Gods Mercy,Why the Jews are Still Gods Chosen People

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 26, 2012
5,853
137
0
No, that is not true at all. your putting words in my mouth, does that make you feel good?

Jesus is not rulling my nation, I have a quasi king in Obama who is more worried about the islamic people, and making poor people who do not want to work rich. But Jesus is my God and my personal king (I follow him)

why do you ignore the signs of the kingdom? And all you have to say is I reject jesus as MY KING?

It is not about who is YOUR KING, it is who is rulling your nation. there will be no national kings in the kingdom. this is prophesied. but something you either ignore, or do not want to see (or maybe some other reason?)

Again, Why is Jesus on his throne punishing NATIONS (not people) who do not come to jerusalem to worship him.

Why is he ruling with the wrath of God on nations who do not follow him, with a rod of iron. and chastening those who do follow him and getting them back on path with this same rod?

Why is paul taking and OT prophesy concerning Israel and God removing their sin as a future prophesy, since Christ already came and went?

just two of the many many questions you have yet to answer.

I asked questions for clarification because that appears to be what you ARE SAYING. The real question is HE ALLOWED to rule as He sees fit? Is He SOVEREIGN or not? Does God have to explain His actions to us and why He allows things as He does?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Yes He is,you do not understand what this judgement is at this time. The judgement is that the Word of God is proclaimed and JUDGES us as being guilty before the Lord. Is it the Holy Spirit that brings CONVICTION to the world. There is peace on this earth,those that are His have His peace between each other and before God. My Bible plainly says that we have the peace that passes all understanding.
No, You are the one who does not understand his judgement (as prophesied)

1. He will inflict his wrath
2. He will rule with a rod of Iron.

How can you look at those passages we all have been posing which shows what he will do, and declare it is happening now?

 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I asked questions for clarification because that appears to be what you ARE SAYING. The real question is HE ALLOWED to rule as He sees fit? Is He SOVEREIGN or not? Does God have to explain His actions to us and why He allows things as He does?
Why does God have to explain his actions to us? this makes no sense, he does not. His soverignty is not in question here, What is in question is will he do what he said he will do (in the prophesies) or will he not do them.

Why does God say he will do these things, and then not do them? and then tell us we should just trust him, he did not mean what he said, he was just saying it.

Did Jesus literally fulfill the prophesy of suffering servant? yes

Did he literally come the moment he was prophesied to come? Yes

then why will he not literally fulfill every other prophesy about him, including what he says he will do?
 
Dec 26, 2012
5,853
137
0
No, You are the one who does not understand his judgement (as prophesied)

1. He will inflict his wrath
2. He will rule with a rod of Iron.

How can you look at those passages we all have been posing which shows what he will do, and declare it is happening now?

I do understand His judgements,if no one was judged guilty before the law,no one would enter the kingdom of Heaven, because no one would see their need for a Messiah. The final judgement is for REJECTING CHRIST.
 
Dec 26, 2012
5,853
137
0
Why does God have to explain his actions to us? this makes no sense, he does not. His soverignty is not in question here, What is in question is will he do what he said he will do (in the prophesies) or will he not do them.

Why does God say he will do these things, and then not do them? and then tell us we should just trust him, he did not mean what he said, he was just saying it.

Did Jesus literally fulfill the prophesy of suffering servant? yes

Did he literally come the moment he was prophesied to come? Yes

then why will he not literally fulfill every other prophesy about him, including what he says he will do?
Sorry EG By definition Jesus DID NOT fulfill everything literally the first. Jesus was NOT a sheep. Jesus did not smack a serpent upside the head with a two by four or a stone. (By the way the definition of literal is that He would have been a sheep) Many of them were fulfilled literally but some were not. John the Baptist was NOT ELIJAH REINCARNATED or brought back to earth,yet Jesus very plainly says John the Baptist is ELIJAH. How in any manner is that a literal fulfillment of prophecy? Jesus own statements makes that a lie that ALL the prophecies of His second MUST be literal.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I do understand His judgements,if no one was judged guilty before the law,no one would enter the kingdom of Heaven, because no one would see their need for a Messiah. The final judgement is for REJECTING CHRIST.
we are not talking about the law. and individual judgment

We are talking about how GOD SAID HE WAS GOING TO JUDGE NATIONS.

Judging nations is not the same as judging individuals according to the law (salvation)

this is a national topic. not an individual topic.


if your going to keep saying it is an individual thing, you will not be able to see the national aspect.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Sorry EG By definition Jesus DID NOT fulfill everything literally the first. Jesus was NOT a sheep. Jesus did not smack a serpent upside the head with a two by four or a stone. (By the way the definition of literal is that He would have been a sheep) Many of them were fulfilled literally but some were not. John the Baptist was NOT ELIJAH REINCARNATED or brought back to earth,yet Jesus very plainly says John the Baptist is ELIJAH. How in any manner is that a literal fulfillment of prophecy? Jesus own statements makes that a lie that ALL the prophecies of His second MUST be literal.

sorry but yes he did.

John called him the lamb of God

Jesus said john was elijah

he did come exactly after 69 weeks (as Daniel said)
He did come, was homely, and had no army, and was rejected by his own, and hung on a tree. (non of these things were said to happen to the messiah who would come.)

you again trying to say he did not fulfill prophesy. If he did not literally fulfill prophesy, then prophesy us useless. You can not use prophesy to prove the word of God is true, or that God is God. you take the power away.

finally

why do you continue to stick on this, and refuse to answer why God said when he comes he will do these things,, yet he did not? why would God say he was going to, and then not do it?

You have to answer that question before you will get me to even contemplate your ideas.
 

SoulWeaver

Senior Member
Oct 25, 2014
4,889
2,534
113
You act as if I have no study in this. and just made up my opinion on my own. I have studied this for almost 30 years. It is one of my favorite subjects. I have changed my opinion on quite a few topics in this subject.

it is not that I know I am right, and everyone else is wrong, it is that no one has shown me anything to make me consider changing my mind.

one of the greatest arguments against preterism is the literal interpretation of prophesy. If you study history, Preterism did not even come about until the roman take over of the church, it was then that they got away from the literal interpretation of the word (because they could not support their belief system they wanted to enforce) and also got away from the Holy Bible as the sole authority for Church doctrine, It came out of a strong anti-semetic dogma (history shows a huge anti-semetic mindset and horrible atrocities against the jews in the age of the church by the roman church, even Hitler used a strong anti-semetic book written by Luther himself.

We have not even touched end times theories or dogma, We have only hit the outside edges, It seems for some reason people want to always talk about the same things and not even really get into it. I would love to, but it seems people do not want to.


If you would like to, I would love to. But to site there and judge me when you do not even know me, Well that is uncalled for!
I have nothing against you as a person and you bringing up Scriptures was helpful to my study.
However, I say that people should not be accused for twisting the Word or being heretics or something like that if they disagree. I said several times I was not a preterist and I was still being called that, well I guess it is simply easy to label people one doesnt personally know. Good that you mention antisemitism, because that was another thing totally wrong with this whole thread. People who understood prophecy spiritually were continually being accused of antisemitism. That is just abusive.

Setting this forum on Read Only now. Frees up my time for more fruitful stuff. :)
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
You are trying to use human reasoning to understand these things. All of these MUST be filtered through what the apostles wrote POST PENTECOST.
Any pagan can "spiritualize "the physical...Plato did and so many Amillennialists were infected with Platonism.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
Any pagan can "spiritualize "the physical...Plato did and so many Amillennialists were infected with Platonism.
We're having a special speaker at our church that I hope to see.He is an expert on Hebrew and the issue of the replacement teaching. It will be very interesting what he has to say.Hope to ask several questions.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
We're having a special speaker at our church that I hope to see.He is an expert on Hebrew and the issue of the replacement teaching. It will be very interesting what he has to say.Hope to ask several questions.
thats the only way to learn, I had to admit to myself that alot I was taught was in error. that is not an easy thing to do, and it took years.
 

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,389
193
63
You are trying to use human reasoning to understand these things. All of these MUST be filtered through what the apostles wrote POST PENTECOST.
And here is an example of something written POST PENTECOST...

2Ti 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

Yet you would have us believe that it really means this...

2Ti 3:16 All scripture (written post Pentecost) is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

Denying this truth...

Luk 4:4 And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.

Hearkening back to this...

Deu 8:3 And he humbled thee, and suffered thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, which thou knewest not, neither did thy fathers know; that he might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the LORD doth man live.

Makes a sensible and logical discussion impossible.
 

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,389
193
63
thats the only way to learn, I had to admit to myself that alot I was taught was in error. that is not an easy thing to do, and it took years.
The years thing is almost an understatement. I am still unlearning.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
The years thing is almost an understatement. I am still unlearning.
I meant years to admit I was taught wrong, Could not believe the people I trusted would do that.. I am still learning also.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
We're having a special speaker at our church that I hope to see.He is an expert on Hebrew and the issue of the replacement teaching. It will be very interesting what he has to say.Hope to ask several questions.
His initial isn't D.D. is it?
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
And here is an example of something written POST PENTECOST...

2Ti 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

Yet you would have us believe that it really means this...

2Ti 3:16 All scripture (written post Pentecost) is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

Denying this truth...

Luk 4:4 And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.

Hearkening back to this...

Deu 8:3 And he humbled thee, and suffered thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, which thou knewest not, neither did thy fathers know; that he might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the LORD doth man live.

Makes a sensible and logical discussion impossible.
Or they mean "All Scripture before Pentecost is to be taken literally and after Pentecost. ..figuratively. "
 
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63
The answer to the first part is the same as to EG

Again you DID NOT read what I said. They asked the question PRE-PENTECOST. Again I asked where do they say so POST Pentecost? Three things have NOT YET taken place,Jesus has not yet ascended into heaven,He has not yet sat down at the right hand of the Father,and the disciples have not yet received the Holy Spirit who would LEAD THEM INTO ALL TRUTH. Yet somehow AFTER they receive the Holy Spirit they NEVER AGAIN speak of an earthly kingdom. HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE that the Holy Spirit DID NOT lead them to ever write about a third temple built by human hands,another restoration of Israel to the land,and an earthly kingdom?

At that point in time they themselves DID NOT understand the nature of the KINGDOM.
Did all other prophecies of the OT "literally" come to pass? If all other prophecies 'literally' came to pass - then why not the prophecy concerning the land promised to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob [Israel] - to Israelites (natural descendants and spiritual descendants) wherein Christ will rule?

If we are living in the kingdom NOW - what is the reason and purpose for new heavens and a new earth?

But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness, Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, an the elements shall melt with fervent heat? Nevertheless, we according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness. Wherefore, beloved, seeing that you look for such things, be diligent that ye may be found of him in peace, without spot, and blameless. 2 Peter 3:10-13
So are you saying you are NOT in the Kingdom at this time? So do you disagree with this passage?

Colossians 1


3For He rescued us from the domain of darkness, and transferred us to the kingdom of His beloved Son, 14in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins.
Sarah - I don't disagree with this statement - We have been rescued "spiritually" in that we are children of God through being born of His Spirit BUT I still live here on this earth - don't you? And if I still live here on this earth, in the domain of darkness then I am not totally "rescued" at this point - At this point I have not been transferred to the kingdom of His beloved Son - When this body of death, this body of corruption, puts on incorruption or this mortal shall have put on immortality THEN I am pulled out of the power of darkness and transferred to the kingdom of God. The above verses are stated in the present tense although they have not "literally" occurred, God's way of reassuring us that we have this hope and we are to look forward to his coming for his Church.
 
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63
<snip> HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE that the Holy Spirit DID NOT lead them to ever write about a third temple built by human hands,another restoration of Israel to the land,and an earthly kingdom?

At that point in time they themselves DID NOT understand the nature of the KINGDOM.
What is your understanding of the "nature of the KINGDOM"? Do you believe that it is a "literal" kingdom with Christ reigning as king? Where is this kingdom? Of what does it consist? Why prepare a new heaven and a new earth wherein dwelleth righteousness if the earth was not to be used?

The meek shall inherit the earth. (Psalm 37:11; Matt. 5:5)
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
I find it interesting that land promises were not given to the Church but given to Israel, it just strengthens the notion that the two have different agendas in Gods scheme of things.