Gods elects

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
D

Depleted

Guest


He said “Well I still consider you a friend.”- which shows that his intention is not disrespect. The Calvinist didn’t have a clear understanding of scripture- that’s true. So you either see how he didn’t match what the Bible says, or you disagree with old hermit and say “Well I think he did match scripture and has a clear understanding.”

If someone said to you “God told Adam and Eve they would die if they ate the forbidden fruit, but they didn’t- therefore God lies.” It would not be disrespectful to reply “You are not understanding this clearly. Adam and Eve did die spiritually and immediately needed a Savior. They also died physically later on. God said they would die, but He didn’t say when. Therefore God is not a liar.”

When Jesus was asked if He was the Christ, the Son of the living God, He had no choice but to say yes. Not because He is bragging, but because it is the truth. And it is the truth that this Calvinist does not have a clear understanding of scripture- therefore you shouldn’t follow his teaching.
Considering you think Calvinist is a person to follow and is dead, let's just say you aren't very good at understanding what was said at all.
 
Jan 6, 2018
1,796
154
63
I'm going to be totally honest with you here. Your "challenge" to discuss Scripture comes across as pompous arrogance because that's what it is.

I've read some of the things you've said in other threads, briefly, but hadn't witnessed this then. But right now, you're completely smug, prideful, conceited. You're proving over and again that you're of the Romans 9:20 mind set.
That comment doesn't prove Ro 9 is about God predestinating only certain people to eternal life.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
i am sort of new here...but i have not seen this poster attempt to address scripture at all???
Does he ever make a scriptural argument?
he asked if i was joking??? no..i was not joking...everyone posts what they think is truth...no one posts and says...I know this is not true, but i will post it anyway...so when N6 says...he or she is opinionated//// this is true for every poster, so why make such a statement...i think it is because very little scripture is available for them to offer.
Off topic, but needs to be addressed for clarification sake.

"Sort of new" is "been here for two days to one month." If you can last on this site for more than 4 months, you are no longer noob. Youse is OLD!

Youse is OLD, dude. You've lasted longer than I did the first time. lol Whatever you know after four months, it is safe to assume you've got the personalities down fairly well.

(And "Youse" just because I live in Philly, so I'm supposed to use that word. lol)
 
Jun 6, 2015
171
0
0
Fair enough. Start with chapter 8 and explain to me how these two chapters teach unconditional election.
First of all I don't like to be called a Calvinest since I don't know noting about him, I'm a Christian and I never said election was unconditional, infact there is only one unforgivable sin and only the elects can do it.
In verse 29 Paul wrote that God foreknew us and he predestined some of us to be firstborn of many, firstborn means that they are saved and he will use them for his purpose.
Verse 30 Those he predestined he also called for his purpose, those he called he also justified, that means he judged them and found them to be righteous, and them he also glorified, the word elect means tried and found to be righteous. God bless
 
D

Depleted

Guest
I do believe he has no real grasp of scripture. The video demonstrated that. Just because he is a Calvinists does not mean that I think all Calvinist are biblically illiterate.
Then please feel free to explain the adjective you used before the word "Calvinist."
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
Here's the whole thing in a nutshell and why people get so emotional over this:

- One group is dead set on proving God chose or saved them because of something they did, like responding, or whatever, in total defiance and loathing of Biblical unconditional election. This is all contrary to 1 Corinthians 1:26-31 teaching and other Scriptures. Most believe they had inherent faith and voted themselves into heaven. This is contrary to 2 Peter 1:1, Ephesians 1:19.

- The other group is dead set to prove from Scripture that God did all the saving, from choosing whom he willed to save to glorification and everything else in between, based on his purpose and will, and based in absolutely nothing in man. It is Soli Deo Gloria. This truth is witnessed throughout Scripture and is not erased by John 3:16 and a slough of "whosoever" verses no matter how hard the others try to pit Scripture against Scripture.

The fight is summed up in this: One group believes they had something to do with their salvation and reason as to why God saved them, the other group gives all the glory to God. Battling for the former over the latter is absurd to put it lightly, it is Romans 9:20. But that is what they are doing, it's a belligerency to prove they had something to do with why God chose them, or more plainly, why they are saved.
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,143
612
113
70
Alabama
First of all I don't like to be called a Calvinest since I don't know noting about him, I'm a Christian and I never said election was unconditional, infact there is only one unforgivable sin and only the elects can do it.
In verse 29 Paul wrote that God foreknew us and he predestined some of us to be firstborn of many, firstborn means that they are saved and he will use them for his purpose.
Verse 30 Those he predestined he also called for his purpose, those he called he also justified, that means he judged them and found them to be righteous, and them he also glorified, the word elect means tried and found to be righteous. God bless
Why are you starting at the end if the chapter? Let's start at the beginning.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
56,264
26,315
113
First of all I don't like to be called a Calvinest since I don't know noting about him, I'm a Christian and I never said election was unconditional, infact there is only one unforgivable sin and only the elects can do it.
If only the "elect" can commit the unforgivable sin, what of those who do not believe?
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
That comment doesn't prove Ro 9 is about God predestinating only certain people to eternal life.
That wasn't my objective Captain Obvious. Are you always this sharp? ;) :D

But we're pretty certain, are we not, that you're only going to reject Biblical revelation that proves this, while go out of context, while pitting Scripture against Scripture, correct? I've witnessed no other method from anti-Cals. Tell me, you're unique, right? I've read many works by noted theologians who go against this truth, and they all fail, every single one of them. But you have a new way to do it, right, because you're more versed and knowledgeable, or do you use their same erroneous arguments?
 
Jan 6, 2018
1,796
154
63
First of all I don't like to be called a Calvinest since I don't know noting about him, I'm a Christian and I never said election was unconditional, infact there is only one unforgivable sin and only the elects can do it.
In verse 29 Paul wrote that God foreknew us and he predestined some of us to be firstborn of many, firstborn means that they are saved and he will use them for his purpose.
Verse 30 Those he predestined he also called for his purpose, those he called he also justified, that means he judged them and found them to be righteous, and them he also glorified, the word elect means tried and found to be righteous. God bless
What did God foreknow about those whom He elected?
 
D

Depleted

Guest
How is wanting to study scripture pompous and arrogant????
Have you ever seen OH "study?" He's done lots of "studies" on this site. None of them were studying. They were teachings. He was the teacher and everyone else was the student.

He will pull out old notes he had on Romans 9, and answer questions to what he said, but he does NOT study with people. There is a completely different feel with studying and being teached-at. He's the teach-at type.

And I say this as someone who has learned from him, but I really did get I was supposed to be the student and he was the teacher. Whenever someone disagrees, after a bit, he tends to tell the person they don't have to stay, and then goes back to teaching from his notes. It's like disagreeing with your Semantics professor. You can disagree all you want, but the test is only about what the professor believes, not what you disagree with, so might as well sit back and accept it. This isn't studying. It's teaching!
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
Anyhow, I'm out of here, going to read some Puritan writ to further my brain washing. I'll be back and more Calvinist than ever!!!! :D

p.s. Someone PM me when the whole thing has been settled and the anti's stop censuring God. :)
 
Jun 6, 2015
171
0
0
Why are you starting at the end if the chapter? Let's start at the beginning.
I started where it explains election and predestination, please rebuttal, did Paul lie? rebuttal and go where you want. God bless
 
D

Depleted

Guest
Anyhow, I'm out of here, going to read some Puritan writ to further my brain washing. I'll be back and more Calvinist than ever!!!! :D

p.s. Someone PM me when the whole thing has been settled and the anti's stop censuring God. :)
Assume you will be jumping over fire hydrants in heaven yourself before you get that PM. lol
 
Jun 6, 2015
171
0
0
If only the "elect" can commit the unforgivable sin, what of those who do not believe?
I don't judge people, Jesus will do that, I try to teach God's word where man's word is being taught, if they prefer mans word that's up to them, I get the reward for planting a seed and they will get whatever they deserve. God bless
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,143
612
113
70
Alabama
I started where it explains election and predestination, please rebuttal, did Paul lie? rebuttal and go where you want. God bless
You are beginning without a contextual base. This is not the way to study scripture.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
56,264
26,315
113
I don't judge people, Jesus will do that, I try to teach God's word where man's word is being taught, if they prefer mans word that's up to them, I get the reward for planting a seed and they will get whatever they deserve. God bless
Your statement implied that the unbeliever does not commit the one unforgivable sin.