Im new here. I need some help regarding 1 Corinth 11:14

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jul 13, 2023
438
192
43
Absolutely.

It is a shame for a man to have long hair because the look is effeminate. It is a shame for a man to look like a woman.

And, if you (whoever) disagree with this statement, it only shows how much your thinking has been affected by the modern [godless] world.

No man should have the appearance of a woman. No woman should have the appearance of a man. This is the intent of God.

And, it is a "doctrinal issue" - it is biblical instruction to us concerning the proper way we are to live our lives according to God.

Please note that the passage does not say that it is a shame for a woman to not have long hair; however, it does most definitely say that it is a shame for a man to have long hair.

Believe what the Bible says even before you understand why it says it.
No that's a western culture thing(and very old at that, people made that accusation about the monkeys in the 1960's) Ever read the story of Sampson?
 
Jun 30, 2015
25,134
13,632
113
Then it’s not a heart issue.
Exactly, so the whole "does not nature teach" argument fails. Even most long-haired women eventually get haircuts. There's no objective standard of "short" or "long", "nature" does not actually teach any such thing, and Paul was speaking from a cultural perspective, not an eternal truth-standard.
 
Jun 30, 2015
25,134
13,632
113
So then if your first suggestion is true, then Paul made a false claim. Still, if the man has long hair and doesn't feel shame before reading scripture, that doesn't mean that's not what nature supposedly teaches. Like a homosexual couple could say that they don't feel ashamed to have a same sex relationship but most people would agree that "nature" teaches against such a relationship, wouldn't they? I'll continue to pray as I have been that God will guide you into all truth in His Spirit which convicts us of our sin. Praise the Lord for you, for He created you to glorify Himself as He created all of us! God bless you sir!
You're trying to conflate a distinctly moral issue with a moral non-issue. Can a society of strict homosexuals reproduce itself? No. Nature prohibits it. On the contrary, nature does not prohibit long hair on men.
 
Jul 13, 2023
438
192
43
Basically, at the end paul leaves it up to us to decide anyway, so unless your going for multi-pound monster hair like Absalom, I wouldn't worry about it too much.
 
Jan 13, 2016
17,040
3,652
113
Exactly, so the whole "does not nature teach" argument fails. Even most long-haired women eventually get haircuts. There's no objective standard of "short" or "long", "nature" does not actually teach any such thing, and Paul was speaking from a cultural perspective, not an eternal truth-standard.
Just don’t be surprised when we get our new bodies that we will have short hair. 😂
 
Oct 10, 2024
41
16
8
You're trying to conflate a distinctly moral issue with a moral non-issue. Can a society of strict homosexuals reproduce itself? No. Nature prohibits it. On the contrary, nature does not prohibit long hair on men.
On what basis do you say that nature prohibits same-sex marriage? I'm not advocating for it, I'm just curious what you'll say.
 
Jan 13, 2016
17,040
3,652
113
On what basis do you say that nature prohibits same-sex marriage? I'm not advocating for it, I'm just curious what you'll say.[/QUOTE

Biblically, there no such thing as same sex marriage. Biblically, man and woman can become one flesh. The becoming one flesh is the marriage union. Men with men, and women with women is an unnatural union, not marriage.
 
Sep 4, 2013
30,603
6,809
113
Paul is writing under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. These aren’t the opinions of men.
Inspiration of the Holy Spirit does not equate to being a Commandment from God. I would think all Preachers/Pastors who give a Sermon are doing so with Holy Spirit inspiration of the Sermon being preached. That does not make everything they say Commandments from God.

The main problem you have is Paul himself stated he was speaking his opinion/advice on how to live a Christ-like life AND NOT Gods Commandments. Can't get around that one.
 
Sep 4, 2013
30,603
6,809
113
Paul makes the statement which is not his opinion:

14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?

Answer is rhetorical: yes
Again, you ignore Paul's words, or, simply do not understand. You simply can not ignore what Paul said to validate your "opinion."

10And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord,Let not the wife depart from her husband:

11But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried, or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife.

12But to the rest speak I, not the Lord:If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be pleased to dwell with him, let him not put her away.

No way to ignore Paul was giving his advice/opinion.

But, hey, free will surely allows you to disagree.