I don't know anything about these manmade terms...I know what I know...
And I know there are those who will have a part in the first resurrection and that there will be those who wont.
And I know that those who hear the VOICE of the SON of GOD and those who believe have passed from death to life now...and won't come under condemnation...
It is only those who died outside of faith in CHRIST who will rise in the final judgment to be judged according to their works...
And those whose names are not found in the book of life will be cast into the lake of fire where the false prophet and the beast are.
No one has yet been cast into the lake of fire
And I know there are those who will have a part in the first resurrection and that there will be those who wont.
And I know that those who hear the VOICE of the SON of GOD and those who believe have passed from death to life now...and won't come under condemnation...
It is only those who died outside of faith in CHRIST who will rise in the final judgment to be judged according to their works...
And those whose names are not found in the book of life will be cast into the lake of fire where the false prophet and the beast are.
No one has yet been cast into the lake of fire
As an Armstrongite, I didn't believe that but Scripture is clear. Lazarus and the Rich Man shows that the rich man's brothers were still alive and hadn't made their decision yet at the point Lazarus was experiencing torment in hades (and yes it uses hades instead of Gehenna).
So, the SDA and Armstrongite view that the wicked aren't being tormented now is incorrect. Scripture also says they are under punishment prior to the judgment (2 Peter 2:9).
Some may ask, how can they be punished before the judgment? Obviously God knows the outcome of the judgment of all men anyways. He has exhaustive foreknowledge (Isaiah 46:9-10).
Regarding Revelation, it cannot be read sequentially like premillennial dispensationalists claim. It's obvious that the events of the first part of Revelation 12 occurred at Christ's first coming, yet it follows events that occur at Christ's return (Revelation 11:15-19 and Revelation 12:1-9). To claim Revelation is to be read sequentially has big issues. The same events happen more than once in the book.
Revelation 20 is a review of elements that already occurred in the earlier part of Revelation. For instance, a battle has already occurred between God's people and Satan previous to the one in Revelation 20. All indications are that it's the same battle (Rev 16:12-14 and Rev 20:8-9).
Premillennial dispensationalists would claim that they are two separate events. I don't buy it.