What is frequently lacking -- and this is shocking -- is the absence of total honesty by those who attack Dispensationalism. Therefore they resort to ad hominem attacks on genuine Christians such as Darby, Scofield, etc.
Simple Definition of Ad Hominem:
Ad hominem remarks are often an example fallacy, because they are irrelevant to the overall argument.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I do not see where any of the threads I've made in refuting dispensationalism fails under the heading of Ad hominem.
Do we on a discussion forum not have the right to question the doctrines that have been written by men such as Darby or Scofield or do we just roll over and play dead?
What would Eminem say? .....