I believe that men sometimes try to make a law by the letter of Paul's word.à I don't believe Paul would have stood for it. And actually, I believe Paul meant, by the husband of one wife, that they were not to have multiple wives at once, which was the culture. And if you make Paul's words into law and letter, you have a lot of problems even though they are overlooked. Any man who has a child who goes astray is immediately disqualified from his position because of what Paul said if you make it into letter and law. And then you face the problem of God's word being rejected for Paul's words made into law because God said the sins of the child would not be held against the father. It immediately gets convoluted when you try to make laws by the letter and place men under them once again. The new way is by the Spirit. But men have a bent toward making it about law.
I don't believe that at all.....the qualifications set are set for a reason...not to be bent, twisted and or looked to in bias....
the office represents Christ and the qualifications are not set and dry by underpinned by other truths....for example...the rebellious child thing...
If a man cannot take care of his house/children....how can he possibly take care of God's own house or a church if you will
The one wife at a time....sure...and qualified under the death of the spouse........
AGAIN...who are we to push the line on what God has set in his word....either Paul was inspired and the word is valid or almost half your N.T. needs to be ripped out and burnt or put next to the toilet.....
By the way...not mad or mouthy so don't take it that way.....just dia-logos