I checked and in this one fact your are correct (I have confused this part with Speak2me).
Actually that is NOT true.
He posted one of RZ's books as a PDF as proof of his heretical views.
So, no Marc, he did not just make a single, somewhat academic, query about something that RZ said in one video. He has made multiple unsubstantiated accusations to try and prove a point.
Remember he is the one who has made the claim that he is the faithful Berean!
Instead his behaviour is just one who is desperately throwing mud-pies in the hope that just one will stick.
I know this is not your approach - yet you are still vindicating him...
Actually that is NOT true.
He posted one of RZ's books as a PDF as proof of his heretical views.
So, no Marc, he did not just make a single, somewhat academic, query about something that RZ said in one video. He has made multiple unsubstantiated accusations to try and prove a point.
Remember he is the one who has made the claim that he is the faithful Berean!
Instead his behaviour is just one who is desperately throwing mud-pies in the hope that just one will stick.
I know this is not your approach - yet you are still vindicating him...
I do not see anywhere where he referred to RZ as heretical.
His concern was that RZ was soft on RCC heresy and expressed the belief that RZ should take a firmer stand.
He cited the book as an example of a soft stance on RCC. Even if we don't see that in the book, there is definitely nothing remotely slanderous in blade's post. He has made multiple unsubstantiated accusations to try and prove a point.
Where has Blade raised any issue other than softness on RCC heresy? I don't see it!
Instead his behaviour is just one who is desperately throwing mud-pies in the hope that just one will stick.
Please point out one mud pie or inappropriate remark; or even one issue other than RCC heresy.
I know this is not your approach - yet you are still vindicating him.
I am vindicating him because I honestly don't see grounds for your attack.
If anyone else on the forum sees a basis for these charges please point them out to me either on the forum or by PM.