to excuse it away and say it does not
God chose Israel over Egypt. That was favoritism.

God chose Jacob over Esau.

God chose Isaac over Ishmael.

Not sure why you don't think God shows favoritism.

I guess you already know that the Atonement can't be because of merit.
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
No more so than the irony of John Calvin and the misuse of his observations.

Tell me do Calvinists have a John 16:8 experience?

For the cause of
Roger

Of course it wouldn't be beneath you to suggest Calvinists are lost. But that is more a commentary upon your person than upon Calvinists.
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
Exactly but under Calvinism it is not necessary to choose to submit to Christ as it is all predestined.
There's a lie. Do you do this often?

In either case the blood is trod underfoot and dismissed as unimportant.

For the cause of
Roger
And the above is way over the top and shows you as out of control and literally slandering, which is of course the second lie of your post.
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
God chose Israel over Egypt. That was favoritism.

God chose Jacob over Esau.

God chose Isaac over Ishmael.

Not sure why you don't think God shows favoritism.

I guess you already know that the Atonement can't be because of merit.
Well, people don't know what "no respecter of persons" means in its context. Favoritism is just another way of describing Sovereign Grace if you think about it.
 

Johnny_B

Senior Member
Mar 18, 2017
1,954
64
48

Everyone will have a choice to either receive or not the work of Christ. We beg them - be reconciled to God because on God's side - He sees you as already reconciled by Christ's work. This is our true ministry.

Who does God already see as reconciled?
 
Dec 21, 2012
2,901
39
0
The main problem I have with Calvanism, is that its based on mans opinion of the scriptures rather then the scriptures themselves, I realize that the 'church fathers' were learned and devoted men, but men they were, therefore ANY doctrine needs to line up with and pass the test of the whole of biblical text in proper context and application, not removing certain verses to back up a doctrine, but rather making certain the doctrine matches what the bible actually teaches.
I have not discern anything wrong yet for Limited Atonement, but Unconditional Election as defined below. I see an error.

From this link below

The Five Points of Calvinism, TULIP

" Unconditional Election:
God does not base His election on anything He sees in the individual. He chooses the elect according to the kind intention of His will (Eph. 1:4-8; Rom. 9:11) without any consideration of merit within the individual. Nor does God look into the future to see who would pick Him. Also, as some are elected into salvation, others are not (Rom. 9:15, 21)."

John 3:[SUP]18 [/SUP]He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.[SUP] 19 [/SUP]And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.[SUP]20 [/SUP]For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.[SUP] 21 [/SUP]But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.

Reads to me that God the Father can see who is seeking Him from those that are not; He can see who prefer their evil deeds rather than come to the Light to be reproved of them. That disproves unconditional election.

Jesus warned about casting pears before swine; hence those who are not seeking Him, and have voiced any missionary to stop that they do not want to know, the believer should follow Jesus by His words.

Matthew 7:[SUP]6 [/SUP]Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.[SUP] 7 [/SUP]Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you:[SUP]8 [/SUP]For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened.

We see how the Holy Spirit forbid missionaries to go into certain countries and then by a dream, told them where to go because God the father knew what country had people seeking Him in.

Acts 16:[SUP]6 [/SUP]Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia,[SUP] 7 [/SUP]After they were come to Mysia, they assayed to go into Bithynia: but the Spirit suffered them not.[SUP] 8 [/SUP]And they passing by Mysia came down to Troas.[SUP] 9 [/SUP]And a vision appeared to Paul in the night; There stood a man of Macedonia, and prayed him, saying, Come over into Macedonia, and help us.[SUP]10 [/SUP]And after he had seen the vision, immediately we endeavoured to go into Macedonia, assuredly gathering that the Lord had called us for to preach the gospel unto them.

So God the Father knows whom are seeking Him from those that prefer their evil deeds rather than be reproved by Him.

The problem with identifying with Calvinism is to identify with the man. Calvin had a heretick put to death, but Jesus did not teach any one to do that for those that have gone astray.

John 16:1These things have I spoken unto you, that ye should not be offended.[SUP] 2 [/SUP]They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.[SUP] 3 [/SUP]And these things will they do unto you, because they have not known the Father, nor me.[SUP] 4 [/SUP]But these things have I told you, that when the time shall come, ye may remember that I told you of them. And these things I said not unto you at the beginning, because I was with you.

So believers killing believers that have gone astray is not taught in the N.T. Bible at all. We are to excommunicate an unrepentant believer, or withdraw from having company with one, but not to treat them as the enemy, but admonish them as brothers. 2 Thessalonians 3:1-7,14-15

So why would I want to be identified with Calvin as if representing a believer as if he has done no wrong nor taught anything wrong?

1 Corinthians 3:[SUP]5 [/SUP]Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man?[SUP] 6 [/SUP]I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.[SUP]7 [/SUP]So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.

2 Corinthians 4:[SUP]5 [/SUP]For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord; and ourselves your servants for Jesus' sake.[SUP]6 [/SUP]For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.[SUP]7 [/SUP]But we have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellency of the power may be of God, and not of us.

If John Calvin did not preach himself, I do not know why believers are or seek to be identified as a Calvinist when we are to be disciples of Jesus Christ in representing Him in seeking His glory.

In any event, I see nothing wrong with limited atonement, but as in all things, no matter how famous or popular any minister is, we are to prove everything by the Lord Jesus Christ by His words as kept in the KJV in following Him.