Do you get that point? And, if you think that is a point, how about we say it's immoral to persecute people for stealing too? What possible harm can come from stealing after all, except in the case when the person being stolen from objects, and then gets mugged or killed? Then it's that person's fault because they were being greedy and wouldn't share.
The logic of weed becoming legal is as thoroughly illogical as the case I just made for stealing.
Well the point is just to address someone by their logic rather than my own, I find it to be more effective that way.
Like for example if you want to equivocate to stealing I would say, regardless of the hypothetical outcomes of stealing (ie: being mugged, injured, or killed), is it okay to steal from people that are greedy like Robin Hood or something? Or to put it another way, let's say your opinion s right that it is okay to steal from the greedy; does that mean it is still immoral to steal from someone that is not greedy?
There are many logics to making weed legal or illegal. The careful reader might notice I have not really taken a personal position and expounded on my personal logic of this matter. I am just having fun exploring other peoples' logics and found the logic here of it being illegal because atheists smoke it to be pretty funny. Definitely the most unique argument I have seen for it.