Our faith has 4 types of righteousness
1. The righteousness of Christ
2. Imputed righteousness
3. Being righteous
4. Counted as righteous
1. The righteousness of Christ - Christ was sinless so righteous.
2. Imputed righeousness - We are seen as righteous because of Christ sacrifice on the cross.
3. Being righteous - After being forgiven of our sins we walk without defilement so are righteous
4. Counted as righteous - Our faith is counted as righteousness before God
Now two camps have appeared.
If you hold we are always sinful, never truly clean, then we could never be righteous
In this case only Christs righteousness could be seen as being our righteousness.
We could be regarded as righteous by our faith being imputed as righteousness as well.
Abraham did not have forgiveness through the cross.
So his righteousness was counted as righteousness because of faith.
He also walk righteously, but this did not count as justification because faith counts.
Now if this works for Abraham why is not the same dynamic working for us.
Christ through the cross dealt with our sin and being washed clean.
We can walk righteously without defilement but our righteousness comes from
the relationship by faith, being counted as righteousness.
But all of this is invalidated if we sin.
If we walk with imputed righteousness, which appears not to be biblical, sin no longer
spoils the relationship, which seems totally wrong.
If righteousness is reconned to us because of faith, why would we need this idea of
imputed righteousness, unless you have a doctrine of total inability to walk in righteousness.
So when did imputed righteousness start to be taught and by whom and why?
1. The righteousness of Christ
2. Imputed righteousness
3. Being righteous
4. Counted as righteous
1. The righteousness of Christ - Christ was sinless so righteous.
2. Imputed righeousness - We are seen as righteous because of Christ sacrifice on the cross.
3. Being righteous - After being forgiven of our sins we walk without defilement so are righteous
4. Counted as righteous - Our faith is counted as righteousness before God
Now two camps have appeared.
If you hold we are always sinful, never truly clean, then we could never be righteous
In this case only Christs righteousness could be seen as being our righteousness.
We could be regarded as righteous by our faith being imputed as righteousness as well.
Abraham did not have forgiveness through the cross.
So his righteousness was counted as righteousness because of faith.
He also walk righteously, but this did not count as justification because faith counts.
Now if this works for Abraham why is not the same dynamic working for us.
Christ through the cross dealt with our sin and being washed clean.
We can walk righteously without defilement but our righteousness comes from
the relationship by faith, being counted as righteousness.
But all of this is invalidated if we sin.
If we walk with imputed righteousness, which appears not to be biblical, sin no longer
spoils the relationship, which seems totally wrong.
If righteousness is reconned to us because of faith, why would we need this idea of
imputed righteousness, unless you have a doctrine of total inability to walk in righteousness.
So when did imputed righteousness start to be taught and by whom and why?