Okay, this is the first time I looked back at this post. I really didn't expect it to get much attention. Pretty entertaining. I only read thru about half of the second page, but it seems like that' prolly enough.
As a couple have pointed out, no, he actually hasn't gone to heaven yet, but he absolutely will. I guess I should have been more specific, but I think everyone understands the basic premise.
Certainly I was being facetious. It is ridiculous to think otherwise, after all, John was the modern day Isaiah. It was merely to point out the fact that baptism is not a requirement of being saved. Obedience is, tho. Some folks get all confused about that. Some say, "Well, he wasn't under the new testament, but the old. Okay, then why did Christ get baptized? He WAS the new. And He also was no sinner, so clearly it wasn't necessary to qualify Him for a return to heaven.
The scripture is plain. Where we are told that we must "repent and be baptized", then what does that mean? It means, that we must repent and be obedient. In other words, repentance is the beginning of salvation. It is a journey, and tho many will argue this too, we must stay the course to maintain that treasured status with Christ. The thief and John surely didn't get baptized, but if they had been offered the opportunity, there can be no doubt they would have willingly done so.
Just think about it awhile, if you're not sure or don't agree. Study the word and stay in prayer. God will reveal His truth to you if you earnestly seek it.