contradiction in the bible
- Thread starter jpett
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Since you are a man of science maybe you can explain these...
Carbon 14 is a element that is in all organic living things... When you die the carbon 14 has a specific half life and is present in all organic matter under 80k years old... If there is no C14 a test would come back inconclusive and not read a result... For if you are doing a test about how many skittles are in a jar and there are none... Your answer would not be 50...
So with that basic understanding of C14 I think you should research August 10, 1990 Asu Allosaurus blind test...
Whenever a known dinosaur bone is found, we automatically assume it is older than 80k years old and negate the C14 test... For mainstream science says that would be a waste of a test... Se we strata test it in the rocks we find... Funny thing is though, any time we blind test (unknowingly test) a dino bone with C14, it comes back under 14k years maximum.... Like the August 10, 1990 ASU test came back with red blood cells, and spongy tissue... all of which to be impossible if evolutionary hypothesis are correct....
So next question is asking, are our modern dating methods correct/accurate? Since we don't use C14 on a C14 positive specimen...
Is strata testing accurate...???
Well in 1980's Mt. St. Helens erupted, and a funny thing occurred... Strata was laid in the matter of hours... Now scientists believe that the strata takes millions and thousands of years to accumulate under the earths environments... So if you find fossil A under 3 layers, it is most likely to be X years old and not under Y years old.... Then they test the rock and date it...
They believe that strata is a chest, locking in every millenniums mysteries and secrets... The thing that died first would be under the thing that died 5 years ago... Which makes sense... But then you get weird fossils such as the picture below... Which in order to stand directly strait up for that amount of strata to accumulate and layer above it... Would take tens of thousands of years...
Then you look back to the 2004 Tsunami of Indonesia, and what occurred was thousands of years of strata in the matter of hours... And the same with the Japanese tsunami, and any tsunami since... What we have found is large amounts of spontaneous water creates more strata then you could believe... And everyone knows about the story of the flood and Noah...
Staying on the topic of strata, the moon has a different kind... Before we ever set foot on the moon, evolutionary atheist's thought there would be at least a few feet of dust on that moon, given X amount of space dust falls on earth with a atmosphere and we have Y amount falling down each year, we can calculate the Z amount the moon should have... Only problem was, we don't know the exact age of the moon... SO there were two hypothesis' the first being there would be feet of dust on that moon, and that was given to the thought the moon was over a billion years old... The second was there should only be a few centimeters... That was given the moon would be under X years, a biblical view...)
Can you tell me how much dust there is?
Next on my topic would be Accombora Mexico... Before Mexico was ever brought into the light of archaeology a few strapping rich young archaeologists went down there to research there culture... What they found was staggering.... The found thousands of archaeological evidence that depicts dinosaurs... That shows men riding the brontosaurus... T-rex's hunting men.... In fact what is funny, is it wasn't like these things were forged... 1st of all, they are in tons of different locations that are proved to be untouched by modern humans... But secondly they are not shown as what the early 1900's archaeologists believed a dinosaur to look like... See we find dinosaur bones and put them back together and give the skeleton structure... But they gave some features that were made out of cartilage... E.g. Nearly every depiction had stegosaurus like triangles on their back...
Another thing which is cool, is we do not have to strata date these artifacts... For I hope you now see strata dating is very uncredible... But we can clay date these artifacts... And all date around a few thousand years old...
I hope after researching this, you do not say that well we just don't have any fossils between 150 million years and today...
So lets do some math... Very simple math any 5th grader could do....
So lets give these dinosaurs a hundred year life span... And lets say only 2 on the earth at 1 time, and they only breed and have offspring their 100'th year... This sounds a reasonably fair thing to say, for if anything... It will help lighten the blow on the numbers I will give you... So take 150,000,000 years into generations of a thing that has a generation of 100 years... This equals 1,500,000 generations which equals 3 million un found fossils... That is a lot of bones... And take in note, this a species who lives 100 years, dies and reproduces on their 100th year... So only 2 of that species are alive at once... Lets hope they do not breed like rabbits...
As you can see finding evidence of only 150,000,000 year old fossils is extremely unlikely...
Carbon 14 is a element that is in all organic living things... When you die the carbon 14 has a specific half life and is present in all organic matter under 80k years old... If there is no C14 a test would come back inconclusive and not read a result... For if you are doing a test about how many skittles are in a jar and there are none... Your answer would not be 50...
So with that basic understanding of C14 I think you should research August 10, 1990 Asu Allosaurus blind test...
Whenever a known dinosaur bone is found, we automatically assume it is older than 80k years old and negate the C14 test... For mainstream science says that would be a waste of a test... Se we strata test it in the rocks we find... Funny thing is though, any time we blind test (unknowingly test) a dino bone with C14, it comes back under 14k years maximum.... Like the August 10, 1990 ASU test came back with red blood cells, and spongy tissue... all of which to be impossible if evolutionary hypothesis are correct....
So next question is asking, are our modern dating methods correct/accurate? Since we don't use C14 on a C14 positive specimen...
Is strata testing accurate...???
Well in 1980's Mt. St. Helens erupted, and a funny thing occurred... Strata was laid in the matter of hours... Now scientists believe that the strata takes millions and thousands of years to accumulate under the earths environments... So if you find fossil A under 3 layers, it is most likely to be X years old and not under Y years old.... Then they test the rock and date it...
They believe that strata is a chest, locking in every millenniums mysteries and secrets... The thing that died first would be under the thing that died 5 years ago... Which makes sense... But then you get weird fossils such as the picture below... Which in order to stand directly strait up for that amount of strata to accumulate and layer above it... Would take tens of thousands of years...
Then you look back to the 2004 Tsunami of Indonesia, and what occurred was thousands of years of strata in the matter of hours... And the same with the Japanese tsunami, and any tsunami since... What we have found is large amounts of spontaneous water creates more strata then you could believe... And everyone knows about the story of the flood and Noah...
Staying on the topic of strata, the moon has a different kind... Before we ever set foot on the moon, evolutionary atheist's thought there would be at least a few feet of dust on that moon, given X amount of space dust falls on earth with a atmosphere and we have Y amount falling down each year, we can calculate the Z amount the moon should have... Only problem was, we don't know the exact age of the moon... SO there were two hypothesis' the first being there would be feet of dust on that moon, and that was given to the thought the moon was over a billion years old... The second was there should only be a few centimeters... That was given the moon would be under X years, a biblical view...)
Can you tell me how much dust there is?
Next on my topic would be Accombora Mexico... Before Mexico was ever brought into the light of archaeology a few strapping rich young archaeologists went down there to research there culture... What they found was staggering.... The found thousands of archaeological evidence that depicts dinosaurs... That shows men riding the brontosaurus... T-rex's hunting men.... In fact what is funny, is it wasn't like these things were forged... 1st of all, they are in tons of different locations that are proved to be untouched by modern humans... But secondly they are not shown as what the early 1900's archaeologists believed a dinosaur to look like... See we find dinosaur bones and put them back together and give the skeleton structure... But they gave some features that were made out of cartilage... E.g. Nearly every depiction had stegosaurus like triangles on their back...
Another thing which is cool, is we do not have to strata date these artifacts... For I hope you now see strata dating is very uncredible... But we can clay date these artifacts... And all date around a few thousand years old...
I hope after researching this, you do not say that well we just don't have any fossils between 150 million years and today...
So lets do some math... Very simple math any 5th grader could do....
So lets give these dinosaurs a hundred year life span... And lets say only 2 on the earth at 1 time, and they only breed and have offspring their 100'th year... This sounds a reasonably fair thing to say, for if anything... It will help lighten the blow on the numbers I will give you... So take 150,000,000 years into generations of a thing that has a generation of 100 years... This equals 1,500,000 generations which equals 3 million un found fossils... That is a lot of bones... And take in note, this a species who lives 100 years, dies and reproduces on their 100th year... So only 2 of that species are alive at once... Lets hope they do not breed like rabbits...
As you can see finding evidence of only 150,000,000 year old fossils is extremely unlikely...
Last edited:
Spot, Spots, Spotted, Spotting, Spottable?
A leopard cannot change its spots - Wiktionary
Can the Ethiopian change his skin
Or the leopard his spots?
Then you also can do good
Who are accustomed to doing evil.
Does a fountain send out from the same opening both fresh and bitter water?
For whoever is joined with all the living, there is hope; surely a live dog is better than a dead lion.
A leopard cannot change its spots - Wiktionary
Can the Ethiopian change his skin
Or the leopard his spots?
Then you also can do good
Who are accustomed to doing evil.
Does a fountain send out from the same opening both fresh and bitter water?
For whoever is joined with all the living, there is hope; surely a live dog is better than a dead lion.
Last edited: