Okay, I read the article, and found absolutely no substantiation for the claims.
The article only says "Certain GOP officials have said..." They're not naming any sources. They are also not indicating WHY these officials are being removed.
It is entirely possible that these election official were removed for breaking the law. Maybe they were found trying to stuff ballot boxes, or intimidating voters, or committing any number of other instances of voter fraud. The article does not explain any of that.
This is what we call "yellow journalism."
For example, I could say, "I heard that Mitt Romney eats babies."
I'm not lying. I did actually hear that. Of course, I heard it from someone who was being sarcastic, and I even knew they were being sarcastic, but for the purposes of this statement, it makes a much better story for me to leave that part out.
Without any references or sources provided, your article is worthless. We have no way to follow up, no way to know what was going on .... no way to investigate and, if there's any substance to these claims, punish those who have committed voter fraud.
This is the kind of thing you see in "National Inquirer" and other rags, not in reputable magazines and newspapers.