Recent content by Aaron56

You just inserted “angels”. Who’s not following scripture again?…

W.W.J.D. is the pseudo-standard for people who say they believe in the Lord Jesus Christ. When judging a matter, believers should use the standard to determine if an act is righteous. Being lawful according to the world and righteous according to God are often separated by a wide chasm.

If you were of the Lord Jesus Christ you would be able to hear my words as truth.

Adam did not cease to be a son of God after He fell. God was his father.

60,000 dead and counting. Let's see: ~2000 casualties on October 7th ... Now 60,000+ dead as a response. Does that sound like W.W.J.D.? I wonder what kind of judgment people are bringing upon their own heads by declaring such a response is warranted. Imagine if that person steals a piece of...

It starts with a deranged rant... And then a claim... But always a failure to acknowledge scripture that doesn't fit their narrative. Like this one in the New Testament (using the King James Version): "..the son of Cainan, Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the...

Imagine cheering the "genetically pure" person when it is written "flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God and and what is perishable is not going to inherit what is imperishable". Is the above post originating from Germany or from a German Baptist? This belongs in the "Conspiracy"...

I like this discussion so I'm just thinking here: While the Word and the Father attended creation (where everything that was made came through the Word) man was made with a current standard: "..in the image and likeness of the Word and Father." Later, in Philippians, this is said about Jesus...

And this gets to the heart of the issue: "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." This was spoken to Jews, who called Abraham their father... as if association with Abraham meant anything of lasting value. No, all men, with the mind of Christ...

The Bible clearly states "Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: neither, because they are the descendant of Abraham, are they all children" So as long as you're not saying that sharing flesh with Abraham = God's chosen you would...

Agreed. Funny how the "Agree" and "Thumbsup" icons dropped off when the full revelation is quoted: "They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God" It's a word for word scripture quote, yet it doesn't fit with the political narrative.

Correct.

Paul explains this too: But it is not that the word of God has taken no effect. For they are not all Israel who are of Israel, 7nor are they all children because they are the seed of Abraham; but, “In Isaac your seed shall be called.” 8That is, those who are the children of the flesh, these...

What's interesting is that Manasseh and Ephraim would be physical representations of men comprised of Jew (Joseph) and Gentile (Asenath from Egypt). So it's interesting that Manasseh is listed among the "tribes of Israel". Joseph, then, would represent a type of Christ whose inheritance extends...

Yeah. The Book of Revelation requires wisdom, not politics, to understand. It's all there in the scriptures. No one is replacing anyone. Antisemitism and Anti-Arab sentiments are both disgusting. No permission, ever, is given to hate another because of their nationality. Jesus, nor any of His...