The just released Republican Heath Care Plan appears to defund Planned Parenthood.
House GOP Obamacare repeal replace plan defund Planned ...
Was listening to one of the FNC Shows last night where one of the Parenthood women was arguing about why this is a bad thing. Trump offered Parenthood a deal........if they would stop doing abortions, he would see that they are funded. They turned down the offer.
Parenthood claims that abortions only account for 3% of their services in women's health care. I have no idea if this is true or not, but even 3% is a lot of babies being killed every year by Parenthood.
They claim that they will always fight to protect a woman's right to choose what they do with their own bodies, and they have been successful in winning this argument. Why? Because the Pro Life people DO NOT properly frame the argument.
Parenthood claims, as does the SCOTUS, that an unborn baby IS NOT a human being, and therefore, not subject to the protections provided for all human beings by the Constitution.
Here's the rub.............these SAME people, and Courts, DO RECOGNIZE unborn babies as human beings IF said baby is killed in some way by a third party.
Example would be........if a pregnant woman is driving down the street, and someone t-bones her car, and she is injured in such a was as to cause the death of the unborn baby, or if she is killed, the driver who t-boned her can and will be charged for the death of the unborn baby.
????????????
How can someone be criminally charged with the wrongful death of something that IS NOT human?
Pro Life.............needs to change their name back to Anti Abortion Advocates (first off) need to properly frame the argument, and demand that Parenthood, and the Courts......SCOTUS, justify this hypocritical reality.
Example would be............a 15 year old girl falls in love with her 26 year old Gym Teacher, has a relationship with him.....that relationship is discovered, the Teacher is arrested and convicted of being a sexual predator and must register as a sex offender for the rest of his life..........because the 15 year old girl IS NOT considered emotionally or mentally mature enough to legally consent to such a relationship.
Same 15 year old girl ends up pregnant from that relationship.........She IS CONSIDERED emotionally and mentally mature enough to decide to have an abortion...........and can do so without the consent, OR EVEN the notification of her parents.
Not mature enough to consent to a sexual relationship...........mature enough to kill her unborn child........
Dear Planned Parenthood / SCOTUS: Please explain this one to me.
House GOP Obamacare repeal replace plan defund Planned ...
Was listening to one of the FNC Shows last night where one of the Parenthood women was arguing about why this is a bad thing. Trump offered Parenthood a deal........if they would stop doing abortions, he would see that they are funded. They turned down the offer.
Parenthood claims that abortions only account for 3% of their services in women's health care. I have no idea if this is true or not, but even 3% is a lot of babies being killed every year by Parenthood.
They claim that they will always fight to protect a woman's right to choose what they do with their own bodies, and they have been successful in winning this argument. Why? Because the Pro Life people DO NOT properly frame the argument.
Parenthood claims, as does the SCOTUS, that an unborn baby IS NOT a human being, and therefore, not subject to the protections provided for all human beings by the Constitution.
Here's the rub.............these SAME people, and Courts, DO RECOGNIZE unborn babies as human beings IF said baby is killed in some way by a third party.
Example would be........if a pregnant woman is driving down the street, and someone t-bones her car, and she is injured in such a was as to cause the death of the unborn baby, or if she is killed, the driver who t-boned her can and will be charged for the death of the unborn baby.
????????????
How can someone be criminally charged with the wrongful death of something that IS NOT human?
Pro Life.............needs to change their name back to Anti Abortion Advocates (first off) need to properly frame the argument, and demand that Parenthood, and the Courts......SCOTUS, justify this hypocritical reality.
Example would be............a 15 year old girl falls in love with her 26 year old Gym Teacher, has a relationship with him.....that relationship is discovered, the Teacher is arrested and convicted of being a sexual predator and must register as a sex offender for the rest of his life..........because the 15 year old girl IS NOT considered emotionally or mentally mature enough to legally consent to such a relationship.
Same 15 year old girl ends up pregnant from that relationship.........She IS CONSIDERED emotionally and mentally mature enough to decide to have an abortion...........and can do so without the consent, OR EVEN the notification of her parents.
Not mature enough to consent to a sexual relationship...........mature enough to kill her unborn child........
Dear Planned Parenthood / SCOTUS: Please explain this one to me.