So I have a question.
I have noticed a shift in the atheist's material... Where as before they would quote blindly from Ezekiel, Leviticus, Deuteronomy, and Numbers... Trying to show how God is evil, cruel, and unjust. This was easily refutable...
For instance, When they would quote Deuteronomy 14:9-10
These ye shall eat of all that are in the waters: all that have fins and scales shall ye eat: And whatsoever hath not fins and scales ye may not eat; it is unclean unto you.
This is easily refuted by showing them that the NT says we can eat any food.
But lately every time I begin to win an argument, or they cannot show my logic to be fallible, they pull this "slave card".
Exodus 21:20-21
If a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod and he dies at his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, he survives a day or two, no vengeance shall be taken; for he is his property.
How do you defend yourself from this? How does the bible further explain this?
I have noticed a shift in the atheist's material... Where as before they would quote blindly from Ezekiel, Leviticus, Deuteronomy, and Numbers... Trying to show how God is evil, cruel, and unjust. This was easily refutable...
For instance, When they would quote Deuteronomy 14:9-10
These ye shall eat of all that are in the waters: all that have fins and scales shall ye eat: And whatsoever hath not fins and scales ye may not eat; it is unclean unto you.
This is easily refuted by showing them that the NT says we can eat any food.
But lately every time I begin to win an argument, or they cannot show my logic to be fallible, they pull this "slave card".
Exodus 21:20-21
If a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod and he dies at his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, he survives a day or two, no vengeance shall be taken; for he is his property.
How do you defend yourself from this? How does the bible further explain this?