*PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA IS RE-ELECTED!!*

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#61
Hi Lil! Those four words are exactly what the majority of the nation's voters were thinking would happen if Romney won the White House which is why they voted to Re-Elect President Obama by a vast majority of electoral votes as well as the popular vote!
-------------------------------------------------------------
Let us all now come together in harmony, unity and peace, and stay focused on a salient purpose that will be of great benefit to the American people. -- HeavenlyWarrior
If you call winning by 2% in the popular vote a vast majority........

Also if the people overwhelmingly wanted the President's polices they would have swept the Republicans from the House, but they didn't.
 
Last edited:
Oct 27, 2012
300
5
0
#62
I likewise found the rest of your response quite amusing to say the least!


You're going to have to explain what about the bank accounts is sinful?

Just go back to playing with your army knives since we have little use for your country. [/color]
Gladly! But to start off I just have to say that there are none so blind as those who Will Not see!

Swiss bank accounts are considered by many to be the source of evil, causing people to sin. If they did not exist people would not have to commit the sin of hiding their Big Money in them in order to evade paying the rightful taxes that they should pay. There can be no doubt that the whole world knows that they can deposit large amounts of money they don't want their government to find out about, thus tax, by opening a Swiss Bank Account. Therefore, with the elimination of the Swiss Bank Accounts the temptation to try to circumvent paying the taxes they owe would not exist! It's that simple really. After all, Jesus encouraged people to do fairly by paying their fair share of taxes.

Listen closely to what Jesus said about needing to pay your fair share of taxes when money was presented to Him by a person who questioned Him about it: "Show me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny. And He saith unto them, Whose is the image and superscription? They say unto him, Caesar's, Then saith He unto them, Fender therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's." -- MATTHEW 22: 19-21 (KJV)

What this Scripture is saying is to render what belongs to the government what belongs to the government (taxes) but in the RIGHTFUL manner! Don't try to escape your responsibility to Pay Your Fair Share of what you must pay to the government! Therefore, do away with all of your Swiss Bank Accounts that cause people to commit a sin by the circumvention of paying what they dutifully should be paying to the government. Your country should certainly do away with that type of shelter that is against God's teachings!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Give Unto Caesar What Is Caesar's!" Therefore, DO AWAY WITH SWISS BANK ACCOUNTS!
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#63
I respect your opinion and think that played a subjective role; however, this is the number one objective reason why Americans are voting Democrat:

I. As of January 2012, the U.S. Census Bureau announced that an astounding 49 percent of all Americans live in a home that receives some form of government benefits.

http://www.census.gov/sipp/tables/quarterly-est/household-char/2010/3-qtr/table2.xls


II. Now we add in all government workers that depend on government for their income. Total employment by industry can be found at:

Table B-1. Employees on nonfarm payrolls by industry sector and selected industry detail [In thousands]

As of October 2012, the federal government employs about 2,807,000 people. State governments employ about 5,242,000 people. Local governments employ about 14,344,000 people. So we need to add another 22,393,000 Americans along with all their dependents that rely on government.


III. Next let's look at how much money government is pumping into the private sector to get an idea of how beholden the private sector is to government money (both what they collect in taxes but also what they borrow because government spends more than it has to the tune of $1 trillion a year currently):

1. Alan Peters and Peter Fisher (Associate Professors, Graduate Program in Urban and Regional Planning, University of Iowa)[5] have estimated that state and local governments provide $40–50 billion annually for corporate welfare.

2. The Cato Institute studies show about $100 billion a year currently is allocated as corporate welfare.

3. The U.S. bailouts of Bush and Obama total $11 trillion committed with $3 trillion already spent.

Follow the money: Bailout tracker - CNNMoney.com


Conclusion: It's apparent that the vast majority of the U.S. population is dependent on government for their money and the Democratic party promises to continue giving them it.

The U.S. population has chosen the path of Greece for exactly the same reason the Greeks did. On the street, it's called: "Laugh now... cry later."



Those four words are exactly what the majority of the nation's voters were thinking would happen if Romney won the White House which is why they voted to Re-Elect President Obama by a vast majority of electoral votes as well as the popular vote!
 
Oct 27, 2012
300
5
0
#64
If you call winning by 2% in the popular vote a vast majority........

Winning by a GREATER margin is still considerd WINNING, fyi! But it is not the popular vote that decides who gets to be president -- it's the Electoral College that gave our president an overwhelming MAJORITY!

Also if the people overwhelmingly wanted the President's polices they would have swept the Republicans from the House, but they didn't.
There can be no doubt that just as there are Liberals there are Conservatives who are deeply entrenched within their respective districts who voted to keep their representatives in this time around. Many had no opposition to speak of so that fared well for them also. But you also have to consider that Rep. Bachmann, a Republican and former presidential candidate, just barely won by the skin of her teeth. That was a real close one though in the end she did win by a razor thin margin, so it was not as great or clear a victory as she or many might have expected who thought she would literally sweep through in a landslide. By contrast, Rep. Jackson Jr. of Illinois, a Democrat, won by an Overwhelming Majority even though he had been gone for about six months and did absolutely little to no campaigning! That is very telling and Speaks Volumes as to the Party Preference of the American People who voted in this nation's election!
---------------------------------------------------
Let us all now come together in harmony, unity and peace, and stay focused on a salient purpose that will be of great benefit to the American people. -- HeavenlyWarrior
 
Oct 19, 2012
42
1
0
#65
Hi Lil! Those four words are exactly what the majority of the nation's voters were thinking would happen if Romney won the White House which is why they voted to Re-Elect President Obama by a vast majority of electoral votes as well as the popular vote!

If you think moving toward a more socialist society is moving forward, you should do some research and understand that socialism doesn't work. By reelecting President Obama, we have solidified more socialistic and liberal policies being pushed through which will only hurt us in the long run. Debt is only going to increase, the unemployment rate will continue to be negative, more entitlement, bigger government, more regulations, etc. are in store for us which will only hinder our economy, not enhance it.

I can only hope and pray that Obama will not completely destroy any possibilities of someone coming in and fixing his mess come 2016.
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#66
There can be no doubt that just as there are Liberals there are Conservatives who are deeply entrenched within their respective districts who voted to keep their representatives in this time around. Many had no opposition to speak of so that fared well for them also. But you also have to consider that Rep. Bachmann, a Republican and former presidential candidate, just barely won by the skin of her teeth. That was a real close one though in the end she did win by a razor thin margin, so it was not as great or clear a victory as she or many might have expected who thought she would literally sweep through in a landslide. By contrast, Rep. Jackson Jr. of Illinois, a Democrat, won by an Overwhelming Majority even though he had been gone for about six months and did absolutely little to no campaigning! That is very telling and Speaks Volumes as to the Party Preference of the American People who voted in this nation's election!
---------------------------------------------------
Let us all now come together in harmony, unity and peace, and stay focused on a salient purpose that will be of great benefit to the American people. -- HeavenlyWarrior
I think the thing your not getting is that the way the Electoral College is set up, and the way states allocate their electors, almost always makes it look like someone won big.

The popular vote usually reveals a different story, and in this case Obama won, but just barely.

As for Party Preference: My Representative and Senator (Both Republicans) didn't campaign at all; I didn't even see a single sign for either of them or a TV ad, and they both swept back into office by a landslide.
 
Oct 27, 2012
300
5
0
#67
Easy by supporting them ourselves. Sure christians might think those are wrong for themselves, but im notgoing to force people to live by a biblical system if they dont want too.
And it might be of Great Interest to ALL to know that recently Two (2) states in these United States of America passed a law regarding a ballot referendum ALLOWING Gay Marriage! Yes, can you believe that -- for the First time in history it was the PEOPLE directly who voted with a majority vote in those two states who have made Gay Marriage a reality there and those in opposition cannot say that Everyone in those two states is Gay or Lesbian therefore that's why it passed because that is simply not the case. It passed with great Heterosexual (Straight) support! Previously, it would have taken a judge or a law to come around to allow that but now it is the people Directly who have Endorsed Gay marriage.

Besides that, the first openly Lesbian senator was elected By_The_People of these United States in the recent election!

Read All About It
-- http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/07/politics/pol-same-sex-marriage/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
-------------------------------------------------------------
Let us all now come together in harmony, unity and peace, and stay focused on a salient purpose that will be of great benefit to the American people. -- HeavenlyWarrior
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#68
And it might be of Great Interest to ALL to know that recently Two (2) states in these United States of America passed a law regarding a ballot referendum ALLOWING Gay Marriage! Yes, can you believe that -- for the First time in history it was the PEOPLE directly who voted with a majority vote in those two states who have made Gay Marriage a reality there and those in opposition cannot say that Everyone in those two states is Gay or Lesbian therefore that's why it passed because that is simply not the case. It passed with great Heterosexual (Straight) support! Previously, it would have taken a judge or a law to come around to allow that but now it is the people Directly who have Endorsed Gay marriage.

Besides that, the first openly Lesbian senator was elected By_The_People of these United States in the recent election!

Read All About It
-- http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/07/politics/pol-same-sex-marriage/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
-------------------------------------------------------------
Let us all now come together in harmony, unity and peace, and stay focused on a salient purpose that will be of great benefit to the American people. -- HeavenlyWarrior
And the people of 29 other states have voted to enshrine a ban against same sex marriage/unions in their constitutions.
 
Oct 27, 2012
300
5
0
#69
Yeah, it's amazing how people see having checks and balances as obstruction. I would never want to have the House, Senate, and Presidency as the same party. There would never be any checks and balances and either agenda would be pushed through without second thought.
While checks and balances is certainly a good thing for either party, the real problem I am talking about here is that that will only result in gridlock when we have the Upper House comprised of One party and the lower one of another. And the kind of gridlock we have been experiencing for the last four years with Republicans more anxious about voting Obama out of office than doing what is actually good for the country by working with him to pass good legislation.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let us all now come together in harmony, unity and peace, and stay focused on a salient purpose that will be of great benefit to the American people. -- HeavenlyWarrior
 
Oct 19, 2012
42
1
0
#70
While checks and balances is certainly a good thing for either party, the real problem I am talking about here is that that will only result in gridlock when we have the Upper House comprised of One party and the lower one of another. And the kind of gridlock we have been experiencing for the last four years with Republicans more anxious about voting Obama out of office than doing what is actually good for the country by working with him to pass good legislation.

Well, the gridlock is not one sided. Obama is not the type of person to budge from his position. You want the right to move toward the center, well, Obama would have to as well and he's so far left that he doesn't want to compromise. Also, Obama had two years with both sides of Congress as a Democratic majority and look where we are now: high unemployment, massive debt, economy in the tank. I mean, if you expect that Obama would change everything around if he didn't have checks and balances then you're delusional.
 
S

SantoSubito

Guest
#71
Well, the gridlock is not one sided. Obama is not the type of person to budge from his position. You want the right to move toward the center, well, Obama would have to as well and he's so far left that he doesn't want to compromise. Also, Obama had two years with both sides of Congress as a Democratic majority and look where we are now: high unemployment, massive debt, economy in the tank. I mean, if you expect that Obama would change everything around if he didn't have checks and balances then you're delusional.
Exactly. Bush was center-right (as was Romney) and Clinton was center-left, and they got things done. Obama on the other hand is probably the most far-left President we've ever had.
 
Oct 27, 2012
300
5
0
#72
And the people of 29 other states have voted to enshrine a ban against same sex marriage/unions in their constitutions.
Yet you can't discount the fact that this is a moving Upward Trend, so much so that it is already being spoken about that many other states will follow these two states shortly since there is now a good precedent! Those in those 29 states will come around as well when they fully realize they too might have Gay and Lesbian children, parents, relatives, friends, etc. as so many indeed have all over. So, the vote may not be completely for being in favor of that type of marriage as much as sympathizing with all the discrimination and prejudice those poor folks have had to endure all these years that they are now sick of seeing and that is why many a mind is changing and will continue to change as they see the light in that these folks were created by God too just as much as you and I and are loved just as much by our LORD!
--------------------------------------------------------------
Let us all now come together in harmony, unity and peace, and stay focused on a salient purpose that will be of great benefit to the American people. -- HeavenlyWarrior
 
B

Batman007

Guest
#73
I have never met someone who considers him or herself an atheist who will come out and say that, but I've met several who, after talking to them, it becomes clear that they aren't really atheists but .... Well, a friend of mine likes to refer to them as "Roaming Catholics" .... They really are just pissed off at God; they haven't gotten over it yet.
Can you give me an example of why you think they hate god? Like what do they say that leads you to that conclusion? I'm not trying to argue, just learn.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#74
Yet you can't discount the fact that this is a moving Upward Trend, so much so that it is already being spoken about that many other states will follow these two states shortly since there is now a good precedent! Those in those 29 states will come around as well when they fully realize they too might have Gay and Lesbian children, parents, relatives, friends, etc. as so many indeed have all over. So, the vote may not be completely for being in favor of that type of marriage as much as sympathizing with all the discrimination and prejudice those poor folks have had to endure all these years that they are now sick of seeing and that is why many a mind is changing and will continue to change as they see the light in that these folks were created by God too just as much as you and I and are loved just as much by our LORD!
--------------------------------------------------------------
Let us all now come together in harmony, unity and peace, and stay focused on a salient purpose that will be of great benefit to the American people. -- HeavenlyWarrior

Actually, the sodomite marriage issue is likely to go the same route of Sodomy Laws with Lawrence V. Texas.

From Wiki:

Red states are states that had their Sodomy-Laws done away with by the Supreme Court in 2003.

Also from Wiki:


What will likely happen is that the supreme court will straight down bans on sodomite marriage. Thus it will continue to assume it's new found role as the third house of the legislature.
 
B

Batman007

Guest
#75
Actually, the sodomite marriage issue is likely to go the same route of Sodomy Laws with Lawrence V. Texas.

From Wiki:

Red states are states that had their Sodomy-Laws done away with by the Supreme Court in 2003.

Also from Wiki:


What will likely happen is that the supreme court will straight down bans on sodomite marriage. Thus it will continue to assume it's new found role as the third house of the legislature.
You really think the supreme court is going to ban gay marriage? Because it's becoming more and more widely accepted, not the other way around...
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,347
1,045
113
#76
Yep. Obama gets another 4 years to destroy our nation and its economy.
 
T

TheGrungeDiva

Guest
#77
an astounding 49 percent of all Americans live in a home that receives some form of government benefits.
First of all, you say that as if it were a bad thing. Let's discuss some of these people who are on some form of "government assistance:"

Social Security - A lot of people have some sort of pension or 401(k) where they work. Some are able to put a little aside into such an account while they were working so that they could retire comfortably. But not everyone is so lucky. Some people lost everything through risky investments, some were just never able to make enough to set something aside. Social security is barely enough to live on. If your house is completely paid off by the time you retire, it may be enough to support your groceries, and then Medicare pays for the health stuff. Without that safety net, what would happen? Well, they'd be forced to stay at their jobs longer, and would not retire, which means unemployment would continue to rise. Seems to me like providing a minimum level of support is healthy for the economy.

Military - By far the largest chunk of federal spending is here. From the five-star general down to the ROTC recruit, every member of the military is a "leech" on the government, receiving payment through federal taxes. In exchange, they give us their bravery and often their lives. Sheesh, how selfish of them.

Children - We've all heard about the lazy "welfare queen" who has babies and just doesn't want to work. Sure, I understand we don't really want to be helping people if they're not willing to help themselves. However, more than 2/3 of those who are on some sort of public assistance are under the age of 14. Cutting off welfare is LITERALLY stealing food from babies. And you wonder why we liberals say you conservatives are so heartless.

State and Local - don't forget that government doesn't just mean federal government. Your state and local government spends a lot of money as well. In fact, I think if you were to look at it objectively, you'd find that 100% of Americans have received some sort of government assistance at some point in their lives.

Did you attend a public school ever? That's government assistance.
Have you ever taken public transportation? That's government assistance.
Or perhaps you're too good for mass transit. Maybe you just drive your car on public roads and fill your tank with federally-subsidized petrol. That's government assistance.
Are you reading this on a computer that's powered by electricity -- either coal, gas, nuclear, geo-thermal, hydro, or solar (unless you designed the cells yourself and built your house yourself, and.....)? That's government assistance.

I don't understand why so many people seem to think government is bad. Yes, I agree that we don't want the government telling us what to do at every juncture. I do NOT agree that the private sector would operate any government-run program more efficiently.

In the U.S., the government is US. If you don't like it, take a look in the mirror and start there.
 
Oct 27, 2012
300
5
0
#78
I respect your opinion and think that played a subjective role; however, this is the number one objective reason why Americans are voting Democrat:

For the sake of brevity in lieu of answering tit-for-tat, let's go to your conclusion as that is obviously your bottom line.

Conclusion: It's apparent that the vast majority of the U.S. population is dependent on government for their money and the Democratic party promises to continue giving them it.

That is simply not true and with all due respect you should be ashamed of yourself by saying and believing that. The majority of the U.S. population are hard working people who go to work just like everyone else and pay their taxes and vote! The Democratic Party surely does help those who cannot help themselves, just as God would have them do. There are many disabled people both physically and mentally, children, the elderly, those who have had unfortunate accidents both at work and at other places perhaps who have even lost limbs, as well as others who find it difficult to work and even those who can and do look for work, the prospective employer can and does many times turn them away without the job for whatever reason. What are they to do especially those with small children? Starve? Well of course that is one option your party has for these people. Shame on you again! But where is your heart at, we just have to ask, after they have tried but have been unsuccessful at obtaining work and have been turned away? Besides, it is Their Money they would be receiving back in benefits as they too have paid their good fair share of taxes and are fully entitled to it in their time of worst need. America is a humanitarian country that has always taken care of its own unlike foreign lands who could give a darn about its people. That's why we even send out food and monetary aid to foreign countries because it is the Christian thing to do! Try to explain it to Jesus Christ why it is not in your heart and why you would prefer to be so tight with your money in helping your brother out who is in dire need of the help.

It is very foolish to buy into that argument that the government takes care of everyone who simply does not want to work because they don't. Obviously you have not personally received any government assistance or compensation or you would certainly know and realize right away how difficult it is to receive such benefits. They will scrutinize you up and down and have you sign legal papers, etc. before you can receive any benefits. And even then there are further checks done often to see if you continue to qualify. Only after a person has proven they completely deserve the benefits and are entitled to them do they receive them.

If you don't believe this just check with any governmental agency and see all the paperwork and thorough checks they do, and things you have to do to qualify for benefits. And another thing you need to be cognizant of is that the people who receive benefits often get less than half of what they would normally be getting if they were working! Therefore, that does not give them any incentive to live in poverty while having a job would earn them better money. But again many simply cannot work and thank God we have a government here in these United States that truly CARES about its people as God would have us do and not as Republicans would prefer to have it.


The U.S. population has chosen the path of Greece for exactly the same reason the Greeks did. On the street, it's called: "Laugh now... cry later."
That is your opinion and that of those who are still reeling over the election results. Many others do not agree!
----------------------------------------------------
Let us all now come together in harmony, unity and peace, and stay focused on a salient purpose that will be of great benefit to the American people. -- HeavenlyWarrior
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#79
You really think the supreme court is going to ban gay marriage? Because it's becoming more and more widely accepted, not the other way around...
I don't know why I put the word "straight." If you have a good eye, sometimes you'll see that I combine two thoughts into my sentences. The more I look at some of my own posts the more I feel like I'm schizo.


Anyway, what I meant to say was "Strike down". This could have been determined to some extent based on my first line:

Actually, the sodomite marriage issue is likely to go the same route of Sodomy Laws with Lawrence V. Texas.
If you take a quick gander at Lawrence V. Texas, you'll see that Sodomy Laws in states such as Texas, Kansas, Michigan, and elsewhere were struck down by the Supreme Court as being unconstitutional.

I apologize for my sometimes confusing statements.
 
T

TheGrungeDiva

Guest
#80
Well, the gridlock is not one sided. Obama is not the type of person to budge from his position. You want the right to move toward the center, well, Obama would have to as well and he's so far left that he doesn't want to compromise.
You're clearly smoking whatever Subito is. Obama has bent over backwards and compromised so much his own party is upset with him. Don't you read anything? This is just so beyond false it's not even funny.

Also, Obama had two years with both sides of Congress as a Democratic majority and look where we are now: high unemployment, massive debt, economy in the tank.
And once again, you're not paying attention.

Every measure of the economy shows improvement since Obama took office. Yes, things are still pretty bad, but they're way better than they were 4 years ago, despite the gridlock he's had to deal with (which has been record-breaking, by the way).

Gadzooks, people, would you listen to something OTHER than Fox News once in a while?