If you want me to educate you on the various things you do not understand............there is a hefty fee. Education can be expensive...........Since you have no desire to put forth the slightest effort to educate yourself, I can only surmise that you are surely a shining example of the "Entitlement Generation."
You make a claim, and instead of backing it up or informing the person you're accusing of being wrong - you tell them they should pay you for that information. You then make the accusation that they must be one of the people who feel they are entitled to free education.
Your logic is as fallows:
1. I don't offer to pay you for information during a DEBATE on an OPEN FORUM. (We are NOT in a college setting)
2. Because I don't offer to pay you for information in a non-college setting, I must therefore feel entitled to free college education.
Please, don't resort to irrational, fallacious, straw man arguments.
Oh, and just in case you missed it:
Let me guess: You vote Democratic, right?
Libertarian. The only way you could be less socialist than me is if you're an anarcho-capitalist.
If you have no desire to make the effort to educate yourself, why should anyone else make the effort to educate you?
If you claim someone is wrong and they ask, "How am I wrong?" you have to be denser than osmium to think the mature response is, "go figure it out yourself." If you tell me to figure it out myself, I can only assume you don't have it figured out yourself so you tell me to do my homework so you don't have to actually support your own claims!
and it is quite clear you did not understand my COMMENT #33......where I did show you how you were wrong in your false statement that Vets are treated far better than other citizens.............
1. No, you didn't. You just told me I was wrong over and over. You didn't show me anything.
2. I never claimed veterans were treated better than civilians. I said they don't deserve special rights that are not available to citizens.
Here's how I see it:
1. Nobody has access to healthcare outside their state.
2. Only veterans have access to healthcare outside their state. Civilians do not.
3. EVERYONE has access to healthcare outside their state.
I'm arguing for number 3 - the most capitalist of the three options. You're acting like I'm supporting option 1 - I don't. Which one of those three options do you support?
Keep in mind, having access to healthcare means that it's available for purchase. It DOES NOT mean you automatically receive that care for free (or through tax dollars). If you thought I was talking about civilians OBTAINING outside healthcare through government, then that would explain why this debate is happening and it would clearly be a huge misunderstanding.