Are women allowed to Preach?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
R

Ralph-

Guest
Especially if you take it out of context!

It's "for", not "because". There is a context to this passage which is critical to understanding its parts.
You're grasping.

Your attempt to frustrate what Paul said in order to make it not really mean what he said does not change what Paul said at all. In fact, 'because' is a definition of 'for'.
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
Especially if you take it out of context!
How was it taken out of context though?

It's "for", not "because". There is a context to this passage which is critical to understanding its parts.
I am not sure how either "for" or "because" makes any significant difference. Paul seems clear to me, contextually, in verses 9-15 in addressing women in particular. This text also seems to complement the text in 1 Corinthians 14, a text that some say is isolated from all his teachings. I have to in all honesty disagree with that assertion.
 
Last edited:

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,722
13,395
113
That is not what the text says. No mention of sisters in any of the Greek Manuscripts in that verse.
True, but the word adelphoi (brethren) may not necessarily refer to males only, so "brothers and sisters" would be the closest English term. Greek doesn't translate perfectly to English in many cases.
 
L

loyaldisciple

Guest
You used the phrase, "little lady" in response to one of our female contributors. It is demeaning and offensive to females in general. Your opinion of it is irrelevant. The tone of your contributions is that women are second-class citizens in the church, despite your denials.
That is your opinion and you are welcome to it my friend. However, it is not my opinion.
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
That is your opinion and you are welcome to it my friend. However, it is not my opinion.
Take some advice, if brothers and sisters are telling you your terminology is offensive and demeaning, then like a good Christian, humble yourself, end it and accept it. It's biblical to do so.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,722
13,395
113
How was it taken out of context though?

I am not sure how either "for" or "because" makes any significant difference. Paul seems clear to me, contextually, in verses 9-15 in addressing women in particular. This text also seems to complement the text in 1 Corinthians 14, a text that so;me say is isolated from all his teachings. I have to in all honesty disagree with that assertion.
Out of context because the verse was presented without context with the implication that it stands on its own and needs no contextual nuancing.

Regarding the "for" vs "because", there is a relevant cultural/religious context, part of which was a cultic teaching that Eve was created before Adam, had secret knowledge from the serpent, and did not sin. Within that context, the meaning would be closer to, "the truth of the matter is that...".
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
Out of context because the verse was presented without context with the implication that it stands on its own and needs no contextual nuancing.

Regarding the "for" vs "because", there is a relevant cultural/religious context, part of which was a cultic teaching that Eve was created before Adam, had secret knowledge from the serpent, and did not sin. Within that context, the meaning would be closer to, "the truth of the matter is that...".
I hear you, but with all due respect it appears you're going a little beyond the usage in this thread with all of that. I don't believe any of that to be intended or implied, the context of this thread facilitates this notion.

The context is clear as to the role of women. "For" or "because" do not change that, although I get you on your reference to some cultic teachings. By the way, I was not aware of such a cult, thanks for that tidbit.
 
L

loyaldisciple

Guest
Take some advice, if brothers and sisters are telling you your terminology is offensive and demeaning, then like a good Christian, humble yourself, end it and accept it. It's biblical to do so.
It is not biblical to be accusing someone of something they are not. Your advice is misdirected and should be pointed at others. I have shown no male female bias. Simply repeated scripture.
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
689
113
I hear your advice, but why must one move on from speaking actual truth of scripture ? Is that not what Christians are supposed to do ? Are those living comfortably in their own worldly opinion not to be given truth ? And to be let to rule over the site ?
How can we miss you if you won't go away?
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
It is not biblical to be accusing someone of something they are not. Your advice is misdirected and should be pointed at others. I have shown no male female bias. Simply repeated scripture.
My advice hit the target and was perfectly directed at the offending one, namely you. Your words aimed at others were designed to demean and had nothing to do with "simply repeating Scripture."

You're simply unteachable, unrepentant and dead set on continuing to sow discord, remain divisive and behave offensively toward other believers. Romans 16:17 was written just for this purpose in order to avoid you and those of your ilk.
 
L

loyaldisciple

Guest
The comments suggesting that the words "little lady" somehow demonstrates a bias against women is ridiculous. What if someone was speaking to a male and said "sonny boy", would that somehow demonstrate a bias against males ? Your claims have no basis in fact supporting any sexual bias. If anything it may indicate one person is older than another, that is all.
 
L

loyaldisciple

Guest
My advice hit the target and was perfectly directed at the offending one, namely you. Your words aimed at others were designed to demean and had nothing to do with "simply repeating Scripture."

You're simply unteachable, unrepentant and dead set on continuing to sow discord, remain divisive and behave offensively toward other believers. Romans 16:17 was written just for this purpose in order to avoid you and those of your ilk.
You, my friend, are the one sowing discord here. The incident you are referring to was many pages ago and has already been thoroughly explained. You bringing it up again in an attempt to start trouble is what is sowing of discord.
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
I get it: You were told your words offend and demean, but you don't care about offending others, "pffffftttt" on them. You? You're more concerned about how you feel, about your rights, and being "right" so offending others doesn't matter, others feelings are expendable as far as you are concerned.

In other words your behavior isn't Christ-like nor remotely Christian.
 
L

loyaldisciple

Guest
How can we miss you if you won't go away?
I don't recall asking anyone to miss me. I only came here to show exactly what the Bible says on any subject that may come up and that is what I have done.
 

lightbearer

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
2,375
504
113
58
HBG. Pa. USA
True, but the word adelphoi (brethren) may not necessarily refer to males only, .
Context would dictate that it does.

If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord. But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.Wherefore, brethren, covet to prophesy, and forbid not to speak with tongues. (1Co 14:37-39 KJV)
 

miknik5

Senior Member
Jun 2, 2016
7,833
588
113
Very good advice for yourself, hornetguy. Actually it is you that has been one of those performing the personal attacks. Calling people things and suggesting they think of themselves as king simply because they are posting God's very own words. You should take your own advice.
Hello. Can I speak with you about Jesus clearing the temple?
 
L

loyaldisciple

Guest
I get it: You were told your words offend and demean, but you don't care about offending others, "pffffftttt" on them. You? You're more concerned about how you feel, about your rights, and being "right" so offending others doesn't matter, others feelings are expendable as far as you are concerned.

In other words your behavior isn't Christ-like nor remotely Christian.
Yes, I was told my words offended and I stated those words meant no offense. Now you are free to either believe that or not. You keeping harping on it several pages afterward is what is not Christ-like and you trying to start trouble is what is not Christ-like.
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
689
113
Context would dictate that it does.

If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord. But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.Wherefore, brethren, covet to prophesy, and forbid not to speak with tongues. (1Co 14:37-39 KJV)
G5100 τίς tis (tis') p/i.
1. some or any person or object
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,486
12,950
113
If you're implying that it cannot rightly be transliterated, "deaconess" you are correct, because it is not a feminine term in the Greek. If you are thereby implying that it cannot refer to a female, you are incorrect, because it is used of Phoebe. She was a "diakonos" and therefore a deacon.
Just because Phoebe was a servant of the church does NOT automatically translate into her becoming a deaconess. There was no such office. The NT is crystal clear that there are ONLY TWO offices in the local assembly (1) elders (pastor/elder/bishops) and (2) deacons. And one of the qualifications of a deacon was they they must be married and their WIVES must meet certain criteria.

Furthermore, when the first group of deacons was appointed (although not termed as such, but given the responsibility of deacons) in the Jerusalem church, the apostles clearly specified that MEN were to be appointed, even though the issue was women (widows) being neglected. This is decisive and was undoubtedly under the authority of the Holy Spirit.

Wherefore, brethren, look ye out among you seven men of honest report, full of the Holy Ghost and wisdom, whom we may appoint over this business (Acts 6:3).

ἐπισκέψασθε οὖν, ἀδελφοί ἄνδρας ἐξ ὑμῶν μαρτυρουμένους ἑπτὰ πλήρεις πνεύματος Ἅγιου καὶ σοφίας οὓς καταστήσομεν ἐπὶ τῆς χρείας ταύτης

Strong's Concordance
anér: a man
Original Word: ἀνήρ, ἀνδρός, ὁ
Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine
Transliteration: anér
Phonetic Spelling: (an'-ayr)
Short Definition: a male human being, a man
Definition: a male human being; a man, husband.


 
Last edited: