If you have no interest in Rick Warren (not an issue, I really don't either!) then why bother commenting and posting verses which have nothing to do with the OP, or the verse which he used to start his blog?
As far as the verses you have posted, I looked them up in context, and in modern English. They are in context of a fuller address Jesus is giving, including the Lord's prayer. The Luke version concentrates on the parts about asking God for forgiveness of sins, and the line about not being brought into temptation.
It is interesting Jesus continues with this verse, about getting anything you want if you pray hard enough. Except, does it in fact say that? I think it is more about the need to seek God! What are you asking for? What are you seeking? What door are you knocking on?
Jesus says we need to seek God, for what purpose? To get 3 loaves of bread? No, the verse, finishes, and I notice you purposely left it off, with the moral of the story.
"If you then, although you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will the heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him!” Luke 11:13 NET
We are to seek God for the Holy Spirit. And another interesting point is that the Holy Spirit had not yet been poured out, for it was promised to the disciples when Jesus ascended as "another helper, another comforter, another advocate." The paraclete, or ὁ παράκλητος is the Holy Spirit. That is what Jesus is talking about in your posted verses.
"When the Advocate comes, whom I will send you from the Father—the Spirit of truth who goes out from the Father—he will testify about me, 27 and you also will testify, because you have been with me from the beginning." John 15:26-27
You probably don't know me yet, but the reason for these repeated exegetical mistakes you make, is you fail to recognize context. And that means not dropping the point Jesus is making in the passage in your post.
Context, means looking at the verses around the key verse, and seeing what Jesus was really saying. It is too easy to pull a part of a verse out of context, or even a passage, as you did, and miss the whole point.
Context, context, context, I always say!
In any event, you post is totally off-topic, and I will not be answering any of these rabbit trails of yours. If you actually want to stick with the topic, I would be glad to discuss it with you. And if you don't like or care about what Rick Warren is posting, then kindly don't bother with this thread.
PS. By dropping verse Luke 11:13 off of your passage, you basically walked into the area I would say is heresy. Heresy is taking the Word of God, and twisting it to prove what you want. (Eisegesis or reading INTO Scripture!) You came up with Word Faith doctrine, by leaving off the part about seeking God to get the Holy Spirit. Not about getting things for yourself. Which is my whole objection to the blog by Rick Warren!