Women should not be allowed to preach in church

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

Pontiac

Guest
he lied and falsely accused another...



it was done in order to reprove the lies
but i will agree namecalling is not the way-to go about it

seems one mistake was made in order to attack someone
the false accusation

and the others were out of being offended by lies





who implied God is impressed with worldly education?
also
why "your"

you think He is impressed with yours?



"And furthermore I have explained that God is not impressed with any of your earthly educations at earthly institutions"

ok
:rolleyes:

are you not imputing he meant worldly education before you "didnt" pretend to be "high" or "mighty" and explain what God isnt and is impressed with?
You obviously have not read what was said ... Icetech did not lie ... He made a mistake of judgment and then apologized ... After his apology he was then attacked and insulted with name calling ... He didn't call anybody any names and he did not lie ... Read the pages starting at page 33 ...
 
D

Depleted

Guest
What I said is absolute truth and that is very evident by reading the last two pages of this thread ... I don't believe God is going to consider speaking truth as being "high minded" as you call it ... The name calling that was said in the last two pages here certainly was not said out of any love ... And there are no lies in what I said and that is precisely why it has struck such a nerve ... It is truth and many know it is truth ... I have only been here a short time and I have seen it several times already ... Icetech made a minor mistake and apologized ... Then still, even after his apology, people continued in calling him names ... Totally uncalled for behavior, especially on a Christian site ... I just ask that everybody actually remember who this site is supposed to be in honor of ... It is not for our honor ... It is supposed to be in God's honor ... He cannot be liking some of what He is seeing, that much I can guarantee ...
Oh brother, still all about your high-and-mighty opinion, huh?

Do you have any idea how bad it is to tell someone who shared her own research in her own words, that she could have just given the link to the site she took it from?

I am a schmuck sometimes. But never, ever call anyone a plagiarist, unless you can prove the charge.

But to you? It's all your perception. You don't even care to see what happened. You're just out to judge-and-jury everyone from your not-even-Bible-centered opinion and actually think you can control everyone because you said so.

You couldn't take it past 2 pages, and yet expect everyone to be up-to-the-minute, on-the-same-post-as-you. Reality time: for people who do actually read post by post, they could be on page 28, while you're complaining about what was said on page 29 and don't even notice your complaint didn't show up until page 36, but you won't give that same realization to others.
 
P

Pontiac

Guest
You obviously have not read what was said ... Icetech did not lie ... He made a mistake of judgment and then apologized ... After his apology he was then attacked and insulted with name calling ... He didn't call anybody any names and he did not lie ... Read the pages starting at page 33 ...
I wasn't the one doing any bragging about any education at all ... If you look back you will see this truth as well ... Any education any of us have was gained through God Himself so he deserves any credit there may be ... This was the message I was delivering and it is His message not mine ... God is the gifter of all knowledge and I can show you the verse if you would like ... So, it is vanity to boast about any education I don't care what it might be ... That is simply the truth which is being passed along ...
 
N

NoNameMcgee

Guest
You obviously have not read what was said ... Icetech did not lie ... He made a mistake of judgment and then apologized ... After his apology he was then attacked and insulted with name calling ... He didn't call anybody any names and he did not lie ... Read the pages starting at page 33 ...
_________________________

here is what i believe this is all over?

it was further back than when you posted
but i think this may have been what started this mess?
________________

postvvvv

I do regret the post that I made and it was in haste. Angela had previously posted a huge amount of information in a single post and followed it up with one equally as large when the argument she makes is already on the internet and a link to the appropriate site would have been sufficient
_______

more a false accusation than a "lie"

a lie is more intentional

i dont know if he made the false accusation on purpose or accident

so sorry for adding "lie"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
P

Pontiac

Guest
Oh brother, still all about your high-and-mighty opinion, huh?

Do you have any idea how bad it is to tell someone who shared her own research in her own words, that she could have just given the link to the site she took it from?

I am a schmuck sometimes. But never, ever call anyone a plagiarist, unless you can prove the charge.

But to you? It's all your perception. You don't even care to see what happened. You're just out to judge-and-jury everyone from your not-even-Bible-centered opinion and actually think you can control everyone because you said so.

You couldn't take it past 2 pages, and yet expect everyone to be up-to-the-minute, on-the-same-post-as-you. Reality time: for people who do actually read post by post, they could be on page 28, while you're complaining about what was said on page 29 and don't even notice your complaint didn't show up until page 36, but you won't give that same realization to others.
Read the pages lady and stop lying yourself ... Icetech did not call anybody any names ... That can be easily verified right there in print so why do you continue to claim that he did ? ... He made an error of judgment and apologized ... There was zero name calling on his part and you know that ... You put those words on the page yourself ... He didn't ...
 
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
Oh brother, still all about your high-and-mighty opinion, huh?

Do you have any idea how bad it is to tell someone who shared her own research in her own words, that she could have just given the link to the site she took it from?

I am a schmuck sometimes. But never, ever call anyone a plagiarist, unless you can prove the charge.

But to you? It's all your perception. You don't even care to see what happened. You're just out to judge-and-jury everyone from your not-even-Bible-centered opinion and actually think you can control everyone because you said so.

You couldn't take it past 2 pages, and yet expect everyone to be up-to-the-minute, on-the-same-post-as-you. Reality time: for people who do actually read post by post, they could be on page 28, while you're complaining about what was said on page 29 and don't even notice your complaint didn't show up until page 36, but you won't give that same realization to others.
I can attest to the truth of this post. Lynn really is sometimes a schmuck. It was in seeing my own capacity to be a schmuck that I was able to forgive lynn of her own schmuckiness.
 
R

Ralph-

Guest
Man "shut up"
Woman "but"
Man "shut up, God said so"
18"Slaves, in reverent fear of God submit yourselves to your masters, not only to those who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh."-1 Peter 2:18
 
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
You'll have to explain that one and how you think it ties into the thread...:)
 

Lucy-Pevensie

Senior Member
Dec 20, 2017
9,265
5,624
113
18"Slaves, in reverent fear of God submit yourselves to your masters, not only to those who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh."-1 Peter 2:18
Ralph, you really might just shoot your eye out with this one ;)
 
N

NoNameMcgee

Guest
I can attest to the truth of this post. Lynn really is sometimes a schmuck. It was in seeing my own capacity to be a schmuck that I was able to forgive lynn of her own schmuckiness.
lol

if im ever a schmuck

please tell me

(unless youre also a schmuck... because then i wont believe you)
 
D

Depleted

Guest
I prefer "hetero purple" myself...... not that there's anything wrong with that!
At one time, most of the flowers in our garden were different shades in the purple family. And me, being a bit nuts, (or very nuts, your choice :rolleyes:), back when I worked on my teddy bear blog and just started learning how to make videos, I had two of my smallest stuffed animal girls (dressed in purple, of course), "write" "An Ode to Purple."

Not funny like bassets hounds running, but still oddly cute.


[video=youtube;adc7xSgw8Hc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adc7xSgw8Hc[/video]
 
Mar 19, 2018
108
2
0
Or solved the whole issue, by googling what I said, and finding that oh, I wrote it. I am pretty sure I said I wrote it and copy and pasted it for myself.
Let me ask you this! Have you made the same accusation recently saying someone was a liar or lying? I am talking about copying and pasting from the web? If yes did you provide evidence for this claim?
Still waiting for a response :)
 
P

Pontiac

Guest
_________________________

here is what i believe this is all over?

it was further back than when you posted
but i think this may have been what started this mess?
________________

postvvvv

I do regret the post that I made and it was in haste. Angela had previously posted a huge amount of information in a single post and followed it up with one equally as large when the argument she makes is already on the internet and a link to the appropriate site would have been sufficient
_______

more a false accusation than a "lie"

a lie is more intentional

i dont know if he made the false accusation on purpose or accident

so sorry for adding "lie"
Yes, it was further back than when I began posting ... I wasn't involved in that discussion at all ... I simply read it and stepped in and asked for the name calling to stop ... It was totally unnecessary ... And contrary to some statements now being made, the Icetech person did not use any name calling whatsoever ... He simply made a mistake and apologized ... I cannot believe he was attacked like he was "after" he made his apology ...
 
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
At one time, most of the flowers in our garden were different shades in the purple family. And me, being a bit nuts, (or very nuts, your choice :rolleyes:), back when I worked on my teddy bear blog and just started learning how to make videos, I had two of my smallest stuffed animal girls (dressed in purple, of course), "write" "An Ode to Purple."

Not funny like bassets hounds running, but still oddly cute.


[video=youtube;adc7xSgw8Hc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adc7xSgw8Hc[/video]
Oh my gosh, I just want to sit out there with a cup of coffee and my bible...
 
N

NoNameMcgee

Guest
Yes, it was further back than when I began posting ... I wasn't involved in that discussion at all ... I simply read it and stepped in and asked for the name calling to stop ... It was totally unnecessary ... And contrary to some statements now being made, the Icetech person did not use any name calling whatsoever ... He simply made a mistake and apologized ... I cannot believe he was attacked like he was "after" he made his apology ...
being after only matters if someone noticed it already

its not like we are in a room having a conversation


i still didnt see an apology

anyways

i didnt come in to speak against him


i sensed an air from what posts ive read of yours

that i addressed

things like

God is not impressed with your worldly institutes

when no one mentioned worldly education
followed by
oh im not high minded
then say things like
also i can garuntee this or that (based on opinions)
then stating your opinions are absolute truth

and if im not mistaken

you liked a post with worldly understanding on top of false accusations

then defend another who falsely accused....

i dont know either of these two

they may indeed be brother and sister in Christ

but i see a log in your eye

while youre pointing your finger

thats why i spoke to you
 
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
I can attest to the truth of this post. Lynn really is sometimes a schmuck. It was in seeing my own capacity to be a schmuck that I was able to forgive lynn of her own schmuckiness.
I'll forgive her even more if she just lets me sit in her back yard surrounded by that quilt with purple seams and drink some coffee! Who knew a schmuck like lynn could make such a beautiful quilt!
 

Lucy-Pevensie

Senior Member
Dec 20, 2017
9,265
5,624
113
Yes, it was further back than when I began posting ... I wasn't involved in that discussion at all ... I simply read it and stepped in and asked for the name calling to stop ... It was totally unnecessary ... And contrary to some statements now being made, the Icetech person did not use any name calling whatsoever ... He simply made a mistake and apologized ... I cannot believe he was attacked like he was "after" he made his apology ...
He has been like a dog with a bone on this issue for quite a number of pages, people were getting frustrated. It's always the case that there will be friction when some want to enforce a rigid interpretation and others don't see it the same way.
 
P

Pontiac

Guest
According to Google:

schmuck
SHmək/
nounNORTH AMERICAN[COLOR=#878787 !important]informal[/COLOR]

[COLOR=#878787 !important]noun: schmuck; plural noun: schmucks; noun: shmuck; plural noun: shmucks[/COLOR]

  • a foolish or contemptible person.
  • [COLOR=#878787 !important]Origin[/COLOR]

late 19th century: from Yiddish shmok ‘penis.’



The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness Titus 2:3

I am willing to admit that I presumed that your post was from the web since it was so large so my mistake. It is apparent that you have been part of this discussion before and had compiled the information previously.

Does the name calling make you feel better?

Right here was his apology ... Read the bottom of the post ... Then about 10 postings later he was attacked again and called an "arrogant little twit" ... Not shortly but well after his apology ... Still a tag team was going on against him ... If it would not have been ridiculous I would have never said a word, but I wasn't going to just stand by and watch that ... I couldn't ...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.