MSNBC "That is Our Job"
- Thread starter BruceWayne
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Did you stop taking the NYT seriously when the manipulated statements from women to make Trump look like a rapist?
Or when they lied about Trump removing MLK's bust from the oval office?
Or how about that time they got got caught giving Hillary Clinton debate questions?
I could name a lot more but it is obvious your outrage is a lop sided farce.
Or when they lied about Trump removing MLK's bust from the oval office?
Or how about that time they got got caught giving Hillary Clinton debate questions?
I could name a lot more but it is obvious your outrage is a lop sided farce.
Talking heads make mistakes on the air all the time.
If they're liberals, it just gets ignored... at least by the media.
Somebody posts it on youtube, but the media never talks about it.
And seriously, lets consider who Mika Brzezinski's own father is.
There are exceptions, but usually the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
And if you really want to defend Mika Brzezinski, and the entire media establishment... that's fine... go ahead.
You can defend whoever you like.
YOU have free speech.
But Mika (even if you DISCOUNT her "odd statement") was making the general point that not EVERYONE should really have free speech.
You want her to have free speech, even to make mistakes.
But SHE was actually making the point that not everyone should really have free speech.
So go ahead.
Defend her.
No worries.
Last edited:
No, Max, I was defending no one. I was saying we should not try to justify deceptive actions on our part by attempting something we know is little more than a typical Liberal smear tactic just to try to make someone look as bad as we can make them appear.
I think we should look at keeping our own selves clean, and not get into the mud with pigs.
I think we should look at keeping our own selves clean, and not get into the mud with pigs.
That was my very point from the beginning. Had it not been for my pushing, the full video probably would never have been seen here. And that is dead wrong. It is little more than selecting the most damning thing available. When honest reporting (by the poster) would have shown the full video...... especially since I finally got him to admit he already knew one existed.
I'm sorry. but that was just a cheap shot, and I called him on it.
I'm sorry. but that was just a cheap shot, and I called him on it.
You think way too highly of yourself lol. There was no "finally" getting me to admit anything; I responded to your first mention of her possibly getting cut off. Despite your assumptions that you were proven to be wrong about, it wasn't even a big deal in the slightest, at least to me. Is a random stranger "calling me out" supposed to mean something? It wasn't wrong. There was no "special selection." There was nothing to be dishonest about as the video was what she said in it's entirety(whether you knew that or not - again, assumptions instead of calmly asking about it). I posted exactly what thousands have seen, posted about on twitter, etc. It wasn't breaking news. I posted exactly what I intended to, which is what she said, not what the guy after her had to say and I'm not apologetic about it. It deserves to be talked about and criticized.
As for the lady herself, she posted on twitter that she said that it's the media's job to keep Trump from making up his own facts. She also said that it was obvious from the transcript. Clearly that is not the case.
I'll leave it at that
As for the lady herself, she posted on twitter that she said that it's the media's job to keep Trump from making up his own facts. She also said that it was obvious from the transcript. Clearly that is not the case.
I'll leave it at that
I dont buy into the "cut her off mid-sentence", I mean she could have clarified what she meant at any point in time.
Anyone who goes out of their way to bash one news network but is quick to defend another is clearly biased : p
It sounds more like a slip up to me, and not an unfinished thought that she didnt get the chance to make clear.
Anyone who goes out of their way to bash one news network but is quick to defend another is clearly biased : p
It sounds more like a slip up to me, and not an unfinished thought that she didnt get the chance to make clear.
You can tell from her voice inflection, and her body language, she had clearly finished what she was saying.
But whatever your view, it's ok, there are people releasing hundreds of hours of leaked audio from the major media outlets... soon we'll all know whatever it is they really think.
We'll know soon enough.
I also think she was somewhat "cut-off" by the man.... HOWEVER, she did not seem to think it was important enough to regain the conversation, and continue with her thought. I do have to fault her for being content to allow whatever impression, false or otherwise, that might have been taken by the audience over the words she did manage to get out.
