THE REAL BAPTISM

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
4,931
1,055
113
#41
Paul thanked God he didn't baptise any of them because he was not sent to baptize.
Said so himself.

You condemn everyone whos sins are washed away by God .You believe they are all sent up hell who are not baptized by man.

You have great faith in the works of man .




corinth 1

14 I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;

15 Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.

16 And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.

17 For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.
You may want to read the points I provided from scripture.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
4,931
1,055
113
#42
Well you go ahead and be obedient to mans water baptism.
And just so you know.Water is not the name of Jesus Christ.If your baptised in water ,you get wet.If you are baptise in the the holy Ghost then you are baptized into Christ and the logos.


I was baptized in the holy Ghost by God through Jesus Christ.It took place while I was praying Aug 31 ,1998.It was about noon on a monday.
There's no mistaking when all your sins are washed away by God.And that cleansing does not come by water.
But there have been others who taught water baptism was essential for that is what they believe to be true.They knew no other baptism.


Mathew 23:25
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.
Receiving the indwelling of the Holy Ghost is necessary and is a separate experience from being water baptized in the name of Jesus for remission of sin. All conversion accounts include both. You may want to take another look at the scriptures. (Acts 2:38-41, 8:12-18, 9:17-18, 10:43-48, 19:1-6, 22:16)
 

tylerbones1313

Active member
May 1, 2022
565
156
43
#43
The passage, found in Matthew 3:11, is part of John the Baptist's proclamation as he prepared the way for Jesus' ministry. In this verse, John contrasts his own baptism with the baptism that Jesus will bring, highlighting two distinct baptisms: one with water and the other with the Holy Spirit and fire.

John 3:5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.

Matthew 3:11 I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost (some translations Spirit), and with fire:

The promise of the Holy Spirit, which Jesus discussed with Nicodemus and which John the Baptist alluded to, was fulfilled at Pentecost (Acts 2) when the Holy Spirit was poured out on the disciples. This event marked the beginning of the Church and the Spirit's ongoing work in and through believers to bear witness to the gospel, live holy lives, and serve in the power of the Spirit.

Baptism with Water unto Repentance: John's baptism was a symbolic act of cleansing, representing the individual's repentance from sin and their decision to turn away from their past life towards God. It was an external sign of an inward change, preparing the people for the coming of the Messiah by encouraging them to reflect on their lives and seek forgiveness for their sins. John's baptism, therefore, was about preparation and repentance.

Baptism with the Holy Spirit: The baptism that Jesus brings is described as being with the Holy Spirit. This signifies a deeper, spiritual transformation that goes beyond the external sign of water baptism. It involves the indwelling of the Holy Spirit in believers, empowering them for service, guiding them in truth, and transforming their hearts and lives to conform to the will of God. This baptism marks the beginning of the believer's new life in Christ, enabling them to live in a relationship with God.

John's statement highlights the superiority of Jesus' ministry and the transformative power of the baptism He offers. John prepares the way, but Jesus inaugurates a new era of the Holy Spirit, where believers are not only cleansed externally but are transformed from within by the Spirit's power.

While water baptism signifies repentance and a desire for a new life, the baptism with the Holy Spirit actually effects change within the believer, equipping them with divine power and gifts for godly living and service.
 

wolfwint

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2014
3,630
887
113
61
#44
The baptism of the Holy Spirit is not impossible to recognize. There was proof that the Holy Ghost had come to dwell in those of all groups of humanity (Jews, Gentiles) and the 12 individuals in Ephesus; they all spoke in tongues. (Acts 2:4, 10:43-48, 19:1-6) The conversion experience of the Samaritans (half-Jew and half-Gentile) was the one exception. (Acts 8:12-18) The group believed the gospel message and submitted to water baptism in the name of Jesus, yet did not receive the Holy Spirit. However, the Samaritan account reveals there is evidence when the experience takes place. This is revealed in the fact that those present knew they had not received the Holy Ghost. How did the know this? The account does not state exactly how they knew. But considering that all of the other accounts mention speaking in tongues specifically, one can conclude that is what was missing. Peter and John were sent to assist in the experience. And Simon saw something that prompted him to offer money to be able to assist in people receiving the Holy Ghost as well. (Acts 8:17-18)
This was important for the first time for to show that Jesus came not alone for the jews, but for all people. Would your claim be true.
Then only pentecostals, since 1900 and charismatics would be baptised with the Holy Spirit. And some cults. All others not!!
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
12,453
4,105
113
#45
This was important for the first time for to show that Jesus came not alone for the jews, but for all people. Would your claim be true.
Then, only Pentecostals, since 1900, and charismatics would be baptized with the Holy Spirit. And some cults. All others not!!

Wrong. You continue to misrepresent this topic as you would like to. The Baptism in the Holy Spirit started in the Book of Acts 40 AD.

It is not in the 1900s, as you incorrectly like to say. In addition, there is nothing in the Bible that says the Gift of the Holy Spirit is no longer for today, and tongues are one on them. 1cor chapters 12 through 14. Acts 1:8 and John 1:33 :) good try but no prize.
 

FollowerofShiloh

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2024
3,189
543
113
#46
When we are truly saved, receive the Holy Spirit saved, the Holy Spirit regenerates the person into a new creature giving them their calling and Gift(s). That is being Baptized into the Holy Spirit.

Water Baptism is a conscience process for our mind and soul exemplifying being dead and risen again.

The first examples happened in Acts and each new believer until Jesus returns goes through the same process.
 

wolfwint

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2014
3,630
887
113
61
#47
Wrong. You continue to misrepresent this topic as you would like to. The Baptism in the Holy Spirit started in the Book of Acts 40 AD.

It is not in the 1900s, as you incorrectly like to say. In addition, there is nothing in the Bible that says the Gift of the Holy Spirit is no longer for today, and tongues are one on them. 1cor chapters 12 through 14. Acts 1:8 and John 1:33 :) good try but no prize.
Then all denominations, except pentecostal and charismatics before 1900 are wrong. And non of there believers were saved. Because they had not the speaking in tongues sign. So they had not the baptism with the Holy Spirit.
This is the conclusion from that what wanswic said.
 

wolfwint

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2014
3,630
887
113
61
#48
Wrong. You continue to misrepresent this topic as you would like to. The Baptism in the Holy Spirit started in the Book of Acts 40 AD.

It is not in the 1900s, as you incorrectly like to say. In addition, there is nothing in the Bible that says the Gift of the Holy Spirit is no longer for today, and tongues are one on them. 1cor chapters 12 through 14. Acts 1:8 and John 1:33 :) good try but no prize.
The begin of the pentecostal movement was 1900. Before this was taught in some circles and cults. The pentecostal movement is proud for that beginning .
Charismatics of course came later.
I know that you will not agree 😀
 

FollowerofShiloh

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2024
3,189
543
113
#49
Then all denominations, except pentecostal and charismatics before 1900 are wrong. And non of there believers were saved. Because they had not the speaking in tongues sign. So they had not the baptism with the Holy Spirit.
This is the conclusion from that what wanswic said.
When you were filled with the Holy Spirit and regenerated, what "Calling and Gift(s) of the Holy Spirit" were you given?
 

tylerbones1313

Active member
May 1, 2022
565
156
43
#50
Paul thanked God he didn't baptise any of them because he was not sent to baptize.
Said so himself.

You condemn everyone whos sins are washed away by God .You believe they are all sent up hell who are not baptized by man.

You have great faith in the works of man .




corinth 1

14 I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;

15 Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.

16 And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.

17 For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.
Paul acknowledges different roles within the Christian community. While baptism is a critical sacrament within the Christian faith, symbolizing a believer's death to sin and new life in Christ, Paul sees his primary calling as the proclamation of the gospel. This doesn't mean that baptism is unimportant or unnecessary; rather, Paul emphasizes that his particular commission was to spread the gospel message. This division of labor is akin to what Paul mentions in 1 Corinthians 3:5-6, where he speaks of planting and watering as different tasks given to different servants of God for the same purpose of growth in faith.

The context of 1 Corinthians 1 suggests that Paul was addressing divisions within the Corinthian church, where people were identifying themselves with specific leaders (1 Corinthians 1:12-13). By stating he was not sent to baptize but to preach, Paul aims to refocus the believers in Christ and the gospel rather than on human leaders who perform baptisms. This statement serves to diminish factionalism and redirect attention to the unifying message of the cross.

By de-emphasizing his role in baptizing, Paul also prevents any potential misunderstanding that might associate baptism too closely with the identity of the person performing the baptism. This helps ensure that the focus remains on the individual's faith in Christ and the meaning of baptism in relation to Christ's death and resurrection, rather than on the prominence or authority of the baptizer.

When Paul states that Christ sent him not to baptize but to preach the gospel, he is not minimizing the importance of baptism but rather emphasizing his specific calling to spread the gospel message as the foundation of Christian faith and unity. This distinction allows Paul to address issues of division within the church, underline the priority of the gospel message, and focus on the spiritual transformation that comes from faith in Christ, beyond the sacramental act.
 

FollowerofShiloh

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2024
3,189
543
113
#51
To Wolfwint
^
It's not a trick question.
Paul said everyone has a Calling and given at least one Gift of the Holy Spirit.
So, if you have been Baptized in the Holy Spirit then you should know this answer.
 

Shilohsfoal

Well-known member
Dec 27, 2018
1,393
129
63
#52
You may want to read the points I provided from scripture.
I've already read all the scripture on baptism.

You believe you can save people by baptising them in water.Those people who have put their faith in you will perish.

The baptism that saves people is the baptism of God.The holy spirit baptism.

Mark 16
15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.

16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.


Washing in water does nothing but clean the outer skin.Nothnng more.
 

Shilohsfoal

Well-known member
Dec 27, 2018
1,393
129
63
#53
Paul acknowledges different roles within the Christian community. While baptism is a critical sacrament within the Christian faith, symbolizing a believer's death to sin and new life in Christ, Paul sees his primary calling as the proclamation of the gospel. This doesn't mean that baptism is unimportant or unnecessary; rather, Paul emphasizes that his particular commission was to spread the gospel message. This division of labor is akin to what Paul mentions in 1 Corinthians 3:5-6, where he speaks of planting and watering as different tasks given to different servants of God for the same purpose of growth in faith.

The context of 1 Corinthians 1 suggests that Paul was addressing divisions within the Corinthian church, where people were identifying themselves with specific leaders (1 Corinthians 1:12-13). By stating he was not sent to baptize but to preach, Paul aims to refocus the believers in Christ and the gospel rather than on human leaders who perform baptisms. This statement serves to diminish factionalism and redirect attention to the unifying message of the cross.

By de-emphasizing his role in baptizing, Paul also prevents any potential misunderstanding that might associate baptism too closely with the identity of the person performing the baptism. This helps ensure that the focus remains on the individual's faith in Christ and the meaning of baptism in relation to Christ's death and resurrection, rather than on the prominence or authority of the baptizer.

When Paul states that Christ sent him not to baptize but to preach the gospel, he is not minimizing the importance of baptism but rather emphasizing his specific calling to spread the gospel message as the foundation of Christian faith and unity. This distinction allows Paul to address issues of division within the church, underline the priority of the gospel message, and focus on the spiritual transformation that comes from faith in Christ, beyond the sacramental act.

Washing the outer skin does nothing to save anyone .

Mark 16
15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.

16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.


You can claim you are saving people by giving them a bath or a shower but you are not saving anyone.
The only baptism that saves people is the baptism of the holy spirit which washes people clean every wit.


There is only one baptism that saves.

Paul acknowledged he made a terrible mistake baptising people when he was not sent to do so.It caused great disputes among the church as it still does today.



1 corinth 1

14 I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;

15 Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.

16 And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.

17 For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.
 

Shilohsfoal

Well-known member
Dec 27, 2018
1,393
129
63
#54
Receiving the indwelling of the Holy Ghost is necessary and is a separate experience from being water baptized in the name of Jesus for remission of sin. All conversion accounts include both. You may want to take another look at the scriptures. (Acts 2:38-41, 8:12-18, 9:17-18, 10:43-48, 19:1-6, 22:16)
All conversion accounts?

That would be false.I was converted without a water baptism.
Johns may have been leading the way for Christ,but Christ is already come.

John is gone and his baptism is a thing of the past.There is a greater baptism performed in these days.




Although I will baptised myself here shortly .I will use soap and shampoo in addition to water.
 

FollowerofShiloh

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2024
3,189
543
113
#55
To Wolfwint
^
It's not a trick question.
Paul said everyone has a Calling and given at least one Gift of the Holy Spirit.
So, if you have been Baptized in the Holy Spirit then you should know this answer.
When you were filled with the Holy Spirit and regenerated, what "Calling and Gift(s) of the Holy Spirit" were you given?
wolfwint,
If you truly cannot answer these simple basic questions that ALL Christians can answer, how do you know that you are even saved?

Your Gift does not have to be speaking in Tongues, There are (7) specific Gifts of the Holy Spirit. If you're saved you have at least ONE of them.
 

Shilohsfoal

Well-known member
Dec 27, 2018
1,393
129
63
#56
More and more divisions

One church teaching another church doesn't baptised the right way.You can't sprinkle with water you have to be fully submerged.Now there are people being baptized in water for other people who are dead and never got baptized by someone.

It doesn't do anything but cause problems.
Water baptism doesn't save anyone.It has only caused division and Paul pointed that problem out.
 

tylerbones1313

Active member
May 1, 2022
565
156
43
#57
Washing the outer skin does nothing to save anyone .

Mark 16
15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.

16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.


You can claim you are saving people by giving them a bath or a shower but you are not saving anyone.
The only baptism that saves people is the baptism of the holy spirit which washes people clean every wit.


There is only one baptism that saves.

Paul acknowledged he made a terrible mistake baptising people when he was not sent to do so.It caused great disputes among the church as it still does today.



1 corinth 1

14 I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;

15 Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.

16 And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.

17 For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.
If you only see baptism as getting wet, then you need a serious reexamining of your heart. There is no saving Grace in the element of water. The saving Grace comes from the believer placing their faith in Christ and what baptism stands for not the water itself.
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
12,453
4,105
113
#58
Then all denominations, except pentecostal and charismatics before 1900 are wrong. And non of there believers were saved. Because they had not the speaking in tongues sign. So they had not the baptism with the Holy Spirit.
This is the conclusion from that what wanswic said.

No one here said you have to speak in tongues to be saved, and if they did, they were wrong. I am a Pentacostel minister, and I have told you that many times, sir.
 

tylerbones1313

Active member
May 1, 2022
565
156
43
#59
I've already read all the scripture on baptism.

You believe you can save people by baptising them in water.Those people who have put their faith in you will perish.
It's a symbolic act of declaring your faith in Jesus Christ and identifying yourself with his death and resurrection. Their faith needs to be on Jesus Christ not the person baptizing otherwise they are doing it for the wrong reason.


Washing in water does nothing but clean the outer skin.Nothnng more.
Baptism is a symbolic act that represents being cleansed of sin and starting fresh with Christ. Just as water washes away dirt, baptism signifies the washing away of our spiritual impurities. While baptism is an outward act, it points to the inward change that happens when we accept Jesus. It's a public declaration of a new life lived for Him.
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
12,453
4,105
113
#60
The begin of the pentecostal movement was 1900. Before this was taught in some circles and cults. The pentecostal movement is proud for that beginning .
Charismatics of course came later.
I know that you will not agree 😀
wrong, it was before the 1900. If you don't know what you are talking about, you should not speak about it 1881 was the establishment of what came to be called Pentecostals. Most were Baptist.