Mind = Blown

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S

SeatBelt

Guest
#61
Can't say I turned coat against a side that I was never on. My allegiance is to that of harmonious gender relations, and healthy balanced parenting that benefits both child and parent. This is an issue where most fellas just need to stretch till you grow.
 
A

arwen83

Guest
#62
Your brain is doing what's it has been programmed to do. Tilting the head and the slight narrowing of eyes is an across the board, all cultures, human thing to do. Some people have more pronounced movements than others, but what you're doing is normal. :D
I enjoy your facts! There should be a thread devoted to all Aimee's facts, and have a daily fact entry! :)
 
S

SeatBelt

Guest
#63
I never said I WON'T but its not like I'm going to approach a stranger and offer to change their child's diaper.
fair enough.... and that second part would just be uber-creepy. Can you say police involvement?

I would say Toyota is to Lexus as Chevrolet is to Cadillac. Or Ford is to Lincoln or Nissan is to Infinity.
Again, fair enough. I Simply chose Buick because they have shared platforms on some of their models, just as Lexus did with Toyota.

But here is one... Scion is to Toyota what Saturn was to GM.
I must reject this one, however. The target market segment is distinctly different. Also it would appear that Scion will not be a costly folly contributing heavily to the near undoing of a backbone corporation. Scion appears to be a sustainable model. Besides, the FR-S concept knocked my socks off at SEMA in 2011. Saturn's coolest was.... Hmmm... either their 2 (later 2.5) door Saturnized Cavalier or the 3 door hatch Astra, both of which lacked the luster they would need to compete with the FR-S in my eyes. I do hereby disqualify the Saturn Sky as this is clearly nothing more than a rebadged Pontiac Solstice - a vehicle line that never got the respect it deserved.
 
J

Jullianna

Guest
#64
*thinking how much fun it would be to watch a poopy diaper changing competition with the guys of this forum as competitors* [video=youtube;D1-C2o424VU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1-C2o424VU[/video]
 
S

SeatBelt

Guest
#65
*thinking how much fun it would be to watch a poopy diaper changing competition with the guys of this forum as competitors*
<--Pre-accepts trophy
 

Liamson

Senior Member
Feb 3, 2010
3,078
69
48
#66
I must reject this one, however. The target market segment is distinctly different. Also it would appear that Scion will not be a costly folly contributing heavily to the near undoing of a backbone corporation. Scion appears to be a sustainable model. Besides, the FR-S concept knocked my socks off at SEMA in 2011. Saturn's coolest was.... Hmmm... either their 2 (later 2.5) door Saturnized Cavalier or the 3 door hatch Astra, both of which lacked the luster they would need to compete with the FR-S in my eyes. I do hereby disqualify the Saturn Sky as this is clearly nothing more than a rebadged Pontiac Solstice - a vehicle line that never got the respect it deserved.
And I must disagree with you. The whole "redline" dept of Saturn was "sporty" and As for Scion the The FR-S/Subaru BRZ, I would rather have as the Subaru. Scion is the Company of the Brave yet Ugly Toaster and the Chic little X-a.

And I rented a Solstice in 2009. I was not thoroughly impressed but, I will say it didn't have a Standard and there wasn't any room for more than a Backpack.
 
S

SeatBelt

Guest
#67
The whole "redline" dept of Saturn was "sporty" and As for Scion the The FR-S/Subaru BRZ, I would rather have as the Subaru. Scion is the Company of the Brave yet Ugly Toaster and the Chic little X-a.
Yes, the Sub is a sveet ride. There are truely sweeter cars out there than anything Subaru or any incarnation of Toyota or GM has built, and I do not intend to say any one car mentioned is the apex of automobilia. I must have somehow missed the intensity of the "sportiness" you refer to from their redline. Sadly, the changes they were wisely making at Saturn were too late.
Alas, Saturn, you were just coming into your own at such an untimely death.
Love me some Toaster. the coolest boxy car readily available since the demise of the 240 - the car that taught us that Sweeds main automotive design tool was the Etch-a-Sketch. I think the Toaster achieved thing that the Cube failed (blatant personal preference)... and surpassed the Element in some respects, though I'd not normally compare the xB and the Element. That's like comparing UPS boxes with USPS boxes: they get you there, but the journey is not the same.

And I rented a Solstice in 2009. I was not thoroughly impressed but, I will say it didn't have a Standard and there wasn't any room for more than a Backpack.
What isn't better with a 3rd pedal? :cool:
A car like that was not meant for getting groceries in, but sadly it seems they may have performed like one. I felt it died as a fledgling that could have one day flown. Nice lines, but not sufficiently adept at leaving two black ones on the tarmac.

I like that we can disagree. If everyone agreed with me, would I ever learn and grow?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
J

Jullianna

Guest
#69
If I couldn't dance I would spontaneously combust. :D
 
S

SeatBelt

Guest
#70
Thumbs up to 'shoot stuff', thumbs down to 'dance'. Just say NO to dancing.
I let my 7 yr old spend his money on a FPS. It's shooting robots with Nerf guns & rated "E." I figure no harm there.
I'm not interested in dancing with my TV, but do like to dance in the right setting ...which is proof that I'm not the stereotypical member of my particular flavor of church.
 
N

NukePooch

Guest
#71
I must reject this one, however. The target market segment is distinctly different. Also it would appear that Scion will not be a costly folly contributing heavily to the near undoing of a backbone corporation. Scion appears to be a sustainable model. Besides, the FR-S concept knocked my socks off at SEMA in 2011. Saturn's coolest was.... Hmmm... either their 2 (later 2.5) door Saturnized Cavalier or the 3 door hatch Astra, both of which lacked the luster they would need to compete with the FR-S in my eyes. I do hereby disqualify the Saturn Sky as this is clearly nothing more than a rebadged Pontiac Solstice - a vehicle line that never got the respect it deserved.
Allow me to weigh in on the car discussion... I agree to reject the Saturn-Scion comparison. Scion has numerous original cars that aren't represented in the domestic US Toyota line. Saturn only had one car (the S-Series) that wasn't part of GM platform sharing. (it wasn't a rebadged Cavalier)

The original Saturn S-Series was a good car for its time. It was built and sold in a different way than what GM was used to. GM then promptly ignored Saturn for the next 12 years before they started adding rebadged GM platforms...Much too little, much too late. If you have a brand that puts out the exact same thing as the other brands, then why bother? (See also: Pontiac, Plymouth, Mercury, and to some extent, Saab, Oldsmobile)

The S-Series also had some special, limited editions and a good showing in car racing. The RedLine trim levels helped, but a brand/model can't survive without a modern redesign every few years. By the time Saturn received mildly interesting rebadged cars in 2006 with the Sky, Astra, and Aura, the brand was already dead.
 
N

NukePooch

Guest
#72
If I couldn't dance I would spontaneously combust. :D
I would spontaneously combust if I were forced to dance. Just shoot me, it'd be less painful.
Fun fact: I have a phobia of dancing. I was asked to stand up in my friend, Jon's wedding. He told his fiance that I would/could/won't dance, so as a prank, she emailed me to tell me that she was planning to have the bridesmaids and groomsmen dance down the aisle to the altar. After a total freakout/meltdown, I wrote her back and told her (among other things in rambling scared-little-puppy-type language) to find someone else. She wrote me back and apologized, as Jon wasn't even aware how weird I get about it.

This dog don't dance.
 
A

arwen83

Guest
#73
No dancing allowed. Dancing is evil. All males and females should be at least one (New AND Old Testament) Bible length away from each other at all times. First step: dancing, second step: pre-marital sex. We must all resist the urge to dance!


:p
 
D

Donkeyfish07

Guest
#74
Can't say I turned coat against a side that I was never on. My allegiance is to that of harmonious gender relations, and healthy balanced parenting that benefits both child and parent. This is an issue where most fellas just need to stretch till you grow.
My allegiance is to not changing diapers. lol
 

Descyple

Senior Member
Jun 7, 2010
3,023
48
48
#75
Bible length away from each other at all times.
At church, I don't even sit in the same pew as a female. The possibility of our hands touching when passing the collection plate is just too great!!!

On an unrelated note, I'm still single and I don't know why! Any ideas???
 
R

Relena7

Guest
#77
Is there an actual underlying common topic in this thread or is this one of those "whatever threads"? I'm slightly lost. :D
 
U

Ugly

Guest
#78
No dancing allowed. Dancing is evil. All males and females should be at least one (New AND Old Testament) Bible length away from each other at all times. First step: dancing, second step: pre-marital sex. We must all resist the urge to dance!


:p
Really? Wow, i need to find a charismatic church in my area. :p:rolleyes::D
 

Descyple

Senior Member
Jun 7, 2010
3,023
48
48
#79
Is there an actual underlying common topic in this thread or is this one of those "whatever threads"? I'm slightly lost. :D
I thought this thread was about the dangers of close proximity between male and female Christians!!!

Oh wait, you're a female, so I should not be talking with you right now (in case somethings "develops" between us).

Please ignore my post!!!

(Descyple runs off to read the book "How To Live Happily Without Female Companionship and Cooties"
 
D

Donkeyfish07

Guest
#80
lol, when did it turn into a thread about dangerous proximity?