Sunday is catholic tradition.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,126
13,138
113
58
To say that John meant that the Lord's day is Sunday is subjective at best. Nothing in Revelation or in any other of the Spirit's utterances through John's writings even hint to that. Actually you will find nothing in all of the Holy Writ to support that. If anything Scripture points to the Lord's day as being the Sabbath.

For the Son of man is Lord even of the Sabbath day.
(Mat 12:8 KJV)

If the Son of Man; Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath, the Sabbath is definitely His Day.
More SDA propaganda. That is a very weak argument and the actual evidence for the first day (Sunday) is much stronger.

Jesus rose on the first day (Sunday) Jesus was crucified on Friday and rose on the first day. The Holy Spirit was given on Pentecost Acts 2:1, which always falls on a Sunday. Early Christians from 30-300AD referred to Sunday as the Lord's day BECAUSE it was the day Jesus rose from the dead. The only example of the Lord's supper being practiced by Christians is in Acts 20:7, on Sunday. If this is not the Lord's supper, as Sabbatarians cannot grant, then there is no example in the Bible of Christians communing. "Sunday" is only used in languages such as German, Dutch, and English, whereas Latin-based languages, such as Spanish, Italian, and French use a derivative of the Latin word "Dominica," literally "Lord's Day."

"The stone which the builders rejected Has become the chief corner stone. This is the Lord's doing; It is marvelous in our eyes. This is the day which the Lord has made; Let us rejoice and be glad in it. O Lord, do save, we beseech You; O Lord, we beseech You, do send prosperity! Blessed is the one who comes in the name of the Lord; We have blessed you from the house of the Lord." (Psalm 118:22-26)

It is obvious that resurrection day, is the day the Lord Made. Resurrection day is Sunday. Sunday is the day the Lord made. The first day (Sunday) is the Lord's Day.

*In all the 5 books that John wrote, he always called the Sabbath "the Sabbath"
*If Revelation 1:10 was the Sabbath, John would have said, "I was in the Spirit on the Sabbath".
*This shows it was not the Sabbath but the First day of the week: Sunday.

*Here are some quotes that show early Christians unanimously referred to the first day of the week as the "Lord's Day."

107AD IGNATIUS: let every friend of Christ keep the Lord's Day as a festival, the resurrection-day, the queen and chief of all the days of the week. (Ignatius, Epistle to the Magnesians, chp 9. Ante-Nicene Fathers , vol. 1, pg. 62-63.)

150AD JUSTIN: But Sunday is the day on which we hold our common assembly, because it is the first day of the week and Jesus our saviour on the same day rose from the dead. (First apology of Justin, Ch 68)

250AD CYPRIAN: The eight day, that is, the first day after the Sabbath, the Lord's Day." (Epistle 58, Sec 4)

250 AD IGNATIUS: "If, therefore, those who were brought up in the ancient order of things have come to the possession of a new hope, no longer observing the Sabbath, but living in the observance of the Lord's Day, on which also our life has sprung up again by Him and by His death-whom some deny, by which mystery we have obtained faith, and therefore endure, that we may be found the disciples of Jesus Christ, our only Master-how shall we be able to live apart from Him, whose disciples the prophets themselves in the Spirit did wait for Him as their Teacher? (Epistle of Ignatius to the Magnesians, Chapter IX)

250AD IGNATIUS: "On the day of the preparation, then, at the third hour, He received the sentence from Pilate, the Father permitting that to happen; at the sixth hour He was crucified; at the ninth hour He gave up the ghost; and before sunset He was buried. During the Sabbath He continued under the earth in the tomb in which Joseph of Arimathaea had laid Him. At the dawning of the Lord's day He arose from the dead, according to what was spoken by Himself, "As Jonah was three days and three nights in the whale's belly, so shall the Son of man also be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth." The day of the preparation, then, comprises the passion; the Sabbath embraces the burial; the Lord's Day contains the resurrection." (The Epistle of Ignatius to the Trallians, chapter 9)

300AD EUSEBIUS: [The Ebionites] were accustomed to observe the Sabbath and other Jewish customs but on the Lord's days to celebrate the same practices as we in remembrance of the resurrection of the Savior. (Church History Ill.xxvii.5)

300 AD Eusebius of Caesarea "The day of his [Christ's] light . . . was the day of his resurrection from the dead, which they say, as being the one and only truly holy day and the Lord's day, is better than any number of days as we ordinarily understand them, and better than the days set apart by the Mosaic Law for feasts, new moons, and Sabbaths, which the Apostle [Paul] teaches are the shadow of days and not days in reality" (Proof of the Gospel 4:16:186).

300AD EUSEBIUS: [The Ebionites] were accustomed to observe the Sabbath and other Jewish customs but on the Lord's days to celebrate the same practices as we in remembrance of the resurrection of the Savior. (Church History Ill.xxvii.5)

300 AD Eusebius of Caesarea "The day of his [Christ's] light . . . was the day of his resurrection from the dead, which they say, as being the one and only truly holy day and the Lord's day (Proof of the Gospel 4:16:186).

345 AD Athanasius "The Sabbath was the end of the first creation, the Lord's day was the beginning of the second, in which he renewed and restored the old in the same way as he prescribed that they should formerly observe the Sabbath as a memorial of the end of the first things, so we honor the Lord's day as being the memorial of the new creation" (On Sabbath and Circumcision 3).

350 AD APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTIONS: Be not careless of yourselves, neither deprive your Saviour of His own members, neither divide His body nor disperse His members, neither prefer the occasions of this life to the word of God; but assemble yourselves together every day, morning and evening, singing psalms and praying in the Lord's house: in the morning saying the sixty-second Psalm, and in the evening the hundred and fortieth, but principally on the Sabbath-day. And on the day of our Lord's resurrection, which is the Lord's day, meet more diligently, sending praise to God that made the universe by Jesus, and sent Him to us, and condescended to let Him suffer, and raised Him from the dead. Otherwise what apology will he make to God who does not assemble on that day to hear the saving word concerning the resurrection, on which we pray thrice standing in memory of Him who arose in three days, in which is performed the reading of the prophets, the preaching of the Gospel, the oblation of the sacrifice, the gift of the holy food? (Constitutions of the Holy Apostles, book 2)

350 AD APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTIONS: Do you therefore fast, and ask your petitions of God. We enjoin you to fast every fourth day of the week, and every day of the preparation, and the surplusage of your fast bestow upon the needy; every Sabbath-day excepting one, and every Lord's day, hold your solemn assemblies, and rejoice: for he will be guilty of sin who fasts on the Lord's day, being the day of the resurrection, or during the time of Pentecost, or, in general, who is sad on a festival day to the Lord For on them we ought to rejoice, and not to mourn. (Constitutions of the Holy Apostles, book 5)

350 AD APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTIONS "How We Ought to Assemble Together, and to Celebrate the Festival Day of Our Saviour's Resurrection. On the day of the resurrection of the Lord, that is, the Lord's day, assemble yourselves together, without fail, giving thanks to God, and praising Him for those mercies God has bestowed upon you through Christ, and has delivered you from ignorance, error, and bondage, that your sacrifice may be unspotted, and acceptable to God, who has said concerning His universal Church: "In every place shall incense and a pure sacrifice be offered unto me; for I am a great King, saith the Lord Almighty, and my name is wonderful among the heathen." (Constitutions of the Holy Apostles, book 7)

400 AD The Apostolic Constitutions "And on the day of our Lord's resurrection, which is the Lord's day, meet more diligently, sending praise to God that made the universe by Jesus, and sent him to us, and condescended to let him suffer, and raised him from the dead." (Apostolic Constitutions 2:7:60).
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
I think I get it: SDA's (and those who are but deny they are) are generally talking of themselves, pointing at their alleged fulfilling of the Law, and, again, talking of themselves, their works, their alleged obedience to ad nauseam.

Those on the other hand who know the Gospel are always pointing to Christ and his completed work and saving of his elect.

Yep. I get it.
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
Paul does not write that all food is clean anywhere Posthuman.
Then eat vegetables...just in case. Romans 14:2.

It amazes me you SDA's just don't get it. Placing a piece of pork in ones mouth has nothing to do with holiness, disobedience, obedience, salvation, position in Christ, or ones spirituality.

These things were symbolic of the separation of God's people from the world, and have zero to do with salvation or obedience today. Those who do these things thinking they contribute to their sanctification, salvation, &c are weak in the faith at best.

Salvation has always been by grace, not by works nor by keeping any point of the Law.
 

lightbearer

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
2,375
504
113
58
HBG. Pa. USA
More SDA propaganda.... .
Never promoted SDA propaganda. Are you Catholic? If not why are you posting Catholic Dogma? Most if not all of this so called evidence you posted is not Scripture and has been protected and handed down through the ages through the Catholic Church.

Your dates seem quite off too.

Ignatius existed around 100 AD not 250. Most of the writings if not all that we have of his are rejected by most scholars as forgeries. How come you did not post that little tidbit?

In relation to the rest of the quotes you posted.

For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ. For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. False prophets among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.
(Jud 1:4; 2Th 2:7; 2Pe 2:1)


I did not take the time to go through all the quotes you provided and look them up, but just in case some of them are taken out of context here is a link that might help.

Sunday Fraud: Church "Fathers" on the Lord's Day

Here is a link to back up what was said in relation to the writings of Ignatius.

The Ignatian Forgeries: They claim to be written by Ignatius in 110 AD, but were forged by another in about 250 AD that deceptively claimed to be Ignatius.

There are many other resources out there to back up what is being shared in both those links. So before one brushes those off as propaganda they can easily verfiy anything claimed by a little footwork.
 

lightbearer

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
2,375
504
113
58
HBG. Pa. USA
Not sure what he teaches, but I am sure of what you teach, and it is in fact heresy.
I don't know what is worse your trolling or someone liking it?

Besides that if you had anything to substantiate your claim about me you would have posted it. You don't; so you haven't.
 

lightbearer

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
2,375
504
113
58
HBG. Pa. USA
Originally Posted by lightbearer

Paul does not write that all food is clean anywhere Posthuman.
Then eat vegetables...just in case. Romans 14:2.
Wrong verse. We are speaking of the unclean and common.


Salvation has always been by grace, not by works nor by keeping any point of the Law.
Amen!
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
I don't know what is worse your trolling or someone liking it?

Besides that if you had anything to substantiate your claim about me you would have posted it. You don't; so you haven't.
Then there is your double standard coupled with callow name calling, the ad hominem you practice when you're teaching is called as to what it is. You do this while you make allowance for yourself to call others who expose you heretics, yet, you cannot handle receiving the same in truth and resort to the above.

If others do what you do they're a "troll."

I'm dealing with what you teach (and your false gospel is what you eat and do gains you eternal life, is a mockery of the finished work of Christ, and that is a fact) -- it's heresy as has been shown you multiple times on here. Your gospel is false and you're in fact deceived by it. But I digress, God is in control of that situation of which you are in.
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
This is how those in your sect deal with exposure, they resort to being dismissive and calling names, not dealing with facts. Don't work to hard responding, today is Saturday, you know?

Careful, you might blow it.

Hey, why not get back to telling us all you're doing to save yourself, you're a champion of that false gospel, no?
 
Jun 5, 2017
3,675
56
0
More SDA propaganda. That is a very weak argument and the actual evidence for the first day (Sunday) is much stronger.

Jesus rose on the first day (Sunday) Jesus was crucified on Friday and rose on the first day. The Holy Spirit was given on Pentecost Acts 2:1, which always falls on a Sunday. Early Christians from 30-300AD referred to Sunday as the Lord's day BECAUSE it was the day Jesus rose from the dead. The only example of the Lord's supper being practiced by Christians is in Acts 20:7, on Sunday. If this is not the Lord's supper, as Sabbatarians cannot grant, then there is no example in the Bible of Christians communing. "Sunday" is only used in languages such as German, Dutch, and English, whereas Latin-based languages, such as Spanish, Italian, and French use a derivative of the Latin word "Dominica," literally "Lord's Day."

"The stone which the builders rejected Has become the chief corner stone. This is the Lord's doing; It is marvelous in our eyes. This is the day which the Lord has made; Let us rejoice and be glad in it. O Lord, do save, we beseech You; O Lord, we beseech You, do send prosperity! Blessed is the one who comes in the name of the Lord; We have blessed you from the house of the Lord." (Psalm 118:22-26)

It is obvious that resurrection day, is the day the Lord Made. Resurrection day is Sunday. Sunday is the day the Lord made. The first day (Sunday) is the Lord's Day.
*In all the 5 books that John wrote, he always called the Sabbath "the Sabbath"
*If Revelation 1:10 was the Sabbath, John would have said, "I was in the Spirit on the Sabbath".
*This shows it was not the Sabbath but the First day of the week: Sunday.
*Here are some quotes that show early Christians unanimously referred to the first day of the week as the "Lord's Day."
Now MMD,

Do you know the scriptures? If you do not KNOW God's WORD how can you know what the Gospel is?

What amazes me is people who point to the teachings and traditions of men that break the commandments of God and think it has more authority then the Word of God and try to use the teachings of men in place of the Word of God.

Yes we can talk history but history does not supersede the Word of God. Histroy can be biased based on who is writing it. History itself has been re-written by the RCC whose tradtions you are trying to protect that break the commandments of God.

Now who is disagreeing here that the early Christian did meet on the first day of the week or any other day of the week? What you are not telling others however, is why or the reason for these meetings and using RCC historical resources to support your tradition of Sunday worship over the Word of God.

Biblically there is NO support whatsoever that says the SUNDAY is the "Lords DAY"

Please by all means show me just one scripture that says that SUNDAY IS THE LORD'S DAY?

You my friend cannot because there is NO such scripture no matter how hard you try to spin it there is NO SCRIPTURE in ALL of GOD'S WORD that says the SUNDAY is the LORD'S DAY.

Yet if you know God's WORD it clearly says the SABBATH IS THE LORDS DAY. Yes it is true that John was in the SPIRIT on the LORDS DAY. What does God's WORD say is the LORD'S DAY? Wait for it..........

WHAT DAY IS THE LORD'S DAY?

Matthew 12
8,
FOR THE SON OF MAN IS LORD EVEN OF THE SABBATH DAY

Mark 2
27,
And he said to them, The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath:
28, Therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath.

Now my friend what day does Jesus himself say is the LORD'S DAY? There you have it THE SABBATH DAY.
Now the difference between what your posting and what is being presented here is that you have to turn to the teachings and traditions of men to try and prove your Catholic tradition.

Where on the other hand we only turn to the WORD of GOD alone to show that the SABBATH and NOT Sunday is the LORD'S DAY.

Now you want to talk History? There is a reason why the early Christians after the Apostles did meet on Sabbath and Sunday. It was because of persecution and early church corruption. Here is some other historical references you might be interersted in reading....

let's look at just a few Historical references....

The original churches generally held the Sabbath.
"The ancient
Christians were very careful in the observation of Saturday, or the seventh day...It is plain that all the Oriental churches, and the greatest part of the world, observed the Sabbath as a festival...Athanasius (A.D. 297-373, Bishop of Alexandria) likewise tells us that they held religious assemblies on the Sabbath, not because they were infected with Judaism, but to worship Jesus, the Lord of the Sabbath. Epiphanius says the same." (Antiquities of the Christian Church, Vol. II, Bk.xx, Ch.3, Sec 1, 66. 1136,1137)

The forsaking of the Sabbath, and the enforcing of Sunday observance was instigated by a Roman Emperor who was a devoted "Sun-Worshipper".
Here are bits and pieces from a letter he wrote in about A.D. 365 to the "heretics" (non-Catholics / true Christians), -"Forasmuch, then, as it is no longer possible to bear with your pernicious errors, we give warning by this present statute (Law) that none of you henceforth presume to assemble yourselves together. We have directed, accordingly, that you be deprived of all the houses in which you are accustomed to hold your assemblies....Take the far better course of entering the Catholic church."(Eusebius' -Life of Constantine, Book III) Commentary: Notice that even after more than 300 years Christians were still observing the Sabbath day.

In 781 the famous China Monument was inscribed in marble to tell of the growth of Christianity in China at that time. The inscription of 763 words was unearthed near the city of Changan in 1625 and now stands in the "Forest of Tablets" at Changan. The extract from the tablet states as follows. "On the SEVENTH-DAY we offer sacrifices, (possibly offerings of praise and thanksgiving) after having purified our hearts, and received absolution for our sins. This religion (Christianity), so perfect and so excellent, is difficult to name, but it enlightens darkness by its brilliant precepts.(Laws)" Christianity in China, Vol.I, Ch.2, pgs 48-49, by M. 1'Abbe Hue)

Sabbath observance was widespread and appears to have been opposed by the Roman Catholic Church. It was kept holy by Christians in Egypt in the third century, as the Oxyrhynchus Papyrus shows.(c. 200-250 A.D.)"Except ye make the Sabbath a real Sabbath [Greek, "sabbatize the Sabbath"], ye shall not see the Father." (The Oxyrhynchus Papyri, Pt. 1, pg 3, Logion 2, verses 4-11, London: Offices of the Egyptian Exploration Fund, 1898)

Early Church leader, Origen also enjoined the keeping of the Sabbath. "After the festival of the unceasing sacrifice (the crucifixion) is put the second festival of the Sabbath, and it is fitting for whoever is righteous among the saints to KEEP ALSO THIS FESTIVAL of the SABBATH. There remaineth therefore a sabbatismus, that is a keeping of the Sabbath, to the people of God."[Hebrews 4:9] (Homily on Numbers 23, para. 4, in Migne, Patrologia Groeca, Vol. 12, cols. 749,750)

The early church taught the Sabbath was for God's work of providence and meditation on His way of life."Thou shalt observe the Sabbath, on account of Him who ceased from His work of creation, but ceased not from His work of providence; it is a rest for meditation of the law, not for idleness of the hands." (Constitution of the Holy Apostles, Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 7, pg 413, 3rd century) This was over 300 years after the resurrection of Christ.

Although the abolishment of the Sabbath and establishment of Sunday worship came through the Roman Catholic church, they freely admit there is absolutely no Biblical authority for it. Notice these statements by Roman Catholic Cardinal Gibbon, -"Is not every Christian obliged to sanctify SUNDAY, and to abstain on that day from unnecessary servile work? Is not the observance of this LAW among the most prominent of our sacred duties? But you may read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, and you will not find a single line authorizing the sanctification of SUNDAY. The SCRIPTURES enforce the religious observance of SATURDAY (Seventh-day), a day we never sanctify." (Faith of our Fathers, by Cardinal Gibbon)

According to the noted historian, H.G. Wells, Christian Sunday worship was borrowed from Pagan Sun-Worship. "During this indefinite time a considerable amount of a sort of theocrasia (intimate union) seems to have gone on between the Christian cult and the almost equally popular and widely diffused Mithraic cult, and the cult Serapis-Isis-Horus. From the former it would seem the Christians ADOPTED SUNDAY as their chief DAY OF WORSHIP instead of the Jewish SABBATH." (The Outline of History 1, pg 455)

In an effort to stamp out Sabbath keeping the Roman church commanded Christians to fast on that day. (Go without food or water, 24 hours). From canon 26 of the Council of Elvira (c.305 A.D.) It appears that the Christian church in Spain were Sabbath keepers. Rome had introduced the practice of fasting on the Sabbath to counteract Sabbath keeping. Pope Sylvester (314-335) was the first to ORDER the churches to fast on the Sabbath, and Pope Innocent (402-417) made it a binding law in the churches that obeyed him.

The Sabbath keeping Churches in Persia underwent forty years of persecution under Shapur II from 335 to 375 specifically because they were Sabbath keepers. "They despise our SUN-GOD. Did not Zoroaster (Prophet of Mithra, the sun-god), the sainted founder of our divine beliefs, institute Sunday one thousand years ago in honour of the sun and supplant the Sabbath of the Old Testament. Yet these Christians have divine services on Saturday." (The Syriac Church and Fathers, by O'Leary, pg 83-84)

The Sabbath was kept in the early Eastern Churches, and some Churches of the West. "For in the Church ofMillaine (Milan), it seemes that Saturday was held in a farre esteeme... Not that the Easterne Churches, or any of the rest which observed that day were inclined to Judaism; but that they came together on the Sabbath day, to worship Jesus Christ the Lord of the Sabbath." (History of the Sabbath, Dr. Peter Heylyn, London 1636, Part 2, para. 5, pgs 73-74)

Sabbath keeping was the original position of the Church. "Sabbath-keeping, the original position of the Church, had spread west into Europe and from Palestine it spread East into India (Early Spread of Christianity, Mingana, Vol. 10, pg 460) and then into China. The introduction of Sabbath-keeping to India caused a controversy in Buddhism in 220 A.D. According to Lloyd (The Creed of Half Japan, pg 23), the Kushan Dynasty of North India called a council of Buddhist priests at Vaisalia to bring uniformity among the Buddhist monks on the observance of their weekly Sabbath." Even many Buddhist monks embraced the Sabbath after receiving and studying the Holy Bible.

Notice this puzzling quote from the historian Socrates. "For although almost all Churches throughout the world celebrate the sacred mysteries on the Sabbath every week, yet the Christians of Alexandria and Rome (Catholics), on account of some ancient tradition, refuse to do this." (Ecclesiastical History, Socrates, Bk 5, Ch.22, pg 289) This ancient tradition was the keeping of Sunday as their day of worship. Sunday worship existed long before the birth of Jesus Christ.

The Roman Catholic Church pronounced all Christians keeping the Sabbath as being condemned and cut off from Christ. Council of Laodicea (c.366), Canon 29, -"Christians must not Judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day honouring rather the Lord's day (reference to Sunday) by resting, if possible, as Christians. However if any shall be found Judaizing, let them be ANATHEMA for Christ." (Mansi, II, pgs 569-570, also Hefele Councils, Vol. 2, b. 6) Notice the definition of "anathema" according to the World Book Dictionary, -"A person or thing that is utterly detested or condemned." And, -"A solemn curse by church authorities excommunicating some person from the church." Also, -"The act of denouncing and condemning some person or thing as evil."

There are too many more historical references these are but a few...

Although we did not need these Historical references unlike you did as we already can show that the LORD'S DAY is the SABBATH DAY through the scriptures alone. Something that you are not able to do

....................

God's 4th commandment is one of the ten (Exodus 20:8-11) If we knowingly break it when God asks us not to we stand guilty before God of committing sin (James 2:8-12). If we do not seek him in repentance and forgiveness we are in danger of the Judgement (Hebrews 10:26-27)

Sunday worship is a tradition and teaching of man that has led many to break the commandments of God. Jesus says that if we follow the traditions of man that break the commandments of God we are not following God (Matthew 15:3-9)

There is not one scripture in all of God's Word that says that God's 4th Commandment is now ABOLISHED and we are now commanded to KEEP Sunday as a Holy day.

Who should we follow the teachings and traditions of men or the Word of God? Who should we believe the Words of men or the Word of God?

In times of ignorance God winks at but now ,<when a KNOWLEDGE of the truth has come> calls all men everywhere to REPENT (FOLLOW) (Acts 17:30-31).
 
Last edited:

lightbearer

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
2,375
504
113
58
HBG. Pa. USA
Then there is your double standard coupled with callow name calling, t.
No double standard. We would not be having this conversation if it were not for your trolling comment to me. I find it interesting and quite telling that you chose to post on this and not continue the post in relation to the unclean and common. Like what was said
Originally Posted by lightbearer

Paul does not write that all food is clean anywhere Posthuman.
Hey, why not get back to telling us all you're doing to save yourself, you're a champion of that false gospel, no?
No. Salvation is through Christ and Him alone.
 
Last edited:
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
SDA double standards and inconsistencies:

"Steve Greg is teaching heresy!" Allowable statement from an SDA.

"'Light'"bearer" is teaching heresy!" Hey, that's "trolling" and is not allowable!!!!! (unless you're an SDA then it's all good.)
 
Jun 5, 2017
3,675
56
0
SDA double standards and inconsistencies:

"Steve Greg is teaching heresy!" Allowable statement from an SDA.

"'Light'"bearer" is teaching heresy!" Hey, that's "trolling" and is not allowable!!!!! (unless you're an SDA then it's all good.)
What I think is interesting is the mainstream teachers of the day, thought that Jesus and the Apostles were also teaching heresy, called his followers a cult and also claimed Jesus had a devil. This is what all those do who follow the teachings and traditions of men over the Word of God. Seems to me that LB has scripture for his point of view and you my friend do not and are only resorting to calling people names because you have no scripture to support your tradition that breaks the commandments of God.

..................

God's 4th commandment is one of the ten (Exodus 20:8-11) If we knowingly break it when God asks us not to we stand guilty before God of committing sin (James 2:8-12). If we do not seek him in repentance and forgiveness we are in danger of the Judgement (Hebrews 10:26-27)

Sunday worship is a tradition and teaching of man that has led many to break the commandments of God. Jesus says that if we follow the traditions of man that break the commandments of God we are not following God (Matthew 15:3-9)

There is not one scripture in all of God's Word that says that God's 4th Commandment is now ABOLISHED and we are now commanded to KEEP Sunday as a Holy day.

Who should we follow the teachings and traditions of men or the Word of God? Who should we believe the Words of men or the Word of God?

In times of ignorance God winks at but now ,<when a KNOWLEDGE of the truth has come> calls all men everywhere to REPENT (FOLLOW) (Acts 17:30-31).
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,126
13,138
113
58
Never promoted SDA propaganda.
Yeah right.

Are you Catholic?
NO.

If not why are you posting Catholic Dogma? Most if not all of this so called evidence you posted is not Scripture and has been protected and handed down through the ages through the Catholic Church.
It's not only Catholics who quote these writings.

Your dates seem quite off too.

Ignatius existed around 100 AD not 250. Most of the writings if not all that we have of his are rejected by most scholars as forgeries. How come you did not post that little tidbit?

In relation to the rest of the quotes you posted.
So all the writings of the church fathers in regards to the Lord's Day are forgeries? I would conveniently make that argument as well if I were SDA and their writings did not agree with my agenda.

For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ. For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. False prophets among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.
(Jud 1:4; 2Th 2:7; 2Pe 2:1)
IRONIC.

I did not take the time to go through all the quotes you provided and look them up, but just in case some of them are taken out of context here is a link that might help.

Sunday Fraud: Church "Fathers" on the Lord's Day
Is Bob Pickle SDA?

LOL! That's the same website that argues against you about the Lord's Day and has some of the same quotes from the church fathers as well. :)

Early Christians always met on the First day (Sunday) and never kept the sabbath!

There are many other resources out there to back up what is being shared in both those links. So before one brushes those off as propaganda they can easily verfiy anything claimed by a little footwork.
He said vs. they said will not ultimately solve the issue, yet I remain convinced that SUNDAY is the Lord's Day:

*In all the 5 books that John wrote, he always called the Sabbath "the Sabbath"
*If Revelation 1:10 was the Sabbath, John would have said, "I was in the Spirit on the Sabbath".
*This shows it was not the Sabbath but the First day of the week: Sunday.

That alone is good enough for me and I'm also convinced that the SDA church is a CULT.

The Truth about the Seventh-day Adventist Church

The Sabbath
 
Jun 5, 2017
3,675
56
0
It is usually also a sign when someone does not know God's WORD they resort to the teachings of men from the Word of website to support they views in order to follow their Catholic traditions that break the commandments of God instead of seeking God through his WORD to know his truth. It is indeed true, man loved darkeness rather then light because their deeds were evil neither do they come to the light lest their deeds be reproved. Little do they know that if they did God could heal them. SIN will keep all those who KNOWINGLY CONTINUE in it OUT of God's KINGDOM.

............

God's 4th commandment is one of the ten (Exodus 20:8-11) If we knowingly break it when God asks us not to we stand guilty before God of committing sin (James 2:8-12). If we do not seek him in repentance and forgiveness we are in danger of the Judgement (Hebrews 10:26-27)

Sunday worship is a tradition and teaching of man that has led many to break the commandments of God. Jesus says that if we follow the traditions of man that break the commandments of God we are not following God (Matthew 15:3-9)

There is not one scripture in all of God's Word that says that God's 4th Commandment is now ABOLISHED and we are now commanded to KEEP Sunday as a Holy day.

Who should we follow the teachings and traditions of men or the Word of God? Who should we believe the Words of men or the Word of God?

In times of ignorance God winks at but now ,<when a KNOWLEDGE of the truth has come> calls all men everywhere to REPENT (FOLLOW) (Acts 17:30-31).
 
Last edited:

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,126
13,138
113
58
Then there is your double standard coupled with callow name calling, the ad hominem you practice when you're teaching is called as to what it is. You do this while you make allowance for yourself to call others who expose you heretics, yet, you cannot handle receiving the same in truth and resort to the above.

If others do what you do they're a "troll."

I'm dealing with what you teach (and your false gospel is what you eat and do gains you eternal life, is a mockery of the finished work of Christ, and that is a fact) -- it's heresy as has been shown you multiple times on here. Your gospel is false and you're in fact deceived by it. But I digress, God is in control of that situation of which you are in.
Amen! SDA's play the same game in salvation as every other false movement of Christendom. They profess to teach that salvation is by grace through faith, but then redefine this in a way that is contrary to the Truth. Even though they deny this, they teach that salvation is by "grace plus law, faith plus works." Their doctrine of salvation is a subtle mixture of law and grace that is a perversion of the Gospel. (Galatians 1:6-9)

We are not deceived by their trickery, deceit and shady lawyer tactics to win their arguments at all costs.