The truth behind the Law

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,452
74
48
lol.. Which I have been saying since I first God here (faith first, Obedience and good works follow)

Again, There was grace in the OT.. Maybe try to read what people say first?

In fact, this response shows you did not even read the post you responded to. If you did, You would not have much such comments.
Please tell me, if obedience and works follow faith, then why did you say in post 232.
No, you would not be condemned for saying salvation is by faith, unless you add works.
And may I ask what is their to be obedient to? If their is no law, what is their?
 
Last edited:

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
588
113
I can see I did not ref to scriptures in my post you responded to but I have quoted them in other posts on this thread and thought they had been seen.
I will get back to this when I have had a sleep, now being nearly 10pm I am tired and in pain...see you later.
I am sorry about your pain. Hopefully after you have had some rest, you will feel better
 

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,452
74
48
Not really.

If you want to be understood then something more than meaningless, if poetic, platitudes are required.
Not being rude, just pointing out what I have seen. If a person wants to to be understood, they are in the wrong place no matter what they say.
I say that as I have said, in as clear as words as I can, that Yeshua is my Savior, And that I follow not to be saved, rather because I am saved. Yet even with that I seen to be condemned by everyone that does not like the truth of my words.
 

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,452
74
48
What happens is that when someone comes and says "we need to observe the Sabbath as outlined in the Old Testament" and "if you don't - you are sinning and dis-obeying God." - this is what causes Christians to react.

Unfortunately CC has been full of these types and people are a bit "gun happy" to label all in the same boat - which I don't agree with personally. Those are definitely called Judaizers and were stood against vehemently by Paul.

Thank you for your offer about the Sabbath - I have read the "reasons" why some observe the Sabbath in it's original way as a type or shadow of Christ but I prefer to observe Christ Himself as He is my true eternal Sabbath rest.

There is always "tension" in different view points on subjects and when it goes against what we have been taught in some of our church teachings and traditions - the "fur can fly" in "defending the truth" but we can just be really "defending our teachings and traditions ".

We all need each other in the body of Christ as each one has a part to play. Bless you
Amen, and thank you.
I understand one wishing to defend what they see as truth, just as I do. Yet when to go calling names, and placing things on others, then turn around and say the same thing for them self, That I don't get at all. I will be the first to say, that NOT one passage in the Bible gives a commandment to ONLY worship on the 7th day. I give praise and worship everyday. That is why I love to talk about His word. If not for all the great works done by Him, I think you will agree, we would not be able to have open discussion at all.
just asking for you idea on this one. You don't need to answer if you don't wish to.
(side note, I am only asking one person ok)
Is it wise for a person that like myself, finds it ok for others to work out their own salvation between them and HaShem, to even bother with a sight like this one? Or would I be better off to just keep on keeping on with my study group?
That is funny when I think about it. We have church leaders gathering together, and none are from the same church, yet we can talk openly about what the other understands, and then say, "Never see it that way, can you get me some notes for next time, I would really like to look into that." Shot even the RCC prist, is now going to a Baptist church on Sunday Night. I think that shows great understanding, and the man is credit to his faith. We keep telling him if he would do a sermon in English we all go and see whats up.
 

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,452
74
48
Has it occurred to you that you are posting to a forum with thousands of members and a lot of other readers besides.
If you do not have the courtesy to actually state who your post was for then you should expect anybody to comment.
If you want a private conversation use the private messaging...
On that note if I may, with out getting my head chopped off. We all should understand that their may well be none believers reading this. What kind of example does this set, and just how can name calling and, fighting over things that to me are clear, ( in that I mean I am being told I am doing things that I am not, and condemned for something , only to find a post from teh same person saying the same thing I have held to from the get go.)
Put your self in the shoes of someone loking to see if if Christ is right ofr them. I know that as I look back over this, and other treads, I think, why would a person look at the actions of as seen on here ever want to become a Believer? I will give to fact their are some on here, that are only looking to find out new understandings, as I am, to see if what they follow might be wrong. Then I get all this crap, and yes i see it as carp, and I think, well looks like I may not so bad off after all. I mean really, I don't need this crap in my life, and I am not the kind of person to just keep repeating my self.

My sister, an atheist, asked me, how I fill my time now that I can't work. I told her about this place. She came over and read just one page of this thread. That my friends was all she needed to tell me, "Now why would I want any part of what you follow? I have been around drug addicts, and drunks, with better behavior."
So I ask, what does say about most of the people posting on this thread?
 

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,452
74
48
Do you walk to work or do you take your lunch?
That was great, I was almost to the point of tears, thank you ever so much. :p I will be getting a good laugh off that for some time to come.
 
Jun 21, 2017
264
18
18
On that note if I may, with out getting my head chopped off. We all should understand that their may well be none believers reading this. What kind of example does this set, and just how can name calling and, fighting over things that to me are clear, ( in that I mean I am being told I am doing things that I am not, and condemned for something , only to find a post from teh same person saying the same thing I have held to from the get go.)
Put your self in the shoes of someone loking to see if if Christ is right ofr them. I know that as I look back over this, and other treads, I think, why would a person look at the actions of as seen on here ever want to become a Believer? I will give to fact their are some on here, that are only looking to find out new understandings, as I am, to see if what they follow might be wrong. Then I get all this crap, and yes i see it as carp, and I think, well looks like I may not so bad off after all. I mean really, I don't need this crap in my life, and I am not the kind of person to just keep repeating my self.

My sister, an atheist, asked me, how I fill my time now that I can't work. I told her about this place. She came over and read just one page of this thread. That my friends was all she needed to tell me, "Now why would I want any part of what you follow? I have been around drug addicts, and drunks, with better behavior."
So I ask, what does say about most of the people posting on this thread?
I truly don't know why we all just can't get along. We need to accept each other's differences, and each other's different interpretations of things. I feel as though just because one is saved and has been forgiveness for their sins, should they really pretend as if they have never sinned, and pass such judgement on others. I have to say I've definitely didn't expect all this negativity, on a site like this. But I'll always treat you with respect, brother man!
 

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,452
74
48
yes, it looks like the "till all is fulfilled" from verse 18 is where we read it differently.

I think all being already fulfilled dovetails nicely with

Galatians 5, For all the law is
fulfilled
in one word, even in this: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.
Nicely put. i do applaud your understanding.
That however does lead me to a question that is a bit off Mat. It does in my mind still hold to same teaching, so please if you will follow along.

Rev 14:12 ¶Here is the patience of the saints; here are those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus.

in this passage, does it not look as though both must go hand in hand? To me it does. If you don't see it that way, I am open to your understanding, and it would be a great help.
I do wish to thank you for being one voice of reason in a room full of disorder.
 

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,452
74
48
I'm asking for it now, but how do you explain v.2 of Genesis 1?



the 'deep' refers to the water I think? yet the Spirit of God was hovering over it (the waters)

I think people need to be careful about supposing what God and cannot do or whether or not the Holy Spirit can be in darkness

did not God create both? if you refer to 'darkness' only as a 'spiritual' darkness, then how do we explain v.2 ?

can you supply scripture that attests to what you say regarding that where the Spirit of God is there is ONLY light?

please try to think about this. arguing is the last thing on my mind.
Now I am not scared of anything, but you are scary. LOL
I also agree with what you said. Goood job.
 

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,452
74
48
uh huh

we can see from this actual joust pic here, that both parties can loose



both have lost their seat. riding is all about balance

( so many metaphors I am getting losteded)

btw, I always wanted to try fencing. we need some fencing here.

stop the metaphors!

ok I'm done
You can't just leave me hanging here, I may die from suspense. Or would that be supposition? No mater I am dead both ways. :p
 

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,452
74
48
Oh, I see. You thought the "joust" was between GRACE777x70 and FGT when you supplied the picture of both riders falling off their seats


i see
Took you that long really?
yes I know sit down and sutup.
 

Ahwatukee

Senior Member
Mar 12, 2015
11,159
2,373
113
I truly don't know why we all just can't get along. We need to accept each other's differences, and each other's different interpretations of things. I feel as though just because one is saved and has been forgiveness for their sins, should they really pretend as if they have never sinned, and pass such judgement on others. I have to say I've definitely didn't expect all this negativity, on a site like this. But I'll always treat you with respect, brother man!
Hello PerfectlyImperfect,

I don't know why you would say that. What you call "negativity" is actually those in Christ contending for the truth of God's word. Regarding this, Paul said the following:

"I am astonished how quickly you are deserting the One who called you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel—which is not even a gospel. Evidently some people are troubling you and trying to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be under a divine curse! As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you embraced, let him be under a divine curse!"


We will also treat you with respect, while at the same time contend for the truth of God's word. This whole thing regarding the Law attempts to undermine the free gift of God which comes through faith in Christ. Scripture states that sin gets its power from the Law. We have been set free from it because Christ came and fulfilled the law, fully and completely, satisfying God's requirements for it. Yet, people want to bring it back and put themselves and other under it again.

It is very important for one to understand how he is saved. For Christ said "I am the way, the truth and the life and no one comes to the Father but by Me." That said, anyone who attempting to get to the Father by observing the works of the Law will fail and that because you are not going through Christ, but are trusting in your own works. Trusting in Christ is exactly that: You come to Christ believing that he provided salvation by what He did, not by what we can do.

Jesus met the righteous requirements of the Law, fulfilling it.

Jesus took upon himself the wrath that we deserve as a result of our sins

Jesus paid the penalty for our sins, the righteous for the unrighteous

Therefore to trust in our own efforts as a requirement for salvation, is to say that Christ's sacrifice was insufficient.

This is a very serious matter, because the Lord knows what an individual is truly trusting in. Putting ones trust in anything but Christ for salvation has eternal consequences.
 

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,452
74
48
I can see I did not ref to scriptures in my post you responded to but I have quoted them in other posts on this thread and thought they had been seen.
I will get back to this when I have had a sleep, now being nearly 10pm I am tired and in pain...see you later.
Sleep well in the arms of Yeshua my friend.
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
If this is right, then please, Give me scripture. I can on the other hand give you many passages that will show my side. Though due to my own rules for this, I will give you just one at this time.

Act 22:3
“I am indeed a Jew, born in Tarsus of Cilicia, but brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel, taught according to the strictness of our fathers' law, and was zealous toward God as you all are today.

I do ask that read this in context please. However for one to say that Paul told us we do not need the Law, would they not first need to remove his words in this passage?

Hi Rainrider. Whose law?

The context is the law of men called the law of the fathers. Christ called them a brood of vipers According to the law of the fathers, would it show they has a proper zeal for God or were they deceived by the father of lies as false zeal?
 

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,452
74
48
Yes. But don't let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, don't announce your works before men, and after you do what you do say of yourself...I am only a servant...i did what was expected
And who is doing that?
 

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,452
74
48
I truly don't know why we all just can't get along. We need to accept each other's differences, and each other's different interpretations of things. I feel as though just because one is saved and has been forgiveness for their sins, should they really pretend as if they have never sinned, and pass such judgement on others. I have to say I've definitely didn't expect all this negativity, on a site like this. But I'll always treat you with respect, brother man!
Yes you have, There some on here that do act out of Love and respect. To them I say keep it up my friends. After all one act can change the world. Well I have been told that anyway, just haven't it really word out that way.
 

Zmouth

Senior Member
Nov 21, 2012
3,391
134
63

The context is the law of men called the law of the fathers. Christ called them a brood of vipers According to the law of the fathers, would it show they has a proper zeal for God or were they deceived by the father of lies as false zeal?
And if not mistaken, aren't you grafted into the seed of Abraham,

I know that ye are Abraham's seed; John 8:37

If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham. John 8:39-40


Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God. John 8:41
 
Last edited:

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
Nicely put. i do applaud your understanding.
That however does lead me to a question that is a bit off Mat. It does in my mind still hold to same teaching, so please if you will follow along.

Rev 14:12 ¶Here is the patience of the saints; here are those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus.

in this passage, does it not look as though both must go hand in hand? To me it does. If you don't see it that way, I am open to your understanding, and it would be a great help.
I do wish to thank you for being one voice of reason in a room full of disorder.
Here's how I look at it,


is this the commandment of God?

On the eighth day she shall take two turtledoves, or two young pigeons, and bring them to the priest, to the door of the Tent of Meeting.

if so, then nobody is keeping it.


Rather,
from John 15, This is my commandment, that you love one another, even as I have loved you.

so yes! the commandment of God and faith in Jesus go hand-in-hand!
 

OneFaith

Senior Member
Sep 5, 2016
2,270
369
83
It seems that I have seen this debate on almost every thread I look at. So I thought it would be nice to see if we can not move that whole debate to one place.

However I would love to see this go as orderly as we can get it. I know that won't be an easy thing to do, so I am going to ask that we please keep this down to one passage at a time. One chapter, is find. However as I have seen, folks seem to think that if enough scripture is placed out at one time, then they think they win. That in my mind is just a way to muddy the water. It also seems to be an attempt to to not answer questions that are meant to make a point. Then that seems to be done when the other party seems to have no real answer.

I am going to do my best to use a translation of the Bible I think we can all agree on. The NKJ. As habit I use the NLB, The old English a bit confusing for me, ( am after all Dyslexic) so I thought we should all stay with the same translation, this seems to be a good compromise.

Also I would like to ask that if you can't stop your from hinting at calling others a liar, please don't post, as that is not the way to show Christ living with in you. This is the ground rules folks, if you can live with them, grate. If not then I ask that every one just stop replying to anyone that they see as braking this simple set of rules.

As for me, I grow wiry of such actions, and as has been seen from other post, I will stop replying, until my question is answered. So I wish to start this off, with just one question. I have made this point my self many times in life. It gets one of 2 reactions.

1 no answer at all.

2 A reply that is so full of scripture, that when you read them all, and ten take time to study it out, you may be a week getting back to answer it.

It is this that has prompted the ground rules I have placed. We all seem to serve HaShem, (if my use of Hebrew is a bit over the top for you, please let me know, I will do best to change it for you). That being said, we should all know that he is nothing if not orderly. Being as we are meant to be like Him,
1Co 11:1 Imitate me, just as I also imitate Christ.

Lets act so though we are trying to do so. Sorry for the long intro, I just seen no other way to do this.

Now we all know that if we are to bass our side on any one passage, it should be,
Mat 5:17 “Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill.
Mat 5:18 “For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.

I am going to start by asking, how does this passage fit your teachings? I do ask once more that we stay inside this passage, and if one must go outside this book, please make sure any passage you use is with in the context of the passage in question.

I will give my teaching on this to kick off this show.

I understand that this one passage may have been removed from it's true contextual intent for many 100's of years now. So I hope that you will not over look the following. As it seems that the one word fulfill or fulfilled, is the hot part of this passage, do we know what they are, and what the true definition of the Hebrew and Greek words used in the text are? Knowing the true meaning of the words first used, can make a world of difference.
From the Hebrew, we have the word, Strongs number is 4137.
Here we find,
plēroō

1) to make full, to fill up, i.e. to fill to the full

1a) to cause to abound, to furnish or supply liberally

1a1) I abound, I am liberally supplied
In the Hebrew it is
Mowladah
From 3205, brith
Don't get mad at me, I am only giving you what Strongs said. I myself am not real sure the word given in Hebrew is even a true Hebrew word. Should anyone ask, I will find out for sure. For now this is what Strongs has.

Working with this, we can say that Yeshua came to do one of 2 things. If we look at the Hebrew, we can say He came to give a rebirth of the Law, or that He came to give new birth.
From the greek we an say he came to fill, furnish, or supply.
What we can not say, is that He came to destroy, abolish, or do away with. To say so, one would have to remove most of what He said. As He told us, not to think that way, then backed this by telling us that not one jot or tittle would be removed, until it was all fulfilled. Please not that He said all. Not a part, or as much as we see fit. Also keep in mind that we are on earth now, and so it has not been done away with as yet.

That all comes down to one thing. If this passage means what it is telling us, then the Law has not been removed. Placing the burden on any that wish to remove it, to first remove this passage, or it's meaning. As I have opened the door to a debate that seems to have no end, and f the ground roles are followed, any passages out side of this one should show that the law was removed. Once more, please work this one passage at a time. Unlike many people, I do understand that I am human, and can be wrong. I do hope you understand that it will take a lot of work to show me that I am.
Ok folks let keep it clean, follow the rules, and lets have fun.
May HaShem guide this discussion to His end, and not to an end that pleases man. AMEN
Jesus compared physical things to spiritual things in order to give us a better understanding (parables). Instead of a battle of scriptures, like I have done many times, this time I decided to only give an example of the way I understand this passage...

Ok there's a mother making a dress for her daughter's prom. She laid out the pattern and showed it to her daughter. She loved it, and was so looking foreword to her prom. Weeks passed, and the dress was ready. The daughter walked into the room just as the mother was throwing away the pattern. Her daughter watched in horror. With every smash crinkling into a ball, and approaching the trash can closer and closer, her daughter's heart crushed more and more.

"My dress! How could you do that!" the daughter screamed, as she quickly rushed to retrieve the dress pattern. "How could you destroy my dress!" she yelled. The mother replied, "I did not come here to destroy your dress, but to get it done. Until your prom, until you walk in with your gorgeous dress and your gorgeous date, and make a memory that will last for years, I will not destroy or get rid of your dress by any means."

"But I saw you attempt to throw it away with my very own eyes just now!" she sobbed. The mother replied, "I love you, I would never destroy your dress that I worked so long and hard to create for you. Sweetie, this is not your dress, it was only the pattern for your dress. Your real dress is over here..."

She lead her daughter to the real dress, and smiled. "Do you like it?" she asked. "What's that!" her daughter sneered. "It's your prom dress, isn't it beautiful?" "Uhm, mom, that..., well..., it's just not what I've been picturing all this time. "Well what have you been picturing?" Her daughter dashed acrossed the room. She held up the pattern, with a gleam in her eye and a smile on her face. "This!!!" She held it up to her body and swayed back and forth with delight.

Her mother explained that the pattern was never the real dress to come, just like a shadow on a wall is not the real thing- but the thing that causes the shadow is the real thing. "See?" she said as she held her hand up close to the wall. "The shadow is the shape of my hand, but it's not my real hand. It is only a form that is temporary. It goes away when my hand goes away, but until the day I die, or something like an accident happens, my hand will not pass away like the shaddow.

"What are you talking about mom? No offense, but you really make no sense sometimes." The daughter took the pattern and left the room. She stapled the front and back paper patterns together, and wore it to the prom.

THE END

"These things were a shadow of what was to come. The reality however, is found in Christ.To God, the physical way of doing things is not the real way. To God, the spiritual way is the real way. For example, a lady sees a man approaching a door with his hands full of heavy boxes. She responds (responsibility- the ability to respond) by opening the door for him. This is an act of love. "Effort is the evidence of love." But opening the door is a physical way to express love.

So can love exist without physical expression? Yes! It is possible to love without evidence. Let's say the woman was in a wheelchair, and couldn't open the door for him. Wishing she could is still live. Opening the door was just a physical action, the real love came from the heart. So under Moses, when God's law was practiced physically, you could not murder someone. But under Christ, if you hate your brother, you are already guilty of murder. Because love or hate is spiritual (real) whether or not it is carried out physically.

Did Christ nail the law to the cross (Colossians 2:14)? The physical way of doing it, yes! He did not come to destroy God's law, but physical rules were never God's law, but only a representation of it. Love (which is not physical) is God's law. If you love God and your neighbor you won't murder them or steal from them. I could give you physical steps, saying to pick up an egg, raise and lower your arm, crack the egg into a bowl, and flour, sugar, and chocolate chips, etc. Lead to a long list of actions- like where to place your feet in order to walk to the cupboards and fridge to gather ingredients. OR I could simply say, "Make cookie." That covers everything, so you no longer need a list of actions. If you love, then no one has to tell you not to murder, cause through love it's automatic. Therefore love fulfills all of the physical laws of the Old Testament prophets.

We no longer physicalky rest on a physical day- we rest in our hearts and have peace knowing that this life is temporary and we're going to heaven. We no longer sacrifice a physically perfect lamb (which never took away one sin) because we have the real thing- the spiritual Lamb of God.

To go go back to being under Moses is to betray Christ (Romans 7;1-4)- Who has all authority over God's people today (Matthew 28:18).