how is it gravity acts towards the outside of your supposed sphere; rotational momentum? if that's so, why aren't we weightless at the poles along the axis of rotation?
I'm not saying the Earth is a sphere. Note that the idea that the Earth is stationary, and the belief that the Earth is flat, are two separate ideas. I would say the first (the Earth is stationary) is proved beyond all reasonable doubt, and verified in scriptures. The second is supported (i.e. implied, though not stated) by scriptures, but there are still doubts as some things can't well be explained (see below). If Earth is a sphere rotating in space (and orbiting the sun), how is it things don't seem to weigh less at the equator compared to the poles? How is it that Airy's experiment shows that it is the stars that are moving, not the Earth (when he filled his telescope with water)?
GEOCENTRICITY - An animated explanation of "Airy's Failure" experiment. - YouTube[/QUOTE]
how does the moon appear to set below the horizon; if the surface is concave there should not be an horizon for the moon to set under?
I'm not sure about the moon and the sun. If the Earth were flat, my calculations show they should disappear about 23 degrees above the horizon when rising/setting. Perhaps there is phenomena we haven't yet discovered, but the moon and sun do not disappear (i.e. the sun sets). If the Earth is a sphere, how do you explain that we can see around the curvature of the Earth (i.e. further than we should be able to see)?
how is that there is night on half of the earth, if the sun is not obscured by the earth itself?
Again, not really well explained, but the distance from the sun to the Earth is supposed to be so great, that the sun light coming to a place at night-time is indistinguishable from the horizon. I put this in the same category as explaining the sun set and sun rise.
why is it cold at the poles, hot at the equator and temperate in the tropics?
The sun travels in spiral path, circling the Earth each day (North pole in the center, Antartica surrounding the outer edges), from the Tropic of Cancer, through the Equator, to the tropic of Capricorn. In the Northern (inner) circle, it is Summer when the sun is at the Tropic of Cancer end of its spiral. In the Southern (outer) circle, it is Summer when the sun is at the Tropic of Capricorn end of the Equator. The sun is thus closer more often to the Equator, than to the tropics of Cancer or Capricorn, so hotter at the Equator, and colder at the poles.
how does this hollow earth have a magnetosphere?
A flat Earth doesn't have a magnetosphere, but it could easily have north and south poles. North pole at the center, south pole along the outer edges, around Antarctica.
if the starry heavens are inside this hollow earth, can you explain the perceived stable location of a single north star?
The north star is at the center of the rotation of the Heavens. So the north star appears stationary, because it is at the point around which the other stars rotate. Again, I'm not arguing the Earth is hollow, just saying the evidence provided (by Truth) does not contradict an Earth that is flat (although it does contradict a spherical, convex Earth).
did you release a mylar balloon with an attached video camera into the atmosphere yet, to give indisputable evidence of the curvature of the earth? thousands of other people have. take a look at youtube.
No, but I read an account by an early balloonist, who did indeed state that from on high, the Earth appears concave. I believe this is due to an optical illusion, with the horizon rising to the level of the eye of the observer. So even though he can see the horizon far away at eye level, when he looks down, he can also see the Earth is far below. Giving a bowl like appearance.
how is a lunar eclipse possible inside a hollow earth?
Again, I haven't been convinced the Earth is hollow. If the Earth were flat, just the moon in front of the sun, right?
why does volcanic activity exist?
I don't see how volcanic activity precludes any shape of Earth.
inquiring minds want to know.
Agreed.