Is universalisim the opposite of Calvinism?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Kojikun

Well-known member
Oct 5, 2018
4,658
2,719
113
#1
I always felt Calvinism was on one end and Armenisim (not sure on proper spelling) was on the other. If that's the case where would universalisim fall? Not saying I believe in universalisim just wondering where it stands as I'm in the middle of Cal and Arm
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,485
12,950
113
#2
If that's the case where would universalisim fall?
Universalism is outside the scope of Bible truth. It claims that everyone will be saved regards of whether or not they obey the Gospel. In one sense it could be the opposite of Calvinism, which says that only the so-called elect will be saved. Neither of these positions is biblical. If you want the biblical position, then give heed to the words of Christ (John 3:16-18):

ALL MAY BE SAVED [REFUTES CALVINISM]
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

ALL SHOULD BE SAVED [GOD'S DESIRE FOR MANKIND]
17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.


ALL WILL NOT BE SAVED [REFUTES UNIVERSALISM]
18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
 

Kojikun

Well-known member
Oct 5, 2018
4,658
2,719
113
#3
Universalism is outside the scope of Bible truth. It claims that everyone will be saved regards of whether or not they obey the Gospel. In one sense it could be the opposite of Calvinism, which says that only the so-called elect will be saved. Neither of these positions is biblical. If you want the biblical position, then give heed to the words of Christ (John 3:16-18):

ALL MAY BE SAVED [REFUTES CALVINISM]
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

ALL SHOULD BE SAVED [GOD'S DESIRE FOR MANKIND]
17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.


ALL WILL NOT BE SAVED [REFUTES UNIVERSALISM]
18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
Ah, yeah that makes sense. I feel there are far too many bible verses that oppose Universalism. I just wondered where it would be if it was measured with two other schools of popular theism
 

Lynx

Folksy yet erudite
Aug 13, 2014
24,934
8,176
113
#4
A Calvinist and an Armenian square off:

CALVINIST: You know, I'm starting to feel like I'm destined to sock you right in the jaw!

ARMENIAN: Oh yeah? Well whatever you CHOOSE to do, buddy!
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,426
3,479
113
#5
I always felt Calvinism was on one end and Armenisim (not sure on proper spelling) was on the other. If that's the case where would universalisim fall? Not saying I believe in universalisim just wondering where it stands as I'm in the middle of Cal and Arm
No.. universalism is just another false doctrine.. as calvinism is a false doctrine.. They are not opposites..